Ah so your a true believer in the minor leaguer's w/l record?
Had thought you were too jaded for that by now.
8 games. 8 fucking games. Get it?
Am I guaranteeing he will succeed? No.
Eight fucking games where not a glimmer of anything fucking special has been shown. My bet is for more of the same, especially since his "OKG" happy horse shit ain't likely to consistently work in a league where all of the major players draw fantastic talent.
Tell me something. What is peenermans calling card? Offensive innovation? Game day coaching? Recruiting? Some say it's his alleged fanatical attention to detail. Boise had a talent advantage at its dreck level and functionally played two and three game seasons. I don't think he brings anything to the Pac that is unique or difference making.
And I've already said that if I am wrong, I'll serve myself the crow.
Aubern doog bases all his analysis on recruiting stars, if he stays consistent no way will he be picking huskies for anything but 8th in conference, he hasnt been right about anything in my lifetime. Might be time to buy low u guys might be on way up.
You're not the only one Aubbie. Enough with the fucking excuses though. Winning 4 of the next 5 should be the minimum expectation.
Talk about doubling down on your doogin........holy shit things is changin in a hurry.
Christ, all year I have had that ucla game as a definite L for you guys.....not so sure anymore. Ditto with my Cougs, thought they would beat you guys by 14 or more, not so sure about that anymore.
In a way,EVERY game you guys have left could go ANY frikkin way. Total mystery.
Could see you guys beating Arizona, could see you guys losing in Boulder. I wouldn't necessarily even pencil in a W against that bizarre osu team.
I agree. Who knows what to expect with this team. If I had to bet, we won't win 4 of 5. It's not doubling down on dooging, it's having some fucking expectations and not making every excuse and blaming Sark for everything that goes wrong.
Aubern doog bases all his analysis on recruiting stars, if he stays consistent no way will he be picking huskies for anything but 8th in conference, he hasnt been right about anything in my lifetime. Might be time to buy low u guys might be on way up.
You also follow recruiting stars, and did when you said UW had less talent than Wazzu. Your defense is barely D1 level.
You're not the only one Aubbie. Enough with the fucking excuses though. Winning 4 of the next 5 should be the minimum expectation.
Talk about doubling down on your doogin........holy shit things is changin in a hurry.
Christ, all year I have had that ucla game as a definite L for you guys.....not so sure anymore. Ditto with my Cougs, thought they would beat you guys by 14 or more, not so sure about that anymore.
In a way,EVERY game you guys have left could go ANY frikkin way. Total mystery.
Could see you guys beating Arizona, could see you guys losing in Boulder. I wouldn't necessarily even pencil in a W against that bizarre osu team.
I agree. Who knows what to expect with this team. If I had to bet, we won't win 4 of 5. It's not doubling down on dooging, it's having some fucking expectations and not making every excuse and blaming Sark for everything that goes wrong.
In the post above you say your expectation is to win 4/5. Now if you have to bet you won't win 4/5... I'm confused.
You're not the only one Aubbie. Enough with the fucking excuses though. Winning 4 of the next 5 should be the minimum expectation.
Talk about doubling down on your doogin........holy shit things is changin in a hurry.
Christ, all year I have had that ucla game as a definite L for you guys.....not so sure anymore. Ditto with my Cougs, thought they would beat you guys by 14 or more, not so sure about that anymore.
In a way,EVERY game you guys have left could go ANY frikkin way. Total mystery.
Could see you guys beating Arizona, could see you guys losing in Boulder. I wouldn't necessarily even pencil in a W against that bizarre osu team.
I agree. Who knows what to expect with this team. If I had to bet, we won't win 4 of 5. It's not doubling down on dooging, it's having some fucking expectations and not making every excuse and blaming Sark for everything that goes wrong.
In the post above you say your expectation is to win 4/5. Now if you have to bet you won't win 4/5... I'm confused.
You're not the only one Aubbie. Enough with the fucking excuses though. Winning 4 of the next 5 should be the minimum expectation.
Talk about doubling down on your doogin........holy shit things is changin in a hurry.
Christ, all year I have had that ucla game as a definite L for you guys.....not so sure anymore. Ditto with my Cougs, thought they would beat you guys by 14 or more, not so sure about that anymore.
In a way,EVERY game you guys have left could go ANY frikkin way. Total mystery.
Could see you guys beating Arizona, could see you guys losing in Boulder. I wouldn't necessarily even pencil in a W against that bizarre osu team.
Hard to argue at this point. Anything can happen
The only thing that is constant is change
Its clear that either way things will get interesting
Aubern doog bases all his analysis on recruiting stars, if he stays consistent no way will he be picking huskies for anything but 8th in conference, he hasnt been right about anything in my lifetime. Might be time to buy low u guys might be on way up.
You also follow recruiting stars, and did when you said UW had less talent than Wazzu. Your defense is barely D1 level.
An "extra" win due to a weak non-conference schedule. Check.
The defense would be solid. Check.
Petersen would bring immediate improvement in terms of execution and effort. Yes and no. The execution on defense is better; we rarely give up big plays. But the execution on offense is worse. And this team has looked flat at times.
The offense would be adequate because our experienced Oline would be dominant, making life easy for our new QB, RBs, and WRs. And I expected one of the QBs to perform at an adequate PAC-12 level Wrong. Really, really wrong.
I expected an Oline of Riva, Hatchie, Tanigawa, Charles, and Criste. Wrong, No Riva, no Criste, and last night, no Charles. I thought we would have the best line in the league. In reality they have been average, at best.
The QB play has been very uneven. Lindquist was terrible against Hawaii. Williams was terrible last night. Miles is clearly our best option this year. He is fine when given time, but can't handle pressure.
And the most surprising thing to me is how confused the coaches clearly are about this offense. They are struggling to find something that works and establish an identity. To me the answer is clear. This offense has looked the best when we run the ball straight ahead consistently, and use that to set up the pass. Think about the long drive at Cal, and the one good drive last night. Pound, pound, pound, pass. That is what this team can do.
But Smith/Petersen keep trying to be too clever. Too many weird calls. Too many reverses. Too many screens. And too many mistakes. Penalties, Drops. Missed blocks. And last night, three turnovers.
Part of this is due to years of bad Oline recruiting. Hatchie is the one and only 4 star recruit in the program.
But the rest lies with Petersen. He and Smith need to make some decisions and settle on what they want this offense to be.
I still have confidence we hired the right coach. The future is bright. But this is going to be another year of mediocrity, and I did not expect that.
no shit?
fuck. you are one of the doogliest doogs on this board. so much so that you probably really belong at the retard farm with Kim and Fatty.
Iron Law #41: Auburdoog will doog.
Let me ask you: how do you square your point that we'd have the best OLs in the conference with "years of bad Oline recruiting"????
Did you think it would just happen anyway? Is there an Iron Law that I'm missing here? Do you actually know anything about the O lines of the other 11 programs in the league????
You're not the only one Aubbie. Enough with the fucking excuses though. Winning 4 of the next 5 should be the minimum expectation.
Talk about doubling down on your doogin........holy shit things is changin in a hurry.
Christ, all year I have had that ucla game as a definite L for you guys.....not so sure anymore. Ditto with my Cougs, thought they would beat you guys by 14 or more, not so sure about that anymore.
In a way,EVERY game you guys have left could go ANY frikkin way. Total mystery.
Could see you guys beating Arizona, could see you guys losing in Boulder. I wouldn't necessarily even pencil in a W against that bizarre osu team.
I agree. Who knows what to expect with this team. If I had to bet, we won't win 4 of 5. It's not doubling down on dooging, it's having some fucking expectations and not making every excuse and blaming Sark for everything that goes wrong.
In the post above you say your expectation is to win 4/5. Now if you have to bet you won't win 4/5... I'm confused.
Not that hard to understand. Fuck off
We're probably not winning 4 of the next 5. You understand that. Like the rest of us, you're not expecting it to happen.
You're not the only one Aubbie. Enough with the fucking excuses though. Winning 4 of the next 5 should be the minimum expectation.
Talk about doubling down on your doogin........holy shit things is changin in a hurry.
Christ, all year I have had that ucla game as a definite L for you guys.....not so sure anymore. Ditto with my Cougs, thought they would beat you guys by 14 or more, not so sure about that anymore.
In a way,EVERY game you guys have left could go ANY frikkin way. Total mystery.
Could see you guys beating Arizona, could see you guys losing in Boulder. I wouldn't necessarily even pencil in a W against that bizarre osu team.
I agree. Who knows what to expect with this team. If I had to bet, we won't win 4 of 5. It's not doubling down on dooging, it's having some fucking expectations and not making every excuse and blaming Sark for everything that goes wrong.
In the post above you say your expectation is to win 4/5. Now if you have to bet you won't win 4/5... I'm confused.
Not that hard to understand. Fuck off
We're probably not winning 4 of the next 5. You understand that. Like the rest of us, you're not expecting it to happen.
You're trying way too hard at this poont.
Even though you predicted 10 wins, you can blame Sark and the talent he left when we lose to WSU or Oregon State. I'll put the blame where it actually belongs. How can we expect to beat UCLA at home? A loss would be no big deal.
4-5 with this schedule would be bullshit. If you don't agree, you have no fucking standards. At least Aubbie mans up about moving the goal posts. The only difference between him and some on this board is he has only been doing it for a decade longer.
You're not the only one Aubbie. Enough with the fucking excuses though. Winning 4 of the next 5 should be the minimum expectation.
Talk about doubling down on your doogin........holy shit things is changin in a hurry.
Christ, all year I have had that ucla game as a definite L for you guys.....not so sure anymore. Ditto with my Cougs, thought they would beat you guys by 14 or more, not so sure about that anymore.
In a way,EVERY game you guys have left could go ANY frikkin way. Total mystery.
Could see you guys beating Arizona, could see you guys losing in Boulder. I wouldn't necessarily even pencil in a W against that bizarre osu team.
I agree. Who knows what to expect with this team. If I had to bet, we won't win 4 of 5. It's not doubling down on dooging, it's having some fucking expectations and not making every excuse and blaming Sark for everything that goes wrong.
In the post above you say your expectation is to win 4/5. Now if you have to bet you won't win 4/5... I'm confused.
Not that hard to understand. Fuck off
We're probably not winning 4 of the next 5. You understand that. Like the rest of us, you're not expecting it to happen.
You're trying way too hard at this poont.
Even though you predicted 10 wins, you can blame Sark and the talent he left when we lose to WSU or Oregon State. I'll put the blame where it actually belongs. How can we expect to beat UCLA at home? A loss would be no big deal.
4-5 with this schedule would be bullshit. If you don't agree, you have no fucking standards. At least Aubbie mans up about moving the goal posts. The only difference between him and some on this board is he has only been doing it for a decade longer.
Me and you are alone on this one. Suddenly expecting more than 7/8 wins with 4 non conference gimmies and in a shitty PAC is dooging. When under sark things were the opposite. I'm confused
Does that mean I'll be calling for Petersen's head? No. I still expect Petersen to be a good coach moving forward. However coaching wise I think him and the staff have been underwhelming and very much culpable for some of the struggles. To be fair saying the team lacks offensive talent is an understatement
Comments
Tell me something. What is peenermans calling card? Offensive innovation? Game day coaching? Recruiting? Some say it's his alleged fanatical attention to detail. Boise had a talent advantage at its dreck level and functionally played two and three game seasons. I don't think he brings anything to the Pac that is unique or difference making.
And I've already said that if I am wrong, I'll serve myself the crow.
I'm confused.
Its clear that either way things will get interesting
fuck. you are one of the doogliest doogs on this board. so much so that you probably really belong at the retard farm with Kim and Fatty.
Iron Law #41: Auburdoog will doog.
Let me ask you: how do you square your point that we'd have the best OLs in the conference with "years of bad Oline recruiting"????
Did you think it would just happen anyway? Is there an Iron Law that I'm missing here? Do you actually know anything about the O lines of the other 11 programs in the league????
More_Cockus, and CollegeDoog take note.
You're trying way too hard at this poont.
4-5 with this schedule would be bullshit. If you don't agree, you have no fucking standards. At least Aubbie mans up about moving the goal posts. The only difference between him and some on this board is he has only been doing it for a decade longer.