Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
after falling to #3 on the depth chart, where does Miley transfer to?
Comments
-
Rowland was better than Moon and Hobart was better than Brunell.
I didn't say any of those other things either.
I said Miles sucks. Because he does -
He said next year. I would assume Karta Samuels and Browning will both get looks, I just can't see us going back to miles for any sort of significant period of timeRoadDawg55 said:What if Williams sucks?
-
You did say use Hobert as an example of a coach getting it wrong. Whatever. We will see how Williams does today and in the future. We disagree on Miles. I see him as a game manager who can win games with a strong running game. He's not good or horrible. He's average. It's no coincidence that every time we have ran the ball well, we have won and Miles has been fine. When we haven't, we lose and Miles sucks.RaceBannon said:Rowland was better than Moon and Hobart was better than Brunell.
I didn't say any of those other things either.
I said Miles sucks. Because he does -
How do I nominate this for POTD?
Mods?
Bleenor?Dennis_DeYoung said:
I guess, being that I never said any of those things, I find it weird that it is viewed as saying those things to say Cyler sucks because he sucks (there's a fucking sentence for you--Jesus).RoadDawg55 said:
I don't give a fuck about Miles or who plays QB. I've just seen this same scenario happen many times and 90% of the time, the back up is no better and often worse. I just want to see Williams play a real game, maybe even a few before crowning him and speculating where Miles will transfer to. Granted, the bar isn't all that high.Dennis_DeYoung said:I love @RoadDawg55 for many reasons and his dooging for Cyler is only one of them.
But man, your vag is sure fucking sensitive about people here discouraging young Cyler.
This is exactly what went on at doogman for years. Paus was better than Pickett, Durocher and Bonnell were better than Stanback, Fouch was a better passer than Locker (yes, a few said that), Miles was better than Price. Oh, but because Hobert was better than Brunell, it means Williams is going to do great.
Anyway, the only Husky QBs I have ever wanted replaced in my life are as follows: Eric Bjornson (I wanted Damon to play) & Casey Paus (Stanback was clearly better). I was too young to say anything about Moon/Rowland and I didn't know who the fuck we should play after Pelluer. I used to make fun of tards on dm.c for calling for the back up. "Isaiah's not a winner" then "Jake's not a winner" "Play Taylor Barton!" what the fuck ever.
All of our QBs have been pretty fucking good. In my mind we've had two actually shitty QBs in my life time, Paus and Miles. Both fucking suck. -
I don't see miles as an average QB.
At some point you have to be able to win games passing the football, this isn't the 1980's.RoadDawg55 said:
You did say use Hobert as an example of a coach getting it wrong. Whatever. We will see how Williams does today and in the future. We disagree on Miles. I see him as a game manager who can win games with a strong running game. He's not good or horrible. He's average. It's no coincidence that every time we have ran the ball well, we have won and Miles has been fine. When we haven't, we lose and Miles sucks.RaceBannon said:Rowland was better than Moon and Hobart was better than Brunell.
I didn't say any of those other things either.
I said Miles sucks. Because he does
Miles doesn't have the ability to win a game with his arm, which is why he will never be the answer long term -
I did. It was.RoadDawg55 said:
You did say use Hobert as an example of a coach getting it wrong. Whatever. We will see how Williams does today and in the future. We disagree on Miles. I see him as a game manager who can win games with a strong running game. He's not good or horrible. He's average. It's no coincidence that every time we have ran the ball well, we have won and Miles has been fine. When we haven't, we lose and Miles sucks.RaceBannon said:Rowland was better than Moon and Hobart was better than Brunell.
I didn't say any of those other things either.
I said Miles sucks. Because he does -
Normally I would call @RoadDawg55 out for saying Miles is average, but after watching CFB this year I think he's probably right. It's just that the average QB is fucking terrible.
-
Disagree. Stanford won two straight Pac 12 titles with a subpar passing game. LSU made a title game with Jarrett Lee and Jefferson at QB. Of course, we want a QB that can air it out, but you don't need one to win.dhdawg said:I don't see miles as an average QB.
At some point you have to be able to win games passing the football, this isn't the 1980's.RoadDawg55 said:
You did say use Hobert as an example of a coach getting it wrong. Whatever. We will see how Williams does today and in the future. We disagree on Miles. I see him as a game manager who can win games with a strong running game. He's not good or horrible. He's average. It's no coincidence that every time we have ran the ball well, we have won and Miles has been fine. When we haven't, we lose and Miles sucks.RaceBannon said:Rowland was better than Moon and Hobart was better than Brunell.
I didn't say any of those other things either.
I said Miles sucks. Because he does
Miles doesn't have the ability to win a game with his arm, which is why he will never be the answer long term
We can argue all day on Miles. There are so many other problems with this offense. I truly don't think it is easy to play QB in this scheme, with these RB's, and with Mickens as your #1 WR. The scheme is something to keep an eye on the rest of the season. We should be doing better on offense, regardless of who is playing QB. The fact is, Petersen's offenses have been average or worse since Kellen Moore graduated. It's easy to have a good offense with Kellen Moore at QB, but those guys are rare. A completely different scheme since Moore left. He hired a first time OC that was QB coach of the mediocre Boise State offenses. I wasn't around in the late 80', but Don James needed to adapt. I'm not completely convinced that is not the case with Petersen and his offense.
Price without Sankey, ASJ, a healthy Kasen, and Smith would struggle too. I think it's probable that Williams will struggle. Miles has his issues, and he certainly is a flawed QB, but just look how doogs always blamed Price, it's happening again with Miles. This offense has serious issues. I have repeated it many times that if we can't run the ball, we will continue to suck. We most likely do not have a great or even good QB on the roster. It's truly that simple. -
Did you really need a @Tequilla territory doog-out to say that you love Cyler?RoadDawg55 said:
Disagree. Stanford won two straight Pac 12 titles with a subpar passing game. LSU made a title game with Jarrett Lee and Jefferson at QB. Of course, we want a QB that can air it out, but you don't need one to win.dhdawg said:I don't see miles as an average QB.
At some point you have to be able to win games passing the football, this isn't the 1980's.RoadDawg55 said:
You did say use Hobert as an example of a coach getting it wrong. Whatever. We will see how Williams does today and in the future. We disagree on Miles. I see him as a game manager who can win games with a strong running game. He's not good or horrible. He's average. It's no coincidence that every time we have ran the ball well, we have won and Miles has been fine. When we haven't, we lose and Miles sucks.RaceBannon said:Rowland was better than Moon and Hobart was better than Brunell.
I didn't say any of those other things either.
I said Miles sucks. Because he does
Miles doesn't have the ability to win a game with his arm, which is why he will never be the answer long term
We can argue all day on Miles. There are so many other problems with this offense. I truly don't think it is easy to play QB in this scheme, with these RB's, and with Mickens as your #1 WR. The scheme is something to keep an eye on the rest of the season. We should be doing better on offense, regardless of who is playing QB. The fact is, Petersen's offenses have been average or worse since Kellen Moore graduated. It's easy to have a good offense with Kellen Moore at QB, but those guys are rare. A completely different scheme since Moore left. He hired a first time OC that was QB coach of the mediocre Boise State offenses. I wasn't around in the late 80', but Don James needed to adapt. I'm not completely convinced that is not the case with Petersen and his offense.
Price without Sankey, ASJ, a healthy Kasen, and Smith would struggle too. I think it's probable that Williams will struggle. Miles has his issues, and he certainly is a flawed QB, but just look how doogs always blamed Price, it's happening again with Miles. This offense has serious issues. I have repeated it many times that if we can't run the ball, we will continue to suck. We most likely do not have a great or even good QB on the roster. It's truly that simple. -
Price never had the pass protection that miles is getting this year.RoadDawg55 said:
Disagree. Stanford won two straight Pac 12 titles with a subpar passing game. LSU made a title game with Jarrett Lee and Jefferson at QB. Of course, we want a QB that can air it out, but you don't need one to win.dhdawg said:I don't see miles as an average QB.
At some point you have to be able to win games passing the football, this isn't the 1980's.RoadDawg55 said:
You did say use Hobert as an example of a coach getting it wrong. Whatever. We will see how Williams does today and in the future. We disagree on Miles. I see him as a game manager who can win games with a strong running game. He's not good or horrible. He's average. It's no coincidence that every time we have ran the ball well, we have won and Miles has been fine. When we haven't, we lose and Miles sucks.RaceBannon said:Rowland was better than Moon and Hobart was better than Brunell.
I didn't say any of those other things either.
I said Miles sucks. Because he does
Miles doesn't have the ability to win a game with his arm, which is why he will never be the answer long term
We can argue all day on Miles. There are so many other problems with this offense. I truly don't think it is easy to play QB in this scheme, with these RB's, and with Mickens as your #1 WR. The scheme is something to keep an eye on the rest of the season. We should be doing better on offense, regardless of who is playing QB. The fact is, Petersen's offenses have been average or worse since Kellen Moore graduated. It's easy to have a good offense with Kellen Moore at QB, but those guys are rare. A completely different scheme since Moore left. He hired a first time OC that was QB coach of the mediocre Boise State offenses. I wasn't around in the late 80', but Don James needed to adapt. I'm not completely convinced that is not the case with Petersen and his offense.
Price without Sankey, ASJ, a healthy Kasen, and Smith would struggle too. I think it's probable that Williams will struggle. Miles has his issues, and he certainly is a flawed QB, but just look how doogs always blamed Price, it's happening again with Miles. This offense has serious issues. I have repeated it many times that if we can't run the ball, we will continue to suck. We most likely do not have a great or even good QB on the roster. It's truly that simple.
Also when defenses don't have to respect the QB, it's pretty difficult to run the football. The offensive struggles have a lot more to do with miles than you're saying it is.
And regarding the pass protection, please don't use sacks to prove it's bad, miles has brought a lot of that on himself
Miles is a poor thrower of the football. You can say Stanford won with a below average passing attack, but Hogan can at least throw the football downfield
