Clowney Hit of the Century...
Comments
-
Ho Lee FUK you guys are some little bitches!
GURGLE -
-
Christ you are struggling.dtd said:
Ho Lee FUK you guys are some little bitches!
GURGLE -
My problem with this whole thing, is the "if in doubt, he is out". There is going to be a lot of doubt, because of how fast the game is, regardless of how many replay angles they can look at. I would also agree with Derek in saying that the Pac refs will screw this up on a regular basis.Southerndawg said:
Agree, especially given that a questionable call under this rule has the potential to be a complete game changer. Ejections should be limited to the most egregious penalties such as leading with the crown of the helmet in an intentional helmet to helmet blow. Tossing a player for that is justifiable, but playing the interpretation game on lesser hits that carry an automatic ejection penalty is a problem.PurpleJ said:I understand the purpose behind trying to protect the players, but I think that there is a lot of gray area here.
How do they justify an ejection, when it takes so much analysis to determine the nature of each hit, especially when there are hits like that in every game? It's a fine line, and every ref is going to interpret things differently. -
He was one of the Quooks on Dawgboard who really dragged the place down. Just wait until that Faber idiot and CougLJ come over.dtd said:
Ho Lee FUK you guys are some little bitches!
GURGLE -
Can't wait for more stupid questions and long winded poasts which could be summarized in 1 sentence.He_Needs_More_Time said:
He was one of the Quooks on Dawgboard who really dragged the place down. Just wait until that Faber idiot and CougLJ come over.dtd said:
Ho Lee FUK you guys are some little bitches!
GURGLE -
If there aren't any indications of rough waters, they'll be here.He_Needs_More_Time said:
He was one of the Quooks on Dawgboard who really dragged the place down. Just wait until that Faber idiot and CougLJ come over.dtd said:
Ho Lee FUK you guys are some little bitches!
GURGLE -
You mean like water is wet?CuntWaffle said:
Can't wait for more stupid questions and long winded poasts which could be summarized in 1 sentence.He_Needs_More_Time said:
He was one of the Quooks on Dawgboard who really dragged the place down. Just wait until that Faber idiot and CougLJ come over.dtd said:
Ho Lee FUK you guys are some little bitches!
GURGLE -
Agree on all counts.PurpleJ said:
My problem with this whole thing, is the "if in doubt, he is out". There is going to be a lot of doubt, because of how fast the game is, regardless of how many replay angles they can look at. I would also agree with Derek in saying that the Pac refs will screw this up on a regular basis.Southerndawg said:
Agree, especially given that a questionable call under this rule has the potential to be a complete game changer. Ejections should be limited to the most egregious penalties such as leading with the crown of the helmet in an intentional helmet to helmet blow. Tossing a player for that is justifiable, but playing the interpretation game on lesser hits that carry an automatic ejection penalty is a problem.PurpleJ said:I understand the purpose behind trying to protect the players, but I think that there is a lot of gray area here.
How do they justify an ejection, when it takes so much analysis to determine the nature of each hit, especially when there are hits like that in every game? It's a fine line, and every ref is going to interpret things differently.
-
I hope Gang Green comes here so we can have another Race vs Gang Green battle.CuntWaffle said:
Can't wait for more stupid questions and long winded poasts which could be summarized in 1 sentence.He_Needs_More_Time said:
He was one of the Quooks on Dawgboard who really dragged the place down. Just wait until that Faber idiot and CougLJ come over.dtd said:
Ho Lee FUK you guys are some little bitches!
GURGLE
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
