Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Clowney Hit of the Century...

PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,282 Founders Club
in Hardcore Husky Board
sbnation.com/college-football/2013/7/22/4545524/jadeveon-clowney-hit-ncaa-ejection
Horse shit?
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Yes, but they are finally getting around to enforcing the Curtis Williams (RIP) rule.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,282 Founders Club
    I understand the purpose behind trying to protect the players, but I think that there is a lot of gray area here.

    How do they justify an ejection, when it takes so much analysis to determine the nature of each hit, especially when there are hits like that in every game? It's a fine line, and every ref is going to interpret things differently.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 63,543 Founders Club
    The Pac-12 refs are sure to interpret this in the worst possible way. I foresee a lot of booing and verbal abuse in the near future.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    DerekJohnson said:

    The Pac-12 refs are sure to interpret this in the worst possible way. I foresee a lot of booing and verbal abuse in the near future.

    booing the refs and coaches is OK. They get paid. I never boo the kids though.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    Criticizing the kids is just fine but flat out bashing the kids is wrong (and i'm out).
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    Criticizing the idiots is fine but criticize the kids and you're gone.

    Some of you need to learn the difference.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,299 Founders Club
    Soccertards have thoroughly infiltrated the NCAA, from Marktard on down.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dtddtd Member Posts: 4,821 Standard Supporter
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Yes, but they are finally getting around to enforcing the Curtis Williams (RIP) rule.

    Thou shalt not smash a woman's face in or thou shalt not withhold child support payments?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    dtd said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Yes, but they are finally getting around to enforcing the Curtis Williams (RIP) rule.

    Thou shalt not smash a woman's face in or thou shalt not withhold child support payments?
    Pressing yet again.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,299 Founders Club
    edited July 2013
    PurpleJ said:

    I understand the purpose behind trying to protect the players, but I think that there is a lot of gray area here.

    How do they justify an ejection, when it takes so much analysis to determine the nature of each hit, especially when there are hits like that in every game? It's a fine line, and every ref is going to interpret things differently.

    Agree, especially given that a questionable call under this rule has the potential to be a complete game changer. Ejections should be limited to the most egregious penalties such as leading with the crown of the helmet in an intentional helmet to helmet blow. Tossing a player for that is justifiable, but playing the interpretation game on lesser hits that carry an automatic ejection penalty is a problem.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dtddtd Member Posts: 4,821 Standard Supporter
    edited July 2013


    Ho Lee FUK you guys are some little bitches!

    GURGLE
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    dtd said:



    Ho Lee FUK you guys are some little bitches!

    GURGLE

    Christ you are struggling.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,282 Founders Club
    Southerndawg said:

    PurpleJ said:

    I understand the purpose behind trying to protect the players, but I think that there is a lot of gray area here.

    How do they justify an ejection, when it takes so much analysis to determine the nature of each hit, especially when there are hits like that in every game? It's a fine line, and every ref is going to interpret things differently.

    Agree, especially given that a questionable call under this rule has the potential to be a complete game changer. Ejections should be limited to the most egregious penalties such as leading with the crown of the helmet in an intentional helmet to helmet blow. Tossing a player for that is justifiable, but playing the interpretation game on lesser hits that carry an automatic ejection penalty is a problem.
    My problem with this whole thing, is the "if in doubt, he is out". There is going to be a lot of doubt, because of how fast the game is, regardless of how many replay angles they can look at. I would also agree with Derek in saying that the Pac refs will screw this up on a regular basis.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    dtd said:



    Ho Lee FUK you guys are some little bitches!

    GURGLE

    He was one of the Quooks on Dawgboard who really dragged the place down. Just wait until that Faber idiot and CougLJ come over.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    dtd said:



    Ho Lee FUK you guys are some little bitches!

    GURGLE

    He was one of the Quooks on Dawgboard who really dragged the place down. Just wait until that Faber idiot and CougLJ come over.
    Can't wait for more stupid questions and long winded poasts which could be summarized in 1 sentence.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,434
    edited July 2013
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    dtd said:



    Ho Lee FUK you guys are some little bitches!

    GURGLE

    He was one of the Quooks on Dawgboard who really dragged the place down. Just wait until that Faber idiot and CougLJ come over.
    If there aren't any indications of rough waters, they'll be here.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,434
    CuntWaffle said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    dtd said:



    Ho Lee FUK you guys are some little bitches!

    GURGLE

    He was one of the Quooks on Dawgboard who really dragged the place down. Just wait until that Faber idiot and CougLJ come over.
    Can't wait for more stupid questions and long winded poasts which could be summarized in 1 sentence.
    You mean like water is wet?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,299 Founders Club
    PurpleJ said:

    Southerndawg said:

    PurpleJ said:

    I understand the purpose behind trying to protect the players, but I think that there is a lot of gray area here.

    How do they justify an ejection, when it takes so much analysis to determine the nature of each hit, especially when there are hits like that in every game? It's a fine line, and every ref is going to interpret things differently.

    Agree, especially given that a questionable call under this rule has the potential to be a complete game changer. Ejections should be limited to the most egregious penalties such as leading with the crown of the helmet in an intentional helmet to helmet blow. Tossing a player for that is justifiable, but playing the interpretation game on lesser hits that carry an automatic ejection penalty is a problem.
    My problem with this whole thing, is the "if in doubt, he is out". There is going to be a lot of doubt, because of how fast the game is, regardless of how many replay angles they can look at. I would also agree with Derek in saying that the Pac refs will screw this up on a regular basis.
    Agree on all counts.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    CuntWaffle said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    dtd said:



    Ho Lee FUK you guys are some little bitches!

    GURGLE

    He was one of the Quooks on Dawgboard who really dragged the place down. Just wait until that Faber idiot and CougLJ come over.
    Can't wait for more stupid questions and long winded poasts which could be summarized in 1 sentence.
    I hope Gang Green comes here so we can have another Race vs Gang Green battle.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.