Hopefully some of the classier posters over there will enter the fold. It's pretty hard to imagine a board without crepe's KrisVashon posts.
You owe me an apology. I was right about dawgboard. Simple fact.
What did you say about dawgboard. I remember you posting frequently on there then stopped when Derek created this forum.
I honestly see no difference between the two boards. The HHB's carried that one then they left to come here. If they decided to leave this forum then this one wouldn't be as fun either.
Look it up. And if you can't see the difference, I can't help you and you should LEAVE!
I thought telling posters to LEAVE! gets you banned(Hi Harv!). I was told by Derek you guys wanted this forum to grow yet you are harassing a new member over something petty like which is the better message board.
Feels very much like a Real Doog vs Doogman debate. Reality is outside of maybe 4 people nobody really cares which site is better.
LEAVE. if you don't understand what I said.
You are looking like either Ruth or Kim. Nobody gives a fuck about these site wars.
Only you seem to give a shit in this Dawboard vs Hardcore Husky "war".
We are all Husky fans who are tired of Kim's bullshit who want a place to post where we can question the mediocrity and not get banned.
Like I said you had no problem posting on Dawgboard(still do under Kim's Skinny Jeans) until this site was created.
Our fan base is already split among "nega's" and doogs. Now you are trying to divide the nega's as well? Just relax and have a beer.
Hopefully some of the classier posters over there will enter the fold. It's pretty hard to imagine a board without crepe's KrisVashon posts.
You owe me an apology. I was right about dawgboard. Simple fact.
What did you say about dawgboard. I remember you posting frequently on there then stopped when Derek created this forum.
I honestly see no difference between the two boards. The HHB's carried that one then they left to come here. If they decided to leave this forum then this one wouldn't be as fun either.
Look it up. And if you can't see the difference, I can't help you and you should LEAVE!
I thought telling posters to LEAVE! gets you banned(Hi Harv!). I was told by Derek you guys wanted this forum to grow yet you are harassing a new member over something petty like which is the better message board.
Feels very much like a Real Doog vs Doogman debate. Reality is outside of maybe 4 people nobody really cares which site is better.
LEAVE. if you don't understand what I said.
You are looking like either Ruth or Kim. Nobody gives a fuck about these site wars.
Only you seem to give a shit in this Dawboard vs Hardcore Husky "war".
We are all Husky fans who are tired of Kim's bullshit who want a place to post where we can question the mediocrity and not get banned.
Like I said you had no problem posting on Dawgboard(still do under Kim's Skinny Jeans) until this site was created.
Our fan base is already split among "nega's" and doogs. Now you are trying to divide the nega's as well? Just relax and have a beer.
I've had 7. Are you new? Speaking of relaxing, why the hard on?
Hopefully some of the classier posters over there will enter the fold. It's pretty hard to imagine a board without crepe's KrisVashon posts.
You owe me an apology. I was right about dawgboard. Simple fact.
What did you say about dawgboard. I remember you posting frequently on there then stopped when Derek created this forum.
I honestly see no difference between the two boards. The HHB's carried that one then they left to come here. If they decided to leave this forum then this one wouldn't be as fun either.
Look it up. And if you can't see the difference, I can't help you and you should LEAVE!
I thought telling posters to LEAVE! gets you banned(Hi Harv!). I was told by Derek you guys wanted this forum to grow yet you are harassing a new member over something petty like which is the better message board.
Feels very much like a Real Doog vs Doogman debate. Reality is outside of maybe 4 people nobody really cares which site is better.
LEAVE. if you don't understand what I said.
You are looking like either Ruth or Kim. Nobody gives a fuck about these site wars.
Only you seem to give a shit in this Dawboard vs Hardcore Husky "war".
We are all Husky fans who are tired of Kim's bullshit who want a place to post where we can question the mediocrity and not get banned.
Like I said you had no problem posting on Dawgboard(still do under Kim's Skinny Jeans) until this site was created.
Our fan base is already split among "nega's" and doogs. Now you are trying to divide the nega's as well? Just relax and have a beer.
I've had 7. Are you new? Speaking of relaxing, why the hard on?
Means I need to catch up and take a long walk on the beach to gain some perspective.
Its a young but experienced team who returns lots of players for this year but also next year.
Does not compute.
Make sure to lather before you rinse.
Its possible to be young and experienced at the same time. Think Sankey, Shelton, Kasen, Timu, etc. These guys have experience but still have half their career left. Shaq could be considered experienced by the second half of this year (would be starting close to his 20th game). Whereas a guy who hasn't played until his 3rd or 4th year would be not experienced. Its actually a good position to be in and why we should expect to be a lot better this season and next season. Glad I could clear that up for you.
Its a young but experienced team who returns lots of players for this year but also next year.
Does not compute.
Make sure to lather before you rinse.
Its possible to be young and experienced at the same time. Think Sankey, Shelton, Kasen, Timu, etc. These guys have experience but still have half their career left. Shaq could be considered experienced by the second half of this year (would be starting close to his 20th game). Whereas a guy who hasn't played until his 3rd or 4th year would be not experienced. Its actually a good position to be in and why we should expect to be a lot better this season and next season. Glad I could clear that up for you.
There is a difference between having young talent and being a young team overall.
You seem to be forgetting the part where we only lost a handful of players that were worth two shits from last years team. I count 13 Seniors and 24 Juniors on this years' roster. Go ahead and compare that to some of the other successful teams in the conference last year, if you want. The difference is coaching.
I respect the fact that you took the time to make a podcast and contribute content, but you should really consider some constructive criticism if you are to be successful with your future endeavors.
Also, the guy who won the Heisman last year was a Freshman. I don't really buy into the youth excuses.
Its a young but experienced team who returns lots of players for this year but also next year.
Does not compute.
Make sure to lather before you rinse.
Its possible to be young and experienced at the same time. Think Sankey, Shelton, Kasen, Timu, etc. These guys have experience but still have half their career left. Shaq could be considered experienced by the second half of this year (would be starting close to his 20th game). Whereas a guy who hasn't played until his 3rd or 4th year would be not experienced. Its actually a good position to be in and why we should expect to be a lot better this season and next season. Glad I could clear that up for you.
There is a difference between having young talent and being a young team overall.
You seem to be forgetting the part where we only lost a handful of players that were worth two shits from last years team. I count 13 Seniors and 24 Juniors on this years' roster. Go ahead and compare that to some of the other successful teams in the conference last year, if you want. The difference is coaching.
I respect the fact that you took the time to make a podcast and contribute content, but you should really consider some constructive criticism if you are to be successful with your future endeavors.
Also, the guy who won the Heisman last year was a Freshman. I don't really buy into the youth excuses.
Sark is a sub par coach, but a big factor of our mediocrity is the OL and DL. In any event, it is Sark's fault we don't have better talent on the OL and DL, but it pretty much impossible to be a very good team with below average lines. We have nice talent in places, but we are missing it at the most important spots.
Its a young but experienced team who returns lots of players for this year but also next year.
Does not compute.
Make sure to lather before you rinse.
Its possible to be young and experienced at the same time. Think Sankey, Shelton, Kasen, Timu, etc. These guys have experience but still have half their career left. Shaq could be considered experienced by the second half of this year (would be starting close to his 20th game). Whereas a guy who hasn't played until his 3rd or 4th year would be not experienced. Its actually a good position to be in and why we should expect to be a lot better this season and next season. Glad I could clear that up for you.
There is a difference between having young talent and being a young team overall.
You seem to be forgetting the part where we only lost a handful of players that were worth two shits from last years team. I count 13 Seniors and 24 Juniors on this years' roster. Go ahead and compare that to some of the other successful teams in the conference last year, if you want. The difference is coaching.
I respect the fact that you took the time to make a podcast and contribute content, but you should really consider some constructive criticism if you are to be successful with your future endeavors.
Also, the guy who won the Heisman last year was a Freshman. I don't really buy into the youth excuses.
If you want to offer constructive criticism, next time actually listen before commenting on it. I never mentioned anything about a young team (IIRC) in the podcast. Better yet, just go dive head first into a bonfire.
Its a young but experienced team who returns lots of players for this year but also next year.
Does not compute.
Make sure to lather before you rinse.
Its possible to be young and experienced at the same time. Think Sankey, Shelton, Kasen, Timu, etc. These guys have experience but still have half their career left. Shaq could be considered experienced by the second half of this year (would be starting close to his 20th game). Whereas a guy who hasn't played until his 3rd or 4th year would be not experienced. Its actually a good position to be in and why we should expect to be a lot better this season and next season. Glad I could clear that up for you.
There is a difference between having young talent and being a young team overall.
You seem to be forgetting the part where we only lost a handful of players that were worth two shits from last years team. I count 13 Seniors and 24 Juniors on this years' roster. Go ahead and compare that to some of the other successful teams in the conference last year, if you want. The difference is coaching.
I respect the fact that you took the time to make a podcast and contribute content, but you should really consider some constructive criticism if you are to be successful with your future endeavors.
Also, the guy who won the Heisman last year was a Freshman. I don't really buy into the youth excuses.
If you want to offer constructive criticism, next time listen before commenting on it. I never mentioned anything about a young team (IIRC). Better yet, just go dive head first into a bonfire.
I actually did listen to the whole thing.
You mentioned youth in your post. Did you not? That's why I was quoting it with the quotes and stuff.
Not trying to be a dick here. Just trying to give you a bit of perspective on the argument you made in your post.
Its a young but experienced team who returns lots of players for this year but also next year.
Does not compute.
Make sure to lather before you rinse.
Its possible to be young and experienced at the same time. Think Sankey, Shelton, Kasen, Timu, etc. These guys have experience but still have half their career left. Shaq could be considered experienced by the second half of this year (would be starting close to his 20th game). Whereas a guy who hasn't played until his 3rd or 4th year would be not experienced. Its actually a good position to be in and why we should expect to be a lot better this season and next season. Glad I could clear that up for you.
There is a difference between having young talent and being a young team overall.
You seem to be forgetting the part where we only lost a handful of players that were worth two shits from last years team. I count 13 Seniors and 24 Juniors on this years' roster. Go ahead and compare that to some of the other successful teams in the conference last year, if you want. The difference is coaching.
I respect the fact that you took the time to make a podcast and contribute content, but you should really consider some constructive criticism if you are to be successful with your future endeavors.
Also, the guy who won the Heisman last year was a Freshman. I don't really buy into the youth excuses.
If you want to offer constructive criticism, next time actually listen before commenting on it. I never mentioned anything about a young team (IIRC) in the podcast. Better yet, just go dive head first into a bonfire.
Sounds like Purple J is just here to beat his chest. I'm hearing he won't last long.
Its a young but experienced team who returns lots of players for this year but also next year.
Does not compute.
Make sure to lather before you rinse.
Its possible to be young and experienced at the same time. Think Sankey, Shelton, Kasen, Timu, etc. These guys have experience but still have half their career left. Shaq could be considered experienced by the second half of this year (would be starting close to his 20th game). Whereas a guy who hasn't played until his 3rd or 4th year would be not experienced. Its actually a good position to be in and why we should expect to be a lot better this season and next season. Glad I could clear that up for you.
There is a difference between having young talent and being a young team overall.
You seem to be forgetting the part where we only lost a handful of players that were worth two shits from last years team. I count 13 Seniors and 24 Juniors on this years' roster. Go ahead and compare that to some of the other successful teams in the conference last year, if you want. The difference is coaching.
I respect the fact that you took the time to make a podcast and contribute content, but you should really consider some constructive criticism if you are to be successful with your future endeavors.
Also, the guy who won the Heisman last year was a Freshman. I don't really buy into the youth excuses.
If you want to offer constructive criticism, next time listen before commenting on it. I never mentioned anything about a young team (IIRC). Better yet, just go dive head first into a bonfire.
I actually did listen to the whole thing.
You mentioned youth in your post. Did you not? That's why I was quoting it with the quotes and stuff.
Not trying to be a dick here. Just trying to give you a bit of perspective on the argument you made in your post.
The fire thing was creative, though. Props.
I appreciate the listen. I think it is fair to say we are experienced, but other than Parker, Price, and probably ASJ, the rest of the team will be back next year. I think that qualifies as a young team, seeing as we are only losing 3 good players. As long as one of the 4* QB's is good, we should have a very strong team in 2014.
If we had a better coach, I would even say we should compete with Oregon for a Pac 12 title in 2014 because Stanford loses a lot of studs off their defense after this year. With Sark, I think we will be pretty good, but not as good as we should be. That's the problem with average coaches.
I agree whole heartedly about the problem being coaching. If it were up to me, Sark would already be gone after last year, but I do think if we won 9, there would be reason for some optimism for the future.
Its a young but experienced team who returns lots of players for this year but also next year.
Does not compute.
Make sure to lather before you rinse.
Its possible to be young and experienced at the same time. Think Sankey, Shelton, Kasen, Timu, etc. These guys have experience but still have half their career left. Shaq could be considered experienced by the second half of this year (would be starting close to his 20th game). Whereas a guy who hasn't played until his 3rd or 4th year would be not experienced. Its actually a good position to be in and why we should expect to be a lot better this season and next season. Glad I could clear that up for you.
There is a difference between having young talent and being a young team overall.
You seem to be forgetting the part where we only lost a handful of players that were worth two shits from last years team. I count 13 Seniors and 24 Juniors on this years' roster. Go ahead and compare that to some of the other successful teams in the conference last year, if you want. The difference is coaching.
I respect the fact that you took the time to make a podcast and contribute content, but you should really consider some constructive criticism if you are to be successful with your future endeavors.
Also, the guy who won the Heisman last year was a Freshman. I don't really buy into the youth excuses.
If you want to offer constructive criticism, next time listen before commenting on it. I never mentioned anything about a young team (IIRC). Better yet, just go dive head first into a bonfire.
I actually did listen to the whole thing.
You mentioned youth in your post. Did you not? That's why I was quoting it with the quotes and stuff.
Not trying to be a dick here. Just trying to give you a bit of perspective on the argument you made in your post.
The fire thing was creative, though. Props.
You initiated a rant based on nothing in the podcast.
Hell of a week for RoadDawg. From HarveyRoad's millcreekcoog to HereToBeatMyChest's iDawg.
Good for you, Roadie. Keep living the dream.
Lol, I appreciate that. I think I learned a valuable lesson with Harv and will handle myself much better when he inevitably makes his triumphant return.
Hell of a week for RoadDawg. From HarveyRoad's millcreekcoog to HereToBeatMyChest's iDawg.
Good for you, Roadie. Keep living the dream.
Lol, I appreciate that. I think I learned a valuable lesson with Harv and will handle myself much better when he inevitably makes his triumphant return.
I assumed Harv was posting under the handle PurpleJ.
Its a young but experienced team who returns lots of players for this year but also next year.
Does not compute.
Make sure to lather before you rinse.
Its possible to be young and experienced at the same time. Think Sankey, Shelton, Kasen, Timu, etc. These guys have experience but still have half their career left. Shaq could be considered experienced by the second half of this year (would be starting close to his 20th game). Whereas a guy who hasn't played until his 3rd or 4th year would be not experienced. Its actually a good position to be in and why we should expect to be a lot better this season and next season. Glad I could clear that up for you.
There is a difference between having young talent and being a young team overall.
You seem to be forgetting the part where we only lost a handful of players that were worth two shits from last years team. I count 13 Seniors and 24 Juniors on this years' roster. Go ahead and compare that to some of the other successful teams in the conference last year, if you want. The difference is coaching.
I respect the fact that you took the time to make a podcast and contribute content, but you should really consider some constructive criticism if you are to be successful with your future endeavors.
Also, the guy who won the Heisman last year was a Freshman. I don't really buy into the youth excuses.
If you want to offer constructive criticism, next time actually listen before commenting on it. I never mentioned anything about a young team (IIRC) in the podcast. Better yet, just go dive head first into a bonfire.
Sounds like Purple J is just here to beat his chest. I'm hearing he won't last long.
Comments
Only you seem to give a shit in this Dawboard vs Hardcore Husky "war".
We are all Husky fans who are tired of Kim's bullshit who want a place to post where we can question the mediocrity and not get banned.
Like I said you had no problem posting on Dawgboard(still do under Kim's Skinny Jeans) until this site was created.
Our fan base is already split among "nega's" and doogs. Now you are trying to divide the nega's as well? Just relax and have a beer.
Make sure to lather before you rinse.
You seem to be forgetting the part where we only lost a handful of players that were worth two shits from last years team. I count 13 Seniors and 24 Juniors on this years' roster. Go ahead and compare that to some of the other successful teams in the conference last year, if you want. The difference is coaching.
I respect the fact that you took the time to make a podcast and contribute content, but you should really consider some constructive criticism if you are to be successful with your future endeavors.
Also, the guy who won the Heisman last year was a Freshman. I don't really buy into the youth excuses.
You mentioned youth in your post. Did you not? That's why I was quoting it with the quotes and stuff.
Not trying to be a dick here. Just trying to give you a bit of perspective on the argument you made in your post.
The fire thing was creative, though. Props.
If we had a better coach, I would even say we should compete with Oregon for a Pac 12 title in 2014 because Stanford loses a lot of studs off their defense after this year. With Sark, I think we will be pretty good, but not as good as we should be. That's the problem with average coaches.
I agree whole heartedly about the problem being coaching. If it were up to me, Sark would already be gone after last year, but I do think if we won 9, there would be reason for some optimism for the future.
Whatever.....but do jump in a fire though.
Good for you, Roadie. Keep living the dream.