It's Simple
Comments
-
Can I pinpoint specific doogs? Not throwing the term out there all willy nilly and such, but there are some that need to be bicth slapped.RaceBannon said:
I doMikeDamone said:
PLSS dared to say this might very well be a 8-9 win team and was buried in hate mail. Do you recall that?CuntWaffle said:I haven't seen a ton of this insane dooging some are claiming. A few comments here and there but overall after the game Saturday most people were pissed and got on Petersen for a shitty coached half of football with his huge unnecessary gambles. Most came to terms that this team isn't going to be doing much this season as it is clear there is some cleaning up to do.
One of the big things before the season that a lot of people, myself included, swung and miss on is that the O Line was going to be one of the better in the Pac (clearly not the case) and that Miles would step in and be just as productive as Price (also not the case). The problem was too much pre season doogin
As long as this risky coaching shit with Petersen doesn't become a pattern i don't see any reason to panic which seems to be the reaction a lot of people want. Watching the team as the season goes along is what I will be watching out for to see if there is noticeable improvements. The only game left on the schedule that is a for sure loss to me is @Oregon. Now in no way do I think we win the rest, but at the very least we shouldn't be getting plungered by anyone like Sark.
There was a lot of optimism. Probably too early to get rid of it all, but there are some warning signs that we glossed over. There was a general exuberance that we finally have a real coach again. Your last couple of posts in this thread are spot on.
I have an issue of the over use and distortion of the term doog. It is a sacred term, not to be thrown around wildly like it is by certain posters. There are specific things that make a person a doog. And there just isn't any evidence that there is wild dooging going on, on this board.
There is still optimism and there is panic now. Abundance
-
If there is specific doogery it should be pointed outMikeDamone said:
Can I pinpoint specific doogs? Not throwing the term out there all willy nilly and such, but there are some that need to be bicth slapped.RaceBannon said:
I doMikeDamone said:
PLSS dared to say this might very well be a 8-9 win team and was buried in hate mail. Do you recall that?CuntWaffle said:I haven't seen a ton of this insane dooging some are claiming. A few comments here and there but overall after the game Saturday most people were pissed and got on Petersen for a shitty coached half of football with his huge unnecessary gambles. Most came to terms that this team isn't going to be doing much this season as it is clear there is some cleaning up to do.
One of the big things before the season that a lot of people, myself included, swung and miss on is that the O Line was going to be one of the better in the Pac (clearly not the case) and that Miles would step in and be just as productive as Price (also not the case). The problem was too much pre season doogin
As long as this risky coaching shit with Petersen doesn't become a pattern i don't see any reason to panic which seems to be the reaction a lot of people want. Watching the team as the season goes along is what I will be watching out for to see if there is noticeable improvements. The only game left on the schedule that is a for sure loss to me is @Oregon. Now in no way do I think we win the rest, but at the very least we shouldn't be getting plungered by anyone like Sark.
There was a lot of optimism. Probably too early to get rid of it all, but there are some warning signs that we glossed over. There was a general exuberance that we finally have a real coach again. Your last couple of posts in this thread are spot on.
I have an issue of the over use and distortion of the term doog. It is a sacred term, not to be thrown around wildly like it is by certain posters. There are specific things that make a person a doog. And there just isn't any evidence that there is wild dooging going on, on this board.
There is still optimism and there is panic now. Abundance -
I think it also shows just how much of a cancer Sark really was. USC has a long rebuild ahead following Kiffin/Sark.
-
I do agree about blaming the talent. We may not have championship level talent or the talent to hang 35 on Stanford, but there was enough talent to win the game.ThomasFremont said:
Don't confuse discussions over play calls, formations, etc. with doogish excuses like "we have no talent". Additionally, Stanford having the best defense didn't win them the USC game. So while it is a legit cause for concern going into the game, it doesn't mean they can't be scored on.RoadDawg55 said:I haven't seen many excuses. Almost everyone agrees that the fake punt was a terrible coaching call. Miles and the offense sucked. It's not dooging to say Stanford has a very good defense. It's a fact.
I do think this bye will be telling and is an opportunity for Peterman to show what he can do. What adjustments can they make on offense to get them playing at a high level? Petersen should get an opportunity to win 10 games.
PS, thanks for the FREE PUB!!1!, we good now. -
I didn't want to give them any FREE PUB!!1! They know who they are.RaceBannon said:
I doMikeDamone said:
PLSS dared to say this might very well be a 8-9 win team and was buried in hate mail. Do you recall that?CuntWaffle said:I haven't seen a ton of this insane dooging some are claiming. A few comments here and there but overall after the game Saturday most people were pissed and got on Petersen for a shitty coached half of football with his huge unnecessary gambles. Most came to terms that this team isn't going to be doing much this season as it is clear there is some cleaning up to do.
One of the big things before the season that a lot of people, myself included, swung and miss on is that the O Line was going to be one of the better in the Pac (clearly not the case) and that Miles would step in and be just as productive as Price (also not the case). The problem was too much pre season doogin
As long as this risky coaching shit with Petersen doesn't become a pattern i don't see any reason to panic which seems to be the reaction a lot of people want. Watching the team as the season goes along is what I will be watching out for to see if there is noticeable improvements. The only game left on the schedule that is a for sure loss to me is @Oregon. Now in no way do I think we win the rest, but at the very least we shouldn't be getting plungered by anyone like Sark.
There was a lot of optimism. Probably too early to get rid of it all, but there are some warning signs that we glossed over. There was a general exuberance that we finally have a real coach again. Your last couple of posts in this thread are spot on.
I have an issue of the over use and distortion of the term doog. It is a sacred term, not to be thrown around wildly like it is by certain posters. There are specific things that make a person a doog. And there just isn't any evidence that there is wild dooging going on, on this board.
There is still optimism and there is panic now. Abundance
FREE PUB!!1! is sacred.
-
Blaming the previous coach, when the previous coach won a Rose Bowl and its 5 years later, to protect Ty was the height of being a doog. I think one can build a non doog case that Sark was not a great recruiter, ran a loose ship, and did not develop talent. That will have to be overcome and I don't think it is doogish to say soCuntWaffle said:I think it also shows just how much of a cancer Sark really was. USC has a long rebuild ahead following Kiffin/Sark.
However, we have seen at many places that it doesn't take years, it takes about a year. This year will be a test of patience. -
See this thread for example http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/9310/way-too-fucking-early-schedule-breakdown/p1
Optimism is ok. We are fans after all. And the analysis after the games here is generally not trying to find excuses too much. -
Kiss and make up timeThomasFremont said:
I didn't want to give them any FREE PUB!!1! They know who they are.RaceBannon said:
I doMikeDamone said:
PLSS dared to say this might very well be a 8-9 win team and was buried in hate mail. Do you recall that?CuntWaffle said:I haven't seen a ton of this insane dooging some are claiming. A few comments here and there but overall after the game Saturday most people were pissed and got on Petersen for a shitty coached half of football with his huge unnecessary gambles. Most came to terms that this team isn't going to be doing much this season as it is clear there is some cleaning up to do.
One of the big things before the season that a lot of people, myself included, swung and miss on is that the O Line was going to be one of the better in the Pac (clearly not the case) and that Miles would step in and be just as productive as Price (also not the case). The problem was too much pre season doogin
As long as this risky coaching shit with Petersen doesn't become a pattern i don't see any reason to panic which seems to be the reaction a lot of people want. Watching the team as the season goes along is what I will be watching out for to see if there is noticeable improvements. The only game left on the schedule that is a for sure loss to me is @Oregon. Now in no way do I think we win the rest, but at the very least we shouldn't be getting plungered by anyone like Sark.
There was a lot of optimism. Probably too early to get rid of it all, but there are some warning signs that we glossed over. There was a general exuberance that we finally have a real coach again. Your last couple of posts in this thread are spot on.
I have an issue of the over use and distortion of the term doog. It is a sacred term, not to be thrown around wildly like it is by certain posters. There are specific things that make a person a doog. And there just isn't any evidence that there is wild dooging going on, on this board.
There is still optimism and there is panic now. Abundance
FREE PUB!!1! is sacred. -
Disagree. You give USC Malzahn or another top coach and they win the South and maybe even sneak into the playoff.CuntWaffle said:I think it also shows just how much of a cancer Sark really was. USC has a long rebuild ahead following Kiffin/Sark.
-
I thin that's why most of were upset - we thought and still think we should have won. Petermen is supposed to be our edge in games where we may have a slight talent gap. Or even a larger one. That was the true genius of James. He beat USC and Michigan in 1977 when we were way undermanned from a talent standpoint. James weakness was beating teams he was supposed toRoadDawg55 said:
I do agree about blaming the talent. We may not have championship level talent or the talent to hang 35 on Stanford, but there was enough talent to win the game.ThomasFremont said:
Don't confuse discussions over play calls, formations, etc. with doogish excuses like "we have no talent". Additionally, Stanford having the best defense didn't win them the USC game. So while it is a legit cause for concern going into the game, it doesn't mean they can't be scored on.RoadDawg55 said:I haven't seen many excuses. Almost everyone agrees that the fake punt was a terrible coaching call. Miles and the offense sucked. It's not dooging to say Stanford has a very good defense. It's a fact.
I do think this bye will be telling and is an opportunity for Peterman to show what he can do. What adjustments can they make on offense to get them playing at a high level? Petersen should get an opportunity to win 10 games.
PS, thanks for the FREE PUB!!1!, we good now.
