The new stadium will score at minimum 14 points which together with the 7 points typically assumed for home field advantage, we should have a 21point handicap before the Huskies leave their new locker-room to storm out of the new Tunnel onto the new fieldturf. that should be more than a genius such as Peterson can overcome in a season opener on the road....... providing Sark's new duck wannabe offense can either add to the Huskies' scoreboard or keep from giving points to the mediocre-by-size Broncos.
And Tailgater, you ignorant fuck. The new stadium wont score any points. Watch BSU against the 'Almighty SEC and GEORGIA. Doesn't matter where Petersen plays, his teams are INCREDIBLY disciplined and prepared no matter what. They have a SYSTEM they follow. They stick to it. Unlike Sark who flys by the seat of his pants, especially when he gets down by 3 in the 1st quarter. Its panic time. Abandon the run, go to 2-minute drill and pray for a miracle.
When Petersen gets down, he calmly sticks with the run/pass balanced philosophy that made him the winningest head coach in college football over his tenure. l
The new stadium will score at minimum 14 points which together with the 7 points typically assumed for home field advantage, we should have a 21point handicap before the Huskies leave their new locker-room to storm out of the new Tunnel onto the new fieldturf. that should be more than a genius such as Peterson can overcome in a season opener on the road....... providing Sark's new duck wannabe offense can either add to the Huskies' scoreboard or keep from giving points to the mediocre-by-size Broncos.
And Tailgater, you ignorant fuck. The new stadium wont score any points. Watch BSU against the 'Almighty SEC and GEORGIA. Doesn't matter where Petersen plays, his teams are INCREDIBLY disciplined and prepared no matter what. They have a SYSTEM they follow. They stick to it. Unlike Sark who flys by the seat of his pants, especially when he gets down by 3 in the 1st quarter. Its panic time. Abandon the run, go to 2-minute drill and pray for a miracle.
When Petersen gets down, he calmly sticks with the run/pass balanced philosophy that made him the winningest head coach in college football over his tenure. l
You're wrong. The new stadium will add points. It was part of the contract with the Pac 12. If UW removed the track, they would be spotted 14 points in every game. Why else would everyone be so confident we are beating Boise State?
You're wrong. The new stadium will add points. It was part of the contract with the Pac 12. If UW removed the track, they would be spotted 14 points in every game. Why else would everyone be so confident we are beating Boise State?
Craaaap...hadn't heard about this. That will make for an interesting pregame speech. Down 14 already? Do we at least get the ball first?
The new stadium will score at minimum 14 points which together with the 7 points typically assumed for home field advantage, we should have a 21point handicap before the Huskies leave their new locker-room to storm out of the new Tunnel onto the new fieldturf. that should be more than a genius such as Peterson can overcome in a season opener on the road....... providing Sark's new duck wannabe offense can either add to the Huskies' scoreboard or keep from giving points to the mediocre-by-size Broncos.
And Tailgater, you ignorant fuck. The new stadium wont score any points. Watch BSU against the 'Almighty SEC and GEORGIA. Doesn't matter where Petersen plays, his teams are INCREDIBLY disciplined and prepared no matter what. They have a SYSTEM they follow. They stick to it. Unlike Sark who flys by the seat of his pants, especially when he gets down by 3 in the 1st quarter. Its panic time. Abandon the run, go to 2-minute drill and pray for a miracle.
When Petersen gets down, he calmly sticks with the run/pass balanced philosophy that made him the winningest head coach in college football over his tenure. l
You're wrong. The new stadium will add points. It was part of the contract with the Pac 12. If UW removed the track, they would be spotted 14 points in every game. Why else would everyone be so confident we are beating Boise State?
Right On! Why else would we build a new stadium and schedule Idaho State. What-oh-what will we do next for easy advantage if the new post-season playoff system decides to not count 1AA cupcake wins for bowl eligibility....... or recognize our 14 point handicap?
Listen' I got laughed off dogboy for suggesting they keep 18-20 olinemen on schollie. One of their fucking experts said "no only 16 is necessary". A week fucking later, ON THEIR FUCKING SHOW, Baird said 18-20. NO QUESTION. Those guys are the biggest fucking bunch of sheep over there.
The concept of recruiting sufficient numbers to maintain OL depth is too technical for the Insider experts at Dm.c. Besides claiming that all OL recruits should come out of high school fully prepared to compete against Pac-12 defenses, Dm.c's experts can't seem to grasp the time needed for kids to develop for the war in the trenches of major college football,....... nor the depth needed to back-up five interior OL positions while anticipating rates of injury or dropout in a typical collegiate program. Assuming a reasonable 20% attrition rate and the time an average OL prospect needs in school to develop, each of five classes including a redshirt class should have close to four scholarship athletes capable of starting at, backing-up, or developing into competitors at each of the five OL positions. In a well managed program built to compete at the highest level, such depth typically computes to 18-20 OLmen on the roster and 4-5 OL recruits each year.
One thing that's always amused me is the Dm.c Insider expert's willingness to follow Cozzetto's lead and list two or more OLmen as starters at one position as well as back-ups at one or two other positions. It's true that some of the more experienced athletes can be penciled as a back-up at more than one position if he isn't starting, but OL starters at least during any week of game preparations are usually anchored at their staring position. But using mirrors makes it appear that 8-10 OLmen is all that's needed to keep a program competitive on the line-of-scrimmage.
LOL Not a ton of confidence in this thread........you're not alone, very few Bronco fans expect to win this game, hell some think we might get smashed.....which is kind of bizarre, considering we beat UW in December minus our best player. I honestly don't know what to expect. Both teams assume certain positions will improve (O-Line for UW, QB/RB/Run blocking for BSU, etc.)....will that be the case? Not sure. I personally don't think we win, but making a prediction seems impossible. So many unknown factors. I do think a lot weighs on whether ASJ plays or not.....which I bet we won't know until game time.
UW will win by 10 or 14 and it won't tell us jack shit about the season, though I fully expect local and even national media will make a big deal out of it. Then we'll struggle to beat Illinois which will remind us how mediocre we are.
When has Sark ever defeated a good opponent by double figures? I can only think of one occasion which was the Holiday Bowl. Also Nebraska didn't want to be there at all.
I see UW winning a close game by like a TD or less or UW getting their asses kicked. I don't see a middle.
Comments
When Petersen gets down, he calmly sticks with the run/pass balanced philosophy that made him the winningest head coach in college football over his tenure.
l
puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Listen' I got laughed off dogboy for suggesting they keep 18-20 olinemen on schollie. One of their fucking experts said "no only 16 is necessary". A week fucking later, ON THEIR FUCKING SHOW, Baird said 18-20. NO QUESTION. Those guys are the biggest fucking bunch of sheep over there.
The concept of recruiting sufficient numbers to maintain OL depth is too technical for the Insider experts at Dm.c. Besides claiming that all OL recruits should come out of high school fully prepared to compete against Pac-12 defenses, Dm.c's experts can't seem to grasp the time needed for kids to develop for the war in the trenches of major college football,....... nor the depth needed to back-up five interior OL positions while anticipating rates of injury or dropout in a typical collegiate program. Assuming a reasonable 20% attrition rate and the time an average OL prospect needs in school to develop, each of five classes including a redshirt class should have close to four scholarship athletes capable of starting at, backing-up, or developing into competitors at each of the five OL positions. In a well managed program built to compete at the highest level, such depth typically computes to 18-20 OLmen on the roster and 4-5 OL recruits each year.
One thing that's always amused me is the Dm.c Insider expert's willingness to follow Cozzetto's lead and list two or more OLmen as starters at one position as well as back-ups at one or two other positions. It's true that some of the more experienced athletes can be penciled as a back-up at more than one position if he isn't starting, but OL starters at least during any week of game preparations are usually anchored at their staring position. But using mirrors makes it appear that 8-10 OLmen is all that's needed to keep a program competitive on the line-of-scrimmage.
I blame Obama.
I see UW winning a close game by like a TD or less or UW getting their asses kicked. I don't see a middle.
If you are going to make stuff up... well... your just making stuff up.