USAID on life support
Another activist judge
Comments
-
IGNORE THE DISTRICT JUDGES and move forward swiftly.
Let it go to the Supremes as quickly as possible
-
and what if the Supreme Court sides with USAID? Do you tell them to fuck off too? Are they also compromised?
-
So SCOTUS can demand that USAID be allowed to do whatever it wants? WHO calls the shots there?
-
and what if the Supreme Court sides with USAID? Do you tell them to fuck off too? Are they also compromised?
If that happens, the executive branch is officially run by the courts and we live in a secular version of a neo-Kritocracy.
I think our first real constitutional crisis in decades will unfold if the powers of the executive branch are taken over by the judiciary. It’s not like it hasn’t happened before in the modern era.
Brazil is very close to it now.
-
Arricle II couldn’t be more specific on executive power. If a single federal judge wants to supersede it, at the very least they shouldn’t have clear conflicts that should call for their recusal from stopping an otherwise legal act by the person in charge of the executive branch.
Desperate partisans trying to hold onto the power they lost in an election, and they are using compromised judges to do so after shopping districts for them.
-
Of course not. It’s the Supreme Court for a reason.
-
lmfao
anyone who doesn't agree with Daddy is corrupt.
-
that's not what they would say at all. the argument has never been allowing it to do what it wants. it's that Trump just shutting it down on his own is unconstitutional.
-
So you’d all be satisfied if Trump takes it down to one employee then?
-
They could be.
DOGE and Kash will figure that out.
