Biden moves to permanently ban offshore oil drilling on federal reserves
What the actual fuck are you Leftist Lunatics doing?
I may be in favor of the Project 25 re-education camps you idiots were pissing yourselves about if you’re pulling this bullshit.
It’s insanity, and you losers are voting your way into a worse standard of living while your leaders laugh at you and reap the benefits.
Comments
-
Retards
-
He can't do it. Not a way for him to get it done without lawmakers involved.
-
Won't matter when Alberta becomes the 51st state.
-
Fuck Biden
-
Trump can just un-ban it!
-
yeah, this strikes me as hollow grandstanding for the base.
-
Checking in on student loan forgiveness speaking of the retarded base
-
Biden is making none of these moves except in name only.
-
Headline/article incongruity. Easy fix if it wasn't intentional.
-
Take it up with the NYT link in the article, you fucking fascist.
Why do you vote for people wanting to make your life more difficult?
Also, why can’t your Leftist news sources such as the NYT figure out how to get their HTML links correct?
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/02/climate/federal-waters-oil-drilling-ban.html
The ban would be a significant victory for environmental advocates who have long argued that new drilling is inconsistent with the need to sharply reduce greenhouse gas emissions from burning oil and gas that are dangerously warming the planet. The year that just ended was the hottest in recorded history.
The move would also cement Mr. Biden’s legacy on climate change as he prepares to leave the White House after a single term. President-elect Donald J. Trump has pledged to reverse virtually every law and regulation aimed at curbing carbon dioxide emissions, and to make it easier for companies to produce and burn more coal, oil and
-
Weeds
-
Won’t respond because it’s indefensible to argue against it if you want to thrive as a society.
The Erns are not serious people. Poorly educated in things that actually matter.
-
Nah brah, your headline is not the NYT headline or the Breitbart headline. You made an editorial decision. The word "some" is huge here, and you took it out. Had I not read the articles, I would have thought all federal reserves were banned from offshore drilling. That's how 95% of people get their news, as you know. These details matter, as you know. Wouldn't be a bad idea to sit and ponder why you thought it was necessary to do the terrible, horrible, no good things you did.
Can't complain about burnin' more weeds tho. Let's ride.
-
permanently ban it for 15 more days Joe.
Go for it.
-
None of it should be banned. Hope this helps for those lost in the weeds
But the headline is the real issue
JFC
-
The problem is that any of the oil and gas investments is in the billions and requires a stream of cash flow for years to earn a return. If that return is predicated on no democrat ever being president or controlling Congress then the investment won't be made in US territory. The moral thing to do is to have the chicoms and the Arabs do the dirty work and sell us the oil, metals and minerals. "Out of sight out of mind" is the leftard world view.
-
Exactly... why use us assets that will be clean when we can use the other world assets that are dirty but nobody is paying attention
-
"Green" marketing in a nutshell.
