ESPN gargling some USC sack...

PurpleBaze

...talking about how USC is one of the teams that will make the 16-team playoff system, under the leadership of Sark.

How many games into the season will ESPN realize the error of their ways?

EsophagealFeces

The over/under is 5.

section8

EsophagealFeces said:

The over/under is 5.

1.5 after a close game with San Jose St. And David Shaw is elbow deep with the plunger by halftime in Palo Alto.

AtomicPiss

section8 said:

EsophagealFeces said:

The over/under is 5.

1.5 after a close game with San Jose St. And David Shaw is elbow deep with the plunger by halftime in Palo Alto.

David Shaw is overrated and Stanford wins that game in a slug fest only because they're at home.

Gladstone

Explain how he is overrated please. I look forward to tearing your argument to pieces.

PurpleJ

We're going to find out this year whether Shaw is overrated or not. He just lost a bunch of guys. Can he still produce results? Stay tuned...

chuck

DerekJohnson said:

section8 said:

EsophagealFeces said:

The over/under is 5.

1.5 after a close game with San Jose St. And David Shaw is elbow deep with the plunger by halftime in Palo Alto.

David Shaw is overrated and Stanford wins that game in a slug fest only because they're at home.

Mods making smart statements might lead me to steal my son's lunch money and donate it to this arm pit.

dnc

DerekJohnson said:

section8 said:

EsophagealFeces said:

The over/under is 5.

1.5 after a close game with San Jose St. And David Shaw is elbow deep with the plunger by halftime in Palo Alto.

David Shaw is overrated and Stanford wins that game in a slug fest only because they're at home.

Shaw is underrated

oregonblitzkrieg

Shaw > Cal.

doogsinparadise

All Shaw has done is win the conference two years running while exposing Oregon's lack of toughness. Absolutely terrible.

DerekJohnson said:

section8 said:

EsophagealFeces said:

The over/under is 5.

1.5 after a close game with San Jose St. And David Shaw is elbow deep with the plunger by halftime in Palo Alto.

David Shaw is overrated and Stanford wins that game in a slug fest only because they're at home.

Doog.

Meek

ESPN loves the story that USC is "home" to Sark because Sark played one term as an average baseball player there (one term - not a whole fucking season even) and then was hired back as an assistant under Pete Carroll. Clearly USC = Sark = USC. It's probably on Wikipedia as a symbiotic relationship. Fucking hell.

oregonblitzkrieg

doogsinparadise said:

All Shaw the Yeti and crew has done is win the conference two years running while exposing Oregon's lack of toughness 2 inches of thunder. Absolutely terrible.

DerekJohnson said:

section8 said:

EsophagealFeces said:

The over/u 2 nder is 5.

1.5 after a close game with San Jose St. And David Shaw is elbow deep with the plunger by halftime in Palo Alto.

David Shaw is overrated and Stanford wins that game in a slug fest only because they're at home.

Doog.

whlinder

Shaw (or his coaching staff) coached like a bunch of fucktards in the Rose Bowl.

gmo

Shaw is a below average game manager IMO. Overall very quality coach but he costs them wins with his often stubborn and suspicious game day coaching.

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

gmo said:

Shaw is a below average game manager IMO. Overall very quality coach but he costs them wins with his often stubborn and suspicious game day coaching.

Shaw's coaching has been good to win a ton of games since Harbaugh left but he shit the bed at least once each year (it seems like once per year): @ UW when UW won the Gameday Championship, the bowl game against Oklahoma State where instead of letting Andrew Luck win the game passing or his running back plow through the defense, he put it all the kicker who missed and then the Rose Bowl last year. MSU was a good team but Stanford had more than enough chances to win.

It should be interesting if we find out he's over-rated. It'll also be interesting if we find out he's under-rated.

Either way, it'll be interesting.

Meek

Shaw's been a great coach overall in my opinion with the exception that he makes one baffling decision in highly pressured games that become his signature.

RoadDawg55

Shaw is a very good coach. Stanford prides themselves on being bigger, smarter, and tougher. He does sometimes make questionable decisions in high pressure situations. He even did against UW when he tried the bootleg on third and one when Peters snuffed that shit out. Their conservative play calling works against them once or twice a year as well.