Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Deboer staying in Seattle

2

Comments

  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,190 Swaye's Wigwam

    theLSkid said:

    NIL at Washington might be in a better place than most schools. This is the only reason I have any level of sanity.

    There’s only two programs in the country right now with long-term NIL plans for their athletes - UW and LSU (Hey Scotty!!)

    Most schools are pay for play, which UW kind of does, but the laws in our state makes that incredibly difficult. States like Texas and Florida have wrote into legislation that schools CAN work directly with NIL, including coaches. This really pissed off Saban as Alabama is far behind the turn for allowing that same thing - hence their Leerfield NIL Lounge and partnership, but they’re behind the curve.

    What LSU and UW are doing includes a trust fund that athletes can access after graduation/NFL, and that fund is invested during their time playing. The more time at the school, the more compound interest, the more money. Along with getting random sponsorship level deals.

    NIL is the name of the game now, Kalen seems like the type to want trust funds and finance guys to handle everything while he coaches ball, at Bama - you gotta embrace leerfield and the agents who are constantly in the lounge, the bag will always be talked about on the recruiting trail in the SEC, and with tOSU struggling to get a collective -Michigan is the only competition.

    Washington had one of the best NIL programs? Then why do we get our shit pushed in with HS recruits? We’re slightly better in the portal but not at the level of the top dogs.
    Washington doesn't do NIL for high school stars horoscope talent roulette

    UW is ELITE at NIL for proven players
  • dirtysouwfdawgdirtysouwfdawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,115 Swaye's Wigwam

    Sources said:

    DeBoer doesn't seem like the type to go in studio and tell husky fans fuck off to their face

    Agree. Also, I believe he’d tell the team first.
    Which would leak this evening.
  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,602 Swaye's Wigwam

    theLSkid said:

    NIL at Washington might be in a better place than most schools. This is the only reason I have any level of sanity.

    There’s only two programs in the country right now with long-term NIL plans for their athletes - UW and LSU (Hey Scotty!!)

    Most schools are pay for play, which UW kind of does, but the laws in our state makes that incredibly difficult. States like Texas and Florida have wrote into legislation that schools CAN work directly with NIL, including coaches. This really pissed off Saban as Alabama is far behind the turn for allowing that same thing - hence their Leerfield NIL Lounge and partnership, but they’re behind the curve.

    What LSU and UW are doing includes a trust fund that athletes can access after graduation/NFL, and that fund is invested during their time playing. The more time at the school, the more compound interest, the more money. Along with getting random sponsorship level deals.

    NIL is the name of the game now, Kalen seems like the type to want trust funds and finance guys to handle everything while he coaches ball, at Bama - you gotta embrace leerfield and the agents who are constantly in the lounge, the bag will always be talked about on the recruiting trail in the SEC, and with tOSU struggling to get a collective -Michigan is the only competition.

    Washington had one of the best NIL programs? Then why do we get our shit pushed in with HS recruits? We’re slightly better in the portal but not at the level of the top dogs.
    Washington doesn't do NIL for high school stars horoscope talent roulette

    UW is ELITE at NIL for proven players
    You could say they are elite at evaluating the transfers, which is all Deboer. But cash pool wise, don't think that is remotely true.
  • theLSkidtheLSkid Member Posts: 344

    theLSkid said:

    NIL at Washington might be in a better place than most schools. This is the only reason I have any level of sanity.

    There’s only two programs in the country right now with long-term NIL plans for their athletes - UW and LSU (Hey Scotty!!)

    Most schools are pay for play, which UW kind of does, but the laws in our state makes that incredibly difficult. States like Texas and Florida have wrote into legislation that schools CAN work directly with NIL, including coaches. This really pissed off Saban as Alabama is far behind the turn for allowing that same thing - hence their Leerfield NIL Lounge and partnership, but they’re behind the curve.

    What LSU and UW are doing includes a trust fund that athletes can access after graduation/NFL, and that fund is invested during their time playing. The more time at the school, the more compound interest, the more money. Along with getting random sponsorship level deals.

    NIL is the name of the game now, Kalen seems like the type to want trust funds and finance guys to handle everything while he coaches ball, at Bama - you gotta embrace leerfield and the agents who are constantly in the lounge, the bag will always be talked about on the recruiting trail in the SEC, and with tOSU struggling to get a collective -Michigan is the only competition.

    Washington had one of the best NIL programs? Then why do we get our shit pushed in with HS recruits? We’re slightly better in the portal but not at the level of the top dogs.
    There’s a difference between pay for play and long term NIL.

    If you want the real reason - it’s because UW hasn’t had a national brand and nobody outside of the west coast wants to visit a city like seattle.

  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,190 Swaye's Wigwam
    theLSkid said:

    theLSkid said:

    NIL at Washington might be in a better place than most schools. This is the only reason I have any level of sanity.

    There’s only two programs in the country right now with long-term NIL plans for their athletes - UW and LSU (Hey Scotty!!)

    Most schools are pay for play, which UW kind of does, but the laws in our state makes that incredibly difficult. States like Texas and Florida have wrote into legislation that schools CAN work directly with NIL, including coaches. This really pissed off Saban as Alabama is far behind the turn for allowing that same thing - hence their Leerfield NIL Lounge and partnership, but they’re behind the curve.

    What LSU and UW are doing includes a trust fund that athletes can access after graduation/NFL, and that fund is invested during their time playing. The more time at the school, the more compound interest, the more money. Along with getting random sponsorship level deals.

    NIL is the name of the game now, Kalen seems like the type to want trust funds and finance guys to handle everything while he coaches ball, at Bama - you gotta embrace leerfield and the agents who are constantly in the lounge, the bag will always be talked about on the recruiting trail in the SEC, and with tOSU struggling to get a collective -Michigan is the only competition.

    Washington had one of the best NIL programs? Then why do we get our shit pushed in with HS recruits? We’re slightly better in the portal but not at the level of the top dogs.
    There’s a difference between pay for play and long term NIL.

    If you want the real reason - it’s because UW hasn’t had a national brand and nobody outside of the west coast wants to visit a city like seattle.

    No one wants to visit seattle?

    Hilarious

    I forget how retarded this place is sometimes

  • Sandra6Sandra6 Member Posts: 150
    People will just take it as a granted that Alabama will get who Alabama wants until the day that Alabama announces that Tommy Rees has been promoted to head coach.

    Lanning was listed as high as -500 just this morning. Then, Lanning announces he doesn’t want the job, so all of a sudden DeBoer becomes the -275 favorite. It’s ridiculous.

    DeBoer doesn’t even have Alabama ties-or SEC ties at all- like Lanning does. I really am clueless about where this rumor is coming from.
  • LawDawg1LawDawg1 Member Posts: 3,869
    I heard Phil Knight is funding the buyout.
  • theLSkidtheLSkid Member Posts: 344

    theLSkid said:

    theLSkid said:

    NIL at Washington might be in a better place than most schools. This is the only reason I have any level of sanity.

    There’s only two programs in the country right now with long-term NIL plans for their athletes - UW and LSU (Hey Scotty!!)

    Most schools are pay for play, which UW kind of does, but the laws in our state makes that incredibly difficult. States like Texas and Florida have wrote into legislation that schools CAN work directly with NIL, including coaches. This really pissed off Saban as Alabama is far behind the turn for allowing that same thing - hence their Leerfield NIL Lounge and partnership, but they’re behind the curve.

    What LSU and UW are doing includes a trust fund that athletes can access after graduation/NFL, and that fund is invested during their time playing. The more time at the school, the more compound interest, the more money. Along with getting random sponsorship level deals.

    NIL is the name of the game now, Kalen seems like the type to want trust funds and finance guys to handle everything while he coaches ball, at Bama - you gotta embrace leerfield and the agents who are constantly in the lounge, the bag will always be talked about on the recruiting trail in the SEC, and with tOSU struggling to get a collective -Michigan is the only competition.

    Washington had one of the best NIL programs? Then why do we get our shit pushed in with HS recruits? We’re slightly better in the portal but not at the level of the top dogs.
    There’s a difference between pay for play and long term NIL.

    If you want the real reason - it’s because UW hasn’t had a national brand and nobody outside of the west coast wants to visit a city like seattle.

    No one wants to visit seattle?

    Hilarious

    I forget how retarded this place is sometimes

    Social media paints seattle in the same light as portland. I spent some time in the south over December and anyone who asked where I was from after I said “Washington” would say “not seattle right?”… I love seattle, but it’s not the same anymore. Go ahead and have lunch near pukes place, first time I’ve ever seen a homeless man jerking it in broad daylight on a sidewalk. At least go under a bridge.

  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,190 Swaye's Wigwam
    theLSkid said:

    theLSkid said:

    theLSkid said:

    NIL at Washington might be in a better place than most schools. This is the only reason I have any level of sanity.

    There’s only two programs in the country right now with long-term NIL plans for their athletes - UW and LSU (Hey Scotty!!)

    Most schools are pay for play, which UW kind of does, but the laws in our state makes that incredibly difficult. States like Texas and Florida have wrote into legislation that schools CAN work directly with NIL, including coaches. This really pissed off Saban as Alabama is far behind the turn for allowing that same thing - hence their Leerfield NIL Lounge and partnership, but they’re behind the curve.

    What LSU and UW are doing includes a trust fund that athletes can access after graduation/NFL, and that fund is invested during their time playing. The more time at the school, the more compound interest, the more money. Along with getting random sponsorship level deals.

    NIL is the name of the game now, Kalen seems like the type to want trust funds and finance guys to handle everything while he coaches ball, at Bama - you gotta embrace leerfield and the agents who are constantly in the lounge, the bag will always be talked about on the recruiting trail in the SEC, and with tOSU struggling to get a collective -Michigan is the only competition.

    Washington had one of the best NIL programs? Then why do we get our shit pushed in with HS recruits? We’re slightly better in the portal but not at the level of the top dogs.
    There’s a difference between pay for play and long term NIL.

    If you want the real reason - it’s because UW hasn’t had a national brand and nobody outside of the west coast wants to visit a city like seattle.

    No one wants to visit seattle?

    Hilarious

    I forget how retarded this place is sometimes

    Social media paints seattle in the same light as portland. I spent some time in the south over December and anyone who asked where I was from after I said “Washington” would say “not seattle right?”… I love seattle, but it’s not the same anymore. Go ahead and have lunch near pukes place, first time I’ve ever seen a homeless man jerking it in broad daylight on a sidewalk. At least go under a bridge.

    Your social media?

    Case closed
  • theLSkidtheLSkid Member Posts: 344

    theLSkid said:

    theLSkid said:

    theLSkid said:

    NIL at Washington might be in a better place than most schools. This is the only reason I have any level of sanity.

    There’s only two programs in the country right now with long-term NIL plans for their athletes - UW and LSU (Hey Scotty!!)

    Most schools are pay for play, which UW kind of does, but the laws in our state makes that incredibly difficult. States like Texas and Florida have wrote into legislation that schools CAN work directly with NIL, including coaches. This really pissed off Saban as Alabama is far behind the turn for allowing that same thing - hence their Leerfield NIL Lounge and partnership, but they’re behind the curve.

    What LSU and UW are doing includes a trust fund that athletes can access after graduation/NFL, and that fund is invested during their time playing. The more time at the school, the more compound interest, the more money. Along with getting random sponsorship level deals.

    NIL is the name of the game now, Kalen seems like the type to want trust funds and finance guys to handle everything while he coaches ball, at Bama - you gotta embrace leerfield and the agents who are constantly in the lounge, the bag will always be talked about on the recruiting trail in the SEC, and with tOSU struggling to get a collective -Michigan is the only competition.

    Washington had one of the best NIL programs? Then why do we get our shit pushed in with HS recruits? We’re slightly better in the portal but not at the level of the top dogs.
    There’s a difference between pay for play and long term NIL.

    If you want the real reason - it’s because UW hasn’t had a national brand and nobody outside of the west coast wants to visit a city like seattle.

    No one wants to visit seattle?

    Hilarious

    I forget how retarded this place is sometimes

    Social media paints seattle in the same light as portland. I spent some time in the south over December and anyone who asked where I was from after I said “Washington” would say “not seattle right?”… I love seattle, but it’s not the same anymore. Go ahead and have lunch near pukes place, first time I’ve ever seen a homeless man jerking it in broad daylight on a sidewalk. At least go under a bridge.

    Your social media?

    Case closed
    I’ve never heard someone post 2020 Chaz say “I can’t wait to go to seattle!” But then again, people who live in Portland/San Fran/Salem/Spokane think it’s GREAT!

  • LoneStarDawgLoneStarDawg Member Posts: 13,343
    TXDawg said:

    Would be hilarous if Deboer was out fishing all day, clueless to the rumor, then comes home to see Fudgie crying on his front lawn.

    Dead people don’t cry
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,260
    edited January 11
    theLSkid said:

    theLSkid said:

    theLSkid said:

    theLSkid said:

    NIL at Washington might be in a better place than most schools. This is the only reason I have any level of sanity.

    There’s only two programs in the country right now with long-term NIL plans for their athletes - UW and LSU (Hey Scotty!!)

    Most schools are pay for play, which UW kind of does, but the laws in our state makes that incredibly difficult. States like Texas and Florida have wrote into legislation that schools CAN work directly with NIL, including coaches. This really pissed off Saban as Alabama is far behind the turn for allowing that same thing - hence their Leerfield NIL Lounge and partnership, but they’re behind the curve.

    What LSU and UW are doing includes a trust fund that athletes can access after graduation/NFL, and that fund is invested during their time playing. The more time at the school, the more compound interest, the more money. Along with getting random sponsorship level deals.

    NIL is the name of the game now, Kalen seems like the type to want trust funds and finance guys to handle everything while he coaches ball, at Bama - you gotta embrace leerfield and the agents who are constantly in the lounge, the bag will always be talked about on the recruiting trail in the SEC, and with tOSU struggling to get a collective -Michigan is the only competition.

    Washington had one of the best NIL programs? Then why do we get our shit pushed in with HS recruits? We’re slightly better in the portal but not at the level of the top dogs.
    There’s a difference between pay for play and long term NIL.

    If you want the real reason - it’s because UW hasn’t had a national brand and nobody outside of the west coast wants to visit a city like seattle.

    No one wants to visit seattle?

    Hilarious

    I forget how retarded this place is sometimes

    Social media paints seattle in the same light as portland. I spent some time in the south over December and anyone who asked where I was from after I said “Washington” would say “not seattle right?”… I love seattle, but it’s not the same anymore. Go ahead and have lunch near pukes place, first time I’ve ever seen a homeless man jerking it in broad daylight on a sidewalk. At least go under a bridge.

    Your social media?

    Case closed
    I’ve never heard someone post 2020 Chaz say “I can’t wait to go to seattle!” But then again, people who live in Portland/San Fran/Salem/Spokane think it’s GREAT!

    Because it is. To quote the most beloved poster in the Tug, you gals are hysterical over the wart of homelessness that exists here, and frankly half of the enthusiasm with which people shit on Seattle (pardon the pun) is fueled by political ideology and determinism. But there is so much more to the city than that. Hell, the Ave was crawling with zombie-like figures all the way back in the day when I was there. We've always had a homeless problem here. By and large it doesn't interfere with your life and there is a shit ton more than that to enjoy.

  • theLSkidtheLSkid Member Posts: 344

    theLSkid said:

    theLSkid said:

    theLSkid said:

    theLSkid said:

    NIL at Washington might be in a better place than most schools. This is the only reason I have any level of sanity.

    There’s only two programs in the country right now with long-term NIL plans for their athletes - UW and LSU (Hey Scotty!!)

    Most schools are pay for play, which UW kind of does, but the laws in our state makes that incredibly difficult. States like Texas and Florida have wrote into legislation that schools CAN work directly with NIL, including coaches. This really pissed off Saban as Alabama is far behind the turn for allowing that same thing - hence their Leerfield NIL Lounge and partnership, but they’re behind the curve.

    What LSU and UW are doing includes a trust fund that athletes can access after graduation/NFL, and that fund is invested during their time playing. The more time at the school, the more compound interest, the more money. Along with getting random sponsorship level deals.

    NIL is the name of the game now, Kalen seems like the type to want trust funds and finance guys to handle everything while he coaches ball, at Bama - you gotta embrace leerfield and the agents who are constantly in the lounge, the bag will always be talked about on the recruiting trail in the SEC, and with tOSU struggling to get a collective -Michigan is the only competition.

    Washington had one of the best NIL programs? Then why do we get our shit pushed in with HS recruits? We’re slightly better in the portal but not at the level of the top dogs.
    There’s a difference between pay for play and long term NIL.

    If you want the real reason - it’s because UW hasn’t had a national brand and nobody outside of the west coast wants to visit a city like seattle.

    No one wants to visit seattle?

    Hilarious

    I forget how retarded this place is sometimes

    Social media paints seattle in the same light as portland. I spent some time in the south over December and anyone who asked where I was from after I said “Washington” would say “not seattle right?”… I love seattle, but it’s not the same anymore. Go ahead and have lunch near pukes place, first time I’ve ever seen a homeless man jerking it in broad daylight on a sidewalk. At least go under a bridge.

    Your social media?

    Case closed
    I’ve never heard someone post 2020 Chaz say “I can’t wait to go to seattle!” But then again, people who live in Portland/San Fran/Salem/Spokane think it’s GREAT!

    Because it is. To quote the most beloved poster on the Tug, you gals are hysterical over the wart of homelessness that exists here. There is so much more to the city than that. Hell, the Ave was crawling with zombie-like figures all the way back in the day when I was there. By and large it doesn't interfere with your life and there is a shit ton more than that going on here.

    That’s not my point, like I said - I love seattle. Spokane is awful though there is absolutely nothing to do.

    The perception of people outside of the west coast is that the city is almost apocalyptic- the same as Detroit back in ‘13 and ‘14, now Detroit is “coming back” when it really hasn’t change much besides the street lights coming back on.



  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,260
    theLSkid said:

    theLSkid said:

    theLSkid said:

    theLSkid said:

    theLSkid said:

    NIL at Washington might be in a better place than most schools. This is the only reason I have any level of sanity.

    There’s only two programs in the country right now with long-term NIL plans for their athletes - UW and LSU (Hey Scotty!!)

    Most schools are pay for play, which UW kind of does, but the laws in our state makes that incredibly difficult. States like Texas and Florida have wrote into legislation that schools CAN work directly with NIL, including coaches. This really pissed off Saban as Alabama is far behind the turn for allowing that same thing - hence their Leerfield NIL Lounge and partnership, but they’re behind the curve.

    What LSU and UW are doing includes a trust fund that athletes can access after graduation/NFL, and that fund is invested during their time playing. The more time at the school, the more compound interest, the more money. Along with getting random sponsorship level deals.

    NIL is the name of the game now, Kalen seems like the type to want trust funds and finance guys to handle everything while he coaches ball, at Bama - you gotta embrace leerfield and the agents who are constantly in the lounge, the bag will always be talked about on the recruiting trail in the SEC, and with tOSU struggling to get a collective -Michigan is the only competition.

    Washington had one of the best NIL programs? Then why do we get our shit pushed in with HS recruits? We’re slightly better in the portal but not at the level of the top dogs.
    There’s a difference between pay for play and long term NIL.

    If you want the real reason - it’s because UW hasn’t had a national brand and nobody outside of the west coast wants to visit a city like seattle.

    No one wants to visit seattle?

    Hilarious

    I forget how retarded this place is sometimes

    Social media paints seattle in the same light as portland. I spent some time in the south over December and anyone who asked where I was from after I said “Washington” would say “not seattle right?”… I love seattle, but it’s not the same anymore. Go ahead and have lunch near pukes place, first time I’ve ever seen a homeless man jerking it in broad daylight on a sidewalk. At least go under a bridge.

    Your social media?

    Case closed
    I’ve never heard someone post 2020 Chaz say “I can’t wait to go to seattle!” But then again, people who live in Portland/San Fran/Salem/Spokane think it’s GREAT!

    Because it is. To quote the most beloved poster on the Tug, you gals are hysterical over the wart of homelessness that exists here. There is so much more to the city than that. Hell, the Ave was crawling with zombie-like figures all the way back in the day when I was there. By and large it doesn't interfere with your life and there is a shit ton more than that going on here.

    That’s not my point, like I said - I love seattle. Spokane is awful though there is absolutely nothing to do.

    The perception of people outside of the west coast is that the city is almost apocalyptic- the same as Detroit back in ‘13 and ‘14, now Detroit is “coming back” when it really hasn’t change much besides the street lights coming back on.



    Yeah, that may be true. I get it.
  • CFetters_Nacho_LoverCFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,407 Founders Club

    theLSkid said:

    theLSkid said:

    theLSkid said:

    theLSkid said:

    NIL at Washington might be in a better place than most schools. This is the only reason I have any level of sanity.

    There’s only two programs in the country right now with long-term NIL plans for their athletes - UW and LSU (Hey Scotty!!)

    Most schools are pay for play, which UW kind of does, but the laws in our state makes that incredibly difficult. States like Texas and Florida have wrote into legislation that schools CAN work directly with NIL, including coaches. This really pissed off Saban as Alabama is far behind the turn for allowing that same thing - hence their Leerfield NIL Lounge and partnership, but they’re behind the curve.

    What LSU and UW are doing includes a trust fund that athletes can access after graduation/NFL, and that fund is invested during their time playing. The more time at the school, the more compound interest, the more money. Along with getting random sponsorship level deals.

    NIL is the name of the game now, Kalen seems like the type to want trust funds and finance guys to handle everything while he coaches ball, at Bama - you gotta embrace leerfield and the agents who are constantly in the lounge, the bag will always be talked about on the recruiting trail in the SEC, and with tOSU struggling to get a collective -Michigan is the only competition.

    Washington had one of the best NIL programs? Then why do we get our shit pushed in with HS recruits? We’re slightly better in the portal but not at the level of the top dogs.
    There’s a difference between pay for play and long term NIL.

    If you want the real reason - it’s because UW hasn’t had a national brand and nobody outside of the west coast wants to visit a city like seattle.

    No one wants to visit seattle?

    Hilarious

    I forget how retarded this place is sometimes

    Social media paints seattle in the same light as portland. I spent some time in the south over December and anyone who asked where I was from after I said “Washington” would say “not seattle right?”… I love seattle, but it’s not the same anymore. Go ahead and have lunch near pukes place, first time I’ve ever seen a homeless man jerking it in broad daylight on a sidewalk. At least go under a bridge.

    Your social media?

    Case closed
    I’ve never heard someone post 2020 Chaz say “I can’t wait to go to seattle!” But then again, people who live in Portland/San Fran/Salem/Spokane think it’s GREAT!

    Because it is. To quote the most beloved poster in the Tug, you gals are hysterical over the wart of homelessness that exists here, and frankly half of the enthusiasm with which people shit on Seattle (pardon the pun) is fueled by political ideology and determinism. But there is so much more to the city than that. Hell, the Ave was crawling with zombie-like figures all the way back in the day when I was there. We've always had a homeless problem here. By and large it doesn't interfere with your life and there is a shit ton more than that to enjoy.

    The homeless problem in the 80s is nothing close to what it is now.
  • TheHBTheHB Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,062 Swaye's Wigwam
    The homeless problem two years ago was worse than it is now, too.
  • dirtysouwfdawgdirtysouwfdawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,115 Swaye's Wigwam
  • WoolleyDoogWoolleyDoog Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,614 Swaye's Wigwam
    If Deboer leaves can he take dirtysouwfdawg with him?
  • CanadawgCanadawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,743 Swaye's Wigwam

    If Deboer leaves can he take dirtysouwfdawg with him?

    Veto. I live for his weekly complaints about his family
Sign In or Register to comment.