Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Defending democracy update

2456

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,543 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Fan Duel must have convicted Trump on a neutral field

    HHusky fucking stupid

    The 14th Amendment isn't that long. You should do the google machine.
    We've been here before

    You have nothing to indicate Trump is guilty of insurrection. Nor does Colorado

    You're a fucking fascist

    Nothing has changed there
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,543 Founders Club
    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Fan Duel must have convicted Trump on a neutral field

    HHusky fucking stupid

    The 14th Amendment isn't that long. You should do the google machine.
    If only we had a way to determine if someone was an insurrectionist, and a special counsel that could have charged him with that.
    Jack "Off" Smith is trying to expedite the show trial so they stop Trump from running

    Supremes have that one too

    Totally not fascist though

    Imagine supporting that while claiming to want democracy
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,336
    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    The Constitution is the law of the land, surprisingly even in Colorado.

    So what jurisdiction does a state Supreme Court have over it? Why should I even need to ask a lawyer this question? Why haven’t you tried to perform a form tackle a moving train yet? Rhetorical questions. I’m sure you know what rhetorical means.
    States administer elections. You seem confused by the Colorado Supreme Court's claim to have jurisdiction over Colorado.
    Hey stupid. Try reading my post and responding to that. States don’t get to make determinations on violations of the US constitution. They can make up another reason to remove him if they like, but they don’t have any say on the federal constitution.
    Don't give up your day job.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,336
    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Fan Duel must have convicted Trump on a neutral field

    HHusky fucking stupid

    The 14th Amendment isn't that long. You should do the google machine.
    If only we had a way to determine if someone was an insurrectionist, and a special counsel that could have charged him with that.
    There was a five day trial, Madam.

    The trial court concluded, based on the evidence presented, that Daddy engaged in insurrection.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,260 Founders Club
    RaceBannon said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Fan Duel must have convicted Trump on a neutral field

    HHusky fucking stupid

    The 14th Amendment isn't that long. You should do the google machine.
    If only we had a way to determine if someone was an insurrectionist, and a special counsel that could have charged him with that.
    Jack "Off" Smith is trying to expedite the show trial so they stop Trump from running

    Supremes have that one too

    Totally not fascist though

    Imagine supporting that while claiming to want democracy
    Orwell taught us that Oceania would win in the end because the party deliberately avoided the mistake of creating martyrs. Don't kill your opponent while he still has hate in his heart.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,773
    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    The Constitution is the law of the land, surprisingly even in Colorado.

    So what jurisdiction does a state Supreme Court have over it? Why should I even need to ask a lawyer this question? Why haven’t you tried to perform a form tackle a moving train yet? Rhetorical questions. I’m sure you know what rhetorical means.
    States administer elections. You seem confused by the Colorado Supreme Court's claim to have jurisdiction over Colorado.
    Hey stupid. Try reading my post and responding to that. States don’t get to make determinations on violations of the US constitution. They can make up another reason to remove him if they like, but they don’t have any say on the federal constitution.
    Don't give up your day job.
    Great well-reasoned rebuttal as always ya fuckin hack
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,336
    edited December 2023
    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    The Constitution is the law of the land, surprisingly even in Colorado.

    So what jurisdiction does a state Supreme Court have over it? Why should I even need to ask a lawyer this question? Why haven’t you tried to perform a form tackle a moving train yet? Rhetorical questions. I’m sure you know what rhetorical means.
    States administer elections. You seem confused by the Colorado Supreme Court's claim to have jurisdiction over Colorado.
    Hey stupid. Try reading my post and responding to that. States don’t get to make determinations on violations of the US constitution. They can make up another reason to remove him if they like, but they don’t have any say on the federal constitution.
    Don't give up your day job.
    Great well-reasoned rebuttal as always ya fuckin hack
    Other than being totally wrong about what state courts do routinely, you really nailed the topic.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,773
    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    The Constitution is the law of the land, surprisingly even in Colorado.

    So what jurisdiction does a state Supreme Court have over it? Why should I even need to ask a lawyer this question? Why haven’t you tried to perform a form tackle a moving train yet? Rhetorical questions. I’m sure you know what rhetorical means.
    States administer elections. You seem confused by the Colorado Supreme Court's claim to have jurisdiction over Colorado.
    Hey stupid. Try reading my post and responding to that. States don’t get to make determinations on violations of the US constitution. They can make up another reason to remove him if they like, but they don’t have any say on the federal constitution.
    Don't give up your day job.
    Great well-reasoned rebuttal as always ya fuckin hack
    Other than being totally wrong about what state courts do routinely, you really nailed the topic.
    So school me Mr 2 degrees. Should be a slam dunk seeing as how I’m not a lawyer and I only read headlines. And don’t tell me your time is expensive because you’re in here all day. I’m all ears. Drop that knowledge fam.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,336
    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    The Constitution is the law of the land, surprisingly even in Colorado.

    So what jurisdiction does a state Supreme Court have over it? Why should I even need to ask a lawyer this question? Why haven’t you tried to perform a form tackle a moving train yet? Rhetorical questions. I’m sure you know what rhetorical means.
    States administer elections. You seem confused by the Colorado Supreme Court's claim to have jurisdiction over Colorado.
    Hey stupid. Try reading my post and responding to that. States don’t get to make determinations on violations of the US constitution. They can make up another reason to remove him if they like, but they don’t have any say on the federal constitution.
    Don't give up your day job.
    Great well-reasoned rebuttal as always ya fuckin hack
    Other than being totally wrong about what state courts do routinely, you really nailed the topic.
    So school me Mr 2 degrees. Should be a slam dunk seeing as how I’m not a lawyer and I only read headlines. And don’t tell me your time is expensive because you’re in here all day. I’m all ears. Drop that knowledge fam.
    State courts routinely rule whether the Federal Constitution has or has not been violated. There's really nothing more to be said about that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,773
    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    The Constitution is the law of the land, surprisingly even in Colorado.

    So what jurisdiction does a state Supreme Court have over it? Why should I even need to ask a lawyer this question? Why haven’t you tried to perform a form tackle a moving train yet? Rhetorical questions. I’m sure you know what rhetorical means.
    States administer elections. You seem confused by the Colorado Supreme Court's claim to have jurisdiction over Colorado.
    Hey stupid. Try reading my post and responding to that. States don’t get to make determinations on violations of the US constitution. They can make up another reason to remove him if they like, but they don’t have any say on the federal constitution.
    Don't give up your day job.
    Great well-reasoned rebuttal as always ya fuckin hack
    Other than being totally wrong about what state courts do routinely, you really nailed the topic.
    So school me Mr 2 degrees. Should be a slam dunk seeing as how I’m not a lawyer and I only read headlines. And don’t tell me your time is expensive because you’re in here all day. I’m all ears. Drop that knowledge fam.
    State courts routinely rule whether the Federal Constitution has or has not been violated. There's really nothing more to be said about that.
    Okay now explain how that precedent applies to this case using specifics.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter