Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Defending democracy update

RaceBannon
RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,794 Founders Club
in Tug Tavern
Colorado supreme courts decide little details like an actual conviction or a legitimate charge don't matter when it comes to denying a citizen a place on ballot. Democracy depends on kangaroo courts and banana republics. 3,2,1 for H to defend it

Haley was gaining a bit of ground - thanks for the assist. Biden is losing ground daily. Get ready for Trump II Fuck You

· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,897
    The Constitution is the law of the land, surprisingly even in Colorado.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,794 Founders Club
    Fan Duel must have convicted Trump on a neutral field

    HHusky fucking stupid
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,897
    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    The Constitution is the law of the land, surprisingly even in Colorado.

    So what jurisdiction does a state Supreme Court have over it? Why should I even need to ask a lawyer this question? Why haven’t you tried to perform a form tackle a moving train yet? Rhetorical questions. I’m sure you know what rhetorical means.
    States administer elections. You seem confused by the Colorado Supreme Court's claim to have jurisdiction over Colorado.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,897
    RaceBannon said:

    Fan Duel must have convicted Trump on a neutral field

    HHusky fucking stupid

    The 14th Amendment isn't that long. You should do the google machine.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,651 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Fan Duel must have convicted Trump on a neutral field

    HHusky fucking stupid

    The 14th Amendment isn't that long. You should do the google machine.
    If only we had a way to determine if someone was an insurrectionist, and a special counsel that could have charged him with that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    The Constitution is the law of the land, surprisingly even in Colorado.

    So what jurisdiction does a state Supreme Court have over it? Why should I even need to ask a lawyer this question? Why haven’t you tried to perform a form tackle a moving train yet? Rhetorical questions. I’m sure you know what rhetorical means.
    States administer elections. You seem confused by the Colorado Supreme Court's claim to have jurisdiction over Colorado.
    Hey stupid. Try reading my post and responding to that. States don’t get to make determinations on violations of the US constitution. They can make up another reason to remove him if they like, but they don’t have any say on the federal constitution.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    edited December 2023
    RaceBannon said:

    Fan Duel must have convicted Trump on a neutral field

    HHusky fucking stupid

    Quite honestly man Trump wins the election if everything is held at a neutral site.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,794 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Fan Duel must have convicted Trump on a neutral field

    HHusky fucking stupid

    The 14th Amendment isn't that long. You should do the google machine.
    We've been here before

    You have nothing to indicate Trump is guilty of insurrection. Nor does Colorado

    You're a fucking fascist

    Nothing has changed there
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,794 Founders Club
    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Fan Duel must have convicted Trump on a neutral field

    HHusky fucking stupid

    The 14th Amendment isn't that long. You should do the google machine.
    If only we had a way to determine if someone was an insurrectionist, and a special counsel that could have charged him with that.
    Jack "Off" Smith is trying to expedite the show trial so they stop Trump from running

    Supremes have that one too

    Totally not fascist though

    Imagine supporting that while claiming to want democracy
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,897
    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    The Constitution is the law of the land, surprisingly even in Colorado.

    So what jurisdiction does a state Supreme Court have over it? Why should I even need to ask a lawyer this question? Why haven’t you tried to perform a form tackle a moving train yet? Rhetorical questions. I’m sure you know what rhetorical means.
    States administer elections. You seem confused by the Colorado Supreme Court's claim to have jurisdiction over Colorado.
    Hey stupid. Try reading my post and responding to that. States don’t get to make determinations on violations of the US constitution. They can make up another reason to remove him if they like, but they don’t have any say on the federal constitution.
    Don't give up your day job.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,897
    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Fan Duel must have convicted Trump on a neutral field

    HHusky fucking stupid

    The 14th Amendment isn't that long. You should do the google machine.
    If only we had a way to determine if someone was an insurrectionist, and a special counsel that could have charged him with that.
    There was a five day trial, Madam.

    The trial court concluded, based on the evidence presented, that Daddy engaged in insurrection.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,651 Founders Club
    RaceBannon said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Fan Duel must have convicted Trump on a neutral field

    HHusky fucking stupid

    The 14th Amendment isn't that long. You should do the google machine.
    If only we had a way to determine if someone was an insurrectionist, and a special counsel that could have charged him with that.
    Jack "Off" Smith is trying to expedite the show trial so they stop Trump from running

    Supremes have that one too

    Totally not fascist though

    Imagine supporting that while claiming to want democracy
    Orwell taught us that Oceania would win in the end because the party deliberately avoided the mistake of creating martyrs. Don't kill your opponent while he still has hate in his heart.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    The Constitution is the law of the land, surprisingly even in Colorado.

    So what jurisdiction does a state Supreme Court have over it? Why should I even need to ask a lawyer this question? Why haven’t you tried to perform a form tackle a moving train yet? Rhetorical questions. I’m sure you know what rhetorical means.
    States administer elections. You seem confused by the Colorado Supreme Court's claim to have jurisdiction over Colorado.
    Hey stupid. Try reading my post and responding to that. States don’t get to make determinations on violations of the US constitution. They can make up another reason to remove him if they like, but they don’t have any say on the federal constitution.
    Don't give up your day job.
    Great well-reasoned rebuttal as always ya fuckin hack
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,897
    edited December 2023
    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    The Constitution is the law of the land, surprisingly even in Colorado.

    So what jurisdiction does a state Supreme Court have over it? Why should I even need to ask a lawyer this question? Why haven’t you tried to perform a form tackle a moving train yet? Rhetorical questions. I’m sure you know what rhetorical means.
    States administer elections. You seem confused by the Colorado Supreme Court's claim to have jurisdiction over Colorado.
    Hey stupid. Try reading my post and responding to that. States don’t get to make determinations on violations of the US constitution. They can make up another reason to remove him if they like, but they don’t have any say on the federal constitution.
    Don't give up your day job.
    Great well-reasoned rebuttal as always ya fuckin hack
    Other than being totally wrong about what state courts do routinely, you really nailed the topic.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    The Constitution is the law of the land, surprisingly even in Colorado.

    So what jurisdiction does a state Supreme Court have over it? Why should I even need to ask a lawyer this question? Why haven’t you tried to perform a form tackle a moving train yet? Rhetorical questions. I’m sure you know what rhetorical means.
    States administer elections. You seem confused by the Colorado Supreme Court's claim to have jurisdiction over Colorado.
    Hey stupid. Try reading my post and responding to that. States don’t get to make determinations on violations of the US constitution. They can make up another reason to remove him if they like, but they don’t have any say on the federal constitution.
    Don't give up your day job.
    Great well-reasoned rebuttal as always ya fuckin hack
    Other than being totally wrong about what state courts do routinely, you really nailed the topic.
    So school me Mr 2 degrees. Should be a slam dunk seeing as how I’m not a lawyer and I only read headlines. And don’t tell me your time is expensive because you’re in here all day. I’m all ears. Drop that knowledge fam.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,897
    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    The Constitution is the law of the land, surprisingly even in Colorado.

    So what jurisdiction does a state Supreme Court have over it? Why should I even need to ask a lawyer this question? Why haven’t you tried to perform a form tackle a moving train yet? Rhetorical questions. I’m sure you know what rhetorical means.
    States administer elections. You seem confused by the Colorado Supreme Court's claim to have jurisdiction over Colorado.
    Hey stupid. Try reading my post and responding to that. States don’t get to make determinations on violations of the US constitution. They can make up another reason to remove him if they like, but they don’t have any say on the federal constitution.
    Don't give up your day job.
    Great well-reasoned rebuttal as always ya fuckin hack
    Other than being totally wrong about what state courts do routinely, you really nailed the topic.
    So school me Mr 2 degrees. Should be a slam dunk seeing as how I’m not a lawyer and I only read headlines. And don’t tell me your time is expensive because you’re in here all day. I’m all ears. Drop that knowledge fam.
    State courts routinely rule whether the Federal Constitution has or has not been violated. There's really nothing more to be said about that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    The Constitution is the law of the land, surprisingly even in Colorado.

    So what jurisdiction does a state Supreme Court have over it? Why should I even need to ask a lawyer this question? Why haven’t you tried to perform a form tackle a moving train yet? Rhetorical questions. I’m sure you know what rhetorical means.
    States administer elections. You seem confused by the Colorado Supreme Court's claim to have jurisdiction over Colorado.
    Hey stupid. Try reading my post and responding to that. States don’t get to make determinations on violations of the US constitution. They can make up another reason to remove him if they like, but they don’t have any say on the federal constitution.
    Don't give up your day job.
    Great well-reasoned rebuttal as always ya fuckin hack
    Other than being totally wrong about what state courts do routinely, you really nailed the topic.
    So school me Mr 2 degrees. Should be a slam dunk seeing as how I’m not a lawyer and I only read headlines. And don’t tell me your time is expensive because you’re in here all day. I’m all ears. Drop that knowledge fam.
    State courts routinely rule whether the Federal Constitution has or has not been violated. There's really nothing more to be said about that.
    Okay now explain how that precedent applies to this case using specifics.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,897
    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    The Constitution is the law of the land, surprisingly even in Colorado.

    So what jurisdiction does a state Supreme Court have over it? Why should I even need to ask a lawyer this question? Why haven’t you tried to perform a form tackle a moving train yet? Rhetorical questions. I’m sure you know what rhetorical means.
    States administer elections. You seem confused by the Colorado Supreme Court's claim to have jurisdiction over Colorado.
    Hey stupid. Try reading my post and responding to that. States don’t get to make determinations on violations of the US constitution. They can make up another reason to remove him if they like, but they don’t have any say on the federal constitution.
    Don't give up your day job.
    Great well-reasoned rebuttal as always ya fuckin hack
    Other than being totally wrong about what state courts do routinely, you really nailed the topic.
    So school me Mr 2 degrees. Should be a slam dunk seeing as how I’m not a lawyer and I only read headlines. And don’t tell me your time is expensive because you’re in here all day. I’m all ears. Drop that knowledge fam.
    State courts routinely rule whether the Federal Constitution has or has not been violated. There's really nothing more to be said about that.
    Okay now explain how that precedent applies to this case using specifics.
    As I've already said, there was a trial. The trial court said Daddy did it. However, the trial court concluded that the insurrection clause doesn't apply to the President. There was an appeal. The Colorado Supreme Court upheld the trial court's finding of insurrection and reversed the trial court's legal conclusion that the insurrection clause does not apply to the President.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,651 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    The Constitution is the law of the land, surprisingly even in Colorado.

    So what jurisdiction does a state Supreme Court have over it? Why should I even need to ask a lawyer this question? Why haven’t you tried to perform a form tackle a moving train yet? Rhetorical questions. I’m sure you know what rhetorical means.
    States administer elections. You seem confused by the Colorado Supreme Court's claim to have jurisdiction over Colorado.
    Hey stupid. Try reading my post and responding to that. States don’t get to make determinations on violations of the US constitution. They can make up another reason to remove him if they like, but they don’t have any say on the federal constitution.
    Don't give up your day job.
    Great well-reasoned rebuttal as always ya fuckin hack
    Other than being totally wrong about what state courts do routinely, you really nailed the topic.
    So school me Mr 2 degrees. Should be a slam dunk seeing as how I’m not a lawyer and I only read headlines. And don’t tell me your time is expensive because you’re in here all day. I’m all ears. Drop that knowledge fam.
    State courts routinely rule whether the Federal Constitution has or has not been violated. There's really nothing more to be said about that.
    Okay now explain how that precedent applies to this case using specifics.
    As I've already said, there was a trial. The trial court said Daddy did it. However, the trial court concluded that the insurrection clause doesn't apply to the President. There was an appeal. The Colorado Supreme Court upheld the trial court's finding of insurrection and reversed the trial court's legal conclusion that the insurrection clause does not apply to the President.
    Now just imagine how bad the current president must be performing to be losing to an insurrectionist fascist in every poll.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    The Constitution is the law of the land, surprisingly even in Colorado.

    So what jurisdiction does a state Supreme Court have over it? Why should I even need to ask a lawyer this question? Why haven’t you tried to perform a form tackle a moving train yet? Rhetorical questions. I’m sure you know what rhetorical means.
    States administer elections. You seem confused by the Colorado Supreme Court's claim to have jurisdiction over Colorado.
    Hey stupid. Try reading my post and responding to that. States don’t get to make determinations on violations of the US constitution. They can make up another reason to remove him if they like, but they don’t have any say on the federal constitution.
    Don't give up your day job.
    Great well-reasoned rebuttal as always ya fuckin hack
    Other than being totally wrong about what state courts do routinely, you really nailed the topic.
    So school me Mr 2 degrees. Should be a slam dunk seeing as how I’m not a lawyer and I only read headlines. And don’t tell me your time is expensive because you’re in here all day. I’m all ears. Drop that knowledge fam.
    State courts routinely rule whether the Federal Constitution has or has not been violated. There's really nothing more to be said about that.
    Okay now explain how that precedent applies to this case using specifics.
    As I've already said, there was a trial. The trial court said Daddy did it. However, the trial court concluded that the insurrection clause doesn't apply to the President. There was an appeal. The Colorado Supreme Court upheld the trial court's finding of insurrection and reversed the trial court's legal conclusion that the insurrection clause does not apply to the President.
    And then? Come on stupid. It can’t be that hard to figure out where I’m going with this.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,715 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Fan Duel must have convicted Trump on a neutral field

    HHusky fucking stupid

    The 14th Amendment isn't that long. You should do the google machine.
    Just list what Trump did to overthrow the government.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sources
    Sources Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,332 Founders Club
    Ts&Ps for fascists with the incoming inevitable reversal
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,651 Founders Club
    @hhusky, this is misinformation right?


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,794 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Fan Duel must have convicted Trump on a neutral field

    HHusky fucking stupid

    The 14th Amendment isn't that long. You should do the google machine.
    If only we had a way to determine if someone was an insurrectionist, and a special counsel that could have charged him with that.
    There was a five day trial, Madam.

    The trial court concluded, based on the evidence presented, that Daddy engaged in insurrection.
    What trial?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Blueduck
    Blueduck Member Posts: 1,600
    edited December 2023
    RaceBannon said:

    HHusky said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Fan Duel must have convicted Trump on a neutral field

    HHusky fucking stupid

    The 14th Amendment isn't that long. You should do the google machine.
    If only we had a way to determine if someone was an insurrectionist, and a special counsel that could have charged him with that.
    There was a five day trial, Madam.

    The trial court concluded, based on the evidence presented, that Daddy engaged in insurrection.
    What trial?
    Im not sure what trial H is talking about but
    There was a trial, it was called impeachment #2 on the charges of citing an insurrection.
    he was acquitted in the senate.

    Any other trial beyond that, I believe, subjects Trump to double jeopardy... But that's obviously not going to stop the left.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 7,006 Standard Supporter
    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    The Constitution is the law of the land, surprisingly even in Colorado.

    So what jurisdiction does a state Supreme Court have over it? Why should I even need to ask a lawyer this question? Why haven’t you tried to perform a form tackle a moving train yet? Rhetorical questions. I’m sure you know what rhetorical means.
    States administer elections. You seem confused by the Colorado Supreme Court's claim to have jurisdiction over Colorado.
    Hey stupid. Try reading my post and responding to that. States don’t get to make determinations on violations of the US constitution. They can make up another reason to remove him if they like, but they don’t have any say on the federal constitution.
    Don't give up your day job.
    Great well-reasoned rebuttal as always ya fuckin hack
    Other than being totally wrong about what state courts do routinely, you really nailed the topic.
    So school me Mr 2 degrees. Should be a slam dunk seeing as how I’m not a lawyer and I only read headlines. And don’t tell me your time is expensive because you’re in here all day. I’m all ears. Drop that knowledge fam.
    State courts routinely rule whether the Federal Constitution has or has not been violated. There's really nothing more to be said about that.
    Okay now explain how that precedent applies to this case using specifics.
    As I've already said, there was a trial. The trial court said Daddy did it. However, the trial court concluded that the insurrection clause doesn't apply to the President. There was an appeal. The Colorado Supreme Court upheld the trial court's finding of insurrection and reversed the trial court's legal conclusion that the insurrection clause does not apply to the President.
    Now just imagine how bad the current president must be performing to be losing to an insurrectionist fascist in every poll.
    Bingo. hh and his leaders can't tell the truth. This was clearly to stop Trump from being President. A serious overstep and clearly politically based. Trump did nothing to encourage an insurrection and rats know it. Rat leaders all across the country encouraged looting, rioting, burning and violence by doing nothing to stop it and telling police to stand down. Compare the rat leadership to Trump and you get a very clear view of just how evil the left is.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Goduckies
    Goduckies Member Posts: 7,965 Standard Supporter
    Bendintheriver said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    PurpleJ said:

    HHusky said:

    The Constitution is the law of the land, surprisingly even in Colorado.

    So what jurisdiction does a state Supreme Court have over it? Why should I even need to ask a lawyer this question? Why haven’t you tried to perform a form tackle a moving train yet? Rhetorical questions. I’m sure you know what rhetorical means.
    States administer elections. You seem confused by the Colorado Supreme Court's claim to have jurisdiction over Colorado.
    Hey stupid. Try reading my post and responding to that. States don’t get to make determinations on violations of the US constitution. They can make up another reason to remove him if they like, but they don’t have any say on the federal constitution.
    Don't give up your day job.
    Great well-reasoned rebuttal as always ya fuckin hack
    Other than being totally wrong about what state courts do routinely, you really nailed the topic.
    So school me Mr 2 degrees. Should be a slam dunk seeing as how I’m not a lawyer and I only read headlines. And don’t tell me your time is expensive because you’re in here all day. I’m all ears. Drop that knowledge fam.
    State courts routinely rule whether the Federal Constitution has or has not been violated. There's really nothing more to be said about that.
    Okay now explain how that precedent applies to this case using specifics.
    As I've already said, there was a trial. The trial court said Daddy did it. However, the trial court concluded that the insurrection clause doesn't apply to the President. There was an appeal. The Colorado Supreme Court upheld the trial court's finding of insurrection and reversed the trial court's legal conclusion that the insurrection clause does not apply to the President.
    Now just imagine how bad the current president must be performing to be losing to an insurrectionist fascist in every poll.
    Bingo. hh and his leaders can't tell the truth. This was clearly to stop Trump from being President. A serious overstep and clearly politically based. Trump did nothing to encourage an insurrection and rats know it. Rat leaders all across the country encouraged looting, rioting, burning and violence by doing nothing to stop it and telling police to stand down. Compare the rat leadership to Trump and you get a very clear view of just how evil the left is.
    Oh he did he told them to march to congress.....





















    Peacefully....


    Democrats forget that part.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter