Surly Horns
Comments
-
yeah that site should have put them in Access Denied probably... but they do have a lot of undefeated seasons, so that has to count for something.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Penn state? Gtfo. Never have won shit. Opposite of a blue blood.gmo said:https://mikefarrellsports.com/featured/college-football-blue-blood-status-check
I think a pretty good breakdown on the subject.
Certified Blue Blood: STATUS - SECURE
Alabama, Ohio State, Oklahoma, Southern California
Certified Blue Blood: STATUS - NOT SECURE
Notre Dame, Michigan, Nebraska, Texas
NOT BLUE BLOOD - STATUS: BORDERLINE
Penn State, Tennessee, LSU, Georgia, Florida State
NOT BLUE BLOOD: STATUS - ACCESS DENIED
Clemson, Miami, Florida -
More like blue balls when they walk by an elementary school.UW_Doog_Bot said:
Penn state? Gtfo. Never have won shit. Opposite of a blue blood.gmo said:https://mikefarrellsports.com/featured/college-football-blue-blood-status-check
I think a pretty good breakdown on the subject.
Certified Blue Blood: STATUS - SECURE
Alabama, Ohio State, Oklahoma, Southern California
Certified Blue Blood: STATUS - NOT SECURE
Notre Dame, Michigan, Nebraska, Texas
NOT BLUE BLOOD - STATUS: BORDERLINE
Penn State, Tennessee, LSU, Georgia, Florida State
NOT BLUE BLOOD: STATUS - ACCESS DENIED
Clemson, Miami, Florida -
Texas is top 3 in all time wins
They are a blue blood because they dominated in the era when legends were made -
And they have ungodly amounts of money they’re throwing around
-
RaceBannon said:
Texas is top 3 in all time wins
They are a blue blood because they dominated in the era when legends were made
-
The best part of their sark-gobbling is the fact they have a thread with like 50+ pages about how shitty Sak and Kwai are.EsophagealFeces said:
They claim to allow free speech, but that’s bullshit. They’re very sensitive and quick to defend LGBTXYZ fags, and get very offended by language you see daily here. Also, if you dare disagree with them that Texas is the best at everything, or if you post anything disparaging about their booger-eating, waitress-fucking coach, they’ll downvote you until you literally get banned from the site. It’s a circle jerk of epic proportions filled with sandy-cunted incels.FireTheJanitor said:
How does the SurlyCunt secret society compare to the one you see here?SECDAWG said:
Man I know.EsophagealFeces said:
That’s putting it mildly, pod. They’re fucking retards who love the smell of their own fartsSECDAWG said:
https://www.surlyhorns.com/board/longduckdong said:
Link?LawDawg1 said:What a Dreck of a website and fanbase. They making Oregon looking fucking reasonable. Holy shitballs.
Get some.
They’re not real tolerable. JS
OU has a better board but TX hammers get their cunts hurt real quick. I kicked em in it a few times and out I went. Meh. Pussies.
I legitimately tried to talk football with them, and they’re so up their own asses that they took my confidence UW could win as trolling, and started downvoting me to oblivion, which gets you banned. Once I realized trying to talk football was pointless, I just started trying to earn my ban, which was embarrassingly easy. I can’t wait to beat those orange faggots on January 1st just so I can create a new account, tell them all I was right about their drugged-up loser coach, and beat my previous record of getting banned in 6 hours. -
Just read their prediction threads. Penix will throw a minimum of 3 picks or be injured by Sweat in the first quarter. Possibly both. Texas eleventy quadrillion UW -threeve. So many predictions of “pain”.
They definitely strike me as a fan base that has never lost a game, just ran out of time, wefs scwewed them, it’s a conspiracy etc. -
They sound like the Super Fans.
"Da Horns!"
-
The ref was excited for Texas to score. Im sure he was unbiased with callsDerekJohnson said:RaceBannon said:Texas is top 3 in all time wins
They are a blue blood because they dominated in the era when legends were made -
Like for all the ways they are morons who are failing to engage meaningfully and arguing "because we're better" - there are a lot of folks here whose arguments are much different, even if they're right.
