Dan Lanning's instant reactions to get another loss to Washington

DerekJohnson

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QteMbB1OSU8

SECDAWG

DerekJohnson said:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QteMbB1OSU8

First thing, and I hated it at GA, he passively aggressively smiles too much. And says, “right!”


Makes my stomach turn.

Now. On to yer video and review…

SECDAWG

1: Lanning is a young coach

2: DeBoer outcoached him. Again.

3: Nix is what he has been. Great against lesser defenses, not too good against GA or Bama types.

4: Lanning has a few steps to go to get to Kirby or Saban standards

5: Be glad he’s out

6: He’s young. Recruit and be passionate.

7: saw some saying he would be the next coach at Bama once Saban retires. No way.

RoadTrip

SECDAWG said:

1: Lanning is a young coach

2: DeBoer outcoached him. Again.

3: Nix is what he has been. Great against lesser defenses, not too good against GA or Bama types.

4: Lanning has a few steps to go to get to Kirby or Saban standards

5: Be glad he’s out

6: He’s young. Recruit and be passionate.

7: saw some saying he would be the next coach at Bama once Saban retires. No way.

The real Dawgs are ending the GA bulldogs' run. Book it. What $ you want? Call it.

MikeSeaver

He gets another year from me, no problem.

Completely bizarre season. Lost 2 games by a total of 6 points (to one team), won the rest by about 300.

You can see player improvement under this staff unlike under the last 3 guys.

Seaver is holding on Lanning.

haie

MikeSeaver said:

He gets another year from me, no problem.

Completely bizarre season. Lost 2 games by a total of 6 points (to one team), won the rest by about 300.

You can see player improvement under this staff unlike under the last 3 guys.

Seaver is holding on Lanning.

Getting Colorado instead of Arizona was huge for him.

Getting USC and Oregon State with nothing to play for and quitter head coaches was also huge.

HFNY

MikeSeaver said:

He gets another year from me, no problem.

Completely bizarre season. Lost 2 games by a total of 6 points (to one team), won the rest by about 300.

You can see player improvement under this staff unlike under the last 3 guys.

Seaver is holding on Lanning.

Lanning is a good coach who assembled a staff of amazing recruiters though they probably aren't the best position coaches.

Oregon's schedule wasn't very difficult as their non-conference schedule was headlined by Texas Tech (come from behind win against them too) and they caught Utah and Oregon State at their worst moments (Utah reeling from peak injuries and Oregon State coming off a very difficult loss to UW, missing two OL starters, and finding out about Smith leaving before the game so it was a funeral for them).

MikeSeaver

HFNY said:

MikeSeaver said:

He gets another year from me, no problem.

Completely bizarre season. Lost 2 games by a total of 6 points (to one team), won the rest by about 300.

You can see player improvement under this staff unlike under the last 3 guys.

Seaver is holding on Lanning.

Lanning is a good coach who assembled a staff of amazing recruiters though they probably aren't the best position coaches.

Oregon's schedule wasn't very difficult as their non-conference schedule was headlined by Texas Tech (come from behind win against them too) and they caught Utah and Oregon State at their worst moments (Utah reeling from peak injuries and Oregon State coming off a very difficult loss to UW, missing two OL starters, and finding out about Smith leaving before the game so it was a funeral for them).

That’s a lot of moral losses, by 4 touchdowns.

The above is no different than any other season as teams play out the schedule. I honestly don’t have any interest in the comic book writing that some of you do.

HFNY

MikeSeaver said:

HFNY said:

MikeSeaver said:

He gets another year from me, no problem.

Completely bizarre season. Lost 2 games by a total of 6 points (to one team), won the rest by about 300.

You can see player improvement under this staff unlike under the last 3 guys.

Seaver is holding on Lanning.

Lanning is a good coach who assembled a staff of amazing recruiters though they probably aren't the best position coaches.

Oregon's schedule wasn't very difficult as their non-conference schedule was headlined by Texas Tech (come from behind win against them too) and they caught Utah and Oregon State at their worst moments (Utah reeling from peak injuries and Oregon State coming off a very difficult loss to UW, missing two OL starters, and finding out about Smith leaving before the game so it was a funeral for them).

That’s a lot of moral losses, by 4 touchdowns.

The above is no different than any other season as teams play out the schedule. I honestly don’t have any interest in the comic book writing that some of you do.

You are shooting the messenger. You said it was a bizarre season and I pointed out why it wasn't that bizarre when analyzed properly. Another aspect is that Oregon missed Arizona on the schedule and they proved to be the 3rd best team in the conference. If Arizona and Oregon had played, Arizona would have had a decent shot of winning (2 of their 3 losses were in OT and their 3rd loss was to UW by 7 at home).

haie

MikeSeaver said:

HFNY said:

MikeSeaver said:

He gets another year from me, no problem.

Completely bizarre season. Lost 2 games by a total of 6 points (to one team), won the rest by about 300.

You can see player improvement under this staff unlike under the last 3 guys.

Seaver is holding on Lanning.

Lanning is a good coach who assembled a staff of amazing recruiters though they probably aren't the best position coaches.

Oregon's schedule wasn't very difficult as their non-conference schedule was headlined by Texas Tech (come from behind win against them too) and they caught Utah and Oregon State at their worst moments (Utah reeling from peak injuries and Oregon State coming off a very difficult loss to UW, missing two OL starters, and finding out about Smith leaving before the game so it was a funeral for them).

That’s a lot of moral losses, by 4 touchdowns.

The above is no different than any other season as teams play out the schedule. I honestly don’t have any interest in the comic book writing that some of you do.

I'm glad you're holding Mike.

My favorite attribute of Dan Lanning is that he can't win shit and yet will still be unfirable long enough for Phil's Alzheimers to set in.

MikeSeaver

HFNY said:

MikeSeaver said:

HFNY said:

MikeSeaver said:

He gets another year from me, no problem.

Completely bizarre season. Lost 2 games by a total of 6 points (to one team), won the rest by about 300.

You can see player improvement under this staff unlike under the last 3 guys.

Seaver is holding on Lanning.

Lanning is a good coach who assembled a staff of amazing recruiters though they probably aren't the best position coaches.

Oregon's schedule wasn't very difficult as their non-conference schedule was headlined by Texas Tech (come from behind win against them too) and they caught Utah and Oregon State at their worst moments (Utah reeling from peak injuries and Oregon State coming off a very difficult loss to UW, missing two OL starters, and finding out about Smith leaving before the game so it was a funeral for them).

That’s a lot of moral losses, by 4 touchdowns.

The above is no different than any other season as teams play out the schedule. I honestly don’t have any interest in the comic book writing that some of you do.

You are shooting the messenger. You said it was a bizarre season and I pointed out why it wasn't that bizarre when analyzed properly. Another aspect is that Oregon missed Arizona on the schedule and they proved to be the 3rd best team in the conference. If Arizona and Oregon had played, Arizona would have had a decent shot of winning (2 of their 3 losses were in OT and their 3rd loss was to UW by 7 at home).

You’re just cherry picking odds and ends to suit the comic book narrative.

This was no different than any other college football season in the way injuries and mythical letdowns happen.

HFNY

MikeSeaver said:

HFNY said:

MikeSeaver said:

HFNY said:

MikeSeaver said:

He gets another year from me, no problem.

Completely bizarre season. Lost 2 games by a total of 6 points (to one team), won the rest by about 300.

You can see player improvement under this staff unlike under the last 3 guys.

Seaver is holding on Lanning.

Lanning is a good coach who assembled a staff of amazing recruiters though they probably aren't the best position coaches.

Oregon's schedule wasn't very difficult as their non-conference schedule was headlined by Texas Tech (come from behind win against them too) and they caught Utah and Oregon State at their worst moments (Utah reeling from peak injuries and Oregon State coming off a very difficult loss to UW, missing two OL starters, and finding out about Smith leaving before the game so it was a funeral for them).

That’s a lot of moral losses, by 4 touchdowns.

The above is no different than any other season as teams play out the schedule. I honestly don’t have any interest in the comic book writing that some of you do.

You are shooting the messenger. You said it was a bizarre season and I pointed out why it wasn't that bizarre when analyzed properly. Another aspect is that Oregon missed Arizona on the schedule and they proved to be the 3rd best team in the conference. If Arizona and Oregon had played, Arizona would have had a decent shot of winning (2 of their 3 losses were in OT and their 3rd loss was to UW by 7 at home).

You’re just cherry picking odds and ends to suit the comic book narrative.

This was no different than any other college football season in the way injuries and mythical letdowns happen.

Guess we'll agree to disagree. @haie also pointed out how things fell favorably for Oregon in not getting Arizona (along with getting USC and Oregon State at opportune moments).

haie

HFNY said:

MikeSeaver said:

HFNY said:

MikeSeaver said:

HFNY said:

MikeSeaver said:

He gets another year from me, no problem.

Completely bizarre season. Lost 2 games by a total of 6 points (to one team), won the rest by about 300.

You can see player improvement under this staff unlike under the last 3 guys.

Seaver is holding on Lanning.

Lanning is a good coach who assembled a staff of amazing recruiters though they probably aren't the best position coaches.

Oregon's schedule wasn't very difficult as their non-conference schedule was headlined by Texas Tech (come from behind win against them too) and they caught Utah and Oregon State at their worst moments (Utah reeling from peak injuries and Oregon State coming off a very difficult loss to UW, missing two OL starters, and finding out about Smith leaving before the game so it was a funeral for them).

That’s a lot of moral losses, by 4 touchdowns.

The above is no different than any other season as teams play out the schedule. I honestly don’t have any interest in the comic book writing that some of you do.

You are shooting the messenger. You said it was a bizarre season and I pointed out why it wasn't that bizarre when analyzed properly. Another aspect is that Oregon missed Arizona on the schedule and they proved to be the 3rd best team in the conference. If Arizona and Oregon had played, Arizona would have had a decent shot of winning (2 of their 3 losses were in OT and their 3rd loss was to UW by 7 at home).

You’re just cherry picking odds and ends to suit the comic book narrative.

This was no different than any other college football season in the way injuries and mythical letdowns happen.

Guess we'll agree to disagree. @haie also pointed out how things fell favorably for Oregon in not getting Arizona (along with getting USC and Oregon State at opportune moments).

The USC-Utah-Beav stretch where they were ALL elimination games for them, plus the most greased up Coug Apple Cup of all time was the hardest test any team in this conference faced.

Not to mention they got Arizona and Oregon back to back, and the bye week meant nothing because Oregon got one too.

MikeSeaver

haie said:

HFNY said:

MikeSeaver said:

HFNY said:

MikeSeaver said:

HFNY said:

MikeSeaver said:

He gets another year from me, no problem.

Completely bizarre season. Lost 2 games by a total of 6 points (to one team), won the rest by about 300.

You can see player improvement under this staff unlike under the last 3 guys.

Seaver is holding on Lanning.

Lanning is a good coach who assembled a staff of amazing recruiters though they probably aren't the best position coaches.

Oregon's schedule wasn't very difficult as their non-conference schedule was headlined by Texas Tech (come from behind win against them too) and they caught Utah and Oregon State at their worst moments (Utah reeling from peak injuries and Oregon State coming off a very difficult loss to UW, missing two OL starters, and finding out about Smith leaving before the game so it was a funeral for them).

That’s a lot of moral losses, by 4 touchdowns.

The above is no different than any other season as teams play out the schedule. I honestly don’t have any interest in the comic book writing that some of you do.

You are shooting the messenger. You said it was a bizarre season and I pointed out why it wasn't that bizarre when analyzed properly. Another aspect is that Oregon missed Arizona on the schedule and they proved to be the 3rd best team in the conference. If Arizona and Oregon had played, Arizona would have had a decent shot of winning (2 of their 3 losses were in OT and their 3rd loss was to UW by 7 at home).

You’re just cherry picking odds and ends to suit the comic book narrative.

This was no different than any other college football season in the way injuries and mythical letdowns happen.

Guess we'll agree to disagree. @haie also pointed out how things fell favorably for Oregon in not getting Arizona (along with getting USC and Oregon State at opportune moments).

The USC-Utah-Beav stretch where they were ALL elimination games for them, plus the most greased up Coug Apple Cup of all time was the hardest test any team in this conference faced.

Not to mention they got Arizona and Oregon back to back, and the bye week meant nothing because Oregon got one too.

Footballsplaining from the King.

RaceBannon

I will admit this meant a lot because of what Oregon has done

Sure it's fun to talk shit but beating them twice this year is an accomplishment

And it's been a bizarre year for Washington in a lot of ways

They avoided every usual landmine and look like they're ready to compete this time in the playoffs

haie

MikeSeaver said:

haie said:

HFNY said:

MikeSeaver said:

HFNY said:

MikeSeaver said:

HFNY said:

MikeSeaver said:

He gets another year from me, no problem.

Completely bizarre season. Lost 2 games by a total of 6 points (to one team), won the rest by about 300.

You can see player improvement under this staff unlike under the last 3 guys.

Seaver is holding on Lanning.

Lanning is a good coach who assembled a staff of amazing recruiters though they probably aren't the best position coaches.

Oregon's schedule wasn't very difficult as their non-conference schedule was headlined by Texas Tech (come from behind win against them too) and they caught Utah and Oregon State at their worst moments (Utah reeling from peak injuries and Oregon State coming off a very difficult loss to UW, missing two OL starters, and finding out about Smith leaving before the game so it was a funeral for them).

That’s a lot of moral losses, by 4 touchdowns.

The above is no different than any other season as teams play out the schedule. I honestly don’t have any interest in the comic book writing that some of you do.

You are shooting the messenger. You said it was a bizarre season and I pointed out why it wasn't that bizarre when analyzed properly. Another aspect is that Oregon missed Arizona on the schedule and they proved to be the 3rd best team in the conference. If Arizona and Oregon had played, Arizona would have had a decent shot of winning (2 of their 3 losses were in OT and their 3rd loss was to UW by 7 at home).

You’re just cherry picking odds and ends to suit the comic book narrative.

This was no different than any other college football season in the way injuries and mythical letdowns happen.

Guess we'll agree to disagree. @haie also pointed out how things fell favorably for Oregon in not getting Arizona (along with getting USC and Oregon State at opportune moments).

The USC-Utah-Beav stretch where they were ALL elimination games for them, plus the most greased up Coug Apple Cup of all time was the hardest test any team in this conference faced.

Not to mention they got Arizona and Oregon back to back, and the bye week meant nothing because Oregon got one too.

Footballsplaining from the Duke of Washougal.

MikeSeaver

RaceBannon said:

I will admit this meant a lot because of what Oregon has done

Sure it's fun to talk shit but beating them twice this year is an accomplishment

And it's been a bizarre year for Washington in a lot of ways

They avoided every usual landmine and look like they're ready to compete this time in the playoffs

Stranger year for Washington than Oregon I’d say.

Kind of reminds me of 2001 Oregon who had a ton of close calls but had the underlying grit to get it done. But did hit one landmine.

FireCohen

RaceBannon said:

I will admit this meant a lot because of what Oregon has done

Sure it's fun to talk shit but beating them twice this year is an accomplishment

And it's been a bizarre year for Washington in a lot of ways

They avoided every usual landmine and look like they're ready to compete this time in the playoffs

our OL can probably hold up against anyone (@firehuff). That is all we need, with our WR room back and healthy. We should put up points on anyone

RaceBannon

MikeSeaver said:

He gets another year from me, no problem.

Completely bizarre season. Lost 2 games by a total of 6 points (to one team), won the rest by about 300.

You can see player improvement under this staff unlike under the last 3 guys.

Seaver is holding on Lanning.

They are a better team than they were under Cristobal (sorry @creepycoug ) except for against UW which is an oddity quite honestly

creepycoug

RaceBannon said:

MikeSeaver said:

He gets another year from me, no problem.

Completely bizarre season. Lost 2 games by a total of 6 points (to one team), won the rest by about 300.

You can see player improvement under this staff unlike under the last 3 guys.

Seaver is holding on Lanning.

They are a better team than they were under Cristobal (sorry @creepycoug ) except for against UW which is an oddity quite honestly

3-0, tanned, certainly not rested, but soon ready to go!

vs.

0-3, not tanned, certainly not rested, but soon ready to go!

Rose Bowl vs. Holiday Bowl

You? guys can't decided if it's winners win or these torturous "you got to play this team after a three-day weekend and steak and lobster on the flight" posts around here. But I have decided:

RaceBannon

Lanning wins the little ones like Bobby Bowden. Bobby eventually won some big ones

Mario loses games he shouldn't but won the ones he needed

Winners do win. Lanning has more. Doesn't mean Mario sucks