Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Dan Lanning's instant reactions to get another loss to Washington

«13

Comments

  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,020
    First thing, and I hated it at GA, he passively aggressively smiles too much. And says, “right!”


    Makes my stomach turn.

    Now. On to yer video and review…
  • SECDAWG
    SECDAWG Member Posts: 5,020
    1: Lanning is a young coach

    2: DeBoer outcoached him. Again.

    3: Nix is what he has been. Great against lesser defenses, not too good against GA or Bama types.

    4: Lanning has a few steps to go to get to Kirby or Saban standards

    5: Be glad he’s out

    6: He’s young. Recruit and be passionate.

    7: saw some saying he would be the next coach at Bama once Saban retires. No way.
  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,240 Founders Club
    SECDAWG said:

    1: Lanning is a young coach

    2: DeBoer outcoached him. Again.

    3: Nix is what he has been. Great against lesser defenses, not too good against GA or Bama types.

    4: Lanning has a few steps to go to get to Kirby or Saban standards

    5: Be glad he’s out

    6: He’s young. Recruit and be passionate.

    7: saw some saying he would be the next coach at Bama once Saban retires. No way.

    The real Dawgs are ending the GA bulldogs' run. Book it. What $ you want? Call it.
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    edited December 2023
    He gets another year from me, no problem.

    Completely bizarre season. Lost 2 games by a total of 6 points (to one team), won the rest by about 300.

    You can see player improvement under this staff unlike under the last 3 guys.

    Seaver is holding on Lanning.
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    HFNY said:

    He gets another year from me, no problem.

    Completely bizarre season. Lost 2 games by a total of 6 points (to one team), won the rest by about 300.

    You can see player improvement under this staff unlike under the last 3 guys.

    Seaver is holding on Lanning.

    Lanning is a good coach who assembled a staff of amazing recruiters though they probably aren't the best position coaches.

    Oregon's schedule wasn't very difficult as their non-conference schedule was headlined by Texas Tech (come from behind win against them too) and they caught Utah and Oregon State at their worst moments (Utah reeling from peak injuries and Oregon State coming off a very difficult loss to UW, missing two OL starters, and finding out about Smith leaving before the game so it was a funeral for them).
    That’s a lot of moral losses, by 4 touchdowns.

    The above is no different than any other season as teams play out the schedule. I honestly don’t have any interest in the comic book writing that some of you do.
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,502

    HFNY said:

    He gets another year from me, no problem.

    Completely bizarre season. Lost 2 games by a total of 6 points (to one team), won the rest by about 300.

    You can see player improvement under this staff unlike under the last 3 guys.

    Seaver is holding on Lanning.

    Lanning is a good coach who assembled a staff of amazing recruiters though they probably aren't the best position coaches.

    Oregon's schedule wasn't very difficult as their non-conference schedule was headlined by Texas Tech (come from behind win against them too) and they caught Utah and Oregon State at their worst moments (Utah reeling from peak injuries and Oregon State coming off a very difficult loss to UW, missing two OL starters, and finding out about Smith leaving before the game so it was a funeral for them).
    That’s a lot of moral losses, by 4 touchdowns.

    The above is no different than any other season as teams play out the schedule. I honestly don’t have any interest in the comic book writing that some of you do.
    You are shooting the messenger. You said it was a bizarre season and I pointed out why it wasn't that bizarre when analyzed properly. Another aspect is that Oregon missed Arizona on the schedule and they proved to be the 3rd best team in the conference. If Arizona and Oregon had played, Arizona would have had a decent shot of winning (2 of their 3 losses were in OT and their 3rd loss was to UW by 7 at home).
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    HFNY said:

    HFNY said:

    He gets another year from me, no problem.

    Completely bizarre season. Lost 2 games by a total of 6 points (to one team), won the rest by about 300.

    You can see player improvement under this staff unlike under the last 3 guys.

    Seaver is holding on Lanning.

    Lanning is a good coach who assembled a staff of amazing recruiters though they probably aren't the best position coaches.

    Oregon's schedule wasn't very difficult as their non-conference schedule was headlined by Texas Tech (come from behind win against them too) and they caught Utah and Oregon State at their worst moments (Utah reeling from peak injuries and Oregon State coming off a very difficult loss to UW, missing two OL starters, and finding out about Smith leaving before the game so it was a funeral for them).
    That’s a lot of moral losses, by 4 touchdowns.

    The above is no different than any other season as teams play out the schedule. I honestly don’t have any interest in the comic book writing that some of you do.
    You are shooting the messenger. You said it was a bizarre season and I pointed out why it wasn't that bizarre when analyzed properly. Another aspect is that Oregon missed Arizona on the schedule and they proved to be the 3rd best team in the conference. If Arizona and Oregon had played, Arizona would have had a decent shot of winning (2 of their 3 losses were in OT and their 3rd loss was to UW by 7 at home).
    You’re just cherry picking odds and ends to suit the comic book narrative.

    This was no different than any other college football season in the way injuries and mythical letdowns happen.