LA Times columnist Bill Plaschke's criticism of Jen Cohen
Comments
-
I think that is the larger problem at usc. They are a bunch of frontrunning soft losers. They can literally still win the conference if they win out but it is like they have given up already. They weren't going to the playoff even if they beat uw.HFNY said:
I just don't see USC beating Oregon on the road. The offenses are comparable but USC's D isn't very good and they've lost 3 of their last 4. Junior Seau and Ronnie Lott ain't coming through the door anytime soon.dannarc said:SC has two conference losses, if they can beat Oregon they should be in drivers seat for #2 spot and another shot at UW. TSIO as far as playoffs for them but there is still a conference championship and alot of foosball left.
The trooj mindset is soft af
-
One sucka fired, LA Times front page.
-
-
Is this out there? Link?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Caple did a great job of getting the text messages between Cohen and Cauce which prove @FireCohen’s point. Jen flat out told Cauce that she wasn’t gonna fire Lake if he showed remorse (my word).FireCohen said:
We got lucky, lake decided to hit a student. That opened the can of worms that got him sacked. She would have kept himPurpleTickler said:The P12CG Oregon debacle was wack. Not firing Hopkins was wack. Letting Lake hire John Donovan was probably the worst of all.
But moving on from Lake quickly and hiring DeBoer, plus getting to the B1G are all good things.
Idk… she’s mediocre. Not worth getting fired up about IMO. They’re stuck with Riley and that contract, but getting Grinch out of there is good for USC. I don’t see how she deserves criticism for what’s happening at USC right now.
She was over her head at UW and thought she’d skate by with Riley already in place at USC but now she’s getting into dangerous territory if Riley wants to stay but can’t figure out the defensive side.
All that being said, she sucks so I hope she gets a ton of criticism and grief.
-
Oregon might win something like 77-49. The best thing to come out of that game for UW will be that Irving and James are going to rack up some mileage on their legs.HFNY said:
I just don't see USC beating Oregon on the road. The offenses are comparable but USC's D isn't very good and they've lost 3 of their last 4. Junior Seau and Ronnie Lott ain't coming through the door anytime soon.dannarc said:SC has two conference losses, if they can beat Oregon they should be in drivers seat for #2 spot and another shot at UW. TSIO as far as playoffs for them but there is still a conference championship and alot of foosball left.
-
What's stopping you?JoeEDangerously said:
I wish I could do a whole podcast on how big of cowards they areFireCohen said:Wish Seattle reporters had fucking standards like the USC reporters.
-
How do you f up your job in the first 30 days Jen?DerekJohnson said:It occurred to me this morning that while in Seattle, Cohen never faced any direct criticism or challenge from mainstream media. Zero. She only received it from Hardcore Husky.
Now she's catching it from the Los Angeles Times no less -
@FireCohenFire_Marshall_Bill said:
What's stopping you?JoeEDangerously said:
I wish I could do a whole podcast on how big of cowards they areFireCohen said:Wish Seattle reporters had fucking standards like the USC reporters.
-
I would love to get my French tips done by Caleb. 💅💄🏈Bob_C said: -
The only chance USC has (besides Lanning screwing things up and some lucky bounces) is doing whatever they can to stop the run. It seemed like their secondary is pretty talented but had communication issues so if they can shore that up with a change in coaching, they might rise to the occasion.chuck said:
Oregon might win something like 77-49. The best thing to come out of that game for UW will be that Irving and James are going to rack up some mileage on their legs.HFNY said:
I just don't see USC beating Oregon on the road. The offenses are comparable but USC's D isn't very good and they've lost 3 of their last 4. Junior Seau and Ronnie Lott ain't coming through the door anytime soon.dannarc said:SC has two conference losses, if they can beat Oregon they should be in drivers seat for #2 spot and another shot at UW. TSIO as far as playoffs for them but there is still a conference championship and alot of foosball left.
I don't know if that means running a true 3-3-5 or even a 3-4 at times but their light front is a disaster. -
Depending on their depth, USC should run a 5-2-4. I don't think USC prepared for the run against UW, which is why it gashed them so badly. For Oregon, they should be expecting it and preparing their DLHFNY said:
The only chance USC has (besides Lanning screwing things up and some lucky bounces) is doing whatever they can to stop the run. It seemed like their secondary is pretty talented but had communication issues so if they can shore that up with a change in coaching, they might rise to the occasion.chuck said:
Oregon might win something like 77-49. The best thing to come out of that game for UW will be that Irving and James are going to rack up some mileage on their legs.HFNY said:
I just don't see USC beating Oregon on the road. The offenses are comparable but USC's D isn't very good and they've lost 3 of their last 4. Junior Seau and Ronnie Lott ain't coming through the door anytime soon.dannarc said:SC has two conference losses, if they can beat Oregon they should be in drivers seat for #2 spot and another shot at UW. TSIO as far as playoffs for them but there is still a conference championship and alot of foosball left.
I don't know if that means running a true 3-3-5 or even a 3-4 at times but their light front is a disaster. -
On the GIF rewatch, I was shocked how many times there was no one for our° to block.whatshouldicareabout said:
Depending on their depth, USC should run a 5-2-4. I don't think USC prepared for the run against UW, which is why it gashed them so badly. For Oregon, they should be expecting it and preparing their DLHFNY said:
The only chance USC has (besides Lanning screwing things up and some lucky bounces) is doing whatever they can to stop the run. It seemed like their secondary is pretty talented but had communication issues so if they can shore that up with a change in coaching, they might rise to the occasion.chuck said:
Oregon might win something like 77-49. The best thing to come out of that game for UW will be that Irving and James are going to rack up some mileage on their legs.HFNY said:
I just don't see USC beating Oregon on the road. The offenses are comparable but USC's D isn't very good and they've lost 3 of their last 4. Junior Seau and Ronnie Lott ain't coming through the door anytime soon.dannarc said:SC has two conference losses, if they can beat Oregon they should be in drivers seat for #2 spot and another shot at UW. TSIO as far as playoffs for them but there is still a conference championship and alot of foosball left.
I don't know if that means running a true 3-3-5 or even a 3-4 at times but their light front is a disaster. -
I tend to agree. Specific schemes aside, if your defense sucks and is going to give up many touchdown drives and you have a really good offense of your own, then just be aggressive and try and make something happen. Just need a couple of plays to go your way to have a chance as we saw last weekend. Don't be scared about giving up big plays and instead just get gashed 8 play drives that end with the same result.whatshouldicareabout said:
Depending on their depth, USC should run a 5-2-4. I don't think USC prepared for the run against UW, which is why it gashed them so badly. For Oregon, they should be expecting it and preparing their DLHFNY said:
The only chance USC has (besides Lanning screwing things up and some lucky bounces) is doing whatever they can to stop the run. It seemed like their secondary is pretty talented but had communication issues so if they can shore that up with a change in coaching, they might rise to the occasion.chuck said:
Oregon might win something like 77-49. The best thing to come out of that game for UW will be that Irving and James are going to rack up some mileage on their legs.HFNY said:
I just don't see USC beating Oregon on the road. The offenses are comparable but USC's D isn't very good and they've lost 3 of their last 4. Junior Seau and Ronnie Lott ain't coming through the door anytime soon.dannarc said:SC has two conference losses, if they can beat Oregon they should be in drivers seat for #2 spot and another shot at UW. TSIO as far as playoffs for them but there is still a conference championship and alot of foosball left.
I don't know if that means running a true 3-3-5 or even a 3-4 at times but their light front is a disaster. -
It won’t matter. Oregon in a boat race.HFNY said:
The only chance USC has (besides Lanning screwing things up and some lucky bounces) is doing whatever they can to stop the run. It seemed like their secondary is pretty talented but had communication issues so if they can shore that up with a change in coaching, they might rise to the occasion.chuck said:
Oregon might win something like 77-49. The best thing to come out of that game for UW will be that Irving and James are going to rack up some mileage on their legs.HFNY said:
I just don't see USC beating Oregon on the road. The offenses are comparable but USC's D isn't very good and they've lost 3 of their last 4. Junior Seau and Ronnie Lott ain't coming through the door anytime soon.dannarc said:SC has two conference losses, if they can beat Oregon they should be in drivers seat for #2 spot and another shot at UW. TSIO as far as playoffs for them but there is still a conference championship and alot of foosball left.
I don't know if that means running a true 3-3-5 or even a 3-4 at times but their light front is a disaster. -
I don't think they have the talent and depth to consistently run with 5 DL.Bob_C said:
I tend to agree. Specific schemes aside, if your defense sucks and is going to give up many touchdown drives and you have a really good offense of your own, then just be aggressive and try and make something happen. Just need a couple of plays to go your way to have a chance as we saw last weekend. Don't be scared about giving up big plays and instead just get gashed 8 play drives that end with the same result.whatshouldicareabout said:
Depending on their depth, USC should run a 5-2-4. I don't think USC prepared for the run against UW, which is why it gashed them so badly. For Oregon, they should be expecting it and preparing their DLHFNY said:
The only chance USC has (besides Lanning screwing things up and some lucky bounces) is doing whatever they can to stop the run. It seemed like their secondary is pretty talented but had communication issues so if they can shore that up with a change in coaching, they might rise to the occasion.chuck said:
Oregon might win something like 77-49. The best thing to come out of that game for UW will be that Irving and James are going to rack up some mileage on their legs.HFNY said:
I just don't see USC beating Oregon on the road. The offenses are comparable but USC's D isn't very good and they've lost 3 of their last 4. Junior Seau and Ronnie Lott ain't coming through the door anytime soon.dannarc said:SC has two conference losses, if they can beat Oregon they should be in drivers seat for #2 spot and another shot at UW. TSIO as far as playoffs for them but there is still a conference championship and alot of foosball left.
I don't know if that means running a true 3-3-5 or even a 3-4 at times but their light front is a disaster.
They can't change their roster at their point and it feels like rearranging deckchairs on the Titanic. -
I was talking more general aggressiveness. A couple of key sacks and maybe a fumble or a pick could be enough here. Sitting back with three lineman and 8 cover guys is just gonna get the slowly carved up all game. Go down swinging on d, they are scoring 40 regardless.HFNY said:
I don't think they have the talent and depth to consistently run with 5 DL.Bob_C said:
I tend to agree. Specific schemes aside, if your defense sucks and is going to give up many touchdown drives and you have a really good offense of your own, then just be aggressive and try and make something happen. Just need a couple of plays to go your way to have a chance as we saw last weekend. Don't be scared about giving up big plays and instead just get gashed 8 play drives that end with the same result.whatshouldicareabout said:
Depending on their depth, USC should run a 5-2-4. I don't think USC prepared for the run against UW, which is why it gashed them so badly. For Oregon, they should be expecting it and preparing their DLHFNY said:
The only chance USC has (besides Lanning screwing things up and some lucky bounces) is doing whatever they can to stop the run. It seemed like their secondary is pretty talented but had communication issues so if they can shore that up with a change in coaching, they might rise to the occasion.chuck said:
Oregon might win something like 77-49. The best thing to come out of that game for UW will be that Irving and James are going to rack up some mileage on their legs.HFNY said:
I just don't see USC beating Oregon on the road. The offenses are comparable but USC's D isn't very good and they've lost 3 of their last 4. Junior Seau and Ronnie Lott ain't coming through the door anytime soon.dannarc said:SC has two conference losses, if they can beat Oregon they should be in drivers seat for #2 spot and another shot at UW. TSIO as far as playoffs for them but there is still a conference championship and alot of foosball left.
I don't know if that means running a true 3-3-5 or even a 3-4 at times but their light front is a disaster.
They can't change their roster at their point and it feels like rearranging deckchairs on the Titanic. -
how is it “over donating” if you get paid to bust a nut?RTD said:SpermCenter's probably the guy who fathered 500-plus children by over donating at the bank. Gettin off to watching dog cuddle videos, Netflix and Chill.
-
UW D made two plays on SC and that was the difference.Bob_C said:
I tend to agree. Specific schemes aside, if your defense sucks and is going to give up many touchdown drives and you have a really good offense of your own, then just be aggressive and try and make something happen. Just need a couple of plays to go your way to have a chance as we saw last weekend. Don't be scared about giving up big plays and instead just get gashed 8 play drives that end with the same result.whatshouldicareabout said:
Depending on their depth, USC should run a 5-2-4. I don't think USC prepared for the run against UW, which is why it gashed them so badly. For Oregon, they should be expecting it and preparing their DLHFNY said:
The only chance USC has (besides Lanning screwing things up and some lucky bounces) is doing whatever they can to stop the run. It seemed like their secondary is pretty talented but had communication issues so if they can shore that up with a change in coaching, they might rise to the occasion.chuck said:
Oregon might win something like 77-49. The best thing to come out of that game for UW will be that Irving and James are going to rack up some mileage on their legs.HFNY said:
I just don't see USC beating Oregon on the road. The offenses are comparable but USC's D isn't very good and they've lost 3 of their last 4. Junior Seau and Ronnie Lott ain't coming through the door anytime soon.dannarc said:SC has two conference losses, if they can beat Oregon they should be in drivers seat for #2 spot and another shot at UW. TSIO as far as playoffs for them but there is still a conference championship and alot of foosball left.
I don't know if that means running a true 3-3-5 or even a 3-4 at times but their light front is a disaster.
Only way SC can win is to create as many turns (possessions) as possible and try to outscore the Ducks, so I'd also go boom/bust with blitzes, stack los, etc and try to get a turnover, sack, holding penalty etc.
If they allow UO to control top they will lose fugly -
Either way this will be an impressive win for oregon. It will also show that uw's win over usc was not very impressive.godawgst said:
UW D made two plays on SC and that was the difference.Bob_C said:
I tend to agree. Specific schemes aside, if your defense sucks and is going to give up many touchdown drives and you have a really good offense of your own, then just be aggressive and try and make something happen. Just need a couple of plays to go your way to have a chance as we saw last weekend. Don't be scared about giving up big plays and instead just get gashed 8 play drives that end with the same result.whatshouldicareabout said:
Depending on their depth, USC should run a 5-2-4. I don't think USC prepared for the run against UW, which is why it gashed them so badly. For Oregon, they should be expecting it and preparing their DLHFNY said:
The only chance USC has (besides Lanning screwing things up and some lucky bounces) is doing whatever they can to stop the run. It seemed like their secondary is pretty talented but had communication issues so if they can shore that up with a change in coaching, they might rise to the occasion.chuck said:
Oregon might win something like 77-49. The best thing to come out of that game for UW will be that Irving and James are going to rack up some mileage on their legs.HFNY said:
I just don't see USC beating Oregon on the road. The offenses are comparable but USC's D isn't very good and they've lost 3 of their last 4. Junior Seau and Ronnie Lott ain't coming through the door anytime soon.dannarc said:SC has two conference losses, if they can beat Oregon they should be in drivers seat for #2 spot and another shot at UW. TSIO as far as playoffs for them but there is still a conference championship and alot of foosball left.
I don't know if that means running a true 3-3-5 or even a 3-4 at times but their light front is a disaster.
Only way SC can win is to create as many turns (possessions) as possible and try to outscore the Ducks, so I'd also go boom/bust with blitzes, stack los, etc and try to get a turnover, sack, holding penalty etc.
If they allow UO to control top they will lose fugly
-
If only you were a member of a Husky Football podcast that could do an episode on it.JoeEDangerously said:
I wish I could do a whole podcast on how big of cowards they areFireCohen said:Wish Seattle reporters had fucking standards like the USC reporters.
-
Just the tipsDoog_de_Jour said:
I would love to get my French tips done by Caleb. 💅💄🏈Bob_C said: -
Komo buttfucker. Can’t have a link when it was 2 years ago.Canadawg said:
Is this out there? Link?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Caple did a great job of getting the text messages between Cohen and Cauce which prove @FireCohen’s point. Jen flat out told Cauce that she wasn’t gonna fire Lake if he showed remorse (my word).FireCohen said:
We got lucky, lake decided to hit a student. That opened the can of worms that got him sacked. She would have kept himPurpleTickler said:The P12CG Oregon debacle was wack. Not firing Hopkins was wack. Letting Lake hire John Donovan was probably the worst of all.
But moving on from Lake quickly and hiring DeBoer, plus getting to the B1G are all good things.
Idk… she’s mediocre. Not worth getting fired up about IMO. They’re stuck with Riley and that contract, but getting Grinch out of there is good for USC. I don’t see how she deserves criticism for what’s happening at USC right now.
She was over her head at UW and thought she’d skate by with Riley already in place at USC but now she’s getting into dangerous territory if Riley wants to stay but can’t figure out the defensive side.
All that being said, she sucks so I hope she gets a ton of criticism and grief.
It was in the Athletic. -
I read the same article. It is legit. Too lazy to look it up tho.Canadawg said:
Is this out there? Link?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Caple did a great job of getting the text messages between Cohen and Cauce which prove @FireCohen’s point. Jen flat out told Cauce that she wasn’t gonna fire Lake if he showed remorse (my word).FireCohen said:
We got lucky, lake decided to hit a student. That opened the can of worms that got him sacked. She would have kept himPurpleTickler said:The P12CG Oregon debacle was wack. Not firing Hopkins was wack. Letting Lake hire John Donovan was probably the worst of all.
But moving on from Lake quickly and hiring DeBoer, plus getting to the B1G are all good things.
Idk… she’s mediocre. Not worth getting fired up about IMO. They’re stuck with Riley and that contract, but getting Grinch out of there is good for USC. I don’t see how she deserves criticism for what’s happening at USC right now.
She was over her head at UW and thought she’d skate by with Riley already in place at USC but now she’s getting into dangerous territory if Riley wants to stay but can’t figure out the defensive side.
All that being said, she sucks so I hope she gets a ton of criticism and grief. -
It really is a shame that we? Lost to Oregon this year.AtomicDawg said:
Either way this will be an impressive win for oregon. It will also show that uw's win over usc was not very impressive.godawgst said:
UW D made two plays on SC and that was the difference.Bob_C said:
I tend to agree. Specific schemes aside, if your defense sucks and is going to give up many touchdown drives and you have a really good offense of your own, then just be aggressive and try and make something happen. Just need a couple of plays to go your way to have a chance as we saw last weekend. Don't be scared about giving up big plays and instead just get gashed 8 play drives that end with the same result.whatshouldicareabout said:
Depending on their depth, USC should run a 5-2-4. I don't think USC prepared for the run against UW, which is why it gashed them so badly. For Oregon, they should be expecting it and preparing their DLHFNY said:
The only chance USC has (besides Lanning screwing things up and some lucky bounces) is doing whatever they can to stop the run. It seemed like their secondary is pretty talented but had communication issues so if they can shore that up with a change in coaching, they might rise to the occasion.chuck said:
Oregon might win something like 77-49. The best thing to come out of that game for UW will be that Irving and James are going to rack up some mileage on their legs.HFNY said:
I just don't see USC beating Oregon on the road. The offenses are comparable but USC's D isn't very good and they've lost 3 of their last 4. Junior Seau and Ronnie Lott ain't coming through the door anytime soon.dannarc said:SC has two conference losses, if they can beat Oregon they should be in drivers seat for #2 spot and another shot at UW. TSIO as far as playoffs for them but there is still a conference championship and alot of foosball left.
I don't know if that means running a true 3-3-5 or even a 3-4 at times but their light front is a disaster.
Only way SC can win is to create as many turns (possessions) as possible and try to outscore the Ducks, so I'd also go boom/bust with blitzes, stack los, etc and try to get a turnover, sack, holding penalty etc.
If they allow UO to control top they will lose fugly
