Does any Pac-12 team make the playoff???

Mosster47

Overall Oregon, UCLA, and Stanford could give anyone in the country a go. ASU, UW, USC, and OS can and will beat some of those three mentioned before. WAZZU and UA are well coached and will only get better. Utah will win at least one game they shouldn't. Cal and Colorado can't really be any worse.

The SEC gets extra credit for a scenario like this. The PAC-12 is called weak because of this.

It's very possible the conference champion could have two losses, especially with Oregon playing Sparty and UCLA facing Texas in the OOC. Does a panel with Condi on it give the PAC credit for overall strength? Almost no chance anyone goes unbeaten out west this year.

TierbsHsotBoobs

Overall Oregon, UCLA, and Stanford could give anyone in the country a go.

I stopped reading here.

oregonblitzkrieg

It's hard to say when you've got shitbag programs like FSU and Ohio State who play nobodies all season long strolling into season's end with no losses.

TierbsHsotBoobs

oregonblitzkrieg said:

It's hard to say when you've got shitbag programs like FSU and Ohio State who play nobodies all season long strolling into season's end with no losses.

The 2010 Ducks played two teams that finished in the top 25: Stanford and Auburn.

Hope this helps.

Mosster47

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Overall Oregon, UCLA, and Stanford could give anyone in the country a go.

I stopped reading here.

So the three teams that will be ranked in the Top 10 aren't nationally competitive? UW won't be any better than Sark left them this year.

TierbsHsotBoobs

Mosster47 said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Overall Oregon, UCLA, and Stanford could give anyone in the country a go.

I stopped reading here.

So the three teams that will be ranked in the Top 10 aren't nationally competitive? UW won't be any better than Sark left them this year.

One of those three teams will shit the bed and the other two will be fringe playoff contenders.


Lather, rinse, repeat.

oregonblitzkrieg

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

It's hard to say when you've got shitbag programs like FSU and Ohio State who play nobodies all season long strolling into season's end with no losses.

The 2010 Ducks played two teams that finished in the top 25: Stanford and Auburn.

Hope this helps.

Sorry man, but you can't compare the mediocre PAC 12 teams in the 2010 season to the teams in the ACC, who are always shit, and which the current Cal team could regularly manhandle.

TierbsHsotBoobs

oregonblitzkrieg said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

It's hard to say when you've got shitbag programs like FSU and Ohio State who play nobodies all season long strolling into season's end with no losses.

The 2010 Ducks played two teams that finished in the top 25: Stanford and Auburn.

Hope this helps.

Sorry man, but you can't compare the mediocre PAC 12 teams in the 2010 season to the teams in the ACC, who are always shit, and which the current Cal team could regularly manhandle.

You still have Cal ranked way too high.

greenblood

oregonblitzkrieg said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

It's hard to say when you've got shitbag programs like FSU and Ohio State who play nobodies all season long strolling into season's end with no losses.

The 2010 Ducks played two teams that finished in the top 25: Stanford and Auburn.

Hope this helps.

Sorry man, but you can't compare the mediocre PAC 12 teams in the 2010 season to the teams in the ACC, who are always shit, and which the current Cal team could regularly manhandle.

Colorado and Cal would be the worst two teams in EVERY Big 5 conference.

greenblood

A one loss Oregon, Stanford, USC, or UCLA will make the playoff.

greenblood

oregonblitzkrieg said:

It's hard to say when you've got shitbag programs like FSU and Ohio State who play nobodies all season long strolling into season's end with no losses.

FSU would bare pickle every team in the Pac 12 last year and not leave a number, just an autographed photo of Winston next to their pillows. I'll give you Ohio State, but even if they had beaten MSU last year, who exposed them, wouldn't have made the top 2. Based on the current state of the Big 10, a one loss Pac 12, Big 12, and ACC champ will beat out an undefeated Ohio State. Also, a 2 loss SEC champ and the one loss runner up beats them out as well. The Big 10 is that bad right now. An undefeated Big 10 might not make the top 4 is what I'm saying.

TierbsHsotBoobs

greenblood said:

A one loss Oregon, Stanford, USC, or UCLA will make the playoff.

In other words, there won't be a Pac-12 team in the playoff.

dnc

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

greenblood said:

A one loss Oregon, Stanford, USC, or UCLA will make the playoff.

In other words, there won't be a Pac-12 team in the playoff.

Defending Pac12 champion Notre Dame might have a chance.

TierbsHsotBoobs

dnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

greenblood said:

A one loss Oregon, Stanford, USC, or UCLA will make the playoff.

In other words, there won't be a Pac-12 team in the playoff.

Defending Pac12 South champion Notre Dame might have a chance.

greenblood

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

greenblood said:

A one loss Oregon, Stanford, USC, or UCLA will make the playoff.

In other words, there won't be a Pac-12 team in the playoff.

I LOL'd for real when I included USC as a possible one loss team. You could give Sark the Seahawks and he'd find two PAC 12 losses on the schedule.

oregonblitzkrieg

greenblood said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

It's hard to say when you've got shitbag programs like FSU and Ohio State who play nobodies all season long strolling into season's end with no losses.

FSU would bare pickle every team in the Pac 12 last year and not leave a number, just an autographed photo of Winston next to their pillows. I'll give you Ohio State, but even if they had beaten MSU last year, who exposed them, wouldn't have made the top 2. Based on the current state of the Big 10, a one loss Pac 12, Big 12, and ACC champ will beat out an undefeated Ohio State. Also, a 2 loss SEC champ and the one loss runner up beats them out as well. The Big 10 is that bad right now. An undefeated Big 10 might not make the top 4 is what I'm saying.

Yeah, kind of like they barepickled Auburn and didn't get completely skullfucked in the first half. And needed a lame penalty at the end of the game in order to score an easy touchdown.

greenblood

Auburn is in the PAC 12?

dnc

oregonblitzkrieg said:

greenblood said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

It's hard to say when you've got shitbag programs like FSU and Ohio State who play nobodies all season long strolling into season's end with no losses.

FSU would bare pickle every team in the Pac 12 last year and not leave a number, just an autographed photo of Winston next to their pillows. I'll give you Ohio State, but even if they had beaten MSU last year, who exposed them, wouldn't have made the top 2. Based on the current state of the Big 10, a one loss Pac 12, Big 12, and ACC champ will beat out an undefeated Ohio State. Also, a 2 loss SEC champ and the one loss runner up beats them out as well. The Big 10 is that bad right now. An undefeated Big 10 might not make the top 4 is what I'm saying.

Yeah, kind of like they barepickled Auburn and didn't get completely skullfucked in the first half. And needed a lame penalty at the end of the game in order to score an easy touchdown.

PLSSPOTD*



























*fucktarded football opinions division

RoadDawg55

Oregon has a shot. After that, I doubt it. UCLA, Stanford, and UW are all losing 2+ games.

PDXDuckFan

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

It's hard to say when you've got shitbag programs like FSU and Ohio State who play nobodies all season long strolling into season's end with no losses.

The 2010 Ducks played two teams that finished in the top 25: Stanford and Auburn.

Hope this helps.

The Pac-12 was hot garbage in 2010, actually for most of the Chip Kelly era, and thankfully Chip took the talent that Bellotti helped recruit to a BCS title game.

USC was decimated by the NCAA, Stanford wasn't quite ready in 2010 or 2011, and coaches in the league included Paul Wulff/Rick Neuheisal/Lane Kiffin/Mike Stoops/Dennis Erickson/Steve Sarkisian/Jeff Tedford. Out of that group, only Sark is a head coach at a school that matters. The rest of these guys were fired, not hired away to better jobs. Those coaches have been replaced by Mike Leach/Jim Mora Jr./Steve Sarkisian/Rich Rodriguez/Todd Graham/Chris Petersen/Sonny Dykes, respectively.

The Pac 12 is a lot more difficult than 4 years ago, and is only going to get better now that pretty much every program is investing money in facilities and upgrading their coaching (USC aside, perhaps).

As I said, the Duck fans on this board come across as entitled assholes who don't know how good we had it as fans during the Kelly era, and also how the conditions were ripe for a great coach (Kelly) to take OK talent to a title game. Kelly didn't exactly set the world on fire in terms of recruiting, and he also landed the Ducks on NCAA probation, which Helfrich and his staff have to tell every single PSA they recruit.

Mosster47

PDXDuckFan said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

It's hard to say when you've got shitbag programs like FSU and Ohio State who play nobodies all season long strolling into season's end with no losses.

The 2010 Ducks played two teams that finished in the top 25: Stanford and Auburn.

Hope this helps.

The Pac-12 was hot garbage in 2010, actually for most of the Chip Kelly era, and thankfully Chip took the talent that Bellotti helped recruit to a BCS title game.

USC was decimated by the NCAA, Stanford wasn't quite ready in 2010 or 2011, and coaches in the league included Paul Wulff/Rick Neuheisal/Lane Kiffin/Mike Stoops/Dennis Erickson/Steve Sarkisian/Jeff Tedford. Out of that group, only Sark is a head coach at a school that matters. The rest of these guys were fired, not hired away to better jobs. Those coaches have been replaced by Mike Leach/Jim Mora Jr./Steve Sarkisian/Rich Rodriguez/Todd Graham/Chris Petersen/Sonny Dykes, respectively.

The Pac 12 is a lot more difficult than 4 years ago, and is only going to get better now that pretty much every program is investing money in facilities and upgrading their coaching (USC aside, perhaps).

As I said, the Duck fans on this board come across as entitled assholes who don't know how good we had it as fans during the Kelly era, and also how the conditions were ripe for a great coach (Kelly) to take OK talent to a title game. Kelly didn't exactly set the world on fire in terms of recruiting, and he also landed the Ducks on NCAA probation, which Helfrich and his staff have to tell every single PSA they recruit.

Holy fuck. Are you trying to downplay what Chip Kelly did? You are the original Quook, but holy fuck!