Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

I'm not going to link a Bleacher Report article

2»

Comments

  • whatshouldicareaboutwhatshouldicareabout Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,939 Swaye's Wigwam
    chuck said:

    Here are some real basic stats and notables:

    Petersen vs top 25:

    Avg points for: 28
    Avg points against: 26
    Avg margin: +2
    Worst loss: -12
    Other losses: -1, -3, -4

    Sark vs top 25:

    Avg points for: 23
    Avg points against: 35
    Avg margin: -12
    Worst loss: -44
    notable losses: -24, -35, -30, -41, -37, -23, -38, -31, -21

    Thanks for copying the stats from my post.
    dnc said:

    Did Peterman have to host a ranked Oregon State?

    He did. Both Oregon and Oregon State visited Boise as ranked teams and lost.
    dnc said:

    What percentage of those games were home/road/neutral? I'm assuming that will demonstrate Peterman's superiority as well.

    5 were neutral with 3 were neutral (bowl games), 1 at Fed Ex Field against Virginia Tech (home game for them) and another in the Georgia Dome against Georgia (home game for them). 4 were away games for Petersen with 2 coming at home.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GladstoneGladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    Seeing Petersen in UW gear is still surreal to me. Massive props to Woodward on that one.
    whatshouldicareabout said:

    For those curious, using ESPN data:

    Petersen: (7-4)
    W vs. #11 Oklahoma 43-42 OT (Fiesta Bowl)
    L @ #14 Hawaii 39-27
    W @ #17 Oregon 37-32
    L vs. #7 TCU 17-16 (Poinsettia Bowl)
    W vs. #16 Oregon 19-8
    W vs. #6 TCU 17-10 (Fiesta Bowl)
    W vs. #10 Virginia Tech 33-30
    W vs. #24 Oregon State 37-24
    L vs. #19 Nevada 34-31 OT
    W @ #19 Georgia 35-21
    L @ #13 Michigan State 17-13

    Sark: (8-18)
    L vs. #11 LSU 31-23
    W vs. #3 USC 16-13
    L vs. #12 Oregon 43-19
    W vs. #19 California 42-10
    L vs. #8 Nebraska 56-21
    W @ #18 USC 32-31
    W vs. #24 Oregon State 35-34 2OT
    L @ #15 Arizona 44-14
    L vs. #13 Stanford 41-0
    L @ #1 Oregon 53-16
    W vs. #20 Nebraska 19-7 (Holiday Bowl)
    L @ #11 Nebraska 51-38
    L @ #7 Stanford 65-21
    L vs. #6 Oregon 34-17
    L @ #18 USC 40-17
    L vs. #13 Baylor 67-56 (Alamo Bowl)
    L @ #3 LSU 41-3
    W vs. #8 Stanford 17-13
    L @ #2 Oregon 52-21
    L vs. #11 USC 24-14
    W vs. #7 Oregon State 20-17
    L vs. #18 Boise State 28-26 (Las Vegas Bowl)
    W vs. #19 Boise State 38-6
    L @ #5 Stanford 31-28
    L vs. #2 Oregon 45-24
    L @ #13 UCLA 41-31

    Petersen's worst loss was by 12 points to a Hawaii team that went to the Sugar Bowl (same on that throttled Ty after going up 21-0 in the 1Q). His 3 other losses came by 4 points (MSU), 1 point (TCU) and a game in OT thanks to 2 missed FGs (for those who forgot, the classic highlights: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8FXLT359VDc).

    Put that in comparison to Sark who has the following losses worse than Petersen: a 44p L to Stanford, 41p L to Stanford, 38p L to LSU, 37p L to Oregon, 35p L to Nebraska, 31p L to Oregon, 30p L to Arizona, 24p L to Oregon, 23p L to USC, 21p L to Oregon, 17p L to Oregon, and a 13p L to Nebraska. That's 12 losses worse than Petersen's worst loss.

    One final tidbit of information. The point differential for Petersen in Top 25 games is +34 whereas Sark is -310. The average scores of these games have Petersen winning 28.0 to 24.9 whereas Sark loses 23.4 to 35.3.

    whatshouldicareabout said:

    For those curious, using ESPN data:
    Sark fact sheet. Belongs.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,309 Swaye's Wigwam
    whatshouldicareabout said:

    chuck said:

    Here are some real basic stats and notables:

    Petersen vs top 25:

    Avg points for: 28
    Avg points against: 26
    Avg margin: +2
    Worst loss: -12
    Other losses: -1, -3, -4

    Sark vs top 25:

    Avg points for: 23
    Avg points against: 35
    Avg margin: -12
    Worst loss: -44
    notable losses: -24, -35, -30, -41, -37, -23, -38, -31, -21

    Thanks for copying the stats from my post.
    dnc said:

    Did Peterman have to host a ranked Oregon State?

    He did. Both Oregon and Oregon State visited Boise as ranked teams and lost.
    dnc said:

    What percentage of those games were home/road/neutral? I'm assuming that will demonstrate Peterman's superiority as well.

    5 were neutral with 3 were neutral (bowl games), 1 at Fed Ex Field against Virginia Tech (home game for them) and another in the Georgia Dome against Georgia (home game for them). 4 were away games for Petersen with 2 coming at home.

    Your post was a wealth of good info. I just crisped it up a bit. It's a compliment, not a slight.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AZDuckAZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    chuck said:

    whatshouldicareabout said:

    chuck said:

    Here are some real basic stats and notables:

    Petersen vs top 25:

    Avg points for: 28
    Avg points against: 26
    Avg margin: +2
    Worst loss: -12
    Other losses: -1, -3, -4

    Sark vs top 25:

    Avg points for: 23
    Avg points against: 35
    Avg margin: -12
    Worst loss: -44
    notable losses: -24, -35, -30, -41, -37, -23, -38, -31, -21

    Thanks for copying the stats from my post.
    dnc said:

    Did Peterman have to host a ranked Oregon State?

    He did. Both Oregon and Oregon State visited Boise as ranked teams and lost.
    dnc said:

    What percentage of those games were home/road/neutral? I'm assuming that will demonstrate Peterman's superiority as well.

    5 were neutral with 3 were neutral (bowl games), 1 at Fed Ex Field against Virginia Tech (home game for them) and another in the Georgia Dome against Georgia (home game for them). 4 were away games for Petersen with 2 coming at home.

    Your post was a wealth of good info. I just crisped it up a bit. It's a compliment, not a slight.
    I think you can crispen up any queery regarding Boise's OOC schedule by saying that Oregon was the only major conference team to play Boise at Boise (and lose, hardy har har!)

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,515 Standard Supporter
    AZDuck said:

    chuck said:

    whatshouldicareabout said:

    chuck said:

    Here are some real basic stats and notables:

    Petersen vs top 25:

    Avg points for: 28
    Avg points against: 26
    Avg margin: +2
    Worst loss: -12
    Other losses: -1, -3, -4

    Sark vs top 25:

    Avg points for: 23
    Avg points against: 35
    Avg margin: -12
    Worst loss: -44
    notable losses: -24, -35, -30, -41, -37, -23, -38, -31, -21

    Thanks for copying the stats from my post.
    dnc said:

    Did Peterman have to host a ranked Oregon State?

    He did. Both Oregon and Oregon State visited Boise as ranked teams and lost.
    dnc said:

    What percentage of those games were home/road/neutral? I'm assuming that will demonstrate Peterman's superiority as well.

    5 were neutral with 3 were neutral (bowl games), 1 at Fed Ex Field against Virginia Tech (home game for them) and another in the Georgia Dome against Georgia (home game for them). 4 were away games for Petersen with 2 coming at home.

    Your post was a wealth of good info. I just crisped it up a bit. It's a compliment, not a slight.
    I think you can crispen up any queery regarding Boise's OOC schedule by saying that Oregon was the only major conference team to play Boise at Boise (and lose, hardy har har!)

    good punchline
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • gmogmo Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,793 Swaye's Wigwam
    the real question is, did Peterman take over an 0-12 program?? 0-12!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CFetters_Nacho_LoverCFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,966 Founders Club
    Meek said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    Do you want Kim to list reasons why Sark lost those games? Sark had good reasons for those losses. Lots of twisting going on.

    Sark didn't lose those games; it was the players.
    The players had a lot of trust issues. You can't expect the head coach to overcome that issue. You all act like 0-12 never happened.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SweatpantsGeneralSweatpantsGeneral Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,140 Swaye's Wigwam
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

    Meek said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    Do you want Kim to list reasons why Sark lost those games? Sark had good reasons for those losses. Lots of twisting going on.

    Sark didn't lose those games; it was the players.
    The players had a lot of trust issues. You can't expect the head coach to overcome that issue. You all act like 0-12 never happened.
    Wait. I don't understand. I trust all my Facebook friends.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.