Betting the under isn't a negative statement against UW lol
UW could win 61-3 and miss the over
Backup qb for az, penix probably plays 3 quarters, McMillan out
Lots of factors, I'm not going to take it as I don't like betting o/u as a general rule, but if I did I'd definitely be going under, and I expect a bloodbath
Betting the under isn't a negative statement against UW lol
UW could win 61-3 and miss the over
Backup qb for az, penix probably plays 3 quarters, McMillan out
Lots of factors, I'm not going to take it as I don't like betting o/u as a general rule, but if I did I'd definitely be going under, and I expect a bloodbath
Betting the under isn't a negative statement against UW lol
UW could win 61-3 and miss the over
Backup qb for az, penix probably plays 3 quarters, McMillan out
Lots of factors, I'm not going to take it as I don't like betting o/u as a general rule, but if I did I'd definitely be going under, and I expect a bloodbath
quit hatin, hammerhead
Big brain thinking saying that suggesting a 61-3 victory would be hating
I posted the o/u numbers earlier, Dawgs are much more likely to cover than go over, that's in no way a sleight
Comments
He's going to have to throw
Further food for thought lol, also good chance penix isn't playing the 4th quarter
DAWG FAN
UW could win 61-3 and miss the over
Backup qb for az, penix probably plays 3 quarters, McMillan out
Lots of factors, I'm not going to take it as I don't like betting o/u as a general rule, but if I did I'd definitely be going under, and I expect a bloodbath
I posted the o/u numbers earlier, Dawgs are much more likely to cover than go over, that's in no way a sleight
We? are fucked.