Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Well, it is that time again.

2»

Comments

  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,375 Standard Supporter
    Bob_C said:

    There is a 60 year old woman in our office well past the age of abortion that still gets visibly mad talking about men telling women what to do with their body

    It's just a thing

    The midway approach is the electoral winner. 3-4 months. Not weeks and not up to birth

    Personally I like the heartbeat approach because we know a lot more now that we knew in 1972. But I don't need the president to back or even think it should be law because it won't change minds. Quite the opposite it is used to show how mean old GOP men want to put ya all in chanins

    That's why he needs to go with the statement of returning control back to the states. And then stay out of it. The dems brought this on with up to the "moment of birth" and the pendulum hit them in the face. No need to give it potential energy.

    After the soundbite of less fed interference, remind voters that when he was in office companies were giving bonus checks and now its layoff notices

    Everyone agrees that this is a state's issue. Unintended consequence is that state's are going to have ballot measures specifically addressing this. They will and have used this tactic to drive turnout, Michigan last year a perfect example.
    Everyone doesn't think this is a state issue. Team Dazzler thinks it's a national issue and demands abortion up to and after birth. Plenty on the right starting with Creep think a nationwide abortion ban is the only moral solution.
Sign In or Register to comment.