Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

There’s just no evidence

2»

Comments

  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    A Pennsylvania court on Friday ruled the state’s mail-in voting law is unconstitutional, with the case likely heading to the state’s Supreme Court.

    The 2019 law allows any voter to vote by mail without providing a reason and contains a number of other provisions aimed at making it easier to cast a ballot. Republicans are arguing it violates an amendment to the state constitution.

    Commonwealth Court Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt agreed with that argument, writing the law violates the 1838 amendment that says a person must vote in-person on Election Day unless they meet certain criteria. She wrote the law can only be changed through another constitutional amendment.

    Didn't take a billion dollars

    What did it prove Race?

    Try not to hurt yourself.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    A Pennsylvania court on Friday ruled the state’s mail-in voting law is unconstitutional, with the case likely heading to the state’s Supreme Court.

    The 2019 law allows any voter to vote by mail without providing a reason and contains a number of other provisions aimed at making it easier to cast a ballot. Republicans are arguing it violates an amendment to the state constitution.

    Commonwealth Court Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt agreed with that argument, writing the law violates the 1838 amendment that says a person must vote in-person on Election Day unless they meet certain criteria. She wrote the law can only be changed through another constitutional amendment.

    Didn't take a billion dollars

    What did it prove Race?

    Try not to hurt yourself.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    Rattled meltdown

    Question was too hard for Race.

    Let’s try again.

    What does this prove?
  • pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,979 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:

    Rattled meltdown

    Question was too hard for Race.

    Let’s try again.

    What does this prove?
    NOC

    Your obsession is yours.

    Hope this helps.

  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    PawzTard is too stupid to tell us what this proves.
    Time to use a lifeline.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,909
    There’s just no evidence of nothing on the bored about nothing.
  • pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,979 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:

    PawzTard is too stupid to tell us what this proves.
    Time to use a lifeline.

    Still trying to figure out what NOC means while calling other's intelligence into question.

    Auce.


  • GoduckiesGoduckies Member Posts: 6,618
  • HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,978
    HHusky said:
    You having an IQ over 55 based on your thousands of comments here?


  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,828 Swaye's Wigwam
    Bob_C said:

    SFGbob said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:
    Any fuck given on internal controls.
    Dazzler says there are plenty of internal controls, he just can't explain what they are and how they work and if you offer suggestions he says they aren't needed. Like that box on your DMV voter registration that you check to say you are an American citizen. That's some internal control according to our hypothetical MBA.
    Hey they totally swear that that they are American citizens and no one ever checks their claim against the citizenship records, in fact, the state of California actively fights any effort by anyone to do so. Why wouldn't you think they're citizens?
    The voter rolls are the main issue in my opinion. As much as I hate the Federal government, the best solution to all of this is to leverage the IRS/SS database. Have the states send their proposed rolls to the IRS/SS, who cross check last filed tax address and citizenship requirements and approve proposals that match and reject ones that don't. SS clears out the dead people. In theory eliminates the lag problem that happens in a lot of places, including Washington where I still get three extra ballots for prior owners every election. Every social security number gets released only to one jurisdiction.

    If you didn't file taxes, you don't get to vote. Have a separate process for people that moved after filing taxes where they need to create action themselves. Anyone that turned 18 after tax filing and before election is exempt one time until they file taxes and are treated like anyone else.
    Illegals use ID's that used to belong to others. Part of why identity fraud is such a big deal.

    Plenty of them ARE paying taxes. Just with someone else's SS #.

    Rand Paul pointed out the number of +100yr olds still on the roles IIRC.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,933 Standard Supporter
    edited September 2023
    https://x.com/iluminatibot/status/1701031545086333401?s=20
    Worth the watch.
    No idea why the tweet isn't showing up.
  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,822 Founders Club

    A Pennsylvania court on Friday ruled the state’s mail-in voting law is unconstitutional, with the case likely heading to the state’s Supreme Court.

    The 2019 law allows any voter to vote by mail without providing a reason and contains a number of other provisions aimed at making it easier to cast a ballot. Republicans are arguing it violates an amendment to the state constitution.

    Commonwealth Court Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt agreed with that argument, writing the law violates the 1838 amendment that says a person must vote in-person on Election Day unless they meet certain criteria. She wrote the law can only be changed through another constitutional amendment.

    Didn't take a billion dollars

    This among countless other egregious decisions is why the Supreme Court should have stepped in. They punted and the Biden selection by the deepstate was accomplished. MSLSD pundints want Trump to die in jail for questioning any of this. '46quook respects deepstate operatives like Pence, Kemp and Butterball for condemning Trump who has been right about the DS and FN all along.

  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,822 Founders Club
    Sledog said:

    https://x.com/iluminatibot/status/1701031545086333401?s=20
    Worth the watch.
    No idea why the tweet isn't showing up.

    There's just no evidence.
  • SourcesSources Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,005 Founders Club
    edited September 2023
    Goduckies said:

    Bob_C said:
    As they should be, too much opportunity for fraud.
    The fact that this happened in Wisconsin and is potentially happening in Pennsylvania is actually a huge deal.
  • trubluetrublue Member Posts: 3,042
    edited September 2023
    SFGbob said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:
    Any fuck given on internal controls.
    Dazzler says there are plenty of internal controls, he just can't explain what they are and how they work and if you offer suggestions he says they aren't needed. Like that box on your DMV voter registration that you check to say you are an American citizen. That's some internal control according to our hypothetical MBA.
    Hey they totally swear that that they are American citizens and no one ever checks their claim against the citizenship records, in fact, the state of California actively fights any effort by anyone to do so. Why wouldn't you think they're citizens?
    You obviously never worked for the Federal Government. Access to Immigration records, IRS records, SS records are not readily accessible to law enforcement agencies, with some exceptions. There is no such centralized database containing “citizenship records” that I’ve ever heard of . . . Perhaps for the CIA, NSA and other intelligence agencies.

    Where is the information to determine whether a body claiming citizenship (on motor voter registrations) can be verified?

    Access is difficult for many of the databases due to alleged privacy concerns.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,933 Standard Supporter
    No data base I know of either. They don't want anyone to be able to check citizenship status. Most vote demonrat. That's why no ID Eben though they ask have a Mexican vote ID. Election rigging plain and simple.
  • pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,979 Founders Club
    edited September 2023
    Sledog said:


    Worth the watch.
    No idea why the tweet isn't showing up.


    Change ‘x’ to ‘twitter’ in the url

    See above


  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,933 Standard Supporter
    edited September 2023
    pawz said:

    Sledog said:


    Worth the watch.
    No idea why the tweet isn't showing up.


    Change ‘x’ to ‘twitter’ in the url

    See above


    Well since it was copied from X I assumed it would work! Silly me.
Sign In or Register to comment.