Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
«1

Comments

  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    I think Kari Lake could have been a star in the GOP but then she decided to hitch her wagon to the 2020 loser.

  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,364 Standard Supporter
    Ron hitched his wagon to the RINO Bushies. Doomed.

    Short people got no reason....
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 104,888 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:


    I think Kari Lake could have been a star in the GOP but then she decided to hitch her wagon to the 2020 loser.

    Cleanest election ever says 46

  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    Butthurt is real.

    She picked the wrong horse to bet her career on.
  • pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,220 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:

    Butthurt is real.

    She picked the wrong horse to bet her career on.

    Is there anyone more obsessed with Trump than you?

    Doubtful but it needed to be asked.

  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,315 Swaye's Wigwam
    HHusky said:
    Any fuck given on internal controls.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,098 Standard Supporter
    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:
    Any fuck given on internal controls.
    Dazzler says there are plenty of internal controls, he just can't explain what they are and how they work and if you offer suggestions he says they aren't needed. Like that box on your DMV voter registration that you check to say you are an American citizen. That's some internal control according to our hypothetical MBA.
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,616 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:

    Butthurt is real.

    She picked the wrong horse to bet her career on.

    projection is real little guy
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 31,986

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:
    Any fuck given on internal controls.
    Dazzler says there are plenty of internal controls, he just can't explain what they are and how they work and if you offer suggestions he says they aren't needed. Like that box on your DMV voter registration that you check to say you are an American citizen. That's some internal control according to our hypothetical MBA.
    Hey they totally swear that that they are American citizens and no one ever checks their claim against the citizenship records, in fact, the state of California actively fights any effort by anyone to do so. Why wouldn't you think they're citizens?
  • SourcesSources Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,975 Founders Club
    Bob_C said:

    SFGbob said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:
    Any fuck given on internal controls.
    Dazzler says there are plenty of internal controls, he just can't explain what they are and how they work and if you offer suggestions he says they aren't needed. Like that box on your DMV voter registration that you check to say you are an American citizen. That's some internal control according to our hypothetical MBA.
    Hey they totally swear that that they are American citizens and no one ever checks their claim against the citizenship records, in fact, the state of California actively fights any effort by anyone to do so. Why wouldn't you think they're citizens?
    The voter rolls are the main issue in my opinion. As much as I hate the Federal government, the best solution to all of this is to leverage the IRS/SS database. Have the states send their proposed rolls to the IRS/SS, who cross check last filed tax address and citizenship requirements and approve proposals that match and reject ones that don't. SS clears out the dead people. In theory eliminates the lag problem that happens in a lot of places, including Washington where I still get three extra ballots for prior owners every election. Every social security number gets released only to one jurisdiction.

    If you didn't file taxes, you don't get to vote. Have a separate process for people that moved after filing taxes where they need to create action themselves. Anyone that turned 18 after tax filing and before election is exempt one time until they file taxes and are treated like anyone else.
    Sounds racist to me
  • Bob_CBob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,315 Swaye's Wigwam
    Sources said:

    Bob_C said:

    SFGbob said:

    Bob_C said:

    HHusky said:
    Any fuck given on internal controls.
    Dazzler says there are plenty of internal controls, he just can't explain what they are and how they work and if you offer suggestions he says they aren't needed. Like that box on your DMV voter registration that you check to say you are an American citizen. That's some internal control according to our hypothetical MBA.
    Hey they totally swear that that they are American citizens and no one ever checks their claim against the citizenship records, in fact, the state of California actively fights any effort by anyone to do so. Why wouldn't you think they're citizens?
    The voter rolls are the main issue in my opinion. As much as I hate the Federal government, the best solution to all of this is to leverage the IRS/SS database. Have the states send their proposed rolls to the IRS/SS, who cross check last filed tax address and citizenship requirements and approve proposals that match and reject ones that don't. SS clears out the dead people. In theory eliminates the lag problem that happens in a lot of places, including Washington where I still get three extra ballots for prior owners every election. Every social security number gets released only to one jurisdiction.

    If you didn't file taxes, you don't get to vote. Have a separate process for people that moved after filing taxes where they need to create action themselves. Anyone that turned 18 after tax filing and before election is exempt one time until they file taxes and are treated like anyone else.
    Sounds racist to me
    Only to racists.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 104,888 Founders Club
    So was the way Pennsylvania went to mail in ballots

    But no evidence
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    So was the way Pennsylvania went to mail in ballots

    But no evidence

    If only there were a billionaire to fund an investigation into this illegal activity.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 104,888 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:

    So was the way Pennsylvania went to mail in ballots

    But no evidence

    If only there were a billionaire to fund an investigation into this illegal activity.
    Team DeSantis agrees with the steal

    That's why he's 90 points behind
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 104,888 Founders Club
    A Pennsylvania court on Friday ruled the state’s mail-in voting law is unconstitutional, with the case likely heading to the state’s Supreme Court.

    The 2019 law allows any voter to vote by mail without providing a reason and contains a number of other provisions aimed at making it easier to cast a ballot. Republicans are arguing it violates an amendment to the state constitution.

    Commonwealth Court Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt agreed with that argument, writing the law violates the 1838 amendment that says a person must vote in-person on Election Day unless they meet certain criteria. She wrote the law can only be changed through another constitutional amendment.

    Didn't take a billion dollars
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    46XiJCAB said:

    So was the way Pennsylvania went to mail in ballots

    But no evidence

    If only there were a billionaire to fund an investigation into this illegal activity.
    Team DeSantis agrees with the steal

    That's why he's 90 points behind
    Spoken like a true cultists.

    You’re not even attempting to hide it anymore.

    Sad.
Sign In or Register to comment.