ACLU
Comments
-
You really don't get it. This all goes back to our previous discussions regarding your lack of basic knowledge of economics. You have some core options that have no basis in any model of prosperity that has ever existed.oregonblitzkrieg said:
The idea that competition brings out the best in people is overrated. Sure it makes most people give their best effort. But it also breeds a cutthroat dog eat dog atmosphere. Why allow foreigners to compete for a slice of the American pie? They can do that in their own countries. America was founded by immigrants, blah, blah. True. But that's no longer very relevant in this day and age. We now have more than 300 million people. We don't need millions more people competing for the limited amount of resources and money available here. The economy is already stretched thin as it is. I wonder what China would think of your immigration stance.dnc said:
This is basically unAmerican. Not just the willful disregard for America The Melting Pot, The Statue Of Liberty and all that. But our economy, watered down though it may be, is essentially founded on the principle that competition brings out best in people and that stifling competition brings out the worst. Immigration is good for the economy as a whole and competition is good for the high school dropouts. What's the problem?oregonblitzkrieg said:My viewpoint is that if the presence of new immigrants adversely affects the economic situation of any group of American citizens (I know, you think it's ok to overlook the high school dropouts), they should be prevented from coming here.
Also last I checked dropping out of high school was a choice, with consequences. As the only high school graduate of four children in my family I have a real hard time feeling sorry for those who didn't give a fuck in school.
Just as a start, your first lesson needs to be that the economy isn't a fixed pie. I know we have been over this economic fallacy and I provided some links for you to educate yourself on the basics, but for some reason you either do your homework. Or maybe you have read them and disagree. If that is the case, I would like to hear your position in why you think the economy is a fixed pie..with citations of course, not just what you think or heard somewhere.
TIA -
OBK just can't seem to make an argument without throwing out a logical fallacy. It's his M.O.dnc said:
Fuck China. Why do you hate AMERICA, dammit?oregonblitzkrieg said:
The idea that competition brings out the best in people is overrated. Sure it makes most people give their best effort. But it also breeds a cutthroat dog eat dog atmosphere. Why allow foreigners to compete for a slice of the American pie? They can do that in their own countries. America was founded by immigrants, blah, blah. True. But that's no longer very relevant in this day and age. We now have more than 300 million people. We don't need millions more people competing for the limited amount of resources and money available here. The economy is already stretched thin as it is. I wonder what China would think of your immigration stance.dnc said:
This is basically unAmerican. Not just the willful disregard for America The Melting Pot, The Statue Of Liberty and all that. But our economy, watered down though it may be, is essentially founded on the principle that competition brings out best in people and that stifling competition brings out the worst. Immigration is good for the economy as a whole and competition is good for the high school dropouts. What's the problem?oregonblitzkrieg said:My viewpoint is that if the presence of new immigrants adversely affects the economic situation of any group of American citizens (I know, you think it's ok to overlook the high school dropouts), they should be prevented from coming here.
Also last I checked dropping out of high school was a choice, with consequences. As the only high school graduate of four children in my family I have a real hard time feeling sorry for those who didn't give a fuck in school.
OTOH, suggesting we should take our immigration policy ideas from a communist nation of over a billion seems extremely relevant, so kudos for that. -
An anti-American leach on the taxpayer that needs to DIAF
Your utilitarian viewpoint that has some merit. But I don't agree that a vast horde of unskilled latinos will improve the well being of the overall economy and the majority. When Rome was at its height everyone wanted a piece of it. Their society gradually caved and caved to the point that eventually they even had emperors that were no longer Roman. It became too much of a melting pot and in time the barbarians overwhelmed it.MikeDamone said:
Are you saying that even though the overall economy and well being of the majority is increased, your basis for closing boarders is to protect high school drop outs? That's fine is you are, I just want to know if that's the foundation of your position.oregonblitzkrieg said:My viewpoint is that if the presence of new immigrants adversely affects the economic situation of any group of American citizens (I know, you think it's ok to overlook the high school dropouts), they should be prevented from coming here.
Even now Europe is undergoing a change. It's become infested with muslims/arabs. Walk around in Marseilles and you won't be able to tell if you're in France or Turkey. There are small towns in England that have been overrun. You really wonder if you're in England or Morocco. France experiences muslim/arab riots. Britain puts up with them calling for the destruction of their own nation.
Obviously latinos are a more peaceable people. I'm not racist. I have nothing against them. At the same time I'm not really eager to see them become the majority. I really doubt Europeans are eager to see arabs become the majority there either. Plenty of room in Mexico, Central America and South America for citizens in that area the world to live and flourish. They don't need to do it here. Also you will have to extend your logic to embrace hostile arabs/muslims that have no intention of assimilating as well, since your policy would be a completely open border. -
An anti-American leach on the taxpayer that needs to DIAF
If we want a billion new Americans in the near future we're following the correct path. Forget the paperwork. Forget the people who do it legally. Open border. Come one come all.dnc said:
Fuck China. Why do you hate AMERICA, dammit?oregonblitzkrieg said:
The idea that competition brings out the best in people is overrated. Sure it makes most people give their best effort. But it also breeds a cutthroat dog eat dog atmosphere. Why allow foreigners to compete for a slice of the American pie? They can do that in their own countries. America was founded by immigrants, blah, blah. True. But that's no longer very relevant in this day and age. We now have more than 300 million people. We don't need millions more people competing for the limited amount of resources and money available here. The economy is already stretched thin as it is. I wonder what China would think of your immigration stance.dnc said:
This is basically unAmerican. Not just the willful disregard for America The Melting Pot, The Statue Of Liberty and all that. But our economy, watered down though it may be, is essentially founded on the principle that competition brings out best in people and that stifling competition brings out the worst. Immigration is good for the economy as a whole and competition is good for the high school dropouts. What's the problem?oregonblitzkrieg said:My viewpoint is that if the presence of new immigrants adversely affects the economic situation of any group of American citizens (I know, you think it's ok to overlook the high school dropouts), they should be prevented from coming here.
Also last I checked dropping out of high school was a choice, with consequences. As the only high school graduate of four children in my family I have a real hard time feeling sorry for those who didn't give a fuck in school.
OTOH, suggesting we should take our immigration policy ideas from a communist nation of over a billion seems extremely relevant, so kudos for that. -
Patriots
Who do you think was the majority before white people became the majority?oregonblitzkrieg said:and in time the barbarians overwhelmed it.
I'm not really eager to see them become the majority.
-
Again with the red herring. Can you simply provide some facts and data rather than just disagreeing. The data is not on your side.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your utilitarian viewpoint that has some merit. But I don't agree that a vast horde of unskilled latinos will improve the well being of the overall economy and the majority. When Rome was at its height everyone wanted a piece of it. Their society gradually caved and caved to the point that eventually they even had emperors that were no longer Roman. It became too much of a melting pot and in time the barbarians overwhelmed it.MikeDamone said:
Are you saying that even though the overall economy and well being of the majority is increased, your basis for closing boarders is to protect high school drop outs? That's fine is you are, I just want to know if that's the foundation of your position.oregonblitzkrieg said:My viewpoint is that if the presence of new immigrants adversely affects the economic situation of any group of American citizens (I know, you think it's ok to overlook the high school dropouts), they should be prevented from coming here.
Even now Europe is undergoing a change. It's become infested with muslims/arabs. Walk around in Marseilles and you won't be able to tell if you're in France or Turkey. There are small towns in England that have been overrun. You really wonder if you're in England or Morocco. France experiences muslim/arab riots. Britain puts up with them calling for the destruction of their own nation.
Obviously latinos are a more peaceable people. I'm not racist. I have nothing against them. At the same time I'm not really eager to see them become the majority. I really doubt Europeans are eager to see arabs become the majority there either. Plenty of room in Mexico, Central America and South America for citizens in that area the world to live and flourish. They don't need to do it here. Also you will have to extend your logic to embrace hostile arabs/muslims that have no intention of assimilating as well, since your policy would be a completely open border. -
forum.hardcorehusky.com/discussion/10848/iroquois-vs-canada-world-lax-semis-open-threadOZONE said:
Who do you think was the majority before white people became the majority?oregonblitzkrieg said:and in time the barbarians overwhelmed it.
I'm not really eager to see them become the majority.
-
An anti-American leach on the taxpayer that needs to DIAFOBK is still talking? When will he take the hint and LEAVE?!
-
An anti-American leach on the taxpayer that needs to DIAF
I like to piggy back ride on other posters instead of actually participating in discussions. I'm spineless like that.PurpleJ said:OBK is still talking? When will he take the hint and LEAVE?!
-
An anti-American leach on the taxpayer that needs to DIAF
I already participated. It didn't go very well for you.oregonblitzkrieg said:
I like to piggy back ride on other posters instead of actually participating in discussions. I'm spineless like that.PurpleJ said:OBK is still talking? When will he take the hint and LEAVE?!
-
It's not just high school dropouts that are competing. I don't know the exact numbers, but about 65% of the population didn't graduate from a four year university. Many of those people are competing with immigrants of different legalities. It doesn't take a PhD to figure out wages will level off for different industries when a flood of people who are willing to work for less compete for those jobs. This is especially true in a right to work state with weak unions. Personally I prefer having a strong middle class. I don't know about you.dnc said:
This is basically unAmerican. Not just the willful disregard for America The Melting Pot, The Statue Of Liberty and all that. But our economy, watered down though it may be, is essentially founded on the principle that competition brings out best in people and that stifling competition brings out the worst. Immigration is good for the economy as a whole and competition is good for the high school dropouts. What's the problem?oregonblitzkrieg said:My viewpoint is that if the presence of new immigrants adversely affects the economic situation of any group of American citizens (I know, you think it's ok to overlook the high school dropouts), they should be prevented from coming here.
Also last I checked dropping out of high school was a choice, with consequences. As the only high school graduate of four children in my family I have a real hard time feeling sorry for those who didn't give a fuck in school.
it's worth noting that between World War II in the late 70's, the middle class was much stronger and immigration was not anything like it was between the early to mid 80's and 2008. There might just be a correlation...
For the record, I don't hate Hispanic people or anything like that. I might even know a few living in a city that's probably 45 Hispanic by now. The border situation as a joke though. Allowing millions of people to come through unchecked his totally unacceptable, and if nothing else think of national security concerns. You libertarians still care about that right?
-
An anti-American leach on the taxpayer that needs to DIAF
I didn't feel a road bump while rolling through your vicinity.PurpleJ said:
I already participated. It didn't go very well for you.oregonblitzkrieg said:
I like to piggy back ride on other posters instead of actually participating in discussions. I'm spineless like that.PurpleJ said:OBK is still talking? When will he take the hint and LEAVE?!
-
An anti-American leach on the taxpayer that needs to DIAF
Exactly. This.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's not just high school dropouts that are competing. I don't know the exact numbers, but about 65% of the population didn't graduate from a four year university. Many of those people are competing with immigrants of different legalities. It doesn't take a PhD to figure out wages will level off for different industries when a flood of people who are willing to work for less compete for those jobs. This is especially true in a right to work state with weak unions. Personally I prefer having a strong middle class. I don't know about you.dnc said:
This is basically unAmerican. Not just the willful disregard for America The Melting Pot, The Statue Of Liberty and all that. But our economy, watered down though it may be, is essentially founded on the principle that competition brings out best in people and that stifling competition brings out the worst. Immigration is good for the economy as a whole and competition is good for the high school dropouts. What's the problem?oregonblitzkrieg said:My viewpoint is that if the presence of new immigrants adversely affects the economic situation of any group of American citizens (I know, you think it's ok to overlook the high school dropouts), they should be prevented from coming here.
Also last I checked dropping out of high school was a choice, with consequences. As the only high school graduate of four children in my family I have a real hard time feeling sorry for those who didn't give a fuck in school.
it's worth noting that between World War II in the late 70's, the middle class was much stronger and immigration was not anything like it was between the early to mid 80's and 2008. There might just be a correlation...
For the record, I don't hate Hispanic people or anything like that. I might even know a few living in a city that's probably 45 Hispanic by now. The border situation as a joke though. Allowing millions of people to come through unchecked his totally unacceptable, and if nothing else think of national security concerns. You libertarians still care about that right?
-
An anti-American leach on the taxpayer that needs to DIAF
You're so embarrassing. Not even worth my time.oregonblitzkrieg said:
I didn't feel a road bump while rolling through your vicinity.PurpleJ said:
I already participated. It didn't go very well for you.oregonblitzkrieg said:
I like to piggy back ride on other posters instead of actually participating in discussions. I'm spineless like that.PurpleJ said:OBK is still talking? When will he take the hint and LEAVE?!
-
An anti-American leach on the taxpayer that needs to DIAF
If you post the links again here that support your position on fixed pies, I'll do my "homework" and find out where you're coming from. Just so you know, I don't believe in fixed pies. They fluctuate and can get bigger or smaller. They're always changing. What doesn't change is the fact that each one is finite. If you're disputing the position that pies are finite, then I'll find facts to back it up. But it's not the first thing on my agenda. I have some weed to smoke and a walk to take.MikeDamone said:
You really don't get it. This all goes back to our previous discussions regarding your lack of basic knowledge of economics. You have some core options that have no basis in any model of prosperity that has ever existed.oregonblitzkrieg said:
The idea that competition brings out the best in people is overrated. Sure it makes most people give their best effort. But it also breeds a cutthroat dog eat dog atmosphere. Why allow foreigners to compete for a slice of the American pie? They can do that in their own countries. America was founded by immigrants, blah, blah. True. But that's no longer very relevant in this day and age. We now have more than 300 million people. We don't need millions more people competing for the limited amount of resources and money available here. The economy is already stretched thin as it is. I wonder what China would think of your immigration stance.dnc said:
This is basically unAmerican. Not just the willful disregard for America The Melting Pot, The Statue Of Liberty and all that. But our economy, watered down though it may be, is essentially founded on the principle that competition brings out best in people and that stifling competition brings out the worst. Immigration is good for the economy as a whole and competition is good for the high school dropouts. What's the problem?oregonblitzkrieg said:My viewpoint is that if the presence of new immigrants adversely affects the economic situation of any group of American citizens (I know, you think it's ok to overlook the high school dropouts), they should be prevented from coming here.
Also last I checked dropping out of high school was a choice, with consequences. As the only high school graduate of four children in my family I have a real hard time feeling sorry for those who didn't give a fuck in school.
Just as a start, your first lesson needs to be that the economy isn't a fixed pie. I know we have been over this economic fallacy and I provided some links for you to educate yourself on the basics, but for some reason you either do your homework. Or maybe you have read them and disagree. If that is the case, I would like to hear your position in why you think the economy is a fixed pie..with citations of course, not just what you think or heard somewhere.
TIA -
If this makes sense to anyone, fill me in.oregonblitzkrieg said:
If you post the links again here that support your position on fixed pies, I'll do my "homework" and find out where you're coming from. Just so you know, I don't believe in fixed pies. They fluctuate and can get bigger or smaller. They're always changing. What doesn't change is the fact that each one is finite. If you're disputing the position that pies are finite, then I'll find facts to back it up. But it's not the first thing on my agenda. I have some weed to smoke and a walk to take.MikeDamone said:
You really don't get it. This all goes back to our previous discussions regarding your lack of basic knowledge of economics. You have some core options that have no basis in any model of prosperity that has ever existed.oregonblitzkrieg said:
The idea that competition brings out the best in people is overrated. Sure it makes most people give their best effort. But it also breeds a cutthroat dog eat dog atmosphere. Why allow foreigners to compete for a slice of the American pie? They can do that in their own countries. America was founded by immigrants, blah, blah. True. But that's no longer very relevant in this day and age. We now have more than 300 million people. We don't need millions more people competing for the limited amount of resources and money available here. The economy is already stretched thin as it is. I wonder what China would think of your immigration stance.dnc said:
This is basically unAmerican. Not just the willful disregard for America The Melting Pot, The Statue Of Liberty and all that. But our economy, watered down though it may be, is essentially founded on the principle that competition brings out best in people and that stifling competition brings out the worst. Immigration is good for the economy as a whole and competition is good for the high school dropouts. What's the problem?oregonblitzkrieg said:My viewpoint is that if the presence of new immigrants adversely affects the economic situation of any group of American citizens (I know, you think it's ok to overlook the high school dropouts), they should be prevented from coming here.
Also last I checked dropping out of high school was a choice, with consequences. As the only high school graduate of four children in my family I have a real hard time feeling sorry for those who didn't give a fuck in school.
Just as a start, your first lesson needs to be that the economy isn't a fixed pie. I know we have been over this economic fallacy and I provided some links for you to educate yourself on the basics, but for some reason you either do your homework. Or maybe you have read them and disagree. If that is the case, I would like to hear your position in why you think the economy is a fixed pie..with citations of course, not just what you think or heard somewhere.
TIA -
Hi there.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's not just high school dropouts that are competing. I don't know the exact numbers, but about 65% of the population didn't graduate from a four year university. Many of those people are competing with immigrants of different legalities. It doesn't take a PhD to figure out wages will level off for different industries when a flood of people who are willing to work for less compete for those jobs. This is especially true in a right to work state with weak unions. Personally I prefer having a strong middle class. I don't know about you.dnc said:
This is basically unAmerican. Not just the willful disregard for America The Melting Pot, The Statue Of Liberty and all that. But our economy, watered down though it may be, is essentially founded on the principle that competition brings out best in people and that stifling competition brings out the worst. Immigration is good for the economy as a whole and competition is good for the high school dropouts. What's the problem?oregonblitzkrieg said:My viewpoint is that if the presence of new immigrants adversely affects the economic situation of any group of American citizens (I know, you think it's ok to overlook the high school dropouts), they should be prevented from coming here.
Also last I checked dropping out of high school was a choice, with consequences. As the only high school graduate of four children in my family I have a real hard time feeling sorry for those who didn't give a fuck in school.
it's worth noting that between World War II in the late 70's, the middle class was much stronger and immigration was not anything like it was between the early to mid 80's and 2008. There might just be a correlation...
For the record, I don't hate Hispanic people or anything like that. I might even know a few living in a city that's probably 45 Hispanic by now. The border situation as a joke though. Allowing millions of people to come through unchecked his totally unacceptable, and if nothing else think of national security concerns. You libertarians still care about that right?
I just like fucking with OBK.
hth
-
He has weed to smoke... that wasn't clear?MikeDamone said:
If this makes sense to anyone, fill me in.oregonblitzkrieg said:
If you post the links again here that support your position on fixed pies, I'll do my "homework" and find out where you're coming from. Just so you know, I don't believe in fixed pies. They fluctuate and can get bigger or smaller. They're always changing. What doesn't change is the fact that each one is finite. If you're disputing the position that pies are finite, then I'll find facts to back it up. But it's not the first thing on my agenda. I have some weed to smoke and a walk to take.MikeDamone said:
You really don't get it. This all goes back to our previous discussions regarding your lack of basic knowledge of economics. You have some core options that have no basis in any model of prosperity that has ever existed.oregonblitzkrieg said:
The idea that competition brings out the best in people is overrated. Sure it makes most people give their best effort. But it also breeds a cutthroat dog eat dog atmosphere. Why allow foreigners to compete for a slice of the American pie? They can do that in their own countries. America was founded by immigrants, blah, blah. True. But that's no longer very relevant in this day and age. We now have more than 300 million people. We don't need millions more people competing for the limited amount of resources and money available here. The economy is already stretched thin as it is. I wonder what China would think of your immigration stance.dnc said:
This is basically unAmerican. Not just the willful disregard for America The Melting Pot, The Statue Of Liberty and all that. But our economy, watered down though it may be, is essentially founded on the principle that competition brings out best in people and that stifling competition brings out the worst. Immigration is good for the economy as a whole and competition is good for the high school dropouts. What's the problem?oregonblitzkrieg said:My viewpoint is that if the presence of new immigrants adversely affects the economic situation of any group of American citizens (I know, you think it's ok to overlook the high school dropouts), they should be prevented from coming here.
Also last I checked dropping out of high school was a choice, with consequences. As the only high school graduate of four children in my family I have a real hard time feeling sorry for those who didn't give a fuck in school.
Just as a start, your first lesson needs to be that the economy isn't a fixed pie. I know we have been over this economic fallacy and I provided some links for you to educate yourself on the basics, but for some reason you either do your homework. Or maybe you have read them and disagree. If that is the case, I would like to hear your position in why you think the economy is a fixed pie..with citations of course, not just what you think or heard somewhere.
TIA