LA Times: Pac-12 collapse was Kalen DeBoer's fault
Comments
-
Simple facts?GrundleStiltzkin said:
Numbers, math, facts, etcPurpleBaze said:
Rather easily...whatshouldicareabout said:
I'd rather have games on Peacock for $70m a year than on AppleTV for $20m a yearPurpleBaze said: -
Anyone know what channel the Pac-12 network is on?
-
NFL playoff games are being put on Peacock this year. Seems to be a little more legit than Apple.haie said: -
Is that channel still a thing? I thought they would’ve shut down business operations immediately like OceanGate after the implosion of the conference.coach_pete_JPG said:Anyone know what channel the Pac-12 network is on?
-
UW did the right thing and I agree with DeBoer's comments above. But I will say that streaming is the future and Apple has the biggest distribution network in the world. That future may not happen for 5+ more years, but it is the future.whlinder said:Does Phil Knight even understand what streaming is?
Anyway, as I've said in other places, I can buy the argument that there was a benefit to Apple given its streaming ambitions and the number of its devices which are in the hands of American consumers on a day to day basis. "Everybody knows" that streaming is the future.
But it's still a basic product strategy problem with distribution networks. Pac-12 content (the product) does not have high demand and therefore consumers will not seek it out regardless of its distribution network. Content like NFL games does have high demand and therefore they can get away with more streaming. Without that power the product is dependent on its distribution network for exposure, hence the need for linear. -
No, they're still broadcasting games this season (football, basketball, etc.).Doog_de_Jour said:
Is that channel still a thing? I thought they would’ve shut down business operations immediately like OceanGate after the implosion of the conference.coach_pete_JPG said:Anyone know what channel the Pac-12 network is on?
It'll probably die next July -
I read that shitpiece article yesterday. The whole thing reeked of Kliavkoff going off the record in order to preserve his future prospects.
-
I don't want this future of which you speak.DerekJohnson said:
UW did the right thing and I agree with DeBoer's comments above. But I will say that streaming is the future and Apple has the biggest distribution network in the world. That future may not happen for 5+ more years, but it is the future.whlinder said:Does Phil Knight even understand what streaming is?
Anyway, as I've said in other places, I can buy the argument that there was a benefit to Apple given its streaming ambitions and the number of its devices which are in the hands of American consumers on a day to day basis. "Everybody knows" that streaming is the future.
But it's still a basic product strategy problem with distribution networks. Pac-12 content (the product) does not have high demand and therefore consumers will not seek it out regardless of its distribution network. Content like NFL games does have high demand and therefore they can get away with more streaming. Without that power the product is dependent on its distribution network for exposure, hence the need for linear. -
I've checked from time to time and it seems they've gone into just showing every replace from every sport they have.Doog_de_Jour said:
Is that channel still a thing? I thought they would’ve shut down business operations immediately like OceanGate after the implosion of the conference.coach_pete_JPG said:Anyone know what channel the Pac-12 network is on?
They will probably do live coverage for football and basketball for the final year. -
I bet yogi cries on tv.
