Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

WoolleyDoog just made a great point in a text

DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 63,600 Founders Club
in Hardcore Husky Board
The Pac-10 severely sanctioning UW in '93 when the Huskies were on top of the world looks even more ridiculous now that the conference is imploding.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • EwaDawgEwaDawg Member Posts: 4,214
    DerekJohnson said:

    The Pac-10 severely sanctioning UW in '93 when the Huskies were on top of the world looks even more ridiculous now that the conference is imploding.

    Oh, the good ole days of the Pac 9. Deja Vu all over again.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BasemanBaseman Member Posts: 12,366
    RaceBannon said:

    They crushed USC in the oughts

    The dropped the hammer, allegedly, on Chip and Oregon

    They hate winners

    Next week? Soon? @RaceBannon , what are you earring?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • gmogmo Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,763 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited July 2023
    also you really think the SEC would have let the NCAA do what they did to USC if Reggie Bush was at Alabama or Georgia?

    "Weakdick conference. Hates winners."

    -PurpleBaze
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WoolleyDoogWoolleyDoog Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,623 Swaye's Wigwam
    I think the difference was USC and Oregon were sanctioned by the NCAA whereas Washington was sanctioned by its own conference? Which is bonkers business for a conference. In hindsight the move may have been to go independent in 93. I’m not sure if logistically possibly with scheduling though.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • gmogmo Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,763 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited July 2023
    WoolleyDoog said:

    I think the difference was USC and Oregon were sanctioned by the NCAA whereas Washington was sanctioned by its own conference? Which is bonkers business for a conference. In hindsight the move may have been to go independent in 93. I’m not sure if logistically possibly with scheduling though.

    true, that is even worse. Also the real deal conferences have sway and stick up for their own vs the bureaucrats in Indianapolis. SEC powers and big boys get slaps on the wrist... I remember Cam Newton was still allowed to play in the national championship game, etc etc.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AtomicDawgAtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,093 Standard Supporter
    WoolleyDoog said:

    I think the difference was USC and Oregon were sanctioned by the NCAA whereas Washington was sanctioned by its own conference? Which is bonkers business for a conference. In hindsight the move may have been to go independent in 93. I’m not sure if logistically possibly with scheduling though.

    What could have possibly gone wrong with our admins commitment to excellence in athletics?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 63,600 Founders Club
    WoolleyDoog said:

    I think the difference was USC and Oregon were sanctioned by the NCAA whereas Washington was sanctioned by its own conference? Which is bonkers business for a conference. In hindsight the move may have been to go independent in 93. I’m not sure if logistically possibly with scheduling though.

    The conference colluded with the UW president
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.