Tucker is going to be the moderator at the upcoming republican debate (sans Trump). I think Vivek Ramaswamy is probably safe as he doesn't have any huge holes. Next would be DeSantis although I think he gets roasted for his association with the Bushies. The rest like Pence or Haley have open sores that Tucker will love to treat with lime juice and salt
Tucker is going to be the moderator at the upcoming republican debate (sans Trump). I think Vivek Ramaswamy is probably safe as he doesn't have any huge holes. Next would be DeSantis although I think he gets roasted for his association with the Bushies. The rest like Pence or Haley have open sores that Tucker will love to treat with lime juice and salt
Tucker is going to be the moderator at the upcoming republican debate (sans Trump). I think Vivek Ramaswamy is probably safe as he doesn't have any huge holes. Next would be DeSantis although I think he gets roasted for his association with the Bushies. The rest like Pence or Haley have open sores that Tucker will love to treat with lime juice and salt
Because that is the role of a debate moderator.
It worked for the Dems in the last few elections you pearl clutching retard.
Tucker is going to be the moderator at the upcoming republican debate (sans Trump). I think Vivek Ramaswamy is probably safe as he doesn't have any huge holes. Next would be DeSantis although I think he gets roasted for his association with the Bushies. The rest like Pence or Haley have open sores that Tucker will love to treat with lime juice and salt
Because that is the role of a debate moderator unless it's a Democrat
Tucker is going to be the moderator at the upcoming republican debate (sans Trump). I think Vivek Ramaswamy is probably safe as he doesn't have any huge holes. Next would be DeSantis although I think he gets roasted for his association with the Bushies. The rest like Pence or Haley have open sores that Tucker will love to treat with lime juice and salt
Because that is the role of a debate moderator.
Now the kunt is worried about an impartial debate moderator.
We just can't have a debate moderator that ask candidates to explain the strategic interest of an open ended proxy war halfway around the world. We just can't.
We just can't have a debate moderator that ask candidates to explain the strategic interest of an open ended proxy war halfway around the world. We just can't.
We just can't have a debate moderator that ask candidates to explain the strategic interest of an open ended proxy war halfway around the world. We just can't.
We just can't have a debate moderator that ask candidates to explain the strategic interest of an open ended proxy war halfway around the world. We just can't.
Isn’t it awful when proxies kill our enemies?
Russia is our enemy? Why exactly?
Unprovoked invasion of sovereign nations.
Support of terrorism and other outlaw regimes.
Interference in US domestic affairs.
Authoritarian crackdowns on its own domestic dissent.
General opposition to the interests of the US and our allies.
We just can't have a debate moderator that ask candidates to explain the strategic interest of an open ended proxy war halfway around the world. We just can't.
Isn’t it awful when proxies kill our enemies?
Russia is our enemy? Why exactly?
Unprovoked invasion of sovereign nations.
Support of terrorism and other outlaw regimes.
Interference in US domestic affairs.
Authoritarian crackdowns on its own domestic dissent.
Sounds like we should be their enemy then. Maybe that explains all of this.
We just can't have a debate moderator that ask candidates to explain the strategic interest of an open ended proxy war halfway around the world. We just can't.
Isn’t it awful when proxies kill our enemies?
Russia is our enemy? Why exactly?
Unprovoked invasion of sovereign nations.
Support of terrorism and other outlaw regimes.
Interference in US domestic affairs.
Authoritarian crackdowns on its own domestic dissent.
Sounds like we should be their enemy then. Maybe that explains all of this.
It does take two to tango. I tend to side with the US. You?
We just can't have a debate moderator that ask candidates to explain the strategic interest of an open ended proxy war halfway around the world. We just can't.
Isn’t it awful when proxies kill our enemies?
Russia is our enemy? Why exactly?
Unprovoked invasion of sovereign nations.
Support of terrorism and other outlaw regimes.
Interference in US domestic affairs.
Authoritarian crackdowns on its own domestic dissent.
Sounds like we should be their enemy then. Maybe that explains all of this.
It does take two to tango. I tend to side with the US. You?
We just can't have a debate moderator that ask candidates to explain the strategic interest of an open ended proxy war halfway around the world. We just can't.
Isn’t it awful when proxies kill our enemies?
Russia is our enemy? Why exactly?
Unprovoked invasion of sovereign nations.
Support of terrorism and other outlaw regimes.
Interference in US domestic affairs.
Authoritarian crackdowns on its own domestic dissent.
Sounds like we should be their enemy then. Maybe that explains all of this.
It does take two to tango. I tend to side with the US. You?
We just can't have a debate moderator that ask candidates to explain the strategic interest of an open ended proxy war halfway around the world. We just can't.
Isn’t it awful when proxies kill our enemies?
Russia is our enemy? Why exactly?
Unprovoked invasion of sovereign nations.
Support of terrorism and other outlaw regimes.
Interference in US domestic affairs.
Authoritarian crackdowns on its own domestic dissent.
Sounds like we should be their enemy then. Maybe that explains all of this.
It does take two to tango. I tend to side with the US. You?
I'm for de-escalation because that is actually in our interests.
We just can't have a debate moderator that ask candidates to explain the strategic interest of an open ended proxy war halfway around the world. We just can't.
Isn’t it awful when proxies kill our enemies?
Russia is our enemy? Why exactly?
Unprovoked invasion of sovereign nations.
Support of terrorism and other outlaw regimes.
Interference in US domestic affairs.
Authoritarian crackdowns on its own domestic dissent.
Sounds like we should be their enemy then. Maybe that explains all of this.
It does take two to tango. I tend to side with the US. You?
I'm for de-escalation because that is actually in our interests.
I’m an advocate of not interrupting an enemy when he’s making a mistake.
We just can't have a debate moderator that ask candidates to explain the strategic interest of an open ended proxy war halfway around the world. We just can't.
Isn’t it awful when proxies kill our enemies?
Russia is our enemy? Why exactly?
Unprovoked invasion of sovereign nations.
Support of terrorism and other outlaw regimes.
Interference in US domestic affairs.
Authoritarian crackdowns on its own domestic dissent.
General opposition to the interests of the US and our allies.
We just can't have a debate moderator that ask candidates to explain the strategic interest of an open ended proxy war halfway around the world. We just can't.
Isn’t it awful when proxies kill our enemies?
Russia is our enemy? Why exactly?
Unprovoked invasion of sovereign nations.
Support of terrorism and other outlaw regimes.
Interference in US domestic affairs.
Authoritarian crackdowns on its own domestic dissent.
General opposition to the interests of the US and our allies.
I have bad news for you
I take your point, but there’s not a dimes worth of difference between Daddy and Biden here.
We just can't have a debate moderator that ask candidates to explain the strategic interest of an open ended proxy war halfway around the world. We just can't.
Isn’t it awful when proxies kill our enemies?
Russia is our enemy? Why exactly?
Unprovoked invasion of sovereign nations.
Support of terrorism and other outlaw regimes.
Interference in US domestic affairs.
Authoritarian crackdowns on its own domestic dissent.
General opposition to the interests of the US and our allies.
I have bad news for you
I take your point, but there’s not a dimes worth of difference between Daddy and Biden here.
No one mentioned daddy. But if you want to talk about previous presidents, we could mention the unprovoked invasion occurred under Obama. Or not.
Either way, by your conditions, Saudi Arabia is also our enemy. China obviously is, as are so many other 'allies'. And we pretty much wrote the playbook on doing those activities.
We just can't have a debate moderator that ask candidates to explain the strategic interest of an open ended proxy war halfway around the world. We just can't.
Isn’t it awful when proxies kill our enemies?
Russia is our enemy? Why exactly?
Unprovoked invasion of sovereign nations.
Support of terrorism and other outlaw regimes.
Interference in US domestic affairs.
Authoritarian crackdowns on its own domestic dissent.
General opposition to the interests of the US and our allies.
I have bad news for you
I take your point, but there’s not a dimes worth of difference between Daddy and Biden here.
No one mentioned daddy. But if you want to talk about previous presidents, we could mention the unprovoked invasion occurred under Obama. Or not.
Either way, by your conditions, Saudi Arabia is also our enemy. China obviously is, as are so many other 'allies'. And we pretty much wrote the playbook on doing those activities.
Uhhhh, the whole context of the conversation is that Daddy would end the Ukraine war in 24 hours.
With respect to Saudi Arabia, I get that geopolitics sometimes forces hard choices, but I fault both political parties here for kowtowing to that regime. You are correct that it satisfies the criteria for enemy to degrees that differ from Russia, as does China.
Comments
Candy Crowley bailing out Obama by lying.gif
Support of terrorism and other outlaw regimes.
Interference in US domestic affairs.
Authoritarian crackdowns on its own domestic dissent.
General opposition to the interests of the US and our allies.
Either way, by your conditions, Saudi Arabia is also our enemy. China obviously is, as are so many other 'allies'. And we pretty much wrote the playbook on doing those activities.
With respect to Saudi Arabia, I get that geopolitics sometimes forces hard choices, but I fault both political parties here for kowtowing to that regime. You are correct that it satisfies the criteria for enemy to degrees that differ from Russia, as does China.