Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Show your support for what this community means to you:
Choose a Donation Amount
Username
(required for credit)
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Big if true

2

Comments

  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,722
    Swaye's Wigwam 10,000 Up Votes 10,000 Awesomes 25000 Comments

    Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.

    Oregon came within a C-hair though of shutting us the fuck up on 1991.

    I don't know why we haven't built a statue for Cam Newton at the Husky Stadium monuments park.
    CFetters_Nacho_LovertheknowledgePawgDawgdflea
  • coronabruincoronabruin Member Posts: 1,218
    2,500 Awesomes 250 Answers 1000 Comments 250 Up Votes
    Canadawg said:

    Keep the gay canuck shit off OUR bored! Go Avs!

    The lady doth protest too much
    Go burn your piece of shit city to the ground after losing another cup final, ya fuckin no natty fish fister.
  • CanadawgCanadawg Member Posts: 2,507
    Standard Supporter 2,500 Awesomes 1,500 Up Votes 250 Answers

    Canadawg said:

    Keep the gay canuck shit off OUR bored! Go Avs!

    The lady doth protest too much
    Go burn your piece of shit city to the ground after losing another cup final, ya fuckin no natty fish fister.
    It just means more
    RaceBannonhaieYellowSnowDerekJohnson
  • ntxduckntxduck Member Posts: 4,559
    Ninth Anniversary 5,000 Awesomes 2,500 Up Votes 2500 Comments

    Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.

    Anyone under the age of 37ish who answers no to this is a liar
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 16,188
    Swaye's Wigwam 10,000 Up Votes 10,000 Awesomes Ninth Anniversary
    ntxduck said:

    Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.

    Anyone under the age of 37ish who answers no to this is a liar
    Only because, like TCU will show, getting to a championship no matter the results seems to give you momentum that lasts a really long time.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 91,534
    Swaye's Wigwam Tenth Anniversary 50000 Comments 10,000 Awesomes
    ntxduck said:

    Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.

    Anyone under the age of 37ish who answers no to this is a liar

    CanadawgBleachedAnusDawgDaviddnc
  • ntxduckntxduck Member Posts: 4,559
    Ninth Anniversary 5,000 Awesomes 2,500 Up Votes 2500 Comments

    ntxduck said:

    Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.

    Anyone under the age of 37ish who answers no to this is a liar

    I said 37 not 137
    RaceBannonLebamDawgdnc
  • 1to392831weretaken1to392831weretaken Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,514
    Swaye's Wigwam 10,000 Awesomes 5,000 Up Votes 5000 Comments
    ntxduck said:

    Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.

    Anyone under the age of 37ish who answers no to this is a liar
    There's somebody here other than Fudgie that's under 37?
    LebamDawgdannarc
  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,162
    10,000 Awesomes Ninth Anniversary 5,000 Up Votes 5000 Comments
    ntxduck said:

    Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.

    Anyone under the age of 37ish who answers no to this is a liar
    lol

    Duck fan doesn't know wtf he's talking about because his team is on the list and he has no idea what it means to win a NC.
    David
  • CanadawgCanadawg Member Posts: 2,507
    Standard Supporter 2,500 Awesomes 1,500 Up Votes 250 Answers
    ntxduck said:

    Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.

    Anyone under the age of 37ish who answers no to this is a liar
    Because of all the nattys Oregon's won since then?
    David
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 17,129
    5,000 Awesomes 10000 Comments 2,500 Up Votes 250 Answers

    One thing is for sure Oregon will never win a 1/2 Championship.
  • ntxduckntxduck Member Posts: 4,559
    Ninth Anniversary 5,000 Awesomes 2,500 Up Votes 2500 Comments
    edited May 25
    dflea said:

    ntxduck said:

    Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.

    Anyone under the age of 37ish who answers no to this is a liar
    lol

    Duck fan doesn't know wtf he's talking about because his team is on the list and he has no idea what it means to win a NC.
    No, because experiencing big wins in the moment is >>>>>>>hearing your two dads talk about the title you won before you were even born/cognizant of what was going on. Obviously for the older crowd winning the 91 title was a huge deal—because you all watched/went to every single game that season. A 30 year old would much rather have the success in his lifetime when he’s actually watching/going to the games.

    Watching grainy footage on YouTube of a team you never saw play live doesn’t make your heart pump the same way as having a Dawgade of wins over Oregon that coincides with when you were in school.
  • CanadawgCanadawg Member Posts: 2,507
    Standard Supporter 2,500 Awesomes 1,500 Up Votes 250 Answers
    ntxduck said:

    dflea said:

    ntxduck said:

    Would you trade the 91 natty for Oregon’s success the past 15 years? I think it’s a tougher question for someone like me who was too young to experience 91. I’d also factor in that UW probably recruits better locally in the 2010s and past few years if they’re more successful in that era and the brand is bigger at a crucial time with the PAC-12 dying and NIL.

    Anyone under the age of 37ish who answers no to this is a liar
    lol

    Duck fan doesn't know wtf he's talking about because his team is on the list and he has no idea what it means to win a NC.
    No, because experiencing big wins in the moment is >>>>>>>hearing your two dads talk about the title you won before you were even born/cognizant of what was going on. Obviously for the older crowd winning the 91 title was a huge deal—because you all watched/went to every single game that season. A 30 year old would much rather have the success in his lifetime when he’s actually watching/going to the games.

    Watching grainy footage on YouTube of a team you never saw play live doesn’t make your heart pump the same way as having a Dawgade of wins over Oregon that coincides with when you were in school.
    You don't...get college football eh
    ntxduck
  • CFetters_Nacho_LoverCFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,048
    Swaye's Wigwam Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Up Votes 10,000 Awesomes
    46XiJCAB said:


    One thing is for sure Oregon will never win a 1/2 Championship.

    1/2 is still greater than zero.
    dnchaie
Sign In or Register to comment.