Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Me So Horny

1568101113

Comments

  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Swaye said:

    HH: Where man love is allowed to blossom but soccer talk is discouraged.

    Huh?
    image
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    Swaye said:

    I think it's pretty cool. And for all you split tails whining, they give game tags to keep the population healthy. It isn't a fucking free for all. But don't let facts get in the way of a good Greenpeace rant.

    Bullshit. They sell game tags to rich foreigners to line their corrupt pockets.

    But don't let the facts get in the way of a good NRA rant.
    Boom. Mother fucking fatality.
    So you didn't do any reading or research. Good to know. Gotta love bumper sticker activism.

    Seriously. You really don't care about increasing healthy populations of these species. All you care about is how you are perceived by other shallow people who don't take the time to really understand problems and their solutions.

    There is so much unbiased research out there it's embarrassing you would argue this shit.

    This is obviously from an NRA shrill:

    environmentmagazine.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/2011/July-August%202011/exploitation-or-conservation-full.html

    There is work to be done and it's not perfect, but overall, the economic and environmental benefits of trophy hunting certainly outweigh the negatives.
    Hey look, you found a publication with a circulation of 3000 that supports your view that imperialist owned hunting ranches in Africa are good for the "environment".

    Holy fuck.

    You probably also think this is a good example of free enterprise and "capitalism".

    How stupid are you?
    BOOM. Roasted.
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,773
    Swaye said:

    HH: Where man love is allowed to blossom but soccer talk is discouraged.

    If we're gonna bash man love, I'm OUT!!!
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    TheGlove said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    Swaye said:

    I think it's pretty cool. And for all you split tails whining, they give game tags to keep the population healthy. It isn't a fucking free for all. But don't let facts get in the way of a good Greenpeace rant.

    Bullshit. They sell game tags to rich foreigners to line their corrupt pockets.

    But don't let the facts get in the way of a good NRA rant.
    Boom. Mother fucking fatality.
    So you didn't do any reading or research. Good to know. Gotta love bumper sticker activism.

    Seriously. You really don't care about increasing healthy populations of these species. All you care about is how you are perceived by other shallow people who don't take the time to really understand problems and their solutions.

    There is so much unbiased research out there it's embarrassing you would argue this shit.

    This is obviously from an NRA shrill:

    environmentmagazine.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/2011/July-August%202011/exploitation-or-conservation-full.html

    There is work to be done and it's not perfect, but overall, the economic and environmental benefits of trophy hunting certainly outweigh the negatives.
    Hey look, you found a publication with a circulation of 3000 that supports your view that imperialist owned hunting ranches in Africa are good for the "environment".

    Holy fuck.

    You probably also think this is a good example of free enterprise and "capitalism".

    How stupid are you?
    BOOM. Roasted.
    That's not what the article said...but still
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346

    TheGlove said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    Swaye said:

    I think it's pretty cool. And for all you split tails whining, they give game tags to keep the population healthy. It isn't a fucking free for all. But don't let facts get in the way of a good Greenpeace rant.

    Bullshit. They sell game tags to rich foreigners to line their corrupt pockets.

    But don't let the facts get in the way of a good NRA rant.
    Boom. Mother fucking fatality.
    So you didn't do any reading or research. Good to know. Gotta love bumper sticker activism.

    Seriously. You really don't care about increasing healthy populations of these species. All you care about is how you are perceived by other shallow people who don't take the time to really understand problems and their solutions.

    There is so much unbiased research out there it's embarrassing you would argue this shit.

    This is obviously from an NRA shrill:

    environmentmagazine.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/2011/July-August%202011/exploitation-or-conservation-full.html

    There is work to be done and it's not perfect, but overall, the economic and environmental benefits of trophy hunting certainly outweigh the negatives.
    Hey look, you found a publication with a circulation of 3000 that supports your view that imperialist owned hunting ranches in Africa are good for the "environment".

    Holy fuck.

    You probably also think this is a good example of free enterprise and "capitalism".

    How stupid are you?
    BOOM. Roasted.
    That's not what the article said...but still
    I know your being sarkastic but I don't read articles.

    HTH
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited July 2014

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    Swaye said:

    I think it's pretty cool. And for all you split tails whining, they give game tags to keep the population healthy. It isn't a fucking free for all. But don't let facts get in the way of a good Greenpeace rant.

    Bullshit. They sell game tags to rich foreigners to line their corrupt pockets.

    But don't let the facts get in the way of a good NRA rant.
    Boom. Mother fucking fatality.
    So you didn't do any reading or research. Good to know. Gotta love bumper sticker activism.

    Seriously. You really don't care about increasing healthy populations of these species. All you care about is how you are perceived by other shallow people who don't take the time to really understand problems and their solutions.

    There is so much unbiased research out there it's embarrassing you would argue this shit.

    This is obviously from an NRA shrill:

    environmentmagazine.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/2011/July-August%202011/exploitation-or-conservation-full.html

    There is work to be done and it's not perfect, but overall, the economic and environmental benefits of trophy hunting certainly outweigh the negatives.
    Hey look, you found a publication with a circulation of 3000 that supports your view that imperialist owned hunting ranches in Africa are good for the "environment".

    Holy fuck.

    You probably also think this is a good example of free enterprise and "capitalism".

    How stupid are you?
    There are many unbiased articles on this topic. Your use of a trite logical fallacy is no surprise here. A thinking person can easily see that hunting can enhance conservation. But some of you Fucktards have trouble thinking beyond the "poor animal". It's not that hard to figure out. Give it a try.

    OBK still won't do the research. He'd rather simply hang on to his uninformed opinion.

    I don't own guns or hunt and do find it distasteful, but looking at the bigger picture the benefits outweigh that.
    What part of culling the animals with the best genes (the trophy animals) is destructive to conservation do you not understand? It's quaint how you're always patting yourself on the back, thinking you've won every argument and have the correct position on everything. Everyone but you is uniformed. The intellectual steed that you ride is the highest horse on the bored. At least in your own mind...

    image
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    dnc said:

    I like to reference irrelevant posts on irrelevant threads because I don't have any firepower left in the barrel.
    I like to accuse others of running out of firepower when I didn't have any firepower to begin with.
    Boom. Mother fucking fatality.
    In this thread you're just a curiosity, a sideline gawker that speaks in lingo. I don't get half of what you're saying.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    Swaye said:

    I think it's pretty cool. And for all you split tails whining, they give game tags to keep the population healthy. It isn't a fucking free for all. But don't let facts get in the way of a good Greenpeace rant.

    Bullshit. They sell game tags to rich foreigners to line their corrupt pockets.

    But don't let the facts get in the way of a good NRA rant.
    Boom. Mother fucking fatality.
    So you didn't do any reading or research. Good to know. Gotta love bumper sticker activism.

    Seriously. You really don't care about increasing healthy populations of these species. All you care about is how you are perceived by other shallow people who don't take the time to really understand problems and their solutions.

    There is so much unbiased research out there it's embarrassing you would argue this shit.

    This is obviously from an NRA shrill:

    environmentmagazine.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/2011/July-August%202011/exploitation-or-conservation-full.html

    There is work to be done and it's not perfect, but overall, the economic and environmental benefits of trophy hunting certainly outweigh the negatives.
    Hey look, you found a publication with a circulation of 3000 that supports your view that imperialist owned hunting ranches in Africa are good for the "environment".

    Holy fuck.

    You probably also think this is a good example of free enterprise and "capitalism".

    How stupid are you?
    There are many unbiased articles on this topic. Your use of a trite logical fallacy is no surprise here. A thinking person can easily see that hunting can enhance conservation. But some of you Fucktards have trouble thinking beyond the "poor animal". It's not that hard to figure out. Give it a try.

    OBK still won't do the research. He'd rather simply hang on to his uninformed opinion.

    I don't own guns or hunt and do find it distasteful, but looking at the bigger picture the benefits outweigh that.
    You realize how fucking ridiculous it is for you to say that right? Remember when we argued over single parents and you hadn't read a single paper one the issue? When I asked you to back up your claims you linked an insane mens rights website that had ties to a holocaust denial website.

    OBK is a dope. You are intelligent. But you're not interested in doing the research either. You like to know just enough to confirm your position, not the bigger picture.
    So far you've provided nothing in this thread so why are you even here? You're gay right, wouldn't you rather be pounding your boyfriend in the ass? You're merely here to suck Damone's dick. You're doing a good job of it, but it makes you look foolish.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited July 2014
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    Swaye said:

    I think it's pretty cool. And for all you split tails whining, they give game tags to keep the population healthy. It isn't a fucking free for all. But don't let facts get in the way of a good Greenpeace rant.

    Bullshit. They sell game tags to rich foreigners to line their corrupt pockets.

    But don't let the facts get in the way of a good NRA rant.
    Boom. Mother fucking fatality.
    So you didn't do any reading or research. Good to know. Gotta love bumper sticker activism.

    Seriously. You really don't care about increasing healthy populations of these species. All you care about is how you are perceived by other shallow people who don't take the time to really understand problems and their solutions.

    There is so much unbiased research out there it's embarrassing you would argue this shit.

    This is obviously from an NRA shrill:

    environmentmagazine.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/2011/July-August%202011/exploitation-or-conservation-full.html

    There is work to be done and it's not perfect, but overall, the economic and environmental benefits of trophy hunting certainly outweigh the negatives.
    Hey look, you found a publication with a circulation of 3000 that supports your view that imperialist owned hunting ranches in Africa are good for the "environment".

    Holy fuck.

    You probably also think this is a good example of free enterprise and "capitalism".

    How stupid are you?
    There are many unbiased articles on this topic. Your use of a trite logical fallacy is no surprise here. A thinking person can easily see that hunting can enhance conservation. But some of you Fucktards have trouble thinking beyond the "poor animal". It's not that hard to figure out. Give it a try.

    OBK still won't do the research. He'd rather simply hang on to his uninformed opinion.

    I don't own guns or hunt and do find it distasteful, but looking at the bigger picture the benefits outweigh that.
    What part of culling the animals with the best genes (the trophy animals) is destructive to conservation do you not understand? It's quaint how you're always patting yourself on the back, thinking you've won every argument and have the correct position on everything. Everyone but you is uniformed. The intellectual steed that you ride is the highest horse on the bored. At least in your own mind...

    image
    No everyone is uninformed, just you and a couple others. Maybe not so much uninformed, but not very good at thinking critically and a bit deeper.