Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Regular people punching back
Comments
-
Nope. No lame ass moral equivalency here. Coulter was telling the truth. Crump is a professional black grifter and gets paid to support more dead black kids and lied.TurdBomber said:
I think the Red Meat this story provides to Coulter is equal to the Red Meat it provides to an exploitative scumbag like Crump.creepycoug said:
I'm talking about her tweet, where she was mocking the implication that we would need to have a receipt to actually believe the nurse over 5 teenage black boys. I'm not sure how else to take that other than how she meant it, and I stand by my position. Gratuitous. She could have just said, "yeah, a pregnant adult nurse getting off her shift and 5 teenage boys running around up to no good. Who are you going to believe?" But Coulter being Coulter, she had to get just a little more attention. It's not helpful IMO.RaceBannon said:On your number 1 the race of the guys meant everything. If they were white no one hears about it
Why wouldn't Ann reference it? H called her a racist before he even knew what the story was
5 dudes took one lady's bike. She has the receipts. She got suspended and doxed
That's the outrage. Not Ann Coulter
Who hates Trump so she should get a pass anyway
Two things can be true at the same time. I made my case on Coulter and I am also outraged at what happened to the nurse. The entire thing is outrageous.
IMO, they cancel each other out. -
TurdBomber said:
I think the Red Meat this story provides to Coulter is equal to the Red Meat it provides to an exploitative scumbag like Crump.creepycoug said:
I'm talking about her tweet, where she was mocking the implication that we would need to have a receipt to actually believe the nurse over 5 teenage black boys. I'm not sure how else to take that other than how she meant it, and I stand by my position. Gratuitous. She could have just said, "yeah, a pregnant adult nurse getting off her shift and 5 teenage boys running around up to no good. Who are you going to believe?" But Coulter being Coulter, she had to get just a little more attention. It's not helpful IMO.RaceBannon said:On your number 1 the race of the guys meant everything. If they were white no one hears about it
Why wouldn't Ann reference it? H called her a racist before he even knew what the story was
5 dudes took one lady's bike. She has the receipts. She got suspended and doxed
That's the outrage. Not Ann Coulter
Who hates Trump so she should get a pass anyway
Two things can be true at the same time. I made my case on Coulter and I am also outraged at what happened to the nurse. The entire thing is outrageous.
IMO, they cancel each other out.
Crump is looking for a payday and additional name recognition (that will increase his payday).
-
It's not a moral equivalency, it's an actual equivalency, i.e., no double standards, fair is fair.WestlinnDuck said:
"TurdBomber said:
I think the Red Meat this story provides to Coulter is equal to the Red Meat it provides to an exploitative scumbag like Crump.creepycoug said:
I'm talking about her tweet, where she was mocking the implication that we would need to have a receipt to actually believe the nurse over 5 teenage black boys. I'm not sure how else to take that other than how she meant it, and I stand by my position. Gratuitous. She could have just said, "yeah, a pregnant adult nurse getting off her shift and 5 teenage boys running around up to no good. Who are you going to believe?" But Coulter being Coulter, she had to get just a little more attention. It's not helpful IMO.RaceBannon said:On your number 1 the race of the guys meant everything. If they were white no one hears about it
Why wouldn't Ann reference it? H called her a racist before he even knew what the story was
5 dudes took one lady's bike. She has the receipts. She got suspended and doxed
That's the outrage. Not Ann Coulter
Who hates Trump so she should get a pass anyway
Two things can be true at the same time. I made my case on Coulter and I am also outraged at what happened to the nurse. The entire thing is outrageous.
IMO, they cancel each other out.
Nope. No lame ass moral equivalency here. Coulter was telling the truth. Crump is a professional black grifter and gets paid to support more dead black kids and lied.
If Crump can blabber his ill-informed racist bullshit without censoring, Coulter can describe his oppressed "victims" however the fuck she wants, so long as it's true and accurate. -
Probably quibbling over words, but I just want to make it clear that the truth > the lie. Nothing wrong with red meat stories if true. Lying about Russian collusion and the covid vaxx is red meat to the left. Posting about black racism to a fed up white base who are not racists is red meat but in this case, Coulter's post was nails.TurdBomber said:
It's not a moral equivalency, it's an actual equivalency, i.e., no double standards, fair is fair.WestlinnDuck said:
"TurdBomber said:
I think the Red Meat this story provides to Coulter is equal to the Red Meat it provides to an exploitative scumbag like Crump.creepycoug said:
I'm talking about her tweet, where she was mocking the implication that we would need to have a receipt to actually believe the nurse over 5 teenage black boys. I'm not sure how else to take that other than how she meant it, and I stand by my position. Gratuitous. She could have just said, "yeah, a pregnant adult nurse getting off her shift and 5 teenage boys running around up to no good. Who are you going to believe?" But Coulter being Coulter, she had to get just a little more attention. It's not helpful IMO.RaceBannon said:On your number 1 the race of the guys meant everything. If they were white no one hears about it
Why wouldn't Ann reference it? H called her a racist before he even knew what the story was
5 dudes took one lady's bike. She has the receipts. She got suspended and doxed
That's the outrage. Not Ann Coulter
Who hates Trump so she should get a pass anyway
Two things can be true at the same time. I made my case on Coulter and I am also outraged at what happened to the nurse. The entire thing is outrageous.
IMO, they cancel each other out.
Nope. No lame ass moral equivalency here. Coulter was telling the truth. Crump is a professional black grifter and gets paid to support more dead black kids and lied.
If Crump can blabber his ill-informed racist bullshit without censoring, Coulter can describe his oppressed "victims" however the fuck she wants, so long as it's true and accurate. -
From the censors in the MSM, who is most likely to be censored, Crump or Coulter?WestlinnDuck said:
Probably quibbling over words, but I just want to make it clear that the truth > the lie. Nothing wrong with red meat stories if true. Lying about Russian collusion and the covid vaxx is red meat to the left. Posting about black racism to a fed up white base who are not racists is red meat but in this case, Coulter's post was nails.TurdBomber said:
It's not a moral equivalency, it's an actual equivalency, i.e., no double standards, fair is fair.WestlinnDuck said:
"TurdBomber said:
I think the Red Meat this story provides to Coulter is equal to the Red Meat it provides to an exploitative scumbag like Crump.creepycoug said:
I'm talking about her tweet, where she was mocking the implication that we would need to have a receipt to actually believe the nurse over 5 teenage black boys. I'm not sure how else to take that other than how she meant it, and I stand by my position. Gratuitous. She could have just said, "yeah, a pregnant adult nurse getting off her shift and 5 teenage boys running around up to no good. Who are you going to believe?" But Coulter being Coulter, she had to get just a little more attention. It's not helpful IMO.RaceBannon said:On your number 1 the race of the guys meant everything. If they were white no one hears about it
Why wouldn't Ann reference it? H called her a racist before he even knew what the story was
5 dudes took one lady's bike. She has the receipts. She got suspended and doxed
That's the outrage. Not Ann Coulter
Who hates Trump so she should get a pass anyway
Two things can be true at the same time. I made my case on Coulter and I am also outraged at what happened to the nurse. The entire thing is outrageous.
IMO, they cancel each other out.
Nope. No lame ass moral equivalency here. Coulter was telling the truth. Crump is a professional black grifter and gets paid to support more dead black kids and lied.
If Crump can blabber his ill-informed racist bullshit without censoring, Coulter can describe his oppressed "victims" however the fuck she wants, so long as it's true and accurate.
I'm saying I want to allow it all, bullshit and truth, because most people are smart enough to decipher what's true when they hear both sides.
Red Meat for the Goose, Red Meat for the Gander. -
I'll disagree on "most people". You need to hit most people in the face to make them wake up.TurdBomber said:
From the censors in the MSM, who is most likely to be censored, Crump or Coulter?WestlinnDuck said:
Probably quibbling over words, but I just want to make it clear that the truth > the lie. Nothing wrong with red meat stories if true. Lying about Russian collusion and the covid vaxx is red meat to the left. Posting about black racism to a fed up white base who are not racists is red meat but in this case, Coulter's post was nails.TurdBomber said:
It's not a moral equivalency, it's an actual equivalency, i.e., no double standards, fair is fair.WestlinnDuck said:
"TurdBomber said:
I think the Red Meat this story provides to Coulter is equal to the Red Meat it provides to an exploitative scumbag like Crump.creepycoug said:
I'm talking about her tweet, where she was mocking the implication that we would need to have a receipt to actually believe the nurse over 5 teenage black boys. I'm not sure how else to take that other than how she meant it, and I stand by my position. Gratuitous. She could have just said, "yeah, a pregnant adult nurse getting off her shift and 5 teenage boys running around up to no good. Who are you going to believe?" But Coulter being Coulter, she had to get just a little more attention. It's not helpful IMO.RaceBannon said:On your number 1 the race of the guys meant everything. If they were white no one hears about it
Why wouldn't Ann reference it? H called her a racist before he even knew what the story was
5 dudes took one lady's bike. She has the receipts. She got suspended and doxed
That's the outrage. Not Ann Coulter
Who hates Trump so she should get a pass anyway
Two things can be true at the same time. I made my case on Coulter and I am also outraged at what happened to the nurse. The entire thing is outrageous.
IMO, they cancel each other out.
Nope. No lame ass moral equivalency here. Coulter was telling the truth. Crump is a professional black grifter and gets paid to support more dead black kids and lied.
If Crump can blabber his ill-informed racist bullshit without censoring, Coulter can describe his oppressed "victims" however the fuck she wants, so long as it's true and accurate.
I'm saying I want to allow it all, bullshit and truth, because most people are smart enough to decipher what's true when they hear both sides.
Red Meat for the Goose, Red Meat for the Gander. -
I think many have become that way due to MSM brainwashing. The MSM is still where 80% of people get their news and info. Google, MS Explorer home page, Apple News, etc. One must go around all those "sources" to get any real news today.WestlinnDuck said:
I'll disagree on "most people". You need to hit most people in the face to make them wake up.TurdBomber said:
From the censors in the MSM, who is most likely to be censored, Crump or Coulter?WestlinnDuck said:
Probably quibbling over words, but I just want to make it clear that the truth > the lie. Nothing wrong with red meat stories if true. Lying about Russian collusion and the covid vaxx is red meat to the left. Posting about black racism to a fed up white base who are not racists is red meat but in this case, Coulter's post was nails.TurdBomber said:
It's not a moral equivalency, it's an actual equivalency, i.e., no double standards, fair is fair.WestlinnDuck said:
"TurdBomber said:
I think the Red Meat this story provides to Coulter is equal to the Red Meat it provides to an exploitative scumbag like Crump.creepycoug said:
I'm talking about her tweet, where she was mocking the implication that we would need to have a receipt to actually believe the nurse over 5 teenage black boys. I'm not sure how else to take that other than how she meant it, and I stand by my position. Gratuitous. She could have just said, "yeah, a pregnant adult nurse getting off her shift and 5 teenage boys running around up to no good. Who are you going to believe?" But Coulter being Coulter, she had to get just a little more attention. It's not helpful IMO.RaceBannon said:On your number 1 the race of the guys meant everything. If they were white no one hears about it
Why wouldn't Ann reference it? H called her a racist before he even knew what the story was
5 dudes took one lady's bike. She has the receipts. She got suspended and doxed
That's the outrage. Not Ann Coulter
Who hates Trump so she should get a pass anyway
Two things can be true at the same time. I made my case on Coulter and I am also outraged at what happened to the nurse. The entire thing is outrageous.
IMO, they cancel each other out.
Nope. No lame ass moral equivalency here. Coulter was telling the truth. Crump is a professional black grifter and gets paid to support more dead black kids and lied.
If Crump can blabber his ill-informed racist bullshit without censoring, Coulter can describe his oppressed "victims" however the fuck she wants, so long as it's true and accurate.
I'm saying I want to allow it all, bullshit and truth, because most people are smart enough to decipher what's true when they hear both sides.
Red Meat for the Goose, Red Meat for the Gander.
It's a miracle the elections are as close as they've been, given the massive efforts and expenditures by the MSM and it's benefactors to completely control and occupy all fields with their narratives.
I believe if it weren't for the multiple, massive conspiracies, false flags and outright fabrications by the DNC, its donors and the MSM, Trump would've landslide the fuck out of the braindead zombie in the WH today.
And I didn't even vote for the guy. -
"And I didn't even vote for the guy." I did say most.
