Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Regular people punching back
Comments
-
Unfortunately, the statistics back up Coulter. Some blacks are preying on white people. A far less percentage of whites are preying on black people. Rather than recognize that fact we have supposedly fine black people making up hate crimes against innocent whites. And like the dazzler, leftard white social justice warriors can't wait to swallow the lies. Hope that wasn't unhelpful.creepycoug said:RaceBannon said:Being male makes them dangerous
I understand the premise and have no problem with her mocking the PC assumption of who is at fault. I would have found another way than "Sure, sure, I'm going to believe 5 black kids over a white pregnant nurse." I just think it's unhelpful and she could have taken a different tack. It's not very strategic to mock a false accusation of racism by making a thinly veiled racist remark.RaceBannon said:The entire premise is that they were black so she was guilty
It should be mocked
Which is what Ann is good at -
I know.WestlinnDuck said:
Unfortunately, the statistics back up Coulter. Some blacks are preying on white people. A far less percentage of whites are preying on black people. Rather than recognize that fact we have supposedly fine black people making up hate crimes against innocent whites. And like the dazzler, leftard white social justice warriors can't wait to swallow the lies. Hope that wasn't unhelpful.creepycoug said:RaceBannon said:Being male makes them dangerous
I understand the premise and have no problem with her mocking the PC assumption of who is at fault. I would have found another way than "Sure, sure, I'm going to believe 5 black kids over a white pregnant nurse." I just think it's unhelpful and she could have taken a different tack. It's not very strategic to mock a false accusation of racism by making a thinly veiled racist remark.RaceBannon said:The entire premise is that they were black so she was guilty
It should be mocked
Which is what Ann is good at
Is there a reason that your otherwise reasonable post had to wrap with a sarcastic remark? Are you mad that I think Coulter's comments are unhelpful? Do you want me to like Ann Coulter? I often do, but in this context, what she wrote was, IMO, unhelpful. -
I think your wrong. Pandering to the black thug element isn't helpful. Any professional black grifter living on a life of accusing whites as institutionally racist deserves to be taken to the woodshed. It's okay to call Coulter a white racist bitch but she can't accurately point out a fake hate crime initiated by black thugs?creepycoug said:
I know.WestlinnDuck said:
Unfortunately, the statistics back up Coulter. Some blacks are preying on white people. A far less percentage of whites are preying on black people. Rather than recognize that fact we have supposedly fine black people making up hate crimes against innocent whites. And like the dazzler, leftard white social justice warriors can't wait to swallow the lies. Hope that wasn't unhelpful.creepycoug said:RaceBannon said:Being male makes them dangerous
I understand the premise and have no problem with her mocking the PC assumption of who is at fault. I would have found another way than "Sure, sure, I'm going to believe 5 black kids over a white pregnant nurse." I just think it's unhelpful and she could have taken a different tack. It's not very strategic to mock a false accusation of racism by making a thinly veiled racist remark.RaceBannon said:The entire premise is that they were black so she was guilty
It should be mocked
Which is what Ann is good at
Is there a reason that your otherwise reasonable post had to wrap with a sarcastic remark? Are you mad that I think Coulter's comments are unhelpful? Do you want me to like Ann Coulter? I often do, but in this context, what she wrote was, IMO, unhelpful. -
PS I treat lying anti-American POS the same whether they are Adam Schiff, the dementia patient or the dazzler.WestlinnDuck said:
I think your wrong. Pandering to the black thug element isn't helpful. Any professional black grifter living on a life of accusing whites as institutionally racist deserves to be taken to the woodshed. It's okay to call Coulter a white racist bitch but she can't accurately point out a fake hate crime initiated by black thugs?creepycoug said:
I know.WestlinnDuck said:
Unfortunately, the statistics back up Coulter. Some blacks are preying on white people. A far less percentage of whites are preying on black people. Rather than recognize that fact we have supposedly fine black people making up hate crimes against innocent whites. And like the dazzler, leftard white social justice warriors can't wait to swallow the lies. Hope that wasn't unhelpful.creepycoug said:RaceBannon said:Being male makes them dangerous
I understand the premise and have no problem with her mocking the PC assumption of who is at fault. I would have found another way than "Sure, sure, I'm going to believe 5 black kids over a white pregnant nurse." I just think it's unhelpful and she could have taken a different tack. It's not very strategic to mock a false accusation of racism by making a thinly veiled racist remark.RaceBannon said:The entire premise is that they were black so she was guilty
It should be mocked
Which is what Ann is good at
Is there a reason that your otherwise reasonable post had to wrap with a sarcastic remark? Are you mad that I think Coulter's comments are unhelpful? Do you want me to like Ann Coulter? I often do, but in this context, what she wrote was, IMO, unhelpful. -
Oh Lordy. Your claims are stylized in the form of the false dilemma. For starters, my position doesn't amount to "pandering to the black thug element." And I don't deny, outright or by implication, that those who weaponize race to run roughshod over others shouldn't be held to account. Nor did I say that Coulter can't defend herself against claims that she is racist or a bitch or both. None of that is on me or my view.WestlinnDuck said:
I think your wrong. Pandering to the black thug element isn't helpful. Any professional black grifter living on a life of accusing whites as institutionally racist deserves to be taken to the woodshed. It's okay to call Coulter a white racist bitch but she can't accurately point out a fake hate crime initiated by black thugs?creepycoug said:
I know.WestlinnDuck said:
Unfortunately, the statistics back up Coulter. Some blacks are preying on white people. A far less percentage of whites are preying on black people. Rather than recognize that fact we have supposedly fine black people making up hate crimes against innocent whites. And like the dazzler, leftard white social justice warriors can't wait to swallow the lies. Hope that wasn't unhelpful.creepycoug said:RaceBannon said:Being male makes them dangerous
I understand the premise and have no problem with her mocking the PC assumption of who is at fault. I would have found another way than "Sure, sure, I'm going to believe 5 black kids over a white pregnant nurse." I just think it's unhelpful and she could have taken a different tack. It's not very strategic to mock a false accusation of racism by making a thinly veiled racist remark.RaceBannon said:The entire premise is that they were black so she was guilty
It should be mocked
Which is what Ann is good at
Is there a reason that your otherwise reasonable post had to wrap with a sarcastic remark? Are you mad that I think Coulter's comments are unhelpful? Do you want me to like Ann Coulter? I often do, but in this context, what she wrote was, IMO, unhelpful.
So you can think what you want; but I didn't assert or argue against any of those positions. My post was crystal clear, so I'm not re-writing here.
As to your PS, I assume you are directing your insults to someone else, or is that a response for the unnecessary comment about being helpful about which I asked? -
Fixed that for you.WestlinnDuck said:
Unfortunately, the statistics back up Coulter. Some blacks are preying on white people. A far less percentage of whites are preying on black people. Rather than recognize that fact we have supposedly fine black people making up hate crimes against innocent whites. And like the dazzler, leftard white social justice warriors can't wait tocreepycoug said:RaceBannon said:Being male makes them dangerous
I understand the premise and have no problem with her mocking the PC assumption of who is at fault. I would have found another way than "Sure, sure, I'm going to believe 5 black kids over a white pregnant nurse." I just think it's unhelpful and she could have taken a different tack. It's not very strategic to mock a false accusation of racism by making a thinly veiled racist remark.RaceBannon said:The entire premise is that they were black so she was guilty
It should be mocked
Which is what Ann is good atswallowrepeat the lies. Hope that wasn't unhelpful.
I had a frank conversation with a leftist friend of mine during the summer of BLM and the riots. She's fully vaxed, double boosted and still had covid twice yet insists on wearing a mask in her FB avatar so you get the picture.
Like most leftists she believes cops are out hunting black teens. She has looooads of black friends who are terrified to let their kids out of the house. She didn't believe me when I cited 19 as the number of unarmed black men shot by police in a year (BTW unarmed doesn't mean not dangerous). Showed her the FBI study that backed up my data- She promised to "Look into it". She hasn't brought up the subject since.
-
Nope, just to point out I'm an equal opportunity hater. We will disagree over Coulter being unhelpful for the reasons I fully explained.creepycoug said:
Oh Lordy. Your claims are stylized in the form of the false dilemma. For starters, my position doesn't amount to "pandering to the black thug element." And I don't deny, outright or by implication, that those who weaponize race to run roughshod over others shouldn't be held to account. Nor did I say that Coulter can't defend herself against claims that she is racist or a bitch or both. None of that is on me or my view.WestlinnDuck said:
I think your wrong. Pandering to the black thug element isn't helpful. Any professional black grifter living on a life of accusing whites as institutionally racist deserves to be taken to the woodshed. It's okay to call Coulter a white racist bitch but she can't accurately point out a fake hate crime initiated by black thugs?creepycoug said:
I know.WestlinnDuck said:
Unfortunately, the statistics back up Coulter. Some blacks are preying on white people. A far less percentage of whites are preying on black people. Rather than recognize that fact we have supposedly fine black people making up hate crimes against innocent whites. And like the dazzler, leftard white social justice warriors can't wait to swallow the lies. Hope that wasn't unhelpful.creepycoug said:RaceBannon said:Being male makes them dangerous
I understand the premise and have no problem with her mocking the PC assumption of who is at fault. I would have found another way than "Sure, sure, I'm going to believe 5 black kids over a white pregnant nurse." I just think it's unhelpful and she could have taken a different tack. It's not very strategic to mock a false accusation of racism by making a thinly veiled racist remark.RaceBannon said:The entire premise is that they were black so she was guilty
It should be mocked
Which is what Ann is good at
Is there a reason that your otherwise reasonable post had to wrap with a sarcastic remark? Are you mad that I think Coulter's comments are unhelpful? Do you want me to like Ann Coulter? I often do, but in this context, what she wrote was, IMO, unhelpful.
So you can think what you want; but I didn't assert or argue against any of those positions. My post was crystal clear, so I'm not re-writing here.
As to your PS, I assume you are directing your insults to someone else, or is that a response for the unnecessary comment about being helpful about which I asked? -
"Blackness?"HHusky said:
Look, I get your point, and Ann's and Candace's. What makes the assembled teenagers dangerous and unbelievable is their blackness.jecornel said:@HHusky i suggest you scroll up and review the response by Candace. Or does her viewpoint not matter because she is black and a woman?
I'm with you. White people shouldn't have to put up with this.
You really are a racist Nazi asshole, aren't you? It doesn't matter whether you're trying to be positive or negative about race. When you make it the essential of everything, you're a racist.
Own it, bigot. -
I think the Red Meat this story provides to Coulter is equal to the Red Meat it provides to an exploitative scumbag like Crump.creepycoug said:
I'm talking about her tweet, where she was mocking the implication that we would need to have a receipt to actually believe the nurse over 5 teenage black boys. I'm not sure how else to take that other than how she meant it, and I stand by my position. Gratuitous. She could have just said, "yeah, a pregnant adult nurse getting off her shift and 5 teenage boys running around up to no good. Who are you going to believe?" But Coulter being Coulter, she had to get just a little more attention. It's not helpful IMO.RaceBannon said:On your number 1 the race of the guys meant everything. If they were white no one hears about it
Why wouldn't Ann reference it? H called her a racist before he even knew what the story was
5 dudes took one lady's bike. She has the receipts. She got suspended and doxed
That's the outrage. Not Ann Coulter
Who hates Trump so she should get a pass anyway
Two things can be true at the same time. I made my case on Coulter and I am also outraged at what happened to the nurse. The entire thing is outrageous.
IMO, they cancel each other out.
