Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Pump my gas duck - couch sale, double feature

12467

Comments

  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 13,014
    RaceBannon said:

    Stacking classes

    Player development is at an all-tim high
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Joey
    Joey Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,536 Founders Club
    RaceBannon said:

    Stacking classes

    First and right. On everything involving Oregon and recruiting.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ntxduck
    ntxduck Member Posts: 6,232
    AtomicDawg said:

    ntxduck said:

    AtomicDawg said:

    ntxduck said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    Oregon lost 2 more Lanning recruits today (thats 5 or 6 now). Oregon fans are pretty sure it's because they were really good but once they saw the list of high school prospects that Lanning is bringing in next year, they realized they would never see the field.

    Also interesting, Oregon has had 7 linebackers transfer out this offseason. I don't think UW even has 7 scholarship LBs

    You should be processing out 5-6 kids from the previous year’s class every season or you’re doing it wrong. Highly recruited kids show up on campus and within a week of fall camp you know which ones you need to cut already.

    It’s one of the reasons why the SEC has been kicking everyone’s ass for the last decade + while Oregon and Washington have been letting glorified walk ons stay on the roster for 5 years.

    Also iirc 4 of those guys (including taggart) signed less than 48 hours after lanning was hired, so I wouldn’t really categorize them as “his guys”.
    Sounds like player development is at an all time high.
    What does player development have to do with kids who are on campus for a week? Some kids just don’t have it, no matter how they looked in HS, and it’s usually very apparent early on. See; smalls. UW should have told him to go portaling after his freshman (or sophomore) season. Would have given you another bite at the apple with another kid you could have brought in. If that kid sucks, portal his ass too. It’s a numbers game. You get as many kids in as you can every year. And in order to do that, you tell the ones who aren’t really going to be contributors to look elsewhere. It kinda sucks that that is what college football has become, but the SEC has been playing that game with medical retirements and suddenly senior-ing for 15 years now. And it allows them to bring in 30+ new guys each year
    Smalls was actually at his best his freshman year in 2020. Trice was nothing. Odunze and McMillan literally could not catch when they were freshman or fight for the ball in Macmillan’s case. Bbk was dragged by everyone for a couple of years before he took off. Culp actually sucked pretty bad. Kevin king was awful until they moved him to the slot and then corner. Tyler Huntley was awful his first 3 years at Utah. Off the top of my head that a lot of nfl draft picks or future picks that were bad when they arrived. Players can actually get better. Foreign concept to some programs. Oregon is not alone how they go about it, but acting you know when their 18 years old is stupid.
    The guys who you tell to get lost after 1 year usually aren’t talent/size related. Think about what separates smalls from the guys above and you’ll get it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,942
    ntxduck said:

    AtomicDawg said:

    ntxduck said:

    AtomicDawg said:

    ntxduck said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    Oregon lost 2 more Lanning recruits today (thats 5 or 6 now). Oregon fans are pretty sure it's because they were really good but once they saw the list of high school prospects that Lanning is bringing in next year, they realized they would never see the field.

    Also interesting, Oregon has had 7 linebackers transfer out this offseason. I don't think UW even has 7 scholarship LBs

    You should be processing out 5-6 kids from the previous year’s class every season or you’re doing it wrong. Highly recruited kids show up on campus and within a week of fall camp you know which ones you need to cut already.

    It’s one of the reasons why the SEC has been kicking everyone’s ass for the last decade + while Oregon and Washington have been letting glorified walk ons stay on the roster for 5 years.

    Also iirc 4 of those guys (including taggart) signed less than 48 hours after lanning was hired, so I wouldn’t really categorize them as “his guys”.
    Sounds like player development is at an all time high.
    What does player development have to do with kids who are on campus for a week? Some kids just don’t have it, no matter how they looked in HS, and it’s usually very apparent early on. See; smalls. UW should have told him to go portaling after his freshman (or sophomore) season. Would have given you another bite at the apple with another kid you could have brought in. If that kid sucks, portal his ass too. It’s a numbers game. You get as many kids in as you can every year. And in order to do that, you tell the ones who aren’t really going to be contributors to look elsewhere. It kinda sucks that that is what college football has become, but the SEC has been playing that game with medical retirements and suddenly senior-ing for 15 years now. And it allows them to bring in 30+ new guys each year
    Smalls was actually at his best his freshman year in 2020. Trice was nothing. Odunze and McMillan literally could not catch when they were freshman or fight for the ball in Macmillan’s case. Bbk was dragged by everyone for a couple of years before he took off. Culp actually sucked pretty bad. Kevin king was awful until they moved him to the slot and then corner. Tyler Huntley was awful his first 3 years at Utah. Off the top of my head that a lot of nfl draft picks or future picks that were bad when they arrived. Players can actually get better. Foreign concept to some programs. Oregon is not alone how they go about it, but acting you know when their 18 years old is stupid.
    The guys who you tell to get lost after 1 year usually aren’t talent/size related. Think about what separates smalls from the guys above and you’ll get it.
    Yeah as fans we have no in sight into their mental make up and drive to work.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AtomicDawg
    AtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,358
    ntxduck said:

    AtomicDawg said:

    ntxduck said:

    AtomicDawg said:

    ntxduck said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    Oregon lost 2 more Lanning recruits today (thats 5 or 6 now). Oregon fans are pretty sure it's because they were really good but once they saw the list of high school prospects that Lanning is bringing in next year, they realized they would never see the field.

    Also interesting, Oregon has had 7 linebackers transfer out this offseason. I don't think UW even has 7 scholarship LBs

    You should be processing out 5-6 kids from the previous year’s class every season or you’re doing it wrong. Highly recruited kids show up on campus and within a week of fall camp you know which ones you need to cut already.

    It’s one of the reasons why the SEC has been kicking everyone’s ass for the last decade + while Oregon and Washington have been letting glorified walk ons stay on the roster for 5 years.

    Also iirc 4 of those guys (including taggart) signed less than 48 hours after lanning was hired, so I wouldn’t really categorize them as “his guys”.
    Sounds like player development is at an all time high.
    What does player development have to do with kids who are on campus for a week? Some kids just don’t have it, no matter how they looked in HS, and it’s usually very apparent early on. See; smalls. UW should have told him to go portaling after his freshman (or sophomore) season. Would have given you another bite at the apple with another kid you could have brought in. If that kid sucks, portal his ass too. It’s a numbers game. You get as many kids in as you can every year. And in order to do that, you tell the ones who aren’t really going to be contributors to look elsewhere. It kinda sucks that that is what college football has become, but the SEC has been playing that game with medical retirements and suddenly senior-ing for 15 years now. And it allows them to bring in 30+ new guys each year
    Smalls was actually at his best his freshman year in 2020. Trice was nothing. Odunze and McMillan literally could not catch when they were freshman or fight for the ball in Macmillan’s case. Bbk was dragged by everyone for a couple of years before he took off. Culp actually sucked pretty bad. Kevin king was awful until they moved him to the slot and then corner. Tyler Huntley was awful his first 3 years at Utah. Off the top of my head that a lot of nfl draft picks or future picks that were bad when they arrived. Players can actually get better. Foreign concept to some programs. Oregon is not alone how they go about it, but acting you know when their 18 years old is stupid.
    The guys who you tell to get lost after 1 year usually aren’t talent/size related. Think about what separates smalls from the guys above and you’ll get it.
    Smalls rumored to not work hard off of the field (weight room etc…)

    And he was always overrated. Probably could be a contributor as a senior if he really wanted it. Didn’t appear that he did. You don’t know this in fall camp their freshmen year though.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,594
    And another



    Duck 247 mod says our old friend Sir Mells is rumored to be next
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ntxduck
    ntxduck Member Posts: 6,232
    ntxduck said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    And another



    Duck 247 mod says our old friend Sir Mells is rumored to be next
    Please god have smells portal


    Thank you jeebus
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,594
    And another

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter