Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Name calling of recruits

245

Comments

  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    DerekJohnson said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    Since one poster constantly is breaking these rules perhaps he should receive another timeout or banning?

    What's the point of rules if one poster constantly takes a shit all over them with no consequence?

    I like to say that a poster should get ANOTHER timeout, then in the next paragraph accuse the site of never having consequences for said poster. It's what I like to do.
    Those were not contradictory statements, the question is of repeated transgressions.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,776
    He_Needs_More_Time said:


    What's the point of rules if one poster constantly takes a shit all over them with no consequence?

    This post is craves some tub girl.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,617
    RaccoonHarry said:

    Sounds like name calling of overage recruits is still on the up
    and up...

    Tripper Johnson?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    DerekJohnson said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    Since one poster constantly is breaking these rules perhaps he should receive another timeout or banning?

    What's the point of rules if one poster constantly takes a shit all over them with no consequence?

    I like to say that a poster should get ANOTHER timeout, then in the next paragraph accuse the site of never having consequences for said poster. It's what I like to do.
    I don't think it was contradicting. You gave him a timeout and told him to not to do it again or he'll be banned. He's repeatedly not followed your advice.

    You want this site to grow as you've said and obviously worried about potential interviews. Well how is allowing one poster to constantly post homophobic material, racial material, can't go a post without saying the word "Cock" or "Cunt" helping with that?

    He's also attacking a poster constantly which was one of your reasons for banning Harv. Like PLSS, Harv could provide some good posts. He could be an asset but chose not to follow your rules which is why you ultimately ran him. How is what PLSS doing any different than Harv?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,741 Founders Club
    MikeDamone said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    Since one poster constantly is breaking these rules perhaps he should receive another timeout or banning?

    What's the point of rules if one poster constantly takes a shit all over them with no consequence?

    I like to say that a poster should get ANOTHER timeout, then in the next paragraph accuse the site of never having consequences for said poster. It's what I like to do.
    I don't think it was contradicting. You gave him a timeout and told him to not to do it again or he'll be banned. He's repeatedly not followed your advice.

    You want this site to grow as you've said and obviously worried about potential interviews. Well how is allowing one poster to constantly post homophobic material, racial material, can't go a post without saying the word "Cock" or "Cunt" helping with that?

    He's also attacking a poster constantly which was one of your reasons for banning Harv. Like PLSS, Harv could provide some good posts. He could be an asset but chose not to follow your rules which is why you ultimately ran him. How is what PLSS doing any different than Harv?
    What part of "new rule" don't you get? And you're not accurate on Harv vs. PLSS.
    Agree.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter