Name calling of recruits

DerekJohnson

We have few rules here and it takes a lot to get the boot. But we now have a new rule. We will no longer allow name calling of underage recruits. It's wrong on many levels. I'm sure most of us can agree that it serves no purpose toward Husky Football or this site. Thank you.

Swaye

Way to go PL_SS.

RaccoonHarry

Sounds like name calling of overage recruits is still on the up
and up...

Sarkingham

Can we still point out when they're being idiots?

Swaye

We only have like 4 rules here. Half of them are as a result of PL_SS. WTF?

topdawgnc

I've heard all recruiting has stopped since Peterman took over.

BennyBeaver

Derek = Kim

[Deleted User]

Since one poster constantly is breaking these rules perhaps he should receive another timeout or banning?

What's the point of rules if one poster constantly takes a shit all over them with no consequence?

Fenwick

can we use euphemisms?

doogsinparadise

Leave the poasting for us Stalin, rofl buddy!!! Hardy har har

PurpleJ

Fucking boof DJ

DerekJohnson

He_Needs_More_Time said:

Since one poster constantly is breaking these rules perhaps he should receive another timeout or banning?

What's the point of rules if one poster constantly takes a shit all over them with no consequence?

I like to say that a poster should get ANOTHER timeout, then in the next paragraph accuse the site of never having consequences for said poster. It's what I like to do.

doogsinparadise

DerekJohnson said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

Since one poster constantly is breaking these rules perhaps he should receive another timeout or banning?

What's the point of rules if one poster constantly takes a shit all over them with no consequence?

I like to say that a poster should get ANOTHER timeout, then in the next paragraph accuse the site of never having consequences for said poster. It's what I like to do.

Those were not contradictory statements, the question is of repeated transgressions.

PurpleJ

He_Needs_More_Time said:

What's the point of rules if one poster constantly takes a shit all over them with no consequence?

This post is craves some tub girl.

bananasnblondes

RaccoonHarry said:

Sounds like name calling of overage recruits is still on the up
and up...

Tripper Johnson?

[Deleted User]

DerekJohnson said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

Since one poster constantly is breaking these rules perhaps he should receive another timeout or banning?

What's the point of rules if one poster constantly takes a shit all over them with no consequence?

I like to say that a poster should get ANOTHER timeout, then in the next paragraph accuse the site of never having consequences for said poster. It's what I like to do.

I don't think it was contradicting. You gave him a timeout and told him to not to do it again or he'll be banned. He's repeatedly not followed your advice.

You want this site to grow as you've said and obviously worried about potential interviews. Well how is allowing one poster to constantly post homophobic material, racial material, can't go a post without saying the word "Cock" or "Cunt" helping with that?

He's also attacking a poster constantly which was one of your reasons for banning Harv. Like PLSS, Harv could provide some good posts. He could be an asset but chose not to follow your rules which is why you ultimately ran him. How is what PLSS doing any different than Harv?

MikeDamone

He_Needs_More_Time said:

DerekJohnson said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

Since one poster constantly is breaking these rules perhaps he should receive another timeout or banning?

What's the point of rules if one poster constantly takes a shit all over them with no consequence?

I like to say that a poster should get ANOTHER timeout, then in the next paragraph accuse the site of never having consequences for said poster. It's what I like to do.

I don't think it was contradicting. You gave him a timeout and told him to not to do it again or he'll be banned. He's repeatedly not followed your advice.

You want this site to grow as you've said and obviously worried about potential interviews. Well how is allowing one poster to constantly post homophobic material, racial material, can't go a post without saying the word "Cock" or "Cunt" helping with that?

He's also attacking a poster constantly which was one of your reasons for banning Harv. Like PLSS, Harv could provide some good posts. He could be an asset but chose not to follow your rules which is why you ultimately ran him. How is what PLSS doing any different than Harv?

What part of "new rule" don't you get? And you're not accurate on Harv vs. PLSS.

Swaye

MikeDamone said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

DerekJohnson said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

Since one poster constantly is breaking these rules perhaps he should receive another timeout or banning?

What's the point of rules if one poster constantly takes a shit all over them with no consequence?

I like to say that a poster should get ANOTHER timeout, then in the next paragraph accuse the site of never having consequences for said poster. It's what I like to do.

I don't think it was contradicting. You gave him a timeout and told him to not to do it again or he'll be banned. He's repeatedly not followed your advice.

You want this site to grow as you've said and obviously worried about potential interviews. Well how is allowing one poster to constantly post homophobic material, racial material, can't go a post without saying the word "Cock" or "Cunt" helping with that?

He's also attacking a poster constantly which was one of your reasons for banning Harv. Like PLSS, Harv could provide some good posts. He could be an asset but chose not to follow your rules which is why you ultimately ran him. How is what PLSS doing any different than Harv?

What part of "new rule" don't you get? And you're not accurate on Harv vs. PLSS.

Agree.

CuntWaffle

If PLSS is banned then I'm out.

PurpleJ

Asking for someone to be banned is for pussies. Simple fact.

Swaye

I think usually PL_SS is sort of asking for himself to be banned. He likes to walk (LOL) a fine line.