Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Name calling of recruits

AtomicPissAtomicPiss Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 64,571 Founders Club
in Hardcore Husky Board
We have few rules here and it takes a lot to get the boot. But we now have a new rule. We will no longer allow name calling of underage recruits. It's wrong on many levels. I'm sure most of us can agree that it serves no purpose toward Husky Football or this site. Thank you.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,544 Founders Club
    Way to go PL_SS.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaccoonHarryRaccoonHarry Member Posts: 2,161
    Sounds like name calling of overage recruits is still on the up
    and up...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SarkinghamSarkingham Member Posts: 299
    Can we still point out when they're being idiots?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838
    I've heard all recruiting has stopped since Peterman took over.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BennyBeaverBennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    Derek = Kim
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Since one poster constantly is breaking these rules perhaps he should receive another timeout or banning?

    What's the point of rules if one poster constantly takes a shit all over them with no consequence?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FenwickFenwick Member Posts: 1,174
    can we use euphemisms?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadisedoogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    Leave the poasting for us Stalin, rofl buddy!!! Hardy har har
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,524 Founders Club
    Fucking boof DJ
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadisedoogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    DerekJohnson said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    Since one poster constantly is breaking these rules perhaps he should receive another timeout or banning?

    What's the point of rules if one poster constantly takes a shit all over them with no consequence?

    I like to say that a poster should get ANOTHER timeout, then in the next paragraph accuse the site of never having consequences for said poster. It's what I like to do.
    Those were not contradictory statements, the question is of repeated transgressions.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,524 Founders Club
    He_Needs_More_Time said:


    What's the point of rules if one poster constantly takes a shit all over them with no consequence?

    This post is craves some tub girl.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bananasnblondesbananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,423
    RaccoonHarry said:

    Sounds like name calling of overage recruits is still on the up
    and up...

    Tripper Johnson?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    DerekJohnson said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    Since one poster constantly is breaking these rules perhaps he should receive another timeout or banning?

    What's the point of rules if one poster constantly takes a shit all over them with no consequence?

    I like to say that a poster should get ANOTHER timeout, then in the next paragraph accuse the site of never having consequences for said poster. It's what I like to do.
    I don't think it was contradicting. You gave him a timeout and told him to not to do it again or he'll be banned. He's repeatedly not followed your advice.

    You want this site to grow as you've said and obviously worried about potential interviews. Well how is allowing one poster to constantly post homophobic material, racial material, can't go a post without saying the word "Cock" or "Cunt" helping with that?

    He's also attacking a poster constantly which was one of your reasons for banning Harv. Like PLSS, Harv could provide some good posts. He could be an asset but chose not to follow your rules which is why you ultimately ran him. How is what PLSS doing any different than Harv?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,544 Founders Club
    MikeDamone said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    Since one poster constantly is breaking these rules perhaps he should receive another timeout or banning?

    What's the point of rules if one poster constantly takes a shit all over them with no consequence?

    I like to say that a poster should get ANOTHER timeout, then in the next paragraph accuse the site of never having consequences for said poster. It's what I like to do.
    I don't think it was contradicting. You gave him a timeout and told him to not to do it again or he'll be banned. He's repeatedly not followed your advice.

    You want this site to grow as you've said and obviously worried about potential interviews. Well how is allowing one poster to constantly post homophobic material, racial material, can't go a post without saying the word "Cock" or "Cunt" helping with that?

    He's also attacking a poster constantly which was one of your reasons for banning Harv. Like PLSS, Harv could provide some good posts. He could be an asset but chose not to follow your rules which is why you ultimately ran him. How is what PLSS doing any different than Harv?
    What part of "new rule" don't you get? And you're not accurate on Harv vs. PLSS.
    Agree.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.