The Program Is Over
Comments
-
Strictly speaking you're right but there's also a big difference between the P12 streaming their games from their phones on Twitch vs being on a new sports streaming page on Netflix which is more available and accessable to more people than FS1whatshouldicareabout said:
The issue is the average fan and media won't care to search for whatever streaming service the P12 will be on, especially if they're competing for the 12:30 or 4:00 time slot against SEC or B1G teamsCanadawg said:Streaming is usually like 15 second behind cable and still not the same quality. That would be my biggest issue with that. As for the schools I don't really care if they add them or not. Will probably only play them a couple times before UW bolts.
-
Okay, I've changed my mind
-
If the Pac-12 is to continue as an actual conference, then those are the two best teams to add. Each of those teams could become a power in 5-7 years of being in the conference. Dallas and San Diego.
Short-term, their presence weakens the conference. -
One of the most important things about to streaming (not Hulu or YouTubeTV) is something mentioned here a couple months ago. Casual fans watching an SEC game aren’t going to change from cable to streaming during commercials to see a PAC12 game. They’ll switch channels because it’s easier. A streaming only package kills the conference visibility.
-
DAVIDDAWG DIED A LONG TIME AGOGeevis_and_Butthead said:
Congrats?brents said:I am more alive than this conference.
Always figured you and Race would kick the bucket before DavidDawg and SLBOB
ALL THAT SHOUTING DID HIM IN -
Yeah pretty much agree. Adding schools is about the market, first. Dallas market with "major" conference revenue coming in to support growing a program, and the football talent in that area, seems like the best play on the table for the PAC.DerekJohnson said:If the Pac-12 is to continue as an actual conference, then those are the two best teams to add. Each of those teams could become a power in 5-7 years of being in the conference. Dallas and San Diego.
Short-term, their presence weakens the conference. -
Unless I'm confusing him with someone else, I knew DD in real life. He not dead, just gone.RaceBannon said:
DAVIDDAWG DIED A LONG TIME AGOGeevis_and_Butthead said:
Congrats?brents said:I am more alive than this conference.
Always figured you and Race would kick the bucket before DavidDawg and SLBOB
ALL THAT SHOUTING DID HIM IN -
DAVIDDAWG'S BLIND ASS WAS THE FIRST NOTEWORTHY DM.C CHARACTER TO SELL THE LIFE COUCH, IIRC.creepycoug said:
Unless I'm confusing him with someone else, I knew DD in real life. He not dead, just gone.RaceBannon said:
DAVIDDAWG DIED A LONG TIME AGOGeevis_and_Butthead said:
Congrats?brents said:I am more alive than this conference.
Always figured you and Race would kick the bucket before DavidDawg and SLBOB
ALL THAT SHOUTING DID HIM IN
THAT PLACE HASN'T BEEN THE SAME SINCE DAVIDDAWG STOPPED POSTING IN ALL CAPS ANYWAY. -
Really depends on the coaching, but we've seen that with that with Ute and TCUBleachedAnusDawg said:
Yeah pretty much agree. Adding schools is about the market, first. Dallas market with "major" conference revenue coming in to support growing a program, and the football talent in that area, seems like the best play on the table for the PAC.DerekJohnson said:If the Pac-12 is to continue as an actual conference, then those are the two best teams to add. Each of those teams could become a power in 5-7 years of being in the conference. Dallas and San Diego.
Short-term, their presence weakens the conference.
Get a decent coach who has a vision and take advantage of the situation -
Can’t wait to drive 15min to watch the dwags with up to 32k of Dallas’ douchest dbags
Real facts: SMU might have the hottest coeds in the conference
