Streaming is usually like 15 second behind cable and still not the same quality. That would be my biggest issue with that. As for the schools I don't really care if they add them or not. Will probably only play them a couple times before UW bolts.
Streaming is usually like 15 second behind cable and still not the same quality. That would be my biggest issue with that. As for the schools I don't really care if they add them or not. Will probably only play them a couple times before UW bolts.
The issue is the average fan and media won't care to search for whatever streaming service the P12 will be on, especially if they're competing for the 12:30 or 4:00 time slot against SEC or B1G teams
Streaming is usually like 15 second behind cable and still not the same quality. That would be my biggest issue with that. As for the schools I don't really care if they add them or not. Will probably only play them a couple times before UW bolts.
The issue is the average fan and media won't care to search for whatever streaming service the P12 will be on, especially if they're competing for the 12:30 or 4:00 time slot against SEC or B1G teams
Strictly speaking you're right but there's also a big difference between the P12 streaming their games from their phones on Twitch vs being on a new sports streaming page on Netflix which is more available and accessable to more people than FS1
If the Pac-12 is to continue as an actual conference, then those are the two best teams to add. Each of those teams could become a power in 5-7 years of being in the conference. Dallas and San Diego.
Short-term, their presence weakens the conference.
One of the most important things about to streaming (not Hulu or YouTubeTV) is something mentioned here a couple months ago. Casual fans watching an SEC game aren’t going to change from cable to streaming during commercials to see a PAC12 game. They’ll switch channels because it’s easier. A streaming only package kills the conference visibility.
If the Pac-12 is to continue as an actual conference, then those are the two best teams to add. Each of those teams could become a power in 5-7 years of being in the conference. Dallas and San Diego.
Short-term, their presence weakens the conference.
Yeah pretty much agree. Adding schools is about the market, first. Dallas market with "major" conference revenue coming in to support growing a program, and the football talent in that area, seems like the best play on the table for the PAC.
If the Pac-12 is to continue as an actual conference, then those are the two best teams to add. Each of those teams could become a power in 5-7 years of being in the conference. Dallas and San Diego.
Short-term, their presence weakens the conference.
Yeah pretty much agree. Adding schools is about the market, first. Dallas market with "major" conference revenue coming in to support growing a program, and the football talent in that area, seems like the best play on the table for the PAC.
Really depends on the coaching, but we've seen that with that with Ute and TCU
Get a decent coach who has a vision and take advantage of the situation
Comments
And college football fans will be watching NBC CBS and ESPN
The fuck ?
Always figured you and Race would kick the bucket before DavidDawg and SLBOB
Short-term, their presence weakens the conference.
ALL THAT SHOUTING DID HIM IN
THAT PLACE HASN'T BEEN THE SAME SINCE DAVIDDAWG STOPPED POSTING IN ALL CAPS ANYWAY.
Get a decent coach who has a vision and take advantage of the situation
Real facts: SMU might have the hottest coeds in the conference