Quote of the Year
Comments
-
Kim would have loved a Nuss though
-
Kim has proven what we've accused him of all along.
He only cares about access. He'd gladly take 0-12 with access than a national title with no access.
He's a little piece of shit who needs to LEAVE! Bad for the program and hopefully he can get his credentials revoked soon. -
Tequila is right. There are no viable concerns with Petersen. He's a proven championship coach and proven developer of talent.
The question is will he get us back to DJ type success or close to that or just win the conference once or twice. -
Interesting.
-
Unlike Sark who had won countless National Championships while at USC before arriving at UW, Peterman has done nothing to indicate he can coach at this level.
-
I just want Washington to go 14-0 this year so Kim can be wrong.
-
I have no problem admitting that I had questions leading up to the hire and in hindsight most of them were driven by the things that I didn't know about his program than the things that I did know.
What I knew was that Boise won at ridiculously high levels that I felt were propped up by the schedule that they played and how they only had to play maybe 3-4 hard games a year. At the same time, you had to give them credit for winning those games. I knew that Boise developed players to the NFL and that recruiting there wasn't easy.
What I was concerned about was how Petersen would be able to recruit in the PAC because you just never know until you see someone. He closed last year's class very strongly by not only getting a full class that may not be full of guys that you'd consider star power, but guys that you look at, consider the foundation of your program and depth, and you might get a few that develop into all conference caliber players for you. Then, when he swung Budda to the UW (and contrary to what Kim and the rest of the sour faced trio wanted to believe, there's no way that a principled young man like Budda was going to show up and play for the morally questionable Dude Brah), I knew that we'd have no problem in the recruiting game because not only was Petersen's eye and ability to develop talent plain to see, but that he's got a very strong appeal to a certain caliber of recruit ... those that are OKGs.
Kim would want you to think that recruiting OKGs is a problem. He'd want you to think that because we only have 3 verbals right now that we're behind the curve. Guess who else has 3 verbals? Stanford. Pretty sure that what they've been doing is working out quite well and nobody is questioning whether or not David Shaw has a plan when it comes to recruiting. Unlike Dude Brah who handed out offers like they were condoms at the local birth control clinic, Petersen does his research on kids before he offers them, ensures that not only are they players that they want at the UW, but are the kinds of kids that will be successful at the UW, and are increasing the prestige of a UW offer to that of being something special. When you hear Petersen say that he considers coming in second for a recruit as a giant waste of his time, you know exactly what he means. To idiots like Kim and Dude Brah, it means free pub.
One of the biggest things that has got me over to Petersen's side very quickly is the fact that you can tell that he places a huge emphasis on accountability, work ethic, and dedication to the TEAM. Anybody that needs further lessons on how that works out at a championship level need to go look at what the San Antonio Spurs have done in the last 12-24 months. -
Tequilla said:
I have no problem admitting that I had questions leading up to the hire and in hindsight most of them were driven by the things that I didn't know about his program than the things that I did know.
What I knew was that Boise won at ridiculously high levels that I felt were propped up by the schedule that they played and how they only had to play maybe 3-4 hard games a year. At the same time, you had to give them credit for winning those games. I knew that Boise developed players to the NFL and that recruiting there wasn't easy.
What I was concerned about was how Petersen would be able to recruit in the PAC because you just never know until you see someone. He closed last year's class very strongly by not only getting a full class that may not be full of guys that you'd consider star power, but guys that you look at, consider the foundation of your program and depth, and you might get a few that develop into all conference caliber players for you. Then, when he swung Budda to the UW (and contrary to what Kim and the rest of the sour faced trio wanted to believe, there's no way that a principled young man like Budda was going to show up and play for the morally questionable Dude Brah), I knew that we'd have no problem in the recruiting game because not only was Petersen's eye and ability to develop talent plain to see, but that he's got a very strong appeal to a certain caliber of recruit ... those that are OKGs.
Kim would want you to think that recruiting OKGs is a problem. He'd want you to think that because we only have 3 verbals right now that we're behind the curve. Guess who else has 3 verbals? Stanford. Pretty sure that what they've been doing is working out quite well and nobody is questioning whether or not David Shaw has a plan when it comes to recruiting. Unlike Dude Brah who handed out offers like they were condoms at the local birth control clinic, Petersen does his research on kids before he offers them, ensures that not only are they players that they want at the UW, but are the kinds of kids that will be successful at the UW, and are increasing the prestige of a UW offer to that of being something special. When you hear Petersen say that he considers coming in second for a recruit as a giant waste of his time, you know exactly what he means. To idiots like Kim and Dude Brah, it means free pub.
One of the biggest things that has got me over to Petersen's side very quickly is the fact that you can tell that he places a huge emphasis on accountability, work ethic, and dedication to the TEAM. Anybody that needs further lessons on how that works out at a championship level need to go look at what the San Antonio Spurs have done in the last 12-24 months.
You were doing so well lately....
-
Disagree.Tequilla said:I have no problem admitting that I had questions leading up to the hire and in hindsight most of them were driven by the things that I didn't know about his program than the things that I did know.
What I knew was that Boise won at ridiculously high levels that I felt were propped up by the schedule that they played and how they only had to play maybe 3-4 hard games a year. At the same time, you had to give them credit for winning those games. I knew that Boise developed players to the NFL and that recruiting there wasn't easy.
What I was concerned about was how Petersen would be able to recruit in the PAC because you just never know until you see someone. He closed last year's class very strongly by not only getting a full class that may not be full of guys that you'd consider star power, but guys that you look at, consider the foundation of your program and depth, and you might get a few that develop into all conference caliber players for you. Then, when he swung Budda to the UW (and contrary to what Kim and the rest of the sour faced trio wanted to believe, there's no way that a principled young man like Budda was going to show up and play for the morally questionable Dude Brah), I knew that we'd have no problem in the recruiting game because not only was Petersen's eye and ability to develop talent plain to see, but that he's got a very strong appeal to a certain caliber of recruit ... those that are OKGs.
Kim would want you to think that recruiting OKGs is a problem. He'd want you to think that because we only have 3 verbals right now that we're behind the curve. Guess who else has 3 verbals? Stanford. Pretty sure that what they've been doing is working out quite well and nobody is questioning whether or not David Shaw has a plan when it comes to recruiting. Unlike Dude Brah who handed out offers like they were condoms at the local birth control clinic, Petersen does his research on kids before he offers them, ensures that not only are they players that they want at the UW, but are the kinds of kids that will be successful at the UW, and are increasing the prestige of a UW offer to that of being something special. When you hear Petersen say that he considers coming in second for a recruit as a giant waste of his time, you know exactly what he means. To idiots like Kim and Dude Brah, it means free pub.
One of the biggest things that has got me over to Petersen's side very quickly is the fact that you can tell that he places a huge emphasis on accountability, work ethic, and dedication to the TEAM. Anybody that needs further lessons on how that works out at a championship level need to go look at what the San Antonio Spurs have done in the last 12-24 months. -
81% of the time I keep the posts short ...
Sometimes I need to rant ... Kim and the Lemon Party trio is often a good reason for me to do so
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
