Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Apparently black lives don't matter unless one is killed during a robbery

WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,402 Standard Supporter
Our hero was shot to death while robbing a restaurant while out on bond for some non-serious crimes. Geezus. Now, the Soros prosecutor has a serious crime to deal with.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/hero-customer-who-shot-armed-robber-houston-taco-joint-ordered-face-grand-jury-soros


https://youtu.be/HrxngFEgIRI


«1

Comments

  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,973
    So, the DA wants a Grand Jury to validate his instinct, which is not to charge.

    Yawn.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,076 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    So, the DA wants a Grand Jury to validate his instinct, which is not to charge.

    Yawn.

    Must
    Defend
    Everything
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,973

    HHusky said:

    So, the DA wants a Grand Jury to validate his instinct, which is not to charge.

    Yawn.

    Must
    Defend
    Everything
    So you care
  • YouKnowItYouKnowIt Member Posts: 543

    Our hero was shot to death while robbing a restaurant while out on bond for some non-serious crimes. Geezus. Now, the Soros prosecutor has a serious crime to deal with.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/hero-customer-who-shot-armed-robber-houston-taco-joint-ordered-face-grand-jury-soros


    https://youtu.be/HrxngFEgIRI


    The first 8 shots or defensible ... the last one not so much ... Will probably lead to manslaughter, if Perp was of different color, probably Not Guilty...
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,076 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    So, the DA wants a Grand Jury to validate his instinct, which is not to charge.

    Yawn.

    Must
    Defend
    Everything
    So you care
    I thought you were bored

    Guess you really do need to defend everything
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,402 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    So, the DA wants a Grand Jury to validate his instinct, which is not to charge.

    Yawn.

    Sure. DAs always take non-probable cause cases to the Grand Jury. Actually the Soros DAs do, but they aren't supposed to.
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,973
    YouKnowIt said:

    Our hero was shot to death while robbing a restaurant while out on bond for some non-serious crimes. Geezus. Now, the Soros prosecutor has a serious crime to deal with.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/hero-customer-who-shot-armed-robber-houston-taco-joint-ordered-face-grand-jury-soros


    https://youtu.be/HrxngFEgIRI


    The first 8 shots or defensible ... the last one not so much ... Will probably lead to manslaughter, if Perp was of different color, probably Not Guilty...
    The coup de grace has to be the issue.

    The DA wants cover. Imagine anyone being shocked by that.

    But if deadly force was justified in the first instance, can you really recommend he be charged when it's essentially all one event without any meaningful interruption?

    I don't think he gets indicted.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,402 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    YouKnowIt said:

    Our hero was shot to death while robbing a restaurant while out on bond for some non-serious crimes. Geezus. Now, the Soros prosecutor has a serious crime to deal with.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/hero-customer-who-shot-armed-robber-houston-taco-joint-ordered-face-grand-jury-soros


    https://youtu.be/HrxngFEgIRI


    The first 8 shots or defensible ... the last one not so much ... Will probably lead to manslaughter, if Perp was of different color, probably Not Guilty...
    The coup de grace has to be the issue.

    The DA wants cover. Imagine anyone being shocked by that.

    But if deadly force was justified in the first instance, can you really recommend he be charged when it's essentially all one event without any meaningful interruption?

    I don't think he gets indicted.
    The DA has all the facts. This isn't an investigative grand jury. If he DA as the highest county legal official isn't competent enough to come to the conclusion that this was a clean shooting under Texas law, then why have a DA? So, a DA that doesn't think there is probable cause will be arguing before the grand jury that there is probable cause for a criminal indictment. That's justice in the dazzler's leftard world. I agree with your analysis, which is really the most common sense thing you have said in your entire posting history. Congrats. Now back to your usual drivel.
  • YouKnowItYouKnowIt Member Posts: 543
    HHusky said:

    YouKnowIt said:

    Our hero was shot to death while robbing a restaurant while out on bond for some non-serious crimes. Geezus. Now, the Soros prosecutor has a serious crime to deal with.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/hero-customer-who-shot-armed-robber-houston-taco-joint-ordered-face-grand-jury-soros


    https://youtu.be/HrxngFEgIRI


    The first 8 shots or defensible ... the last one not so much ... Will probably lead to manslaughter, if Perp was of different color, probably Not Guilty...
    The coup de grace has to be the issue.

    The DA wants cover. Imagine anyone being shocked by that.

    But if deadly force was justified in the first instance, can you really recommend he be charged when it's essentially all one event without any meaningful interruption?

    I don't think he gets indicted.
    Most self defense law only protects you when you are under threat, anything after that would not be considered Self defense...in this case he knows the threat is neutralized (grabs the guys gun), then Fires another round...aka Murder/Manslaughter. Could he say he wasn't sure if the guy had another gun, yes, but I wouldn't want to have a jury decide if they believe me or not...
  • HHuskyHHusky Member Posts: 20,973
    YouKnowIt said:

    HHusky said:

    YouKnowIt said:

    Our hero was shot to death while robbing a restaurant while out on bond for some non-serious crimes. Geezus. Now, the Soros prosecutor has a serious crime to deal with.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/hero-customer-who-shot-armed-robber-houston-taco-joint-ordered-face-grand-jury-soros


    https://youtu.be/HrxngFEgIRI


    The first 8 shots or defensible ... the last one not so much ... Will probably lead to manslaughter, if Perp was of different color, probably Not Guilty...
    The coup de grace has to be the issue.

    The DA wants cover. Imagine anyone being shocked by that.

    But if deadly force was justified in the first instance, can you really recommend he be charged when it's essentially all one event without any meaningful interruption?

    I don't think he gets indicted.
    Most self defense law only protects you when you are under threat, anything after that would not be considered Self defense...in this case he knows the threat is neutralized (grabs the guys gun), then Fires another round...aka Murder/Manslaughter. Could he say he wasn't sure if the guy had another gun, yes, but I wouldn't want to have a jury decide if they believe me or not...
    I agree and that's a rational analysis.

    But when the deceased created the situation which inevitably leads to an emotional response, I think most jurors are going to have sympathy with the shooter.
  • WestlinnDuckWestlinnDuck Member Posts: 15,402 Standard Supporter
    YouKnowIt said:

    HHusky said:

    YouKnowIt said:

    Our hero was shot to death while robbing a restaurant while out on bond for some non-serious crimes. Geezus. Now, the Soros prosecutor has a serious crime to deal with.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/hero-customer-who-shot-armed-robber-houston-taco-joint-ordered-face-grand-jury-soros


    https://youtu.be/HrxngFEgIRI


    The first 8 shots or defensible ... the last one not so much ... Will probably lead to manslaughter, if Perp was of different color, probably Not Guilty...
    The coup de grace has to be the issue.

    The DA wants cover. Imagine anyone being shocked by that.

    But if deadly force was justified in the first instance, can you really recommend he be charged when it's essentially all one event without any meaningful interruption?

    I don't think he gets indicted.
    Most self defense law only protects you when you are under threat, anything after that would not be considered Self defense...in this case he knows the threat is neutralized (grabs the guys gun), then Fires another round...aka Murder/Manslaughter. Could he say he wasn't sure if the guy had another gun, yes, but I wouldn't want to have a jury decide if they believe me or not...
    What was the cause of death? Bullets 1-8 or number 9. In Texas, he gets to testify he was still scared for his life and the other patrons. In that part of Texas, he walks as he should.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,969 Standard Supporter
    Last story I saw was that police did not want him for any crime but just to interview him. So a HH style shitbag DA wants to charge him? Good luck with that. Guys waving guns threatening to shoot people during a robbery are fair game in any state.
  • SwisherSweetboySwisherSweetboy Member Posts: 583 Standard Supporter

    What was the cause of death? Bullets 1-8 or number 9. In Texas, he gets to testify he was still scared for his life and the other patrons. In that part of Texas, he walks as he should.

    After bullet 1-8 the guy could have rolled over and shot a few people (had he a real gun). Guns are no good unless you use them with deadly force. Bullet 9 was needed.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    HHusky said:

    So, the DA wants a Grand Jury to validate his instinct, which is not to charge.

    Yawn.

    One upvote for the career thug noted.
  • 46XiJCAB46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    Sledog said:

    Last story I saw was that police did not want him for any crime but just to interview him. So a HH style shitbag DA wants to charge him? Good luck with that. Guys waving guns threatening to shoot people during a robbery are fair game in any state.

    Dazzler would have asked the thug if he could be of assistance so people could finish eating their tacos. He didn't shoot anyone for their money, did he?
  • RoadTripRoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,823 Founders Club
    But why didn't he just shoot the gun out of his hand? I'm sure he was gentle giant
  • YouKnowItYouKnowIt Member Posts: 543

    What was the cause of death? Bullets 1-8 or number 9. In Texas, he gets to testify he was still scared for his life and the other patrons. In that part of Texas, he walks as he should.

    After bullet 1-8 the guy could have rolled over and shot a few people (had he a real gun). Guns are no good unless you use them with deadly force. Bullet 9 was needed.
    SO you didn't watch the video ... shots 1-4 are fine, Perp falls to ground gun flys away from him... pause in shots, Shots 5-8 are fired... Shooter walks over, grabs the Perp Gun (threat neutralized), shoots Perp in the head.

    I wouldn't want a jury to decide my fate in this if I was the shooter.


    https://legalinsurrection.com/2023/01/houston-taqueria-shooting-legally-justified-killing-or-simply-an-execution/
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,076 Founders Club
    I'd vote not guilty

  • SwisherSweetboySwisherSweetboy Member Posts: 583 Standard Supporter
    Stuff happens fast. Just don't rob people waving around a fake gun and you'll be OK.
Sign In or Register to comment.