Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

How did WSU's WR's end up better than UW''s?

This is without Marquis Wilson too. Fuck I just saw a replay of apple cup. There isn't one WR aside from KW #2 who would start for WSU. Marquis Wilson would have beat out Kasen for the #1 WR spot and Dominique Williams isnt far off and would have sent every other UW WR to the bench. Bobby Ratliff, Isiah Meyers, Gabe Marks are all little known guys who'd be starting and making plays for UW.

Its alarming that going into year 5 we don't even have a legitimate stud at WR or #2 WR, a LT, C, #2 TE, #2 QB, Pass-rusher or a starting safety opposite PARKER (or either backup)

Where are all of Sarks 10 WR's he took every year instead of Olinemen? Now Sark has 1 WR and a few (count on 1 hand) Olinemen. What the Fungus has SS_ been doing for over 4 years? The most alarming is the backup QB spot. Scary that nobody got snaps last year.

Comments

  • Mad_SonMad_Son Member Posts: 10,194
    edited June 2013
    Jimmie Dougherty < Eric Keisau << *
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    Because Sark is ditching the running game for Leach's air-raid WEST, I thought it necessary to at least bring up or WR comparisons. Sorry if I offended die-hard HUSKY-FOOTBALL posters like PASSION, who believe in classic hard nosed husky football. It hurt me too to write this. Roaddawg, you can respond, but don't get offended, its only an opinion...albeit from a true expert. Maybe you'll get motivated and post an original thought:)
  • DeepSeaZDeepSeaZ Member Posts: 3,901

    Because Sark is ditching the running game for Leach's air-raid WEST, I thought it necessary to at least bring up or WR comparisons. Sorry if I offended die-hard HUSKY-FOOTBALL posters like PASSION, who believe in classic hard nosed husky football. It hurt me too to write this. Roaddawg, you can respond, but don't get offended, its only an opinion...albeit from a true expert. Maybe you'll get motivated and post an original thought:)

    I don't think Sark will ditch the running game. It's been his most successful offensive weapon since he has been here. That said, the receivers need to show a lot more heart and technique to get open. WR development has been terrible.
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    I don't really follow the team but didnt Sark just sign two highly rated QB recruits last season? And they both redshirted? That's a pretty good position to be in for a college team. How many teams have proven back up QBs?
  • PopeHarvPopeHarv Member Posts: 92

    This is without Marquis Wilson too. Fuck I just saw a replay of apple cup. There isn't one WR aside from KW #2 who would start for WSU. Marquis Wilson would have beat out Kasen for the #1 WR spot and Dominique Williams isnt far off and would have sent every other UW WR to the bench. Bobby Ratliff, Isiah Meyers, Gabe Marks are all little known guys who'd be starting and making plays for UW.

    Its alarming that going into year 5 we don't even have a legitimate stud at WR or #2 WR, a LT, C, #2 TE, #2 QB, Pass-rusher or a starting safety opposite PARKER (or either backup)

    Where are all of Sarks 10 WR's he took every year instead of Olinemen? Now Sark has 1 WR and a few (count on 1 hand) Olinemen. What the Fungus has SS_ been doing for over 4 years? The most alarming is the backup QB spot. Scary that nobody got snaps last year.

    The Coogs WR's are nowhere near as good as ours. Wake up.
  • PurpleBazePurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,097 Founders Club
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,812

    I don't really follow the team but didnt Sark just sign two highly rated QB recruits last season? And they both redshirted? That's a pretty good position to be in for a college team. How many teams have proven back up QBs?

    napagbe
Sign In or Register to comment.