The way him and Chest use metrics in their arguments is nails on a chalkboard. There's only about 10+ other variables they don't take into account when weighing a matchup.
So do we wish UW was playing Central Michigan or something? I don't get it.
I think this is just a strange way of saying UW beat Oregon so we got a better bowl and are playing a better team (which metrics come into play since UNC had a better record than Texas)
Comments
I'm honestly impressed with how they maintain this level