Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Americans FURIOUS As Democrats AND GOP Pledge 45 Billion To Zelensky & Ukraine

13»

Comments

  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    “If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it”

    “I articulated it”

    Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)

    "My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia."

    You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.
    Your position is a series of questions apparently. Awesome. Really helpful.

    Your position is one of kneeling to foreign threats, unless you can get someone else to fight your battles, in which case you're all-in.

    Classic Chickenhawk Pussy.
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,569 Standard Supporter

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    “If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it”

    “I articulated it”

    Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)

    "My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia."

    You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.
    Your position is a series of questions apparently. Awesome. Really helpful.

    Your position is one of kneeling to foreign threats, unless you can get someone else to fight your battles, in which case you're all-in.

    Classic Chickenhawk Pussy.
    It was "Americans" like the dazzler that volunteered the US for world's policeman. European NATO along with the Scandis economies dwarf the Russians and yet they expect us to pay the freight. Phuck em. If Russia is an existential threat to Europe, then they can pay the freight. We are paying more than most of the Euros put together and they still whine about the US making money on selling arms to the Euros. And the Euros sneered when Trump told not to be dependent on Russian oil and gas and that they needed to pay their fair share of NATO. So did the US deep state. Along comes the dementia patient and then gives Nord Stream II the go ahead. The Germans were an existential threat before World War II and the Soviet Union was also after World War II. But like Jim Crow, that was decades ago and yet the dems and the US military grifters keep playing the same tune.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    “If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it”

    “I articulated it”

    Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)

    "My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia."

    You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.
    Your position is a series of questions apparently. Awesome. Really helpful.

    Your position is one of kneeling to foreign threats, unless you can get someone else to fight your battles, in which case you're all-in.

    Classic Chickenhawk Pussy.
    It was "Americans" like the dazzler that volunteered the US for world's policeman. European NATO along with the Scandis economies dwarf the Russians and yet they expect us to pay the freight. Phuck em. If Russia is an existential threat to Europe, then they can pay the freight. We are paying more than most of the Euros put together and they still whine about the US making money on selling arms to the Euros. And the Euros sneered when Trump told not to be dependent on Russian oil and gas and that they needed to pay their fair share of NATO. So did the US deep state. Along comes the dementia patient and then gives Nord Stream II the go ahead. The Germans were an existential threat before World War II and the Soviet Union was also after World War II. But like Jim Crow, that was decades ago and yet the dems and the US military grifters keep playing the same tune.
    Dazzler would be right at home in many European countries that never get their hands dirty while refusing to pay their obligations to NATO.
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,569 Standard Supporter

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    “If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it”

    “I articulated it”

    Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)

    "My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia."

    You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.
    Your position is a series of questions apparently. Awesome. Really helpful.

    Your position is one of kneeling to foreign threats, unless you can get someone else to fight your battles, in which case you're all-in.

    Classic Chickenhawk Pussy.
    It was "Americans" like the dazzler that volunteered the US for world's policeman. European NATO along with the Scandis economies dwarf the Russians and yet they expect us to pay the freight. Phuck em. If Russia is an existential threat to Europe, then they can pay the freight. We are paying more than most of the Euros put together and they still whine about the US making money on selling arms to the Euros. And the Euros sneered when Trump told not to be dependent on Russian oil and gas and that they needed to pay their fair share of NATO. So did the US deep state. Along comes the dementia patient and then gives Nord Stream II the go ahead. The Germans were an existential threat before World War II and the Soviet Union was also after World War II. But like Jim Crow, that was decades ago and yet the dems and the US military grifters keep playing the same tune.
    Dazzler would be right at home in many European countries that never get their hands dirty while refusing to pay their obligations to NATO.
    But he uses the correct pronouns and has a Ukrainian flag, so it's all good and he really cares about democracy and honest elections in the Ukraine and a secure Ukrainian border.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,878 Founders Club
    If the left is for a war, that war has no redeeming value for America

    If the left is against the war then it has value to America

    The bigger picture is that the world won't allow any nation to win a war so the only way to win is not to play

    H being all in on the Ukraine scam is on brand to the max
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter
    Careful Race. You're giving away H's secrets from his favorite book, The Art of Chickenhawking.
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,569 Standard Supporter

    If the left is for a war, that war has no redeeming value for America

    If the left is against the war then it has value to America

    The bigger picture is that the world won't allow any nation to win a war so the only way to win is not to play

    H being all in on the Ukraine scam is on brand to the max

    The Euros gave Putin the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics and the 2018 World Cup. They gave the chicoms the 2022 Winter Olympics with no punishment for the chicom crud. Then toss in the Qatar World Cup. And we are letting them run our foreign policy with the assistance of the dazzler and the people he votes for.
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    “If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it”

    “I articulated it”

    Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)

    "My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia."

    You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.
    Your position is a series of questions apparently. Awesome. Really helpful.

    Your answer is why it's not worth having any discussions with you, madam. I stated my position. You acted like a child, pretended not to have read it, and then when it is restated for you, you say it's just a series of questions.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    edited December 2022

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    “If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it”

    “I articulated it”

    Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)

    "My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia."

    You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.
    Your position is a series of questions apparently. Awesome. Really helpful.

    Your position is one of kneeling to foreign threats, unless you can get someone else to fight your battles, in which case you're all-in.

    Classic Chickenhawk Pussy.
    Amusing given my oft stated opposition to leaving Afghanistan and my support for all our recent military involvements. But turning down an opportunity to weaken an adversary by proxy when it falls into your lap just makes you nothing less than a dumb shit.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    edited December 2022
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    “If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it”

    “I articulated it”

    Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)

    "My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia."

    You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.
    Your position is a series of questions apparently. Awesome. Really helpful.

    Your answer is why it's not worth having any discussions with you, madam. I stated my position. You acted like a child, pretended not to have read it, and then when it is restated for you, you say it's just a series of questions.
    The only declarative sentence you offered is that Russia is not our biggest rival. I repeat my response to that irrelevant observation: so what?

    It’s okay to expect your country to be able to do two things at once. Maybe even three.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,878 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    “If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it”

    “I articulated it”

    Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)

    "My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia."

    You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.
    Your position is a series of questions apparently. Awesome. Really helpful.

    Your answer is why it's not worth having any discussions with you, madam. I stated my position. You acted like a child, pretended not to have read it, and then when it is restated for you, you say it's just a series of questions.
    The only declarative sentence you offered is that Russia is not our biggest rival. I repeat my response to that irrelevant observation: so what?

    It’s okay to expect your country to be able to do two things at once. Maybe even three.
    You should tell the fucking retards you voted for




  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,878 Founders Club
    H in every thread


  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    “If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it”

    “I articulated it”

    Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)

    "My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia."

    You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.
    Your position is a series of questions apparently. Awesome. Really helpful.

    Your position is one of kneeling to foreign threats, unless you can get someone else to fight your battles, in which case you're all-in.

    Classic Chickenhawk Pussy.
    Amusing given my oft stated opposition to leaving Afghanistan and my support for all our recent military involvements. But turning down an opportunity to weaken an adversary by proxy when it falls into your lap just makes you nothing less than a dumb shit.
    So you stood with Trump when he faced off with China. Good to know.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    “If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it”

    “I articulated it”

    Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)

    "My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia."

    You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.
    Your position is a series of questions apparently. Awesome. Really helpful.

    Your position is one of kneeling to foreign threats, unless you can get someone else to fight your battles, in which case you're all-in.

    Classic Chickenhawk Pussy.
    Amusing given my oft stated opposition to leaving Afghanistan and my support for all our recent military involvements. But turning down an opportunity to weaken an adversary by proxy when it falls into your lap just makes you nothing less than a dumb shit.
    So you stood with Trump when he faced off with China. Good to know.

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    “If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it”

    “I articulated it”

    Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)

    "My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia."

    You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.
    Your position is a series of questions apparently. Awesome. Really helpful.

    Your answer is why it's not worth having any discussions with you, madam. I stated my position. You acted like a child, pretended not to have read it, and then when it is restated for you, you say it's just a series of questions.
    The only declarative sentence you offered is that Russia is not our biggest rival. I repeat my response to that irrelevant observation: so what?

    It’s okay to expect your country to be able to do two things at once. Maybe even three.
    You should tell the fucking retards you voted for




    I completely agree that this would be unacceptable. It isn’t how things would play out, however.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    It’s going great for the US. I’m pleased. You’re not.

    It's going so great we need to spend more, and other NATO nations are doing what? I'm pleased that you know my inner thoughts as well.
    The Dazzler mind reading trick. It never fails.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    “If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it”

    “I articulated it”

    Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)

    "My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia."

    You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.
    Your position is a series of questions apparently. Awesome. Really helpful.

    Your position is one of kneeling to foreign threats, unless you can get someone else to fight your battles, in which case you're all-in.

    Classic Chickenhawk Pussy.
    Amusing given my oft stated opposition to leaving Afghanistan and my support for all our recent military involvements. But turning down an opportunity to weaken an adversary by proxy when it falls into your lap just makes you nothing less than a dumb shit.
    So you stood with Trump when he faced off with China. Good to know.
    I liked offing the Iranian general too.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    “If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it”

    “I articulated it”

    Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)

    "My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia."

    You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.
    Your position is a series of questions apparently. Awesome. Really helpful.

    Your position is one of kneeling to foreign threats, unless you can get someone else to fight your battles, in which case you're all-in.

    Classic Chickenhawk Pussy.
    Amusing given my oft stated opposition to leaving Afghanistan and my support for all our recent military involvements. But turning down an opportunity to weaken an adversary by proxy when it falls into your lap just makes you nothing less than a dumb shit.
    So you stood with Trump when he faced off with China. Good to know.
    I liked offing the Iranian general too.
    Is that why we didn't hear a peep from you when your team was doing their WWIII chicken little act?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,878 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    “If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it”

    “I articulated it”

    Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)

    "My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia."

    You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.
    Your position is a series of questions apparently. Awesome. Really helpful.

    Your position is one of kneeling to foreign threats, unless you can get someone else to fight your battles, in which case you're all-in.

    Classic Chickenhawk Pussy.
    Amusing given my oft stated opposition to leaving Afghanistan and my support for all our recent military involvements. But turning down an opportunity to weaken an adversary by proxy when it falls into your lap just makes you nothing less than a dumb shit.
    So you stood with Trump when he faced off with China. Good to know.

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    “If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it”

    “I articulated it”

    Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)

    "My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia."

    You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.
    Your position is a series of questions apparently. Awesome. Really helpful.

    Your answer is why it's not worth having any discussions with you, madam. I stated my position. You acted like a child, pretended not to have read it, and then when it is restated for you, you say it's just a series of questions.
    The only declarative sentence you offered is that Russia is not our biggest rival. I repeat my response to that irrelevant observation: so what?

    It’s okay to expect your country to be able to do two things at once. Maybe even three.
    You should tell the fucking retards you voted for




    I completely agree that this would be unacceptable. It isn’t how things would play out, however.
    The dumbass just gave a green light and said the complete opposite of your cock sucking support of Ukraine

    You completely agree what is unacceptable?

    How did Ukraine play out when Biden gave Putin the green light?

    You voted for fucking morons because that's what you are
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    edited December 2022
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    “If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it”

    “I articulated it”

    Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)

    "My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia."

    You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.
    Your position is a series of questions apparently. Awesome. Really helpful.

    Your answer is why it's not worth having any discussions with you, madam. I stated my position. You acted like a child, pretended not to have read it, and then when it is restated for you, you say it's just a series of questions.
    The only declarative sentence you offered is that Russia is not our biggest rival. I repeat my response to that irrelevant observation: so what?

    It’s okay to expect your country to be able to do two things at once. Maybe even three.


    Lulz. Declarative sentences!
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    “If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it”

    “I articulated it”

    Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)

    "My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia."

    You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.
    Your position is a series of questions apparently. Awesome. Really helpful.

    Your position is one of kneeling to foreign threats, unless you can get someone else to fight your battles, in which case you're all-in.

    Classic Chickenhawk Pussy.
    Amusing given my oft stated opposition to leaving Afghanistan and my support for all our recent military involvements. But turning down an opportunity to weaken an adversary by proxy when it falls into your lap just makes you nothing less than a dumb shit.
    So you stood with Trump when he faced off with China. Good to know.

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    “If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it”

    “I articulated it”

    Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)

    "My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia."

    You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.
    Your position is a series of questions apparently. Awesome. Really helpful.

    Your answer is why it's not worth having any discussions with you, madam. I stated my position. You acted like a child, pretended not to have read it, and then when it is restated for you, you say it's just a series of questions.
    The only declarative sentence you offered is that Russia is not our biggest rival. I repeat my response to that irrelevant observation: so what?

    It’s okay to expect your country to be able to do two things at once. Maybe even three.
    You should tell the fucking retards you voted for




    I completely agree that this would be unacceptable. It isn’t how things would play out, however.
    The dumbass just gave a green light and said the complete opposite of your cock sucking support of Ukraine

    You completely agree what is unacceptable?

    How did Ukraine play out when Biden gave Putin the green light?

    You voted for fucking morons because that's what you are
    It is utterly unacceptable to be announcing an unwillingness to do what it takes to deter the Chinese. It would be unacceptable to actually be unwilling as well, but that’s not going to be an issue.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,898
    hardhat said:



    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    “If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it”

    “I articulated it”

    Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)

    "My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia."

    You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.
    Your position is a series of questions apparently. Awesome. Really helpful.

    Your answer is why it's not worth having any discussions with you, madam. I stated my position. You acted like a child, pretended not to have read it, and then when it is restated for you, you say it's just a series of questions.
    The only declarative sentence you offered is that Russia is not our biggest rival. I repeat my response to that irrelevant observation: so what?

    It’s okay to expect your country to be able to do two things at once. Maybe even three.


    Lulz. Declarative sentences!
    So we agree this is a stupid statement, or not?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,878 Founders Club
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    “If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it”

    “I articulated it”

    Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)

    "My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia."

    You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.
    Your position is a series of questions apparently. Awesome. Really helpful.

    Your position is one of kneeling to foreign threats, unless you can get someone else to fight your battles, in which case you're all-in.

    Classic Chickenhawk Pussy.
    Amusing given my oft stated opposition to leaving Afghanistan and my support for all our recent military involvements. But turning down an opportunity to weaken an adversary by proxy when it falls into your lap just makes you nothing less than a dumb shit.
    So you stood with Trump when he faced off with China. Good to know.

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    “If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it”

    “I articulated it”

    Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)

    "My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia."

    You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.
    Your position is a series of questions apparently. Awesome. Really helpful.

    Your answer is why it's not worth having any discussions with you, madam. I stated my position. You acted like a child, pretended not to have read it, and then when it is restated for you, you say it's just a series of questions.
    The only declarative sentence you offered is that Russia is not our biggest rival. I repeat my response to that irrelevant observation: so what?

    It’s okay to expect your country to be able to do two things at once. Maybe even three.
    You should tell the fucking retards you voted for




    I completely agree that this would be unacceptable. It isn’t how things would play out, however.
    The dumbass just gave a green light and said the complete opposite of your cock sucking support of Ukraine

    You completely agree what is unacceptable?

    How did Ukraine play out when Biden gave Putin the green light?

    You voted for fucking morons because that's what you are
    It is utterly unacceptable to be announcing an unwillingness to do what it takes to deter the Chinese. It would be unacceptable to actually be unwilling as well, but that’s not going to be an issue.
    Peace through weakness and dumbass statements that embolden the enemy


    Imagine being dumb enough to vote for that
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:



    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    “If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it”

    “I articulated it”

    Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)

    "My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia."

    You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.
    Your position is a series of questions apparently. Awesome. Really helpful.

    Your answer is why it's not worth having any discussions with you, madam. I stated my position. You acted like a child, pretended not to have read it, and then when it is restated for you, you say it's just a series of questions.
    The only declarative sentence you offered is that Russia is not our biggest rival. I repeat my response to that irrelevant observation: so what?

    It’s okay to expect your country to be able to do two things at once. Maybe even three.


    Lulz. Declarative sentences!
    So we agree this is a stupid statement, or not?
    It's a lame excuse and an opinion masquerading as a fact. And of course @HHusky is swallowing it whole.

    And from the mouth of one of the dumber members of Biden's legendary stupid cabinet.
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:



    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    hardhat said:

    HHusky said:

    “If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it”

    “I articulated it”

    Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)

    "My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia."

    You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.
    Your position is a series of questions apparently. Awesome. Really helpful.

    Your answer is why it's not worth having any discussions with you, madam. I stated my position. You acted like a child, pretended not to have read it, and then when it is restated for you, you say it's just a series of questions.
    The only declarative sentence you offered is that Russia is not our biggest rival. I repeat my response to that irrelevant observation: so what?

    It’s okay to expect your country to be able to do two things at once. Maybe even three.


    Lulz. Declarative sentences!
    So we agree this is a stupid statement, or not?
    Not as stupid as you.
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    edited December 2022
    hhusky getting dumpstered. A tradition like no other.
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344
    HHusky said:
    Own goals from fat retards are even better