It’s going great for the US. I’m pleased. You’re not.
It's going so great we need to spend more, and other NATO nations are doing what? I'm pleased that you know my inner thoughts as well.
I remember all that money and the American lives we saved waiting to get involved in another of “Europe’s wars”. You girls opposed even the modest support we did provide and ultimately we had to send Americans off to war anyway. And we rebuilt the place.
Ever learn anything, ladies? This is a Fram Oil Filter Man moment.
I remember all the money and American lives we saved in Afghanistan too, genius. I shared my view. I believe China is a bigger threat, and that Russia threatens Europe more than the US. You can disagree, or resort to bad analogies, straw man arguments, and hurtful misgendering. You seem convinced this is marshall plan 2.0 and that Biden is the master of international diplomacy. OK!
Much less ambitious than the Marshall plan. You want to wait until events force you to acknowledge isolationism is foolish. Again.
You'll want to point to where I mentioned isolationism. Day drinking again, Gladys?
You didn’t have to mention it. It’s obvious.
I missed this gem because I went to open gym with my son. Was Reagan an isolationist too? Very stable genius hhusky is on a roll today. "I think China is the biggest threat to the United States" 'LMFAO, r u an isolationist? Like fr u r dumb!'
So China is the bigger threat. So what?
Does this mean you won’t whine about sending billions to Taiwan?
Are you capable of asking someone's opinion without turning it into a strawman?
It’s going great for the US. I’m pleased. You’re not.
It's going so great we need to spend more, and other NATO nations are doing what? I'm pleased that you know my inner thoughts as well.
I remember all that money and the American lives we saved waiting to get involved in another of “Europe’s wars”. You girls opposed even the modest support we did provide and ultimately we had to send Americans off to war anyway. And we rebuilt the place.
Ever learn anything, ladies? This is a Fram Oil Filter Man moment.
I remember all the money and American lives we saved in Afghanistan too, genius. I shared my view. I believe China is a bigger threat, and that Russia threatens Europe more than the US. You can disagree, or resort to bad analogies, straw man arguments, and hurtful misgendering. You seem convinced this is marshall plan 2.0 and that Biden is the master of international diplomacy. OK!
Much less ambitious than the Marshall plan. You want to wait until events force you to acknowledge isolationism is foolish. Again.
You'll want to point to where I mentioned isolationism. Day drinking again, Gladys?
You didn’t have to mention it. It’s obvious.
I missed this gem because I went to open gym with my son. Was Reagan an isolationist too? Very stable genius hhusky is on a roll today. "I think China is the biggest threat to the United States" 'LMFAO, r u an isolationist? Like fr u r dumb!'
So China is the bigger threat. So what?
Does this mean you won’t whine about sending billions to Taiwan?
Are you capable of asking someone's opinion without turning it into a strawman?
It’s going great for the US. I’m pleased. You’re not.
It's going so great we need to spend more, and other NATO nations are doing what? I'm pleased that you know my inner thoughts as well.
I remember all that money and the American lives we saved waiting to get involved in another of “Europe’s wars”. You girls opposed even the modest support we did provide and ultimately we had to send Americans off to war anyway. And we rebuilt the place.
Ever learn anything, ladies? This is a Fram Oil Filter Man moment.
I remember all the money and American lives we saved in Afghanistan too, genius. I shared my view. I believe China is a bigger threat, and that Russia threatens Europe more than the US. You can disagree, or resort to bad analogies, straw man arguments, and hurtful misgendering. You seem convinced this is marshall plan 2.0 and that Biden is the master of international diplomacy. OK!
Much less ambitious than the Marshall plan. You want to wait until events force you to acknowledge isolationism is foolish. Again.
You'll want to point to where I mentioned isolationism. Day drinking again, Gladys?
You didn’t have to mention it. It’s obvious.
I missed this gem because I went to open gym with my son. Was Reagan an isolationist too? Very stable genius hhusky is on a roll today. "I think China is the biggest threat to the United States" 'LMFAO, r u an isolationist? Like fr u r dumb!'
So China is the bigger threat. So what?
Does this mean you won’t whine about sending billions to Taiwan?
Are you capable of asking someone's opinion without turning it into a strawman?
China attacks Taiwan. We should do what?
Russia attacks Ukraine. We should do what?
Squeeze Russia economically and engage them in a proxy war.
Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise
Take it easy on the strawman.
We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.
Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?
Why would you have wanted it to start?
a) fucking stupid
b) dumb fucking shill
c) criminal war profiteer
d) brb jo for death and destruction
I didn’t want it to start, but turning down an opportunity to bludgeon an adversary shows you girls are fucking stupid.
Great cost-benefit analysis as always.
It’s important to note for the historical record who “created” the opportunity. It’s important for the critical thinker in determining how the pieces on the global chess board will play out.
Ever wonder why the rest of the BRICS haven’t run to support our side? Of course you haven’t.
Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise
Take it easy on the strawman.
We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.
Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?
Why would you have wanted it to start?
a) fucking stupid
b) dumb fucking shill
c) criminal war profiteer
d) brb jo for death and destruction
I didn’t want it to start, but turning down an opportunity to bludgeon an adversary shows you girls are fucking stupid.
Great cost-benefit analysis as always.
It’s important to note for the historical record who “created” the opportunity. It’s important for the critical thinker in determining how the pieces on the global chess board will play out.
Ever wonder why the rest of the BRICS haven’t run to support our side? Of course you haven’t.
It’s okay if you don’t want to be the leader of the free world, of course. If you would like to relinquish leadership, you clearly voted for the right candidate in 2020.
It’s going great for the US. I’m pleased. You’re not.
It's going so great we need to spend more, and other NATO nations are doing what? I'm pleased that you know my inner thoughts as well.
I remember all that money and the American lives we saved waiting to get involved in another of “Europe’s wars”. You girls opposed even the modest support we did provide and ultimately we had to send Americans off to war anyway. And we rebuilt the place.
Ever learn anything, ladies? This is a Fram Oil Filter Man moment.
I remember all the money and American lives we saved in Afghanistan too, genius. I shared my view. I believe China is a bigger threat, and that Russia threatens Europe more than the US. You can disagree, or resort to bad analogies, straw man arguments, and hurtful misgendering. You seem convinced this is marshall plan 2.0 and that Biden is the master of international diplomacy. OK!
Much less ambitious than the Marshall plan. You want to wait until events force you to acknowledge isolationism is foolish. Again.
You'll want to point to where I mentioned isolationism. Day drinking again, Gladys?
You didn’t have to mention it. It’s obvious.
I missed this gem because I went to open gym with my son. Was Reagan an isolationist too? Very stable genius hhusky is on a roll today. "I think China is the biggest threat to the United States" 'LMFAO, r u an isolationist? Like fr u r dumb!'
So China is the bigger threat. So what?
Does this mean you won’t whine about sending billions to Taiwan?
Are you capable of asking someone's opinion without turning it into a strawman?
China attacks Taiwan. We should do what?
Russia attacks Ukraine. We should do what?
Squeeze Russia economically and engage them in a proxy war.
See how easy that was?
Preventing China from invading Taiwan is what I'd like to do. So of course I'd whine about it? You're really quite the genius when it comes to geopolitcs. First, Ukraine was a 'fledgling democracy'. Now it's all about bludgeoning Russia. And of course if someone says they're worried about China, they're stupid and an isolationist, and China invading Taiwan is exactly the same as what happened in Ukraine. Right. Flat out embarrassing stupidity from you. Are you a Reagan admirer?
It’s going great for the US. I’m pleased. You’re not.
It's going so great we need to spend more, and other NATO nations are doing what? I'm pleased that you know my inner thoughts as well.
I remember all that money and the American lives we saved waiting to get involved in another of “Europe’s wars”. You girls opposed even the modest support we did provide and ultimately we had to send Americans off to war anyway. And we rebuilt the place.
Ever learn anything, ladies? This is a Fram Oil Filter Man moment.
I remember all the money and American lives we saved in Afghanistan too, genius. I shared my view. I believe China is a bigger threat, and that Russia threatens Europe more than the US. You can disagree, or resort to bad analogies, straw man arguments, and hurtful misgendering. You seem convinced this is marshall plan 2.0 and that Biden is the master of international diplomacy. OK!
Much less ambitious than the Marshall plan. You want to wait until events force you to acknowledge isolationism is foolish. Again.
You'll want to point to where I mentioned isolationism. Day drinking again, Gladys?
You didn’t have to mention it. It’s obvious.
I missed this gem because I went to open gym with my son. Was Reagan an isolationist too? Very stable genius hhusky is on a roll today. "I think China is the biggest threat to the United States" 'LMFAO, r u an isolationist? Like fr u r dumb!'
So China is the bigger threat. So what?
Does this mean you won’t whine about sending billions to Taiwan?
Are you capable of asking someone's opinion without turning it into a strawman?
China attacks Taiwan. We should do what?
Russia attacks Ukraine. We should do what?
Squeeze Russia economically and engage them in a proxy war.
See how easy that was?
Preventing China from invading Taiwan is what I'd like to do. So of course I'd whine about it? You're really quite the genius when it comes to geopolitcs. First, Ukraine was a 'fledgling democracy'. Now it's all about bludgeoning Russia. And of course if someone says they're worried about China, they're stupid and an isolationist, and China invading Taiwan is exactly the same as what happened in Ukraine. Right. Flat out embarrassing stupidity from you. Are you a Reagan admirer?
I am.
He’d be ashamed of you.
As for supporting fledgling democracies and inflicting damage on an autocratic aggressor, there’s no conflict between the two notions. Feel free to explain why supporting Taiwan against China is soooo different. Or do you just plan to shriek that nobody ever asks your opinion again?
Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise
Take it easy on the strawman.
We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.
Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?
Why would you have wanted it to start?
a) fucking stupid
b) dumb fucking shill
c) criminal war profiteer
d) brb jo for death and destruction
I didn’t want it to start, but turning down an opportunity to bludgeon an adversary shows you girls are fucking stupid.
Great cost-benefit analysis as always.
It’s important to note for the historical record who “created” the opportunity. It’s important for the critical thinker in determining how the pieces on the global chess board will play out.
Ever wonder why the rest of the BRICS haven’t run to support our side? Of course you haven’t.
It’s okay if you don’t want to be the leader of the free world, of course. If you would like to relinquish leadership, you clearly voted for the right candidate in 2020.
You voted for the straw man they installed. You're IQ is showing.
It’s going great for the US. I’m pleased. You’re not.
It's going so great we need to spend more, and other NATO nations are doing what? I'm pleased that you know my inner thoughts as well.
I remember all that money and the American lives we saved waiting to get involved in another of “Europe’s wars”. You girls opposed even the modest support we did provide and ultimately we had to send Americans off to war anyway. And we rebuilt the place.
Ever learn anything, ladies? This is a Fram Oil Filter Man moment.
I remember all the money and American lives we saved in Afghanistan too, genius. I shared my view. I believe China is a bigger threat, and that Russia threatens Europe more than the US. You can disagree, or resort to bad analogies, straw man arguments, and hurtful misgendering. You seem convinced this is marshall plan 2.0 and that Biden is the master of international diplomacy. OK!
Much less ambitious than the Marshall plan. You want to wait until events force you to acknowledge isolationism is foolish. Again.
You'll want to point to where I mentioned isolationism. Day drinking again, Gladys?
You didn’t have to mention it. It’s obvious.
I missed this gem because I went to open gym with my son. Was Reagan an isolationist too? Very stable genius hhusky is on a roll today. "I think China is the biggest threat to the United States" 'LMFAO, r u an isolationist? Like fr u r dumb!'
So China is the bigger threat. So what?
Does this mean you won’t whine about sending billions to Taiwan?
Are you capable of asking someone's opinion without turning it into a strawman?
China attacks Taiwan. We should do what?
Russia attacks Ukraine. We should do what?
Squeeze Russia economically and engage them in a proxy war.
See how easy that was?
Preventing China from invading Taiwan is what I'd like to do. So of course I'd whine about it? You're really quite the genius when it comes to geopolitcs. First, Ukraine was a 'fledgling democracy'. Now it's all about bludgeoning Russia. And of course if someone says they're worried about China, they're stupid and an isolationist, and China invading Taiwan is exactly the same as what happened in Ukraine. Right. Flat out embarrassing stupidity from you. Are you a Reagan admirer?
I am.
He’d be ashamed of you.
As for supporting fledgling democracies and inflicting damage on an autocratic aggressor, there’s no conflict between the two notions. Feel free to explain why supporting Taiwan against China is soooo different. Or do you just plan to shriek that nobody ever asks your opinion again?
Feel free to think about it, champ. If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it to someone who's so caught up in the current thing and prefers to twist. Rage on.
Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise
Take it easy on the strawman.
We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.
And arming terrorist groups through the healthy black markets for US weapons in the ME, Africa and Europe.
What will you say when a commercial jetliner is shot down over Poland or Germany with American weapons in the hands of terrorist groups?
Hitler was never a comedic figure. Mein Kampf was written in 1925 and it wasn't a comedic work. Only a moron like our hypothetical MBA or that commie bastard pedophile Charlie Chaplin would think so.
Hitler was never a comedic figure. Mein Kampf was written in 1925 and it wasn't a comedic work. Only a moron like our hypothetical MBA or that commie bastard pedophile Charlie Chaplin would think so.
He's on a epic struggle in this thread though. Best analogy ever: Taiwan and Ukraine are exactly the same. And feel free to explain why they are not! Just impossible to do so.
It’s going great for the US. I’m pleased. You’re not.
It's going so great we need to spend more, and other NATO nations are doing what? I'm pleased that you know my inner thoughts as well.
I remember all that money and the American lives we saved waiting to get involved in another of “Europe’s wars”. You girls opposed even the modest support we did provide and ultimately we had to send Americans off to war anyway. And we rebuilt the place.
Ever learn anything, ladies? This is a Fram Oil Filter Man moment.
I remember all the money and American lives we saved in Afghanistan too, genius. I shared my view. I believe China is a bigger threat, and that Russia threatens Europe more than the US. You can disagree, or resort to bad analogies, straw man arguments, and hurtful misgendering. You seem convinced this is marshall plan 2.0 and that Biden is the master of international diplomacy. OK!
Much less ambitious than the Marshall plan. You want to wait until events force you to acknowledge isolationism is foolish. Again.
You'll want to point to where I mentioned isolationism. Day drinking again, Gladys?
You didn’t have to mention it. It’s obvious.
I missed this gem because I went to open gym with my son. Was Reagan an isolationist too? Very stable genius hhusky is on a roll today. "I think China is the biggest threat to the United States" 'LMFAO, r u an isolationist? Like fr u r dumb!'
So China is the bigger threat. So what?
Does this mean you won’t whine about sending billions to Taiwan?
Are you capable of asking someone's opinion without turning it into a strawman?
China attacks Taiwan. We should do what?
Russia attacks Ukraine. We should do what?
Squeeze Russia economically and engage them in a proxy war.
See how easy that was?
Preventing China from invading Taiwan is what I'd like to do. So of course I'd whine about it? You're really quite the genius when it comes to geopolitcs. First, Ukraine was a 'fledgling democracy'. Now it's all about bludgeoning Russia. And of course if someone says they're worried about China, they're stupid and an isolationist, and China invading Taiwan is exactly the same as what happened in Ukraine. Right. Flat out embarrassing stupidity from you. Are you a Reagan admirer?
I am.
He’d be ashamed of you.
As for supporting fledgling democracies and inflicting damage on an autocratic aggressor, there’s no conflict between the two notions. Feel free to explain why supporting Taiwan against China is soooo different. Or do you just plan to shriek that nobody ever asks your opinion again?
Feel free to think about it, champ. If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it to someone who's so caught up in the current thing and prefers to twist. Rage on.
Another gal who says her position is “obvious” and therefore won’t be articulated. I’m losing interest in your bored, Stalin. I’ll need to be paid if I’m going to keep propping it up.
It’s going great for the US. I’m pleased. You’re not.
It's going so great we need to spend more, and other NATO nations are doing what? I'm pleased that you know my inner thoughts as well.
I remember all that money and the American lives we saved waiting to get involved in another of “Europe’s wars”. You girls opposed even the modest support we did provide and ultimately we had to send Americans off to war anyway. And we rebuilt the place.
Ever learn anything, ladies? This is a Fram Oil Filter Man moment.
I remember all the money and American lives we saved in Afghanistan too, genius. I shared my view. I believe China is a bigger threat, and that Russia threatens Europe more than the US. You can disagree, or resort to bad analogies, straw man arguments, and hurtful misgendering. You seem convinced this is marshall plan 2.0 and that Biden is the master of international diplomacy. OK!
Much less ambitious than the Marshall plan. You want to wait until events force you to acknowledge isolationism is foolish. Again.
You'll want to point to where I mentioned isolationism. Day drinking again, Gladys?
You didn’t have to mention it. It’s obvious.
I missed this gem because I went to open gym with my son. Was Reagan an isolationist too? Very stable genius hhusky is on a roll today. "I think China is the biggest threat to the United States" 'LMFAO, r u an isolationist? Like fr u r dumb!'
So China is the bigger threat. So what?
Does this mean you won’t whine about sending billions to Taiwan?
Are you capable of asking someone's opinion without turning it into a strawman?
China attacks Taiwan. We should do what?
Russia attacks Ukraine. We should do what?
Squeeze Russia economically and engage them in a proxy war.
See how easy that was?
Preventing China from invading Taiwan is what I'd like to do. So of course I'd whine about it? You're really quite the genius when it comes to geopolitcs. First, Ukraine was a 'fledgling democracy'. Now it's all about bludgeoning Russia. And of course if someone says they're worried about China, they're stupid and an isolationist, and China invading Taiwan is exactly the same as what happened in Ukraine. Right. Flat out embarrassing stupidity from you. Are you a Reagan admirer?
I am.
He’d be ashamed of you.
As for supporting fledgling democracies and inflicting damage on an autocratic aggressor, there’s no conflict between the two notions. Feel free to explain why supporting Taiwan against China is soooo different. Or do you just plan to shriek that nobody ever asks your opinion again?
Feel free to think about it, champ. If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it to someone who's so caught up in the current thing and prefers to twist. Rage on.
Another gal who says her position is “obvious” and therefore won’t be articulated. I’m losing interest in your bored, Stalin. I’ll need to be paid if I’m going to keep propping it up.
I articulated it, retard. You just twisted it and first called me a 'Reagan admirer' and then an 'isolationist'. You can fuck off anytime and will not be missed. We'll always have your narrative hawt takes on covid though. Those are the best.
“If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it”
“I articulated it”
Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)
"My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia."
You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.
“If you can't see the difference, it's not worth explaining it”
“I articulated it”
Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)
"My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia."
You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.
Your position is a series of questions apparently. Awesome. Really helpful.
Comments
See how easy that was?
Great cost-benefit analysis as always.
It’s important to note for the historical record who “created” the opportunity. It’s important for the critical thinker in determining how the pieces on the global chess board will play out.
Ever wonder why the rest of the BRICS haven’t run to support our side? Of course you haven’t.
He’d be ashamed of you.
As for supporting fledgling democracies and inflicting damage on an autocratic aggressor, there’s no conflict between the two notions. Feel free to explain why supporting Taiwan against China is soooo different. Or do you just plan to shriek that nobody ever asks your opinion again?
"But it's a fledgling democracy, gals"
What will you say when a commercial jetliner is shot down over Poland or Germany with American weapons in the hands of terrorist groups?
Hitler was never a comedic figure. Mein Kampf was written in 1925 and it wasn't a comedic work. Only a moron like our hypothetical MBA or that commie bastard pedophile Charlie Chaplin would think so.
“I articulated it”
Which is it? You need to pick a story and stick with it. (That’s not Rider ball.)
You can't read, or you want to keep twisting that? Or do you want to pretend to think about leaving and not post here because it's so boring? Pick a story and stick with it.