Americans FURIOUS As Democrats AND GOP Pledge 45 Billion To Zelensky & Ukraine

pawz

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

Take it easy on the strawman.

We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.

It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.

Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?

Why would you have wanted it to start?

a) fucking stupid

b) dumb fucking shill

c) criminal war profiteer

d) brb jo for death and destruction

Fire_Marshall_Bill

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

Take it easy on the strawman.

We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.

It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.

Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?

Yes, more wars!

hardhat

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

Take it easy on the strawman.

We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.

It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.

Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?

My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia.

HHusky

pawz said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

Take it easy on the strawman.

We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.

It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.

Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?

Why would you have wanted it to start?

a) fucking stupid

b) dumb fucking shill

c) criminal war profiteer

d) brb jo for death and destruction

I didn’t want it to start, but turning down an opportunity to bludgeon an adversary shows you girls are fucking stupid.

hardhat

HHusky said:

pawz said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

Take it easy on the strawman.

We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.

It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.

Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?

Why would you have wanted it to start?

a) fucking stupid

b) dumb fucking shill

c) criminal war profiteer

d) brb jo for death and destruction

I didn’t want it to start, but turning down an opportunity to bludgeon an adversary shows you girls are fucking stupid.

How's the 'bludgeoning' going, fat retard? You mean you don't care about the fledgling democracy anymore?

HHusky

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

Take it easy on the strawman.

We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.

It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.

Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?

My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia.

China isn’t looking for an opportunity to suffer the same fate as Russia. And its support for Putin is tepid at best. Making an example of Russia now is what you supposed Reagan admirers should be all in on. Of course, you’re not really the party of Reagan anymore. Just a bunch of 1930s style isolationists really.

hardhat

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

Take it easy on the strawman.

We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.

It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.

Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?

My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia.

China isn’t looking for an opportunity to suffer the same fate as Russia. And its support for Putin is tepid at best. Making an example of Russia now is what you supposed Reagan admirers should be all in on. Of course, you’re not really the party of Reagan anymore. Just a bunch of 1930s style isolationists really.

I'd like some receipts on how I'm a Reagan admirer. Stop projecting. What fate is Russia looking to suffer? Are we really making an example of Russia?

HHusky

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

Take it easy on the strawman.

We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.

It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.

Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?

My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia.

China isn’t looking for an opportunity to suffer the same fate as Russia. And its support for Putin is tepid at best. Making an example of Russia now is what you supposed Reagan admirers should be all in on. Of course, you’re not really the party of Reagan anymore. Just a bunch of 1930s style isolationists really.

I'd like some receipts on how I'm a Reagan admirer. Stop projecting. What fate is Russia looking to suffer? Are we really making an example of Russia?

Sorry. You gals all look alike. I do appreciate your honesty. A 1930s style isolationist without the pretense of admiring Reagan. Some others here could learn from your example.

I guess you think this war has really worked out well for Russia. We’ll have to agree to disagree.

hardhat

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

Take it easy on the strawman.

We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.

It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.

Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?

My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia.

China isn’t looking for an opportunity to suffer the same fate as Russia. And its support for Putin is tepid at best. Making an example of Russia now is what you supposed Reagan admirers should be all in on. Of course, you’re not really the party of Reagan anymore. Just a bunch of 1930s style isolationists really.

I'd like some receipts on how I'm a Reagan admirer. Stop projecting. What fate is Russia looking to suffer? Are we really making an example of Russia?

Sorry. You gals all look alike. I do appreciate your honesty. A 1930s style isolationist without the pretense of admiring Reagan. Some others here could learn from your example.

I guess you think this war has really worked out well for Russia. We’ll have to agree to disagree.

You made a claim, the onus is on you to provide evidence. Or isn't it how that works?

Also, some of you gold guys are really fixated on Russia and Reagan. It must be fun for you to relive your glory days.

HHusky

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

hardhat said:

HHusky said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

Insert sanctimonious Hhusky line about how it's a drop in the bucket budget wise

Take it easy on the strawman.

We’re getting to fight a proxy war with Russia and all it’s costing us is money—which we have a lot of. You gals don’t know a good thing when it’s handed to you.

It’s all about that ‘fledgling democracy’, right retard? You make Thomas Friedman sound smart.

Bloodying Russia without having to put our own boots on the ground. Why are you against that? Why would you ever want it to end?

My view is that Russia is not the gravest threat to the United States. I would ask why we need to 'bloody' them in the first place. I didn't see large scale bombing raids flatten Kiev. Foreign fighters are still dying in Ukraine. Are we? really bloodying Russia, or just watching helplessly as they make alliances with China and Saudi Arabia.

China isn’t looking for an opportunity to suffer the same fate as Russia. And its support for Putin is tepid at best. Making an example of Russia now is what you supposed Reagan admirers should be all in on. Of course, you’re not really the party of Reagan anymore. Just a bunch of 1930s style isolationists really.

I'd like some receipts on how I'm a Reagan admirer. Stop projecting. What fate is Russia looking to suffer? Are we really making an example of Russia?

Sorry. You gals all look alike. I do appreciate your honesty. A 1930s style isolationist without the pretense of admiring Reagan. Some others here could learn from your example.

I guess you think this war has really worked out well for Russia. We’ll have to agree to disagree.

You made a claim, the onus is on you to provide evidence. Or isn't it how that works?

I took your word for it. Obviously.

Did you actually graduate from RHS?