Don’t lose to a shitty Arizona St team and none of this is a conversation point
Control what you can control
Dumb fucking talking point. Tell Utah not to lose to a 6-6 Florida. Or Kansas State to beat someone better than a 7-5 Texas Tech. Who the fuck has Clemson beat?
College football is literally built on the concept of evaluating an entire body of work and subjectively ranking teams. And the committee just laid bare how unserious their process is. Might as well let a Facebook poll set the rankings.
Don’t lose to a shitty Arizona St team and none of this is a conversation point
Control what you can control
Dumb fucking talking point. Tell Utah not to lose to a 6-6 Florida. Or Kansas State to beat someone better than a 7-5 Texas Tech. Who the fuck has Clemson beat?
College football is literally built on the concept of evaluating an entire body of work and subjectively ranking teams. And the committee just laid bare how unserious their process is. Might as well let a Facebook poll set the rankings.
Don’t lose to a shitty Arizona St team and none of this is a conversation point
Control what you can control
Dumb fucking talking point. Tell Utah not to lose to a 6-6 Florida. Or Kansas State to beat someone better than a 7-5 Texas Tech. Who the fuck has Clemson beat?
College football is literally built on the concept of evaluating an entire body of work and subjectively ranking teams. And the committee just laid bare how unserious their process is. Might as well let a Facebook poll set the rankings.
Utah has a better resume at this point … things change
Don’t lose to a shitty Arizona St team and none of this is a conversation point
Control what you can control
Dumb fucking talking point. Tell Utah not to lose to a 6-6 Florida. Or Kansas State to beat someone better than a 7-5 Texas Tech. Who the fuck has Clemson beat?
College football is literally built on the concept of evaluating an entire body of work and subjectively ranking teams. And the committee just laid bare how unserious their process is. Might as well let a Facebook poll set the rankings.
Utah has a better resume at this point … things change
Don’t lose to a shitty Arizona St team and none of this is a conversation point
Control what you can control
Dumb fucking talking point. Tell Utah not to lose to a 6-6 Florida. Or Kansas State to beat someone better than a 7-5 Texas Tech. Who the fuck has Clemson beat?
College football is literally built on the concept of evaluating an entire body of work and subjectively ranking teams. And the committee just laid bare how unserious their process is. Might as well let a Facebook poll set the rankings.
Utah has a better resume at this point … things change
Stop being a low information snowflake Doog
Sounds like you can't defend your stupid point
Seriously?
You’ve lost your fastball from the winners win days
Losing at ASU is significantly worse than any of Utah’s losses
USC’s win against USC is better than UW’s best win
UW likely doesn’t win Game #1 in Florida
All metrics point to Utah being better (to date) than UW
UW will be in the Rose Bowl if USC wins
Getting your panties in a wad on this is small time BS
UW’s schedule this year was as soft as the Depends that you wear
I don’t think it really matters which is ranked ahead of the other right now because everything tied to UW is dependent on Friday
There are reasonable arguments for Utah to be ranked ahead of UW … this idea that it’s incomprehensible is idiotic
UW’s fan base has gone incredibly soft
Within conference games, here are the differences in schedule: Utah played USC UW played Cal
Each played 2 cupcakes non-con. Utah played at Florida, which went 6-6. Utah lost. UW played home vs Michigan State, which went 5-7. UW on. Maybe if UW had lost we'd be ranked higher cause MSU would be 6-6?
Florida plays 8 conference games while MSU played 9. Those teams aren't that far apart in sucking.
USC as a win and opponent makes for a tougher schedule for Yoote. Yoote 2-2 vs good teams, UW 2-1.
And somehow UW is worse that Utah because a road loss to a bad conference team is worse than a road loss to a mediocre non conference team.
Is the difference between Charmin Soft and a TUFF schedule truly the difference between swapping a 4-8 team for an 11-1 one?
There is a lot of hair splitting to support Utah. When it is that close, tiebreaker should go to the team that has lost less.
Comments
College football is literally built on the concept of evaluating an entire body of work and subjectively ranking teams. And the committee just laid bare how unserious their process is. Might as well let a Facebook poll set the rankings.
Your take is the ultimate low info talking head point
Stop being a low information snowflake Doog
You’ve lost your fastball from the winners win days
Losing at ASU is significantly worse than any of Utah’s losses
USC’s win against USC is better than UW’s best win
UW likely doesn’t win Game #1 in Florida
All metrics point to Utah being better (to date) than UW
UW will be in the Rose Bowl if USC wins
Getting your panties in a wad on this is small time BS
That's what I thought
Every tie break the Pac 10 or 12 had before they went full retard this year has UW second. Every. Damn. One
10 games winners win over 9 game winners
We don't do hypotheticals
The only wadded panties are yours. It's a shitty take. As usual
I don’t think it really matters which is ranked ahead of the other right now because everything tied to UW is dependent on Friday
There are reasonable arguments for Utah to be ranked ahead of UW … this idea that it’s incomprehensible is idiotic
UW’s fan base has gone incredibly soft
I’ve said that the changing out of North/South this year was idiotic … anytime you have to go to a 5th tiebreaker you’re system sucks
Utah played USC
UW played Cal
Each played 2 cupcakes non-con.
Utah played at Florida, which went 6-6. Utah lost.
UW played home vs Michigan State, which went 5-7. UW on. Maybe if UW had lost we'd be ranked higher cause MSU would be 6-6?
Florida plays 8 conference games while MSU played 9. Those teams aren't that far apart in sucking.
USC as a win and opponent makes for a tougher schedule for Yoote. Yoote 2-2 vs good teams, UW 2-1.
And somehow UW is worse that Utah because a road loss to a bad conference team is worse than a road loss to a mediocre non conference team.
Is the difference between Charmin Soft and a TUFF schedule truly the difference between swapping a 4-8 team for an 11-1 one?
There is a lot of hair splitting to support Utah. When it is that close, tiebreaker should go to the team that has lost less.