Oregon is Lost.
Comments
-
Bumptrublue said:HHusky:
Please explain how judges are selected in the State of Oregon: Circuit Court and higher. District Courts were eliminated over 20+ years ago.
They face re-election once appointed. What happens when one resigns or retires mid-term? Who makes the appointment?
How many years have the Democrats been in control of the Governor’s position?
Think that may have a tad to due with the judicial temperament of judges appointed in Oregon the past 35 years?
How else could the Court of Appeals come up with a ruling making possessing a stolen car,(Unauthorized Use of a Motor Vehicle), a Class C felony, practically unprovable?
https://oregoncapitalchronicle.com/2022/06/02/governor-makes-lasting-impact-in-oregon-with-100-judges-appointed/
Leftist Governors appointing Judges; Soros backed Secretary of State’s; now Soros backed DA’s.
Please quit embarrassing the University of Washington, Dumbfuck!
Why is it a shock we have judges who make rulings devoid of common sense and seem to favor a particular political bent?
It’s a mystery to any buffoon like you. -
https://www.oregonlive.com/crime/2022/11/portland-pot-shops-struck-by-stolen-cars-robbed-police-arrest-three-teens.html
Great! The 14 and 15-year-old burglars were charged with also Unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. They won’t be convicted of that charge unless they admit they stole the car or knew the car was stolen.
Meanwhile, the Portland citizen gets to contact their insurance company; pay to get it out of towing yard and whatever co-pays they have on their insurance policy if it isn’t totaled by the insurance company.
The young offenders will get a stern lecture from a Juvenile Court judge and a slap on the wrist. -
Please explain how judges in the State of Oregon - Circuit Court and higher, are selected; and the role of the Governor in these selections.HHusky said:I want issues decided by tweet.
educated electorate!
Stick to business law, you ignorant slut.
Run and hide.
-
There are three degrees of Robbery in the the Oregon Revised Statutes. All are felonies. Which one was the defendant charged with?HHusky said:
Imagine Mall Cop being in "law enforcement". Good thing they forced him out.Sledog said:
It's only robbery!WestlinnDuck said:
Uh, being attacked and his cell phone stolen. Like I said, he deserved it because he is anti antifa.HHusky said:
Deserved what, Gasbag?WestlinnDuck said:
Just be glad that the dazzler fully supports equal justice. And don't ever call him an antifa apologist. Plus Ngo is gay and was wearing a short dress so he deserved it.HHusky said:I want issues decided by tweet.
educated electorate!
The charge was robbery. Yes or No?
Please spell out the elements of the crime.
You’ve got an awfully ignorant mouth for a lawyer who has never worked a single day in the criminal justice system.
What year did you graduate from law school? What year did you pass the Bar exam on your second attempt?
-
The prosecutor decides what will be charged.greenblood said:
Was he not charged for assault? Even if he was found guilty of stealing his phone, what’s the phone’s value? Sounds like robbery at worst would have been a misdemeanor.SFGbob said:
After assualting Ngo he took his phone. Who cares what his fucking intent was? His actions explain his intent and he should have been found guilty if for no other reason than to deter his shitty behavior in the future.HHusky said:
All three degrees of Robbery are felonies in the State of Oregon.
Serious question, was he charges for assault? If not, why? -
Quintuple shitpost meltdown.
-
He lost.SFGbob said:
The last time the Dazzler was even in a courtroom was to contest a traffic ticket he got.trublue said:
Sounds like the Soros-backed Portland DA put his heart and soul into “justice” in this particular case.greenblood said:
Was he not charged for assault? Even if he was found guilty of stealing his phone, what’s the phone’s value? Sounds like robbery at worst would have been a misdemeanor.SFGbob said:
After assualting Ngo he took his phone. Who cares what his fucking intent was? His actions explain his intent and he should have been found guilty if for no other reason than to deter his shitty behavior in the future.HHusky said:
Serious question, was he charges for assault? If not, why?
The Dazzler does not practice criminal law.
-
God damnit Turdbomber!TurdBomber said:
Classmate of Jimmy McGill.trublue said:
American Samoa Law SchoolTurdBomber said:
JFC! Do you not know what "reasoning" is, you fucking moron?HHusky said:
The charge was robbery.TurdBomber said:
Filming is provocative and a contributing cause to the violence, so a reporter shouldn't do it.HHusky said:
Right. Fuck the First Amendment.
Of course you see nothing wrong with that, you pathetic POS.
Weird how you girls keep missing that.
It's almost like you went back and listened to only a little of the video.
How's that Guam University Law Degree working for you, Dazzler?
Who wound up spending the rest of his life in prison.
Oops! Spoiler Alert.
