Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Oregon is Lost.
Comments
-
Btw, just checked the Oregon statute. Robbery in the third degree is a felony. Also it seems as if the assault could have been separately charged as a lesser included offense (?).Tactical decision by the prosecutor? Hindsight is 2020, as they say.greenblood said:
Again, I don’t know why you guys arguing this. This seems like a misdemeanor at worst. Dazzler, can you explain why an assault charge wasn’t made?HHusky said:
You're working too hard, TurdForBrains.TurdBomber said:
Because, in the judge's mind, Ngo's filming of the perp with his phone "escalated things." Like "asking a question" or scribbling notes, and other stuff journalists do for a living.SFGbob said:
Doesn't appear so. I don't know why he wasn't.greenblood said:
Was he not charged for assault? Even if he was found guilty of stealing his phone, what’s the phone’s value? Sounds like robbery at worst would have been a misdemeanor.SFGbob said:
After assualting Ngo he took his phone. Who cares what his fucking intent was? His actions explain his intent and he should have been found guilty if for no other reason than to deter his shitty behavior in the future.HHusky said:
Serious question, was he charges for assault? If not, why?
We really need to get rid of that "provocative" First Amendment thing.
Intent to permanently deprive him of his property. An element of the crime.
Not proved beyond a reasonable doubt to the judge sitting as jury.
Acquittal is the Constitutionally required outcome.
It's almost as if you don't know what reasoning is. -
HHusky said:
Btw, just checked the Oregon statute. Robbery in the third degree is a felony. Also it seems as if the assault could have been separately charged as a lesser included offense (?).greenblood said:
Again, I don’t know why you guys arguing this. This seems like a misdemeanor at worst. Dazzler, can you explain why an assault charge wasn’t made?HHusky said:
You're working too hard, TurdForBrains.TurdBomber said:
Because, in the judge's mind, Ngo's filming of the perp with his phone "escalated things." Like "asking a question" or scribbling notes, and other stuff journalists do for a living.SFGbob said:
Doesn't appear so. I don't know why he wasn't.greenblood said:
Was he not charged for assault? Even if he was found guilty of stealing his phone, what’s the phone’s value? Sounds like robbery at worst would have been a misdemeanor.SFGbob said:
After assualting Ngo he took his phone. Who cares what his fucking intent was? His actions explain his intent and he should have been found guilty if for no other reason than to deter his shitty behavior in the future.HHusky said:
Serious question, was he charges for assault? If not, why?
We really need to get rid of that "provocative" First Amendment thing.
Intent to permanently deprive him of his property. An element of the crime.
Not proved beyond a reasonable doubt to the judge sitting as jury.
Acquittal is the Constitutionally required outcome.
It's almost as if you don't know what reasoning is.Tacticalpolitical decision by the prosecutor? Hindsight is 2020, as they say. -
If Ngo was a leftist his attackers over the years would all be charged with hate crimes. Beating a right wing gay Asian…no problemo. Beating a leftist gay Asian…now we have a problem.
-
This is where Gasbag pretends he wouldn't have criticized charging the lesser included offense. He's lying, per usual.WestlinnDuck said:HHusky said:
Btw, just checked the Oregon statute. Robbery in the third degree is a felony. Also it seems as if the assault could have been separately charged as a lesser included offense (?).greenblood said:
Again, I don’t know why you guys arguing this. This seems like a misdemeanor at worst. Dazzler, can you explain why an assault charge wasn’t made?HHusky said:
You're working too hard, TurdForBrains.TurdBomber said:
Because, in the judge's mind, Ngo's filming of the perp with his phone "escalated things." Like "asking a question" or scribbling notes, and other stuff journalists do for a living.SFGbob said:
Doesn't appear so. I don't know why he wasn't.greenblood said:
Was he not charged for assault? Even if he was found guilty of stealing his phone, what’s the phone’s value? Sounds like robbery at worst would have been a misdemeanor.SFGbob said:
After assualting Ngo he took his phone. Who cares what his fucking intent was? His actions explain his intent and he should have been found guilty if for no other reason than to deter his shitty behavior in the future.HHusky said:
Serious question, was he charges for assault? If not, why?
We really need to get rid of that "provocative" First Amendment thing.
Intent to permanently deprive him of his property. An element of the crime.
Not proved beyond a reasonable doubt to the judge sitting as jury.
Acquittal is the Constitutionally required outcome.
It's almost as if you don't know what reasoning is.Tacticalpolitical decision by the prosecutor? Hindsight is 2020, as they say. -
Sounds like he poured water over him.MikeDamone said:If Ngo was a leftist his attackers over the years would all be charged with hate crimes. Beating a right wing gay Asian…no problemo. Beating a leftist gay Asian…now we have a problem.
Take a Midol, Madge.
#Beating! -
Missing the Entire Point by a thousand miles, once again.HHusky said:
You're working too hard, TurdForBrains.TurdBomber said:
Because, in the judge's mind, Ngo's filming of the perp with his phone "escalated things." Like "asking a question" or scribbling notes, and other stuff journalists do for a living.SFGbob said:
Doesn't appear so. I don't know why he wasn't.greenblood said:
Was he not charged for assault? Even if he was found guilty of stealing his phone, what’s the phone’s value? Sounds like robbery at worst would have been a misdemeanor.SFGbob said:
After assualting Ngo he took his phone. Who cares what his fucking intent was? His actions explain his intent and he should have been found guilty if for no other reason than to deter his shitty behavior in the future.HHusky said:
Serious question, was he charges for assault? If not, why?
We really need to get rid of that "provocative" First Amendment thing.
Intent to permanently deprive him of his property. An element of the crime.
Not proved beyond a reasonable doubt to the judge sitting as jury.
Acquittal is the Constitutionally required outcome.
It's almost as if you don't know what reasoning is.
The outcome is not the issue, you fucking idiot. It's the Judge's reasoning throughout his explanation as to how he reached his verdict. I'm not impressed with your "See Dick. See Dick run. See Dick run after the ball" level of legal analysis. It's as tedious and unrevealing as anything else you poast.
I truly feel sorry for anyone who wastes their money on a sack-of-shit pettifogger like you. -
At the end of the day Dazzler shows once again that he's an Antifa ball licker.
AB deserved to be shot dead for climbing through a broken window. She was endangering NO ONE. Dazzler agreed with her murder. As did all of the other shitty human beings. -
Yeah…water. You fucking idiot. And re read my post dumb fuck.HHusky said:
Sounds like he poured water over him.MikeDamone said:If Ngo was a leftist his attackers over the years would all be charged with hate crimes. Beating a right wing gay Asian…no problemo. Beating a leftist gay Asian…now we have a problem.
Take a Midol, Madge.
#Beating!
https://www.wsj.com/video/opinion-journalist-andy-ngo-violently-assaulted-by-antifa-protesters/519A71E1-7C02-44E7-913B-EBC3F3B79560.html -
He's the jury, dimwit. He has a doubt as to an element of the crime. He cannot possibly be wrong about the fact of his own doubt.TurdBomber said:
Missing the Entire Point by a thousand miles, once again.HHusky said:
You're working too hard, TurdForBrains.TurdBomber said:
Because, in the judge's mind, Ngo's filming of the perp with his phone "escalated things." Like "asking a question" or scribbling notes, and other stuff journalists do for a living.SFGbob said:
Doesn't appear so. I don't know why he wasn't.greenblood said:
Was he not charged for assault? Even if he was found guilty of stealing his phone, what’s the phone’s value? Sounds like robbery at worst would have been a misdemeanor.SFGbob said:
After assualting Ngo he took his phone. Who cares what his fucking intent was? His actions explain his intent and he should have been found guilty if for no other reason than to deter his shitty behavior in the future.HHusky said:
Serious question, was he charges for assault? If not, why?
We really need to get rid of that "provocative" First Amendment thing.
Intent to permanently deprive him of his property. An element of the crime.
Not proved beyond a reasonable doubt to the judge sitting as jury.
Acquittal is the Constitutionally required outcome.
It's almost as if you don't know what reasoning is.
The outcome is not the issue, you fucking idiot. It's the Judge's reasoning throughout his explanation as to how he reached his verdict. I'm not impressed with your "See Dick. See Dick run. See Dick run after the ball" level of legal analysis. It's as tedious and unrevealing as anything else you poast.
I truly feel sorry for anyone who wastes their money on a sack-of-shit pettifogger like you.
Acquittal is mandatory. -
Update: Missing the Entire Point by a MILLION miles.HHusky said:
He's the jury, dimwit. He has a doubt as to an element of the crime. He cannot possibly be wrong about the fact of his own doubt.TurdBomber said:
Missing the Entire Point by a thousand miles, once again.HHusky said:
You're working too hard, TurdForBrains.TurdBomber said:
Because, in the judge's mind, Ngo's filming of the perp with his phone "escalated things." Like "asking a question" or scribbling notes, and other stuff journalists do for a living.SFGbob said:
Doesn't appear so. I don't know why he wasn't.greenblood said:
Was he not charged for assault? Even if he was found guilty of stealing his phone, what’s the phone’s value? Sounds like robbery at worst would have been a misdemeanor.SFGbob said:
After assualting Ngo he took his phone. Who cares what his fucking intent was? His actions explain his intent and he should have been found guilty if for no other reason than to deter his shitty behavior in the future.HHusky said:
Serious question, was he charges for assault? If not, why?
We really need to get rid of that "provocative" First Amendment thing.
Intent to permanently deprive him of his property. An element of the crime.
Not proved beyond a reasonable doubt to the judge sitting as jury.
Acquittal is the Constitutionally required outcome.
It's almost as if you don't know what reasoning is.
The outcome is not the issue, you fucking idiot. It's the Judge's reasoning throughout his explanation as to how he reached his verdict. I'm not impressed with your "See Dick. See Dick run. See Dick run after the ball" level of legal analysis. It's as tedious and unrevealing as anything else you poast.
I truly feel sorry for anyone who wastes their money on a sack-of-shit pettifogger like you.
Acquittal is mandatory.
@HHusky's Retardation Confirmed. -
H defends EVERYTHING
-
Just water - Andy just complains about water
Calm down gals
-
I get black eyes and broken skin around my eyes every time I shower.
Doesn't everyone? It's just water. -
It wasn't an accident that he knocked Ngo's phone out of his hand and then physically took the phone from Ngo. When you take something from someone by force to deprive them of the ability to use that item that is per se criminal intent. The judge just ignored the law and then lied. It wasn't an accident that the defendant wasn't charged with assault. This was a political decision, not a legal decision based on the clear facts of the case.HHusky said:
He's the jury, dimwit. He has a doubt as to an element of the crime. He cannot possibly be wrong about the fact of his own doubt.TurdBomber said:
Missing the Entire Point by a thousand miles, once again.HHusky said:
You're working too hard, TurdForBrains.TurdBomber said:
Because, in the judge's mind, Ngo's filming of the perp with his phone "escalated things." Like "asking a question" or scribbling notes, and other stuff journalists do for a living.SFGbob said:
Doesn't appear so. I don't know why he wasn't.greenblood said:
Was he not charged for assault? Even if he was found guilty of stealing his phone, what’s the phone’s value? Sounds like robbery at worst would have been a misdemeanor.SFGbob said:
After assualting Ngo he took his phone. Who cares what his fucking intent was? His actions explain his intent and he should have been found guilty if for no other reason than to deter his shitty behavior in the future.HHusky said:
Serious question, was he charges for assault? If not, why?
We really need to get rid of that "provocative" First Amendment thing.
Intent to permanently deprive him of his property. An element of the crime.
Not proved beyond a reasonable doubt to the judge sitting as jury.
Acquittal is the Constitutionally required outcome.
It's almost as if you don't know what reasoning is.
The outcome is not the issue, you fucking idiot. It's the Judge's reasoning throughout his explanation as to how he reached his verdict. I'm not impressed with your "See Dick. See Dick run. See Dick run after the ball" level of legal analysis. It's as tedious and unrevealing as anything else you poast.
I truly feel sorry for anyone who wastes their money on a sack-of-shit pettifogger like you.
Acquittal is mandatory. -
Unless they're Canadian truckers.RaceBannon said:H defends EVERYTHING
-
Wrong incident, Einstein.MikeDamone said:Just water - Andy just complains about water
Calm down gals
Apparently Andy is the Sled of his world. Everyone wants to kill him. -
You seem to be bothered by him.HHusky said:
Wrong incident, Einstein.MikeDamone said:Just water - Andy just complains about water
Calm down gals
Apparently Andy is the Sled of his world. Everyone wants to kill him. -
Gargle those Antifa balls Dazzler.HHusky said:
He's the jury, dimwit. He has a doubt as to an element of the crime. He cannot possibly be wrong about the fact of his own doubt.TurdBomber said:
Missing the Entire Point by a thousand miles, once again.HHusky said:
You're working too hard, TurdForBrains.TurdBomber said:
Because, in the judge's mind, Ngo's filming of the perp with his phone "escalated things." Like "asking a question" or scribbling notes, and other stuff journalists do for a living.SFGbob said:
Doesn't appear so. I don't know why he wasn't.greenblood said:
Was he not charged for assault? Even if he was found guilty of stealing his phone, what’s the phone’s value? Sounds like robbery at worst would have been a misdemeanor.SFGbob said:
After assualting Ngo he took his phone. Who cares what his fucking intent was? His actions explain his intent and he should have been found guilty if for no other reason than to deter his shitty behavior in the future.HHusky said:
Serious question, was he charges for assault? If not, why?
We really need to get rid of that "provocative" First Amendment thing.
Intent to permanently deprive him of his property. An element of the crime.
Not proved beyond a reasonable doubt to the judge sitting as jury.
Acquittal is the Constitutionally required outcome.
It's almost as if you don't know what reasoning is.
The outcome is not the issue, you fucking idiot. It's the Judge's reasoning throughout his explanation as to how he reached his verdict. I'm not impressed with your "See Dick. See Dick run. See Dick run after the ball" level of legal analysis. It's as tedious and unrevealing as anything else you poast.
I truly feel sorry for anyone who wastes their money on a sack-of-shit pettifogger like you.
Acquittal is mandatory. -
You owe Damone money?hardhat said:
You seem to be bothered by him.HHusky said:
Wrong incident, Einstein.MikeDamone said:Just water - Andy just complains about water
Calm down gals
Apparently Andy is the Sled of his world. Everyone wants to kill him. -
He defended AB's murder in the capitol. If he thinks that whole thing is over, well he's going to be in for a surprise.RaceBannon said:H defends EVERYTHING
-
You realize that you're taking the @TheKobeStopper route and raging at mean Andy Ngo? I never about him until Vox and other lefties started crying about him. Now with any piece of news about him, lefties lose their shit.HHusky said:
You owe Damone money?hardhat said:
You seem to be bothered by him.HHusky said:
Wrong incident, Einstein.MikeDamone said:Just water - Andy just complains about water
Calm down gals
Apparently Andy is the Sled of his world. Everyone wants to kill him. -
I barely have heard of him. Apparently his claim to fame is getting the shit kicked out him. So much so that Mikey got confused.hardhat said:
You realize that you're taking the @TheKobeStopper route and raging at mean Andy Ngo? I never about him until Vox and other lefties started crying about him. Now with any piece of news about him, lefties lose their shit.HHusky said:
You owe Damone money?hardhat said:
You seem to be bothered by him.HHusky said:
Wrong incident, Einstein.MikeDamone said:Just water - Andy just complains about water
Calm down gals
Apparently Andy is the Sled of his world. Everyone wants to kill him. -
If he were a Progressive Gay Asian dude reporting on all the MAGA terrorists raging in the streets and was attacked, our worthless AG would be prosecuting any MAGA touching him with a hate crime. And he would be up for a Pulitzer.hardhat said:
You realize that you're taking the @TheKobeStopper route and raging at mean Andy Ngo? I never about him until Vox and other lefties started crying about him. Now with any piece of news about him, lefties lose their shit.HHusky said:
You owe Damone money?hardhat said:
You seem to be bothered by him.HHusky said:
Wrong incident, Einstein.MikeDamone said:Just water - Andy just complains about water
Calm down gals
Apparently Andy is the Sled of his world. Everyone wants to kill him. -
The Nines is where most visiting NBA teams stay while in Portland. Don't know if this is still true.
https://www.wweek.com/news/2021/05/29/portland-protesters-chase-tackle-and-punch-someone-they-believe-to-be-andy-ngo-until-he-hides-in-the-nines-hotel/
A man protesters believed was Andy Ngo hides behind the desk of the Nines hotel in Portland on May 28, 2021.
By Suzette Smith
May 29, 2021 at 11:30 am PDT
People in a May 28 protest crowd in front of the Multnomah County Justice Center chased, tackled and punched someone they believed to be right-wing author Andy Ngo, pursuing him through the streets of Portland until he hid inside The Nines hotel.
The enraged group pulled on the hotel’s front doors and shouted, “You wanna kill us? You wanna kill us, Andy?” at The Nines staff while the hotel staff frantically tried to hold the entrance closed.
The person hiding in The Nines appeared to be Ngo to this reporter—who saw him in the light of an elevator as he entered it and faced the front before the doors closed. But Ngo has not responded to WW’s inquiries whether he was assaulted, and has released no public statements about the incident.
andy nines A man protesters believed was Andy Ngo hides behind the desk of the Nines hotel in Portland on May 28, 2021. (Suzette Smith) (Suzette Smith)
By Suzette Smith
May 29, 2021 at 11:30 am PDT
People in a May 28 protest crowd in front of the Multnomah County Justice Center chased, tackled and punched someone they believed to be right-wing author Andy Ngo, pursuing him through the streets of Portland until he hid inside The Nines hotel.
The enraged group pulled on the hotel’s front doors and shouted, “You wanna kill us? You wanna kill us, Andy?” at The Nines staff while the hotel staff frantically tried to hold the entrance closed.
The person hiding in The Nines appeared to be Ngo to this reporter—who saw him in the light of an elevator as he entered it and faced the front before the doors closed. But Ngo has not responded to WW’s inquiries whether he was assaulted, and has released no public statements about the incident.
The small crowd of leftist protesters—approximately 75—was already on edge after the Department of Homeland Security and Portland police conducted two targeted arrests early in the evening in Terry Schrunk Plaza. In response, the crowd threw raw eggs at the Southwest 2nd Avenue entrance of the Justice Center before peacefully marching through the downtown, chanting and beating drums.
The small crowd gathered because May 28 was the one-year anniversary of Portland’s first night of protests of the murder of George Floyd.
Friday’s march concluded around 11:30 pm without much fanfare. Word began to spread that Ngo was in the crowd—disguised and wearing a Black Lives Matter flag around his shoulders.
A group of five to 10 people in identity-obscuring clothing called “black bloc” followed the person they suspected of being Ngo for blocks, inquiring who he was. At one point, the person they pursued said his name was Jake. In front of the AC Marriott, the group tried to unmask the unknown man. He ran for blocks until someone in the pursuing group tackled him—at Southwest 4th Avenue and Morrison Street—and punched him several times after his head hit the brick sidewalk.
A nearby man holding a skateboard admonished the group, saying that their quarry looked like he’d “had enough.” However, when someone nearby shouted that the person they were assaulting was Ngo, the skateboard-carrying man changed his attitude, swearing and joining the group.
When the fleeing man took shelter in The Nines, he appeared to be pleading with staff. “They’re going to kill me,” he said. -
Barely have heard of him...I'm a centrist...you gals are hilarious.HHusky said:
I barely have heard of him. Apparently his claim to fame is getting the shit kicked out him. So much so that Mikey got confused.hardhat said:
You realize that you're taking the @TheKobeStopper route and raging at mean Andy Ngo? I never about him until Vox and other lefties started crying about him. Now with any piece of news about him, lefties lose their shit.HHusky said:
You owe Damone money?hardhat said:
You seem to be bothered by him.HHusky said:
Wrong incident, Einstein.MikeDamone said:Just water - Andy just complains about water
Calm down gals
Apparently Andy is the Sled of his world. Everyone wants to kill him. -
Now do purse snatching isn't robbery. I'll wait.HHusky said:
Beats listening to the judge recite the elements of the crime alleged, of course.Sledog said:Since Dazzler knows zero actual law I'll explain.
In Kali and pretty much everywhere else, robbery is defined as the theft of property via force or fear. Seems we had all the elements of the crime but a cowardly judge who didn't want his home burned down. -
All the more reason the judge should have convicted the Antifa piece of shit. They have a history of beating and assualting Ngo. But just like your team used to do with the Klan back in the day. Local law enforcement Judges and Politicians just give a wink and nod to the Brownshirts who they know are on their team.HHusky said:
I barely have heard of him. Apparently his claim to fame is getting the shit kicked out him. So much so that Mikey got confused.hardhat said:
You realize that you're taking the @TheKobeStopper route and raging at mean Andy Ngo? I never about him until Vox and other lefties started crying about him. Now with any piece of news about him, lefties lose their shit.HHusky said:
You owe Damone money?hardhat said:
You seem to be bothered by him.HHusky said:
Wrong incident, Einstein.MikeDamone said:Just water - Andy just complains about water
Calm down gals
Apparently Andy is the Sled of his world. Everyone wants to kill him. -
Reread my post, dumbshit.HHusky said:
Wrong incident, Einstein.MikeDamone said:Just water - Andy just complains about water
Calm down gals
Apparently Andy is the Sled of his world. Everyone wants to kill him. -
Please try to keep up. I know reading is hard for you. Dumbfuck.HHusky said:
I barely have heard of him. Apparently his claim to fame is getting the shit kicked out him. So much so that Mikey got confused.hardhat said:
You realize that you're taking the @TheKobeStopper route and raging at mean Andy Ngo? I never about him until Vox and other lefties started crying about him. Now with any piece of news about him, lefties lose their shit.HHusky said:
You owe Damone money?hardhat said:
You seem to be bothered by him.HHusky said:
Wrong incident, Einstein.MikeDamone said:Just water - Andy just complains about water
Calm down gals
Apparently Andy is the Sled of his world. Everyone wants to kill him. -
No big deal. He’s not a leftist. Herr dazzler is ok with him getting assaulted.SFGbob said:
All the more reason the judge should have convicted the Antifa piece of shit. They have a history of beating and assualting Ngo. But just like your team used to do with the Klan back in the day. Local law enforcement Judges and Politicians just give a wink and nod to the Brownshirts who they know are on their team.HHusky said:
I barely have heard of him. Apparently his claim to fame is getting the shit kicked out him. So much so that Mikey got confused.hardhat said:
You realize that you're taking the @TheKobeStopper route and raging at mean Andy Ngo? I never about him until Vox and other lefties started crying about him. Now with any piece of news about him, lefties lose their shit.HHusky said:
You owe Damone money?hardhat said:
You seem to be bothered by him.HHusky said:
Wrong incident, Einstein.MikeDamone said:Just water - Andy just complains about water
Calm down gals
Apparently Andy is the Sled of his world. Everyone wants to kill him.
