Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Is Blue Chip ratio still a thing

145791012

Comments

  • TheHB
    TheHB Member Posts: 6,736
    So we’re just ignoring the whole blue chip thing then?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,541 Founders Club
    Quick question

    Dan Lamboing or Dan Lannbo?
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,435 Founders Club
    46XiJCAB said:

    TheHB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Bottom line of this thread.

    Blue chips no longer matter because those classes are not in the dogs future. I get it, lowered expectations. Maybe Fats can parlay turning around a team with talent to begin with into the soon to be open TAM job?

    I’d be more concerned about the dumbassery exhibited by Lanning. Maybe he will get better in the head coaching department, but he appears to be in way over his head.

    Point being that, of course blue chips matter. But if you coach them like Lanning does, it won’t matter how many stars his players had as recruits.

    Our fat coach has demonstrated an ability so far to get more than most expected out of lesser talent. All things being equal in the coaching dept., I’d want Oregon’s talent. But things don’t look equal to me.
    8-2 over his head POTD. The guy is a first time HC that got his head beat in by his mentor and then ran off 8 in a row before dropping a 3 pointer even with 2 dumb ass calls. He's gonna be just fine. Chip got his head beat in by BSU and did the same thing. Smart coaches learn from mistakes. Well except for J. Lake.

    Fats only has 88 more games as a HC than Lanning. He whipped his ass by 3 with all of that experience.
    Easiest conference schedule up until the UW game. You got UCLA with GameDay there and everyone jacked out of their mind. Did not get ranked beavlet squad the week before. You got Colorado. It's debatable whether or not Oregon is as good as beavlet.
  • TheHB
    TheHB Member Posts: 6,736
    Ducks will be 8-4. Book it.
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    TheHB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Bottom line of this thread.

    Blue chips no longer matter because those classes are not in the dogs future. I get it, lowered expectations. Maybe Fats can parlay turning around a team with talent to begin with into the soon to be open TAM job?

    I’d be more concerned about the dumbassery exhibited by Lanning. Maybe he will get better in the head coaching department, but he appears to be in way over his head.

    Point being that, of course blue chips matter. But if you coach them like Lanning does, it won’t matter how many stars his players had as recruits.

    Our fat coach has demonstrated an ability so far to get more than most expected out of lesser talent. All things being equal in the coaching dept., I’d want Oregon’s talent. But things don’t look equal to me.
    8-2 over his head POTD. The guy is a first time HC that got his head beat in by his mentor and then ran off 8 in a row before dropping a 3 pointer even with 2 dumb ass calls. He's gonna be just fine. Chip got his head beat in by BSU and did the same thing. Smart coaches learn from mistakes. Well except for J. Lake.

    Fats only has 88 more games as a HC than Lanning. He whipped his ass by 3 with all of that experience.
    Easiest conference schedule up until the UW game. You got UCLA with GameDay there and everyone jacked out of their mind. Did not get ranked beavlet squad the week before. You got Colorado. It's debatable whether or not Oregon is as good as beavlet.
    Going to add this to my fan fic blog and going to say I wrote it.
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,435 Founders Club

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    TheHB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Bottom line of this thread.

    Blue chips no longer matter because those classes are not in the dogs future. I get it, lowered expectations. Maybe Fats can parlay turning around a team with talent to begin with into the soon to be open TAM job?

    I’d be more concerned about the dumbassery exhibited by Lanning. Maybe he will get better in the head coaching department, but he appears to be in way over his head.

    Point being that, of course blue chips matter. But if you coach them like Lanning does, it won’t matter how many stars his players had as recruits.

    Our fat coach has demonstrated an ability so far to get more than most expected out of lesser talent. All things being equal in the coaching dept., I’d want Oregon’s talent. But things don’t look equal to me.
    8-2 over his head POTD. The guy is a first time HC that got his head beat in by his mentor and then ran off 8 in a row before dropping a 3 pointer even with 2 dumb ass calls. He's gonna be just fine. Chip got his head beat in by BSU and did the same thing. Smart coaches learn from mistakes. Well except for J. Lake.

    Fats only has 88 more games as a HC than Lanning. He whipped his ass by 3 with all of that experience.
    Easiest conference schedule up until the UW game. You got UCLA with GameDay there and everyone jacked out of their mind. Did not get ranked beavlet squad the week before. You got Colorado. It's debatable whether or not Oregon is as good as beavlet.
    Going to add this to my fan fic blog and going to say I wrote it.
    Don't forget "Probation" ASU 😆
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,379

    TheHB said:

    TheHB said:

    TheHB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Scoreboard Baby

    Now that’s more like it. Now do it 15 of the next 19 and we’re even over the last 40.
    And I was worried you guys were gonna be Nebraska classy. Thanks for keeping it real.

    Amazing that with that kind of dominance, duck is still behind 61–48–5 all-time.

    So win 13 in a row, and we're? even.
    NOC
    YYD
    If I did I would have known what the series record was.

    You care about stupid shit because you never win anything.

    You’d go 0-10 against Oregon if it meant 10 league titles. As would I reversed.

    NOC

    This is called projection. You care so you think everyone else does. You care because UW has been worse than Oregon for the majority of your life. You probably spend a lot of time thinking about football so you have to find SOMETHING to make it worth it. For Hiai, it’s academic rankings, as an example.

    Washington being 13 games (thanks for the data point Grace) better than Oregon happened before I was born.

    Are you sick because Oregon won the 1919 Rose Bowl? I’m going to assume not but you can tell me.
    I am. Still can't let it go
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    edited November 2022
    haie said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    TheHB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Bottom line of this thread.

    Blue chips no longer matter because those classes are not in the dogs future. I get it, lowered expectations. Maybe Fats can parlay turning around a team with talent to begin with into the soon to be open TAM job?

    I’d be more concerned about the dumbassery exhibited by Lanning. Maybe he will get better in the head coaching department, but he appears to be in way over his head.

    Point being that, of course blue chips matter. But if you coach them like Lanning does, it won’t matter how many stars his players had as recruits.

    Our fat coach has demonstrated an ability so far to get more than most expected out of lesser talent. All things being equal in the coaching dept., I’d want Oregon’s talent. But things don’t look equal to me.
    8-2 over his head POTD. The guy is a first time HC that got his head beat in by his mentor and then ran off 8 in a row before dropping a 3 pointer even with 2 dumb ass calls. He's gonna be just fine. Chip got his head beat in by BSU and did the same thing. Smart coaches learn from mistakes. Well except for J. Lake.

    Fats only has 88 more games as a HC than Lanning. He whipped his ass by 3 with all of that experience.
    Easiest conference schedule up until the UW game. You got UCLA with GameDay there and everyone jacked out of their mind. Did not get ranked beavlet squad the week before. You got Colorado. It's debatable whether or not Oregon is as good as beavlet.
    Going to add this to my fan fic blog and going to say I wrote it.
    Don't forget "Probation" ASU 😆
    It’s fan fic so I’ll be sure to add all the reasons why I don’t care what anyone says, that was a GOOD asu team.

    If only there was a way to find out who’s had the easier schedule this year. Spoiler alert: There is and I don’t think you’ll like the results.

  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,435 Founders Club

    haie said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    TheHB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Bottom line of this thread.

    Blue chips no longer matter because those classes are not in the dogs future. I get it, lowered expectations. Maybe Fats can parlay turning around a team with talent to begin with into the soon to be open TAM job?

    I’d be more concerned about the dumbassery exhibited by Lanning. Maybe he will get better in the head coaching department, but he appears to be in way over his head.

    Point being that, of course blue chips matter. But if you coach them like Lanning does, it won’t matter how many stars his players had as recruits.

    Our fat coach has demonstrated an ability so far to get more than most expected out of lesser talent. All things being equal in the coaching dept., I’d want Oregon’s talent. But things don’t look equal to me.
    8-2 over his head POTD. The guy is a first time HC that got his head beat in by his mentor and then ran off 8 in a row before dropping a 3 pointer even with 2 dumb ass calls. He's gonna be just fine. Chip got his head beat in by BSU and did the same thing. Smart coaches learn from mistakes. Well except for J. Lake.

    Fats only has 88 more games as a HC than Lanning. He whipped his ass by 3 with all of that experience.
    Easiest conference schedule up until the UW game. You got UCLA with GameDay there and everyone jacked out of their mind. Did not get ranked beavlet squad the week before. You got Colorado. It's debatable whether or not Oregon is as good as beavlet.
    Going to add this to my fan fic blog and going to say I wrote it.
    Don't forget "Probation" ASU 😆
    It’s fan fic so I’ll be sure to add all the reasons why I don’t care what anyone says, that was a GOOD asu team.

    If only there was a way to find out who’s had the easier schedule this year. Spoiler alert: There is and I don’t think you’ll like the results.

    Oregon conference road games: Arizona, Cal, Colorado.

    Getting the shitty teams on the road, one placed specifically in front of your rivalry game at home, is a called the softest of conference schedules.

    No fan fic needed.
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    haie said:

    haie said:

    haie said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    TheHB said:

    46XiJCAB said:

    Bottom line of this thread.

    Blue chips no longer matter because those classes are not in the dogs future. I get it, lowered expectations. Maybe Fats can parlay turning around a team with talent to begin with into the soon to be open TAM job?

    I’d be more concerned about the dumbassery exhibited by Lanning. Maybe he will get better in the head coaching department, but he appears to be in way over his head.

    Point being that, of course blue chips matter. But if you coach them like Lanning does, it won’t matter how many stars his players had as recruits.

    Our fat coach has demonstrated an ability so far to get more than most expected out of lesser talent. All things being equal in the coaching dept., I’d want Oregon’s talent. But things don’t look equal to me.
    8-2 over his head POTD. The guy is a first time HC that got his head beat in by his mentor and then ran off 8 in a row before dropping a 3 pointer even with 2 dumb ass calls. He's gonna be just fine. Chip got his head beat in by BSU and did the same thing. Smart coaches learn from mistakes. Well except for J. Lake.

    Fats only has 88 more games as a HC than Lanning. He whipped his ass by 3 with all of that experience.
    Easiest conference schedule up until the UW game. You got UCLA with GameDay there and everyone jacked out of their mind. Did not get ranked beavlet squad the week before. You got Colorado. It's debatable whether or not Oregon is as good as beavlet.
    Going to add this to my fan fic blog and going to say I wrote it.
    Don't forget "Probation" ASU 😆
    It’s fan fic so I’ll be sure to add all the reasons why I don’t care what anyone says, that was a GOOD asu team.

    If only there was a way to find out who’s had the easier schedule this year. Spoiler alert: There is and I don’t think you’ll like the results.

    Oregon conference road games: Arizona, Cal, Colorado.

    Getting the shitty teams on the road, one placed specifically in front of your rivalry game at home, is a called the softest of conference schedules.

    No fan fic needed.
    There’s resources you can check to see who has played the far easier schedule. You just have to Google it.

    Note that Oregons will improve the next two weeks while UWs will decrease.

    Fan fic is fan fic. Facts are facts.