Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The DeBoer HH relationship timeline

189111314

Comments

  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,500
    I was all in on Deboer after he beat a RANKED Oregon State.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Baseman said:

    whlinder said:



    Due to clock mismanagement at the end of the game I poasted that. Outcomes matter. So does process.

    I would like a Damone Doog rating plz
    The process matters most. Get that right and wins follow. Have a shitty process and you win games with a late interception off an Arizona players foot and think you coached a masterful game.

    Have a shitty process, but luck out with a QB named Tui, have a bunch of big comeback wins, go to the rose bowl and pop off, but in reality your’re a 7-6 coach. Eventually patterns emerge. It takes time.

    Is Penix DeBoer’s Tui? I’m not saying he is, I’m saying I don’t know. But we have seen it before.
    I've been spending three days a week in Spokane smashing that point into the face of the branch. It's a process. It's hard

    But DeBoer does have a proven process. Like me he's a winner.
    He has a process in the glorified high school division. Was OK at FSU, 9-5 conference record. He is in his 3rd year as a power 5 head coach. LIPO.
    Jim Tressel was a national champion at Youngstown State before Ohio State

    Winning is winning

    Rick was spotty before UW and after

    I am LIPO but sharing some of my brilliant insight that you can't get anywhere else
    Just making sure everything is evidence based.

    Greg Bohl won several national championships at NDSU. Is now a .500 coach at Wyoming.

    LIPO
    Since you waived your 15 game rule before drawing a conclusion, I'll point out the following:

    Bohl took over a 5-7 team at Wyoming and won 4 games his first year, 2 the next. DeBoner doesn't need time to get his guys in here, even though he does.

    Even with Bohl's 3 natties, he lost 32 games. DeBoner 3.

    Baseman Disclaimer: Natties won/Losses >= 1, ELITE coach

    I do applaud your effort even though your comp falls short.
    Races example was simplistic. As was my response. Small time Nattys may or may not translate to a winning FBS coach. There are examples each way. Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    Baseman said:

    whlinder said:



    Due to clock mismanagement at the end of the game I poasted that. Outcomes matter. So does process.

    I would like a Damone Doog rating plz
    The process matters most. Get that right and wins follow. Have a shitty process and you win games with a late interception off an Arizona players foot and think you coached a masterful game.

    Have a shitty process, but luck out with a QB named Tui, have a bunch of big comeback wins, go to the rose bowl and pop off, but in reality your’re a 7-6 coach. Eventually patterns emerge. It takes time.

    Is Penix DeBoer’s Tui? I’m not saying he is, I’m saying I don’t know. But we have seen it before.
    I've been spending three days a week in Spokane smashing that point into the face of the branch. It's a process. It's hard

    But DeBoer does have a proven process. Like me he's a winner.
    He has a process in the glorified high school division. Was OK at FSU, 9-5 conference record. He is in his 3rd year as a power 5 head coach. LIPO.
    Jim Tressel was a national champion at Youngstown State before Ohio State

    Winning is winning

    Rick was spotty before UW and after

    I am LIPO but sharing some of my brilliant insight that you can't get anywhere else
    Just making sure everything is evidence based.

    Greg Bohl won several national championships at NDSU. Is now a .500 coach at Wyoming.

    LIPO
    Since you waived your 15 game rule before drawing a conclusion, I'll point out the following:

    Bohl took over a 5-7 team at Wyoming and won 4 games his first year, 2 the next. DeBoner doesn't need time to get his guys in here, even though he does.

    Even with Bohl's 3 natties, he lost 32 games. DeBoner 3.

    Baseman Disclaimer: Natties won/Losses >= 1, ELITE coach

    I do applaud your effort even though your comp falls short.
    Races example was simplistic. As was my response. Small time Nattys may or may not translate to a winning FBS coach. There are examples each way. Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal.
    A winning percentage speaks volumes and is not simplistic

    Tressel was 70% at Youngstown 15 years 4-2 in the natty game

    Bohl was 74 percent in 11 years 3-1 in the natty game. Also old as fuck now

    DeBoer was 95% in 5 years and 4-1 in natty games

    Not a guarantee but DeBoer is ridiculous

    Sounds like you’ve had a boner for DeBoer since day one and loved the hire. That’s good.
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,379

    Baseman said:

    whlinder said:



    Due to clock mismanagement at the end of the game I poasted that. Outcomes matter. So does process.

    I would like a Damone Doog rating plz
    The process matters most. Get that right and wins follow. Have a shitty process and you win games with a late interception off an Arizona players foot and think you coached a masterful game.

    Have a shitty process, but luck out with a QB named Tui, have a bunch of big comeback wins, go to the rose bowl and pop off, but in reality your’re a 7-6 coach. Eventually patterns emerge. It takes time.

    Is Penix DeBoer’s Tui? I’m not saying he is, I’m saying I don’t know. But we have seen it before.
    I've been spending three days a week in Spokane smashing that point into the face of the branch. It's a process. It's hard

    But DeBoer does have a proven process. Like me he's a winner.
    He has a process in the glorified high school division. Was OK at FSU, 9-5 conference record. He is in his 3rd year as a power 5 head coach. LIPO.
    Jim Tressel was a national champion at Youngstown State before Ohio State

    Winning is winning

    Rick was spotty before UW and after

    I am LIPO but sharing some of my brilliant insight that you can't get anywhere else
    Just making sure everything is evidence based.

    Greg Bohl won several national championships at NDSU. Is now a .500 coach at Wyoming.

    LIPO
    Since you waived your 15 game rule before drawing a conclusion, I'll point out the following:

    Bohl took over a 5-7 team at Wyoming and won 4 games his first year, 2 the next. DeBoner doesn't need time to get his guys in here, even though he does.

    Even with Bohl's 3 natties, he lost 32 games. DeBoner 3.

    Baseman Disclaimer: Natties won/Losses >= 1, ELITE coach

    I do applaud your effort even though your comp falls short.
    Races example was simplistic. As was my response. Small time Nattys may or may not translate to a winning FBS coach. There are examples each way. Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal.
    A winning percentage speaks volumes and is not simplistic

    Tressel was 70% at Youngstown 15 years 4-2 in the natty game

    Bohl was 74 percent in 11 years 3-1 in the natty game. Also old as fuck now

    DeBoer was 95% in 5 years and 4-1 in natty games

    Not a guarantee but DeBoer is ridiculous

    Race is RIGHT as Purple Rain
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,379

    Baseman said:

    whlinder said:



    Due to clock mismanagement at the end of the game I poasted that. Outcomes matter. So does process.

    I would like a Damone Doog rating plz
    The process matters most. Get that right and wins follow. Have a shitty process and you win games with a late interception off an Arizona players foot and think you coached a masterful game.

    Have a shitty process, but luck out with a QB named Tui, have a bunch of big comeback wins, go to the rose bowl and pop off, but in reality your’re a 7-6 coach. Eventually patterns emerge. It takes time.

    Is Penix DeBoer’s Tui? I’m not saying he is, I’m saying I don’t know. But we have seen it before.
    I've been spending three days a week in Spokane smashing that point into the face of the branch. It's a process. It's hard

    But DeBoer does have a proven process. Like me he's a winner.
    He has a process in the glorified high school division. Was OK at FSU, 9-5 conference record. He is in his 3rd year as a power 5 head coach. LIPO.
    Jim Tressel was a national champion at Youngstown State before Ohio State

    Winning is winning

    Rick was spotty before UW and after

    I am LIPO but sharing some of my brilliant insight that you can't get anywhere else
    Just making sure everything is evidence based.

    Greg Bohl won several national championships at NDSU. Is now a .500 coach at Wyoming.

    LIPO
    Since you waived your 15 game rule before drawing a conclusion, I'll point out the following:

    Bohl took over a 5-7 team at Wyoming and won 4 games his first year, 2 the next. DeBoner doesn't need time to get his guys in here, even though he does.

    Even with Bohl's 3 natties, he lost 32 games. DeBoner 3.

    Baseman Disclaimer: Natties won/Losses >= 1, ELITE coach

    I do applaud your effort even though your comp falls short.
    Races example was simplistic. As was my response. Small time Nattys may or may not translate to a winning FBS coach. There are examples each way. Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal.
    Beat TCC and Lincoln High, then pop-off!
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club

    Baseman said:

    whlinder said:



    Due to clock mismanagement at the end of the game I poasted that. Outcomes matter. So does process.

    I would like a Damone Doog rating plz
    The process matters most. Get that right and wins follow. Have a shitty process and you win games with a late interception off an Arizona players foot and think you coached a masterful game.

    Have a shitty process, but luck out with a QB named Tui, have a bunch of big comeback wins, go to the rose bowl and pop off, but in reality your’re a 7-6 coach. Eventually patterns emerge. It takes time.

    Is Penix DeBoer’s Tui? I’m not saying he is, I’m saying I don’t know. But we have seen it before.
    I've been spending three days a week in Spokane smashing that point into the face of the branch. It's a process. It's hard

    But DeBoer does have a proven process. Like me he's a winner.
    He has a process in the glorified high school division. Was OK at FSU, 9-5 conference record. He is in his 3rd year as a power 5 head coach. LIPO.
    Jim Tressel was a national champion at Youngstown State before Ohio State

    Winning is winning

    Rick was spotty before UW and after

    I am LIPO but sharing some of my brilliant insight that you can't get anywhere else
    Just making sure everything is evidence based.

    Greg Bohl won several national championships at NDSU. Is now a .500 coach at Wyoming.

    LIPO
    Since you waived your 15 game rule before drawing a conclusion, I'll point out the following:

    Bohl took over a 5-7 team at Wyoming and won 4 games his first year, 2 the next. DeBoner doesn't need time to get his guys in here, even though he does.

    Even with Bohl's 3 natties, he lost 32 games. DeBoner 3.

    Baseman Disclaimer: Natties won/Losses >= 1, ELITE coach

    I do applaud your effort even though your comp falls short.
    Races example was simplistic. As was my response. Small time Nattys may or may not translate to a winning FBS coach. There are examples each way. Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal.
    Three in a row (effectively) is THE mindset of a Champion.

    Tim Grover would call that a "cleaner". IYKYK.

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,503 Founders Club

    Baseman said:

    whlinder said:



    Due to clock mismanagement at the end of the game I poasted that. Outcomes matter. So does process.

    I would like a Damone Doog rating plz
    The process matters most. Get that right and wins follow. Have a shitty process and you win games with a late interception off an Arizona players foot and think you coached a masterful game.

    Have a shitty process, but luck out with a QB named Tui, have a bunch of big comeback wins, go to the rose bowl and pop off, but in reality your’re a 7-6 coach. Eventually patterns emerge. It takes time.

    Is Penix DeBoer’s Tui? I’m not saying he is, I’m saying I don’t know. But we have seen it before.
    I've been spending three days a week in Spokane smashing that point into the face of the branch. It's a process. It's hard

    But DeBoer does have a proven process. Like me he's a winner.
    He has a process in the glorified high school division. Was OK at FSU, 9-5 conference record. He is in his 3rd year as a power 5 head coach. LIPO.
    Jim Tressel was a national champion at Youngstown State before Ohio State

    Winning is winning

    Rick was spotty before UW and after

    I am LIPO but sharing some of my brilliant insight that you can't get anywhere else
    Just making sure everything is evidence based.

    Greg Bohl won several national championships at NDSU. Is now a .500 coach at Wyoming.

    LIPO
    Since you waived your 15 game rule before drawing a conclusion, I'll point out the following:

    Bohl took over a 5-7 team at Wyoming and won 4 games his first year, 2 the next. DeBoner doesn't need time to get his guys in here, even though he does.

    Even with Bohl's 3 natties, he lost 32 games. DeBoner 3.

    Baseman Disclaimer: Natties won/Losses >= 1, ELITE coach

    I do applaud your effort even though your comp falls short.
    Races example was simplistic. As was my response. Small time Nattys may or may not translate to a winning FBS coach. There are examples each way. Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal.
    A winning percentage speaks volumes and is not simplistic

    Tressel was 70% at Youngstown 15 years 4-2 in the natty game

    Bohl was 74 percent in 11 years 3-1 in the natty game. Also old as fuck now

    DeBoer was 95% in 5 years and 4-1 in natty games

    Not a guarantee but DeBoer is ridiculous

    Sounds like you’ve had a boner for DeBoer since day one and loved the hire. That’s good.
    I was against it
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    Baseman said:

    whlinder said:



    Due to clock mismanagement at the end of the game I poasted that. Outcomes matter. So does process.

    I would like a Damone Doog rating plz
    The process matters most. Get that right and wins follow. Have a shitty process and you win games with a late interception off an Arizona players foot and think you coached a masterful game.

    Have a shitty process, but luck out with a QB named Tui, have a bunch of big comeback wins, go to the rose bowl and pop off, but in reality your’re a 7-6 coach. Eventually patterns emerge. It takes time.

    Is Penix DeBoer’s Tui? I’m not saying he is, I’m saying I don’t know. But we have seen it before.
    I've been spending three days a week in Spokane smashing that point into the face of the branch. It's a process. It's hard

    But DeBoer does have a proven process. Like me he's a winner.
    He has a process in the glorified high school division. Was OK at FSU, 9-5 conference record. He is in his 3rd year as a power 5 head coach. LIPO.
    Jim Tressel was a national champion at Youngstown State before Ohio State

    Winning is winning

    Rick was spotty before UW and after

    I am LIPO but sharing some of my brilliant insight that you can't get anywhere else
    Just making sure everything is evidence based.

    Greg Bohl won several national championships at NDSU. Is now a .500 coach at Wyoming.

    LIPO
    Since you waived your 15 game rule before drawing a conclusion, I'll point out the following:

    Bohl took over a 5-7 team at Wyoming and won 4 games his first year, 2 the next. DeBoner doesn't need time to get his guys in here, even though he does.

    Even with Bohl's 3 natties, he lost 32 games. DeBoner 3.

    Baseman Disclaimer: Natties won/Losses >= 1, ELITE coach

    I do applaud your effort even though your comp falls short.
    Races example was simplistic. As was my response. Small time Nattys may or may not translate to a winning FBS coach. There are examples each way. Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal.
    A winning percentage speaks volumes and is not simplistic

    Tressel was 70% at Youngstown 15 years 4-2 in the natty game

    Bohl was 74 percent in 11 years 3-1 in the natty game. Also old as fuck now

    DeBoer was 95% in 5 years and 4-1 in natty games

    Not a guarantee but DeBoer is ridiculous

    Sounds like you’ve had a boner for DeBoer since day one and loved the hire. That’s good.
    I was against it
    Why? He won 95% of his games. Winners win