Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Is DeBoer a More PC Version of Sark?
Comments
-
Imagine typing this out. Or reading it
-
Pete recruited a bunch of OKG soft, mixed kids from private high schools & thought he could augment black players for Samoans. Yes, his recruits have consistently under performed because they suck. What legit program does not recruit a black linebacker or d-lineman for multiple cycles.haie said:
After Pete brought his "mountain west" recruits in that made the playoffs, won the conference 2/3 years and now play in the NFL, we got these soft players that were great looking on paper but continue to struggle on the field.Baseman said:
Playoff team and our prize, as top QB recruit was either now stand-up comedian, D. Bridge-Gadd or JC clipboard extraordinaire, TRod (i like to call him TRod)haie said:
You don't need to remind me how much of a burnout fucking B- coach Petersen was at UW.Baseman said:
Deboner will go for it on 4th down behind the 50 with his QB behind center. Peterman, twice called for a fake punt, behind the 50 and relied on his punter to make a first down. Both attempts failed. Sark would call a fake punt behind the 50, get stuffed and turn the ball over one time, sucseed the next time only to have it called back for too many players on the field. One time I think we had thirteen guys out there at once.haie said:
Unless you're @TequillaKingdome_Urinals said:DeBoer has a track record of moving from the bottom upward by his own ability. Sark had none of that.
If Sark started at North Dakota State or whatever, where would he be? Nowhere. Do the math.
They are in no way similar.
And even then you realize what a retard you were and start backpedaling "Well, Deboer could win 7 games like Sark did."
Petersen won 7 games one year. What a dipshit.
I could go full TL;DR on how many games he fucked up. People on this site act like going 7/8 wins half his years wasn't a big deal because he made the playoffs one year.
2014 and 15 he took 10 win teams (not saying they would win their division but should have competed and won a bowl to get to 10) and won 8 and fucking 7 games with that talent. But because he pounded a ranked cuoglet or whatever he got a pass.
Guys like Molden are the only exceptions. -
Not this shit againATLDawg said:Pete recruited a bunch of OKG soft, mixed kids from private high schools & thought he could augment black players for Samoans. Yes, his recruits have consistently under performed because they suck. What legit program does not recruit a black linebacker or d-lineman for multiple cycles.
haie said:
After Pete brought his "mountain west" recruits in that made the playoffs, won the conference 2/3 years and now play in the NFL, we got these soft players that were great looking on paper but continue to struggle on the field.Baseman said:
Playoff team and our prize, as top QB recruit was either now stand-up comedian, D. Bridge-Gadd or JC clipboard extraordinaire, TRod (i like to call him TRod)haie said:
You don't need to remind me how much of a burnout fucking B- coach Petersen was at UW.Baseman said:
Deboner will go for it on 4th down behind the 50 with his QB behind center. Peterman, twice called for a fake punt, behind the 50 and relied on his punter to make a first down. Both attempts failed. Sark would call a fake punt behind the 50, get stuffed and turn the ball over one time, sucseed the next time only to have it called back for too many players on the field. One time I think we had thirteen guys out there at once.haie said:
Unless you're @TequillaKingdome_Urinals said:DeBoer has a track record of moving from the bottom upward by his own ability. Sark had none of that.
If Sark started at North Dakota State or whatever, where would he be? Nowhere. Do the math.
They are in no way similar.
And even then you realize what a retard you were and start backpedaling "Well, Deboer could win 7 games like Sark did."
Petersen won 7 games one year. What a dipshit.
I could go full TL;DR on how many games he fucked up. People on this site act like going 7/8 wins half his years wasn't a big deal because he made the playoffs one year.
2014 and 15 he took 10 win teams (not saying they would win their division but should have competed and won a bowl to get to 10) and won 8 and fucking 7 games with that talent. But because he pounded a ranked cuoglet or whatever he got a pass.
Guys like Molden are the only exceptions. -
Sark is his own special brand of aggressive mediocrity
-
This shit was the cringiest thing ive ever seen on the internet.bananasnblondes said:
Not this shit againATLDawg said:Pete recruited a bunch of OKG soft, mixed kids from private high schools & thought he could augment black players for Samoans. Yes, his recruits have consistently under performed because they suck. What legit program does not recruit a black linebacker or d-lineman for multiple cycles.
haie said:
After Pete brought his "mountain west" recruits in that made the playoffs, won the conference 2/3 years and now play in the NFL, we got these soft players that were great looking on paper but continue to struggle on the field.Baseman said:
Playoff team and our prize, as top QB recruit was either now stand-up comedian, D. Bridge-Gadd or JC clipboard extraordinaire, TRod (i like to call him TRod)haie said:
You don't need to remind me how much of a burnout fucking B- coach Petersen was at UW.Baseman said:
Deboner will go for it on 4th down behind the 50 with his QB behind center. Peterman, twice called for a fake punt, behind the 50 and relied on his punter to make a first down. Both attempts failed. Sark would call a fake punt behind the 50, get stuffed and turn the ball over one time, sucseed the next time only to have it called back for too many players on the field. One time I think we had thirteen guys out there at once.haie said:
Unless you're @TequillaKingdome_Urinals said:DeBoer has a track record of moving from the bottom upward by his own ability. Sark had none of that.
If Sark started at North Dakota State or whatever, where would he be? Nowhere. Do the math.
They are in no way similar.
And even then you realize what a retard you were and start backpedaling "Well, Deboer could win 7 games like Sark did."
Petersen won 7 games one year. What a dipshit.
I could go full TL;DR on how many games he fucked up. People on this site act like going 7/8 wins half his years wasn't a big deal because he made the playoffs one year.
2014 and 15 he took 10 win teams (not saying they would win their division but should have competed and won a bowl to get to 10) and won 8 and fucking 7 games with that talent. But because he pounded a ranked cuoglet or whatever he got a pass.
Guys like Molden are the only exceptions.
Which says a lot. -
Really pretty on brand for what upper campus envisions for football.Pitchfork51 said:Sark is his own special brand of aggressive mediocrity
-
MWC offense.
MWC defense.
People are somehow surprised. -
Year one. It’s concerning and has to get better. Changes probably need to be made on that side of the ball.46XiJCAB said:MWC offense.
MWC defense.
People are somehow surprised. -
It’s blown coverages, shitty technique and bad tackling. This staff can’t come back on defense. It’s an inevitable firing after another shitty performance next year if they are here.RoadDawg55 said:
Year one. It’s concerning and has to get better. Changes probably need to be made on that side of the ball.46XiJCAB said:MWC offense.
MWC defense.
People are somehow surprised. -
Is DeBoer a More PC Version of Sark?
