Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
OKC
Comments
-
Lots of twisting going on here
-
He still hasn't started one game in 2 years. Has 1 start in the last four years and has 10 for his career.doogsinparadise said:You need to learn the difference between what I'm hearing and what I actually think. FWIW, he's averaging 24 mpg against the Pacers this year.
He's part of their bench. Their bench is better than OKC's. Seriously come back to this convo when you actually have factual material instead of drunken gibberish. -
So Rashard is a starter now because of one series? Whatever, does it matter when you play fluid rotations with half bench guys and half starters.
-
Did I say he was a starter? But saying Anderson is a starter when he literally has never started in two years and typically plays under 20 minutes a night is serious pressing.doogsinparadise said:So Rashard is a starter now because of one series? Whatever, does it matter when you play fluid rotations with half bench guys and half starters.
You claimed OKC bench was better then immediately back tracked so you started to say Anderson doesn't count.
Anderson doesn't start, has never started for Miami and doesn't play starters minutes. -
I still like the Spurs in 6. Originally had them in 5 without Ibaka. I didn't think he would be so courageous and end up playing through the excruciating pain of a calf strain... a true role model.
-
I picked the Spurs originally, but I think the Thunder win. They have the two best players and there is no more paint advantage with Ibaka playing. Thunder 12-2 in the last 14 against the Spurs when Ibaka plays.
-
Curious at how low the minutes have been for Duncan, Parker, Ginobili, and Leonard have been.
I still think the Spurs win the series in 7. -
That is why I felt uncomfortable picking the Spurs. Originally when Ibaka was "healthy" I had OKC in 6 but with him out changed to Spurs in 6.RoadDawg55 said:I picked the Spurs originally, but I think the Thunder win. They have the two best players and there is no more paint advantage with Ibaka playing. Thunder 12-2 in the last 14 against the Spurs when Ibaka plays.
Picking against the best player in the series in the NBA is foolish let alone the two best.
I'll say this about OKC and this includes Miami even when OKC is playing at their best nobody can touch them.
Durant-Westbrook athletically best combo in the last 25 years. They are up there with Lebron-Wade first two years, MJ-Pippen on the first three-peat and that's about it. -
RoadDawg55 said:
That is pretty stubborn. OKC has looked a lot different with Ibaka and at home. If Spurs win the series, it will be because they have home court advantage. I've seen nothing to suggest San Antonio will win one at OKC.He_Needs_More_Time said:The game was over when I saw Joey Crawford was officiating. Still sticking with Spurs in 6 though.
This team does not suck. The rebuild is ahead of schedule.RoadDawg55 said:
That's fine, but Durant and Westbrook aren't losing a must win game 6 at home. The NBA won't want that to happen either.He_Needs_More_Time said:The game was over when I saw Joey Crawford was officiating. Still sticking with Spurs in 6 though.
I'm hearing the Pacers will win in 7 games. Wade might be the fifth best player on the court.
I guess I'm not so "stubborn" after all for correctly calling Spurs in six and Heat in six. -
FYI, Thunderfans.com ended their Seattle IP address ban, if anyone wants to go over there and congratulate their season....



