My thoughts on the secondary
Comments
-
Fuck that guy. Shane Pahokoa would beat his ass.Baseman said:
Taylor Rapp is a selfish POSMikeDamone said:
UW getting a stop last night at that point was horrific odds. HTHPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Disagree. In the Rose Bowl UW needed to get an onside kick and TD IN 30 seconds which is horrific odds.MikeDamone said:
It was a close game like the Rose Bowl v tOSU was as close game. An ass beating and then a flurry that no one thought was going to result in a win.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
It's actually an interesting point you bring up.MikeDamone said:
I was hearing it was blowout and MSU got close in garbage time.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.MikeDamone said:
So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
PressingMikeDamone said:
Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.MikeDamone said:
It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effortHouhusky said:People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.
I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.
to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
Fucking Doogs are delusional
Hth
You don't think UCLA won convincingly? Christ.
Id say UCLA won convincingly, but it was also a close game.
Now if UCLA was WSU you would have a case
All UW needed last night was a stop on defense and a 2 point conversion. Four minutes left and all 3 timeouts
UCLA could do what they wanted on offense when they wanted.
"All they needed to do was get a stop, score and get a 2 point conversion". That's all -
Shane's not a big Rapp fanMikeDamone said:
Fuck that guy. Shane Pahokoa would beat his ass.Baseman said:
Taylor Rapp is a selfish POSMikeDamone said:
UW getting a stop last night at that point was horrific odds. HTHPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Disagree. In the Rose Bowl UW needed to get an onside kick and TD IN 30 seconds which is horrific odds.MikeDamone said:
It was a close game like the Rose Bowl v tOSU was as close game. An ass beating and then a flurry that no one thought was going to result in a win.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
It's actually an interesting point you bring up.MikeDamone said:
I was hearing it was blowout and MSU got close in garbage time.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.MikeDamone said:
So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
PressingMikeDamone said:
Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.MikeDamone said:
It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effortHouhusky said:People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.
I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.
to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
Fucking Doogs are delusional
Hth
You don't think UCLA won convincingly? Christ.
Id say UCLA won convincingly, but it was also a close game.
Now if UCLA was WSU you would have a case
All UW needed last night was a stop on defense and a 2 point conversion. Four minutes left and all 3 timeouts
UCLA could do what they wanted on offense when they wanted.
"All they needed to do was get a stop, score and get a 2 point conversion". That's all -
Nope. Shane told me that to my FACEBaseman said:
Shane's not a big Rapp fanMikeDamone said:
Fuck that guy. Shane Pahokoa would beat his ass.Baseman said:
Taylor Rapp is a selfish POSMikeDamone said:
UW getting a stop last night at that point was horrific odds. HTHPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Disagree. In the Rose Bowl UW needed to get an onside kick and TD IN 30 seconds which is horrific odds.MikeDamone said:
It was a close game like the Rose Bowl v tOSU was as close game. An ass beating and then a flurry that no one thought was going to result in a win.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
It's actually an interesting point you bring up.MikeDamone said:
I was hearing it was blowout and MSU got close in garbage time.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.MikeDamone said:
So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
PressingMikeDamone said:
Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.MikeDamone said:
It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effortHouhusky said:People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.
I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.
to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
Fucking Doogs are delusional
Hth
You don't think UCLA won convincingly? Christ.
Id say UCLA won convincingly, but it was also a close game.
Now if UCLA was WSU you would have a case
All UW needed last night was a stop on defense and a 2 point conversion. Four minutes left and all 3 timeouts
UCLA could do what they wanted on offense when they wanted.
"All they needed to do was get a stop, score and get a 2 point conversion". That's all -
Enough guys. Recruits/players family members read these boreds.
-
Noone in their right mind ever thought UW had more than a 2 percent chance at winningPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Disagree. In the Rose Bowl UW needed to get an onside kick and TD IN 30 seconds which is horrific odds.MikeDamone said:
It was a close game like the Rose Bowl v tOSU was as close game. An ass beating and then a flurry that no one thought was going to result in a win.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
It's actually an interesting point you bring up.MikeDamone said:
I was hearing it was blowout and MSU got close in garbage time.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.MikeDamone said:
So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
PressingMikeDamone said:
Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.MikeDamone said:
It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effortHouhusky said:People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.
I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.
to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
Fucking Doogs are delusional
Hth
You don't think UCLA won convincingly? Christ.
Id say UCLA won convincingly, but it was also a close game.
Now if UCLA was WSU you would have a case
All UW needed last night was a stop on defense and a 2 point conversion. Four minutes left and all 3 timeouts -
UW got blown out. We had two red zone stops and still got beat bad. I guess considering the safety, our goal line stand probably helped UCLA more than us. In any case, we got beat pretty easily.
Our DB’s are terrible. UCLA adjusted to our pressure. UCLA is tough to stop if DTR isn’t getting hit. -
I hate to say so but it felt like a blowout to me. I was confident enough that UW wasn't going to get the key stops that I changed the channel halfway through the 4th.RoadDawg55 said:UW got blown out. We had two red zone stops and still got beat bad. I guess considering the safety, our goal line stand probably helped UCLA more than us. In any case, we got beat pretty easily.
Our DB’s are terrible. UCLA adjusted to our pressure. UCLA is tough to stop if DTR isn’t getting hit.
It's funny because it was close enough in the fourth that a comeback win was well within reach just based on the clock. You could just sense that it wasn't happening. -
2 score win>1 score winMikeDamone said:
Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.MikeDamone said:
It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effortHouhusky said:People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.
I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.
to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
You've gotten so worked up you forgot basic math 🤡 -
C'mon, man. Don't go confusing little mikey with facts.Canadawg said:
2 score win>1 score winMikeDamone said:
Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.MikeDamone said:
It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effortHouhusky said:People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.
I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.
to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
You've gotten so worked up you forgot basic math 🤡 -
As they should.CuntWaffle said:Enough guys. Recruits/players family members read these boreds.
-
Anyone who doesn’t think UW got blown out by Ucla is fighting for the honor of poster child doog.
UW had no chance. The defense is abysmal. -
8 points isn't a blowout!!!! All we needed was a stop!!!1!TheHB said:Anyone who doesn’t think UW got blown out by Ucla is fighting for the honor of poster child doog.
UW had no chance. The defense is abysmal. -
Did you watch the game 👩🦯Canadawg said:
2 score win>1 score winMikeDamone said:
Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.MikeDamone said:
It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effortHouhusky said:People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.
I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.
to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
You've gotten so worked up you forgot basic math 🤡 -
I've said it many times. How a game is won or lost matters more than the final school. I've used the Sark Az bounce off the foot pick six win as an example. That game was a mess and showed huge problems. But the "can't you just be happy with a win" crowd went nuts. Good and bad trends will eventually emerge and produce consistent results.chuck said:
I hate to say so but it felt like a blowout to me. I was confident enough that UW wasn't going to get the key stops that I changed the channel halfway through the 4th.RoadDawg55 said:UW got blown out. We had two red zone stops and still got beat bad. I guess considering the safety, our goal line stand probably helped UCLA more than us. In any case, we got beat pretty easily.
Our DB’s are terrible. UCLA adjusted to our pressure. UCLA is tough to stop if DTR isn’t getting hit.
It's funny because it was close enough in the fourth that a comeback win was well within reach just based on the clock. You could just sense that it wasn't happening.
I can remember a loss that gave me a huge amount of optimism as to what was coming. UW vs Colorado. You could see that UW team was about to explode big time. -
While that is true, Washington had already thrashed Florida 34-7 in the previous year's Freedom Bowl and USC 31-0 in mid-Sept of 1990. So you could already see what was coming. But yes, playing the defending national champions to a 20-14 loss on the road was indicative.MikeDamone said:
I've said it many times. How a game is won or lost matters more than the final school. I've used the Sark Az bounce off the foot pick six win as an example. That game was a mess and showed huge problems. But the "can't you just be happy with a win" crowd went nuts. Good and bad trends will eventually emerge and produce consistent results.chuck said:
I hate to say so but it felt like a blowout to me. I was confident enough that UW wasn't going to get the key stops that I changed the channel halfway through the 4th.RoadDawg55 said:UW got blown out. We had two red zone stops and still got beat bad. I guess considering the safety, our goal line stand probably helped UCLA more than us. In any case, we got beat pretty easily.
Our DB’s are terrible. UCLA adjusted to our pressure. UCLA is tough to stop if DTR isn’t getting hit.
It's funny because it was close enough in the fourth that a comeback win was well within reach just based on the clock. You could just sense that it wasn't happening.
I can remember a loss that gave me a huge amount of optimism as to what was coming. UW vs Colorado. You could see that UW team was about to explode big time.
Also of note, that 1990 Colorado game wasn't on TV. Hard to fathom these days. -
Wow I have a grandma who is blind from diabetes. Ever think about that asshole?MikeDamone said:
Did you watch the game 👩🦯Canadawg said:
2 score win>1 score winMikeDamone said:
Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.MikeDamone said:
It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effortHouhusky said:People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.
I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.
to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
You've gotten so worked up you forgot basic math 🤡 -
DerekJohnson said:
While that is true, Washington had already thrashed Florida 34-7 in the previous year's Freedom Bowl and USC 31-0 in mid-Sept of 1990. So you could already see what was coming. But yes, playing the defending national champions to a 20-14 loss on the road was indicative.MikeDamone said:
I've said it many times. How a game is won or lost matters more than the final school. I've used the Sark Az bounce off the foot pick six win as an example. That game was a mess and showed huge problems. But the "can't you just be happy with a win" crowd went nuts. Good and bad trends will eventually emerge and produce consistent results.chuck said:
I hate to say so but it felt like a blowout to me. I was confident enough that UW wasn't going to get the key stops that I changed the channel halfway through the 4th.RoadDawg55 said:UW got blown out. We had two red zone stops and still got beat bad. I guess considering the safety, our goal line stand probably helped UCLA more than us. In any case, we got beat pretty easily.
Our DB’s are terrible. UCLA adjusted to our pressure. UCLA is tough to stop if DTR isn’t getting hit.
It's funny because it was close enough in the fourth that a comeback win was well within reach just based on the clock. You could just sense that it wasn't happening.
I can remember a loss that gave me a huge amount of optimism as to what was coming. UW vs Colorado. You could see that UW team was about to explode big time.
Also of note, that 1990 Colorado game wasn't on TV. Hard to fathom these days.
My point about Colorado was that it was a scoreboard loss that gave me hope. That was truly an example of playing them close. Not going into the 4th quarter needed 3 TDs and 3 2 point conversions definition that we seem to have today.
I'm listened to it on the radio. A note about the 89 freedom bowl. Huskies were in ranked and we definitely underdogs to the Emmitt Smith lead gators 🐊. They after losing to all their ranked opponents that year they finished strong ranked 23 at 8-4. Don James sleeping in his office and drinking maxwell house was starting to pay off. Like I said, it's about trends. -
Sounds like a real morale victory.Canadawg said:
2 score win>1 score winMikeDamone said:
Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.MikeDamone said:
It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effortHouhusky said:People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.
I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.
to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
You've gotten so worked up you forgot basic math 🤡 -
Need @GrandpaSankey to chime in here.CuntWaffle said:
Wow I have a grandma who is blind from diabetes. Ever think about that asshole?MikeDamone said:
Did you watch the game 👩🦯Canadawg said:
2 score win>1 score winMikeDamone said:
Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.MikeDamone said:
It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effortHouhusky said:People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.
I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.
to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
You've gotten so worked up you forgot basic math 🤡 -
2000 had a few games that were a mess and it was a sign of things to come. Some luck is needed sometimes.MikeDamone said:
I've said it many times. How a game is won or lost matters more than the final school. I've used the Sark Az bounce off the foot pick six win as an example. That game was a mess and showed huge problems. But the "can't you just be happy with a win" crowd went nuts. Good and bad trends will eventually emerge and produce consistent results.chuck said:
I hate to say so but it felt like a blowout to me. I was confident enough that UW wasn't going to get the key stops that I changed the channel halfway through the 4th.RoadDawg55 said:UW got blown out. We had two red zone stops and still got beat bad. I guess considering the safety, our goal line stand probably helped UCLA more than us. In any case, we got beat pretty easily.
Our DB’s are terrible. UCLA adjusted to our pressure. UCLA is tough to stop if DTR isn’t getting hit.
It's funny because it was close enough in the fourth that a comeback win was well within reach just based on the clock. You could just sense that it wasn't happening.
I can remember a loss that gave me a huge amount of optimism as to what was coming. UW vs Colorado. You could see that UW team was about to explode big time. -
Time to bash the kids. Effort some showed, not close to championship level. I’ll bash Jeremiah Martin. Too much loafing. Didn’t like the fumble and picks but more worrisome is the effort. Sure, one stop and things might have been different but the effort stands out. Not championship level.MikeDamone said:
I've said it many times. How a game is won or lost matters more than the final school. I've used the Sark Az bounce off the foot pick six win as an example. That game was a mess and showed huge problems. But the "can't you just be happy with a win" crowd went nuts. Good and bad trends will eventually emerge and produce consistent results.chuck said:
I hate to say so but it felt like a blowout to me. I was confident enough that UW wasn't going to get the key stops that I changed the channel halfway through the 4th.RoadDawg55 said:UW got blown out. We had two red zone stops and still got beat bad. I guess considering the safety, our goal line stand probably helped UCLA more than us. In any case, we got beat pretty easily.
Our DB’s are terrible. UCLA adjusted to our pressure. UCLA is tough to stop if DTR isn’t getting hit.
It's funny because it was close enough in the fourth that a comeback win was well within reach just based on the clock. You could just sense that it wasn't happening.
I can remember a loss that gave me a huge amount of optimism as to what was coming. UW vs Colorado. You could see that UW team was about to explode big time. -
Is Bama a bad team because they were lucky to beat an 8-4 Texas team? If you go look at good seasons in cfb all teams catch a break once or twice a yearUW_Doog_Bot said:
Sounds like a real morale victory.Canadawg said:
2 score win>1 score winMikeDamone said:
Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.MikeDamone said:
It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effortHouhusky said:People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.
I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.
to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
You've gotten so worked up you forgot basic math 🤡 -
Our effort level seemed to deflate once we hit a rough patch, and that is worrisome.Baseman said:
Time to bash the kids. Effort some showed, not close to championship level. I’ll bash Jeremiah Martin. Too much loafing. Didn’t like the fumble and picks but more worrisome is the effort. Sure, one stop and things might have been different but the effort stands out. Not championship level.MikeDamone said:
I've said it many times. How a game is won or lost matters more than the final school. I've used the Sark Az bounce off the foot pick six win as an example. That game was a mess and showed huge problems. But the "can't you just be happy with a win" crowd went nuts. Good and bad trends will eventually emerge and produce consistent results.chuck said:
I hate to say so but it felt like a blowout to me. I was confident enough that UW wasn't going to get the key stops that I changed the channel halfway through the 4th.RoadDawg55 said:UW got blown out. We had two red zone stops and still got beat bad. I guess considering the safety, our goal line stand probably helped UCLA more than us. In any case, we got beat pretty easily.
Our DB’s are terrible. UCLA adjusted to our pressure. UCLA is tough to stop if DTR isn’t getting hit.
It's funny because it was close enough in the fourth that a comeback win was well within reach just based on the clock. You could just sense that it wasn't happening.
I can remember a loss that gave me a huge amount of optimism as to what was coming. UW vs Colorado. You could see that UW team was about to explode big time. -
Yes I understood your overall point, which was valid.MikeDamone said:DerekJohnson said:
While that is true, Washington had already thrashed Florida 34-7 in the previous year's Freedom Bowl and USC 31-0 in mid-Sept of 1990. So you could already see what was coming. But yes, playing the defending national champions to a 20-14 loss on the road was indicative.MikeDamone said:
I've said it many times. How a game is won or lost matters more than the final school. I've used the Sark Az bounce off the foot pick six win as an example. That game was a mess and showed huge problems. But the "can't you just be happy with a win" crowd went nuts. Good and bad trends will eventually emerge and produce consistent results.chuck said:
I hate to say so but it felt like a blowout to me. I was confident enough that UW wasn't going to get the key stops that I changed the channel halfway through the 4th.RoadDawg55 said:UW got blown out. We had two red zone stops and still got beat bad. I guess considering the safety, our goal line stand probably helped UCLA more than us. In any case, we got beat pretty easily.
Our DB’s are terrible. UCLA adjusted to our pressure. UCLA is tough to stop if DTR isn’t getting hit.
It's funny because it was close enough in the fourth that a comeback win was well within reach just based on the clock. You could just sense that it wasn't happening.
I can remember a loss that gave me a huge amount of optimism as to what was coming. UW vs Colorado. You could see that UW team was about to explode big time.
Also of note, that 1990 Colorado game wasn't on TV. Hard to fathom these days.
My point about Colorado was that it was a scoreboard loss that gave me hope. That was truly an example of playing them close. Not going into the 4th quarter needed 3 TDs and 3 2 point conversions definition that we seem to have today.
I'm listened to it on the radio. A note about the 89 freedom bowl. Huskies were in ranked and we definitely underdogs to the Emmitt Smith lead gators 🐊. They after losing to all their ranked opponents that year they finished strong ranked 23 at 8-4. Don James sleeping in his office and drinking maxwell house was starting to pay off. Like I said, it's about trends. -
Pics?CuntWaffle said:
Wow I have a grandma who is blind from diabetes. Ever think about that asshole?MikeDamone said:
Did you watch the game 👩🦯Canadawg said:
2 score win>1 score winMikeDamone said:
Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.MikeDamone said:
It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effortHouhusky said:People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.
I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.
to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
You've gotten so worked up you forgot basic math 🤡 -
-
did you Google Native drinking bleach?? Of all the things to exist on the world wide web.Swaye said:
