Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

My thoughts on the secondary

1356

Comments

  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,659

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited October 2022

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
    So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

    Fucking Doogs are delusional.

    There was no point after UCLA went up by 3 scores that UW had a prayer. Two garbage time TDs. BFD
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,659

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
    So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

    Fucking Doogs are delusional
    UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.

    Hth
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
    So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

    Fucking Doogs are delusional
    UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.

    Hth
    I was hearing it was blowout and MSU got close in garbage time.

    You don't think UCLA won convincingly? Christ.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,659

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
    So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

    Fucking Doogs are delusional
    UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.

    Hth
    I was hearing it was blowout and MSU got close in garbage time.

    You don't think UCLA won convincingly? Christ.
    It's actually an interesting point you bring up.

    Id say UCLA won convincingly, but it was also a close game.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited October 2022

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
    So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

    Fucking Doogs are delusional
    UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.

    Hth
    I was hearing it was blowout and MSU got close in garbage time.

    You don't think UCLA won convincingly? Christ.
    It's actually an interesting point you bring up.

    Id say UCLA won convincingly, but it was also a close game.
    It was a close game like the Rose Bowl v tOSU was as close game. An ass beating and then a flurry that no one thought was going to result in a win.

    Now if UCLA was WSU you would have a case
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,387 Founders Club
    edited October 2022
    What should have been a close game was given to UCLA because of a mind numbingly bad play call and 2 picks into triple coverage. It's still close even with the defense playing poorly without those.

    The two members of the team getting fluffed the most over the past month gave the game away.

    Another pretty critical play was tuli getting a pick and letting fucking skinny ass DTR hit him and knock it to an incompletion. I think they get it at midfield if he just falls down immediately with the catch.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,659

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
    So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

    Fucking Doogs are delusional
    UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.

    Hth
    I was hearing it was blowout and MSU got close in garbage time.

    You don't think UCLA won convincingly? Christ.
    It's actually an interesting point you bring up.

    Id say UCLA won convincingly, but it was also a close game.
    It was a close game like the Rose Bowl v tOSU was as close game. An ass beating and then a flurry that no one thought was going to result in a win.

    Now if UCLA was WSU you would have a case
    Disagree. In the Rose Bowl UW needed to get an onside kick and TD IN 30 seconds which is horrific odds.

    All UW needed last night was a stop on defense and a 2 point conversion. Four minutes left and all 3 timeouts
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited October 2022

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
    So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

    Fucking Doogs are delusional
    UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.

    Hth
    I was hearing it was blowout and MSU got close in garbage time.

    You don't think UCLA won convincingly? Christ.
    It's actually an interesting point you bring up.

    Id say UCLA won convincingly, but it was also a close game.
    It was a close game like the Rose Bowl v tOSU was as close game. An ass beating and then a flurry that no one thought was going to result in a win.

    Now if UCLA was WSU you would have a case
    Disagree. In the Rose Bowl UW needed to get an onside kick and TD IN 30 seconds which is horrific odds.

    All UW needed last night was a stop on defense and a 2 point conversion. Four minutes left and all 3 timeouts
    UW getting a stop last night at that point was horrific odds. HTH

    UCLA could do what they wanted on offense when they wanted.

    "All they needed to do was get a stop, score and get a 2 point conversion". That's all
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,379

    Houhusky said:

    People forget that I was the first to point out that the offense was good enough to win 9+ games and the defense bad enough to lose 6+ games right after OUR best win of the season, Kent State.

    I remember when people were talking about the difference between having a good offense and having a good defense and being happy about it.

    I'll take losing 40-32 at 4-0 UCLA in a sloppy ass effort

    to losing 13-7 at dogshit ASU with Pete
    It was blowout. It not like it was tied and UCLA scored a late TD for the win. Garbage time TDs don’t make it a close game. That’s what I was hearing after the MSU game.
    UCLA got the ball with 4 minutes left in a one score game. It was a close game. Christ.
    Now do the MSU game. UW got blown out. Maybe it's too soon and we need wait until tell the truth Tuesday to face that fact.
    Pressing
    So you're not going to do the MSU game which the consensus was UW blew them out. Got it.

    Fucking Doogs are delusional
    UW didnt blow them out. They won convincingly and the game wasnt a one possession game.

    Hth
    I was hearing it was blowout and MSU got close in garbage time.

    You don't think UCLA won convincingly? Christ.
    It's actually an interesting point you bring up.

    Id say UCLA won convincingly, but it was also a close game.
    It was a close game like the Rose Bowl v tOSU was as close game. An ass beating and then a flurry that no one thought was going to result in a win.

    Now if UCLA was WSU you would have a case
    Disagree. In the Rose Bowl UW needed to get an onside kick and TD IN 30 seconds which is horrific odds.

    All UW needed last night was a stop on defense and a 2 point conversion. Four minutes left and all 3 timeouts
    UW getting a stop last night at that point was horrific odds. HTH

    UCLA could do what they wanted on offense when they wanted.

    "All they needed to do was get a stop, score and get a 2 point conversion". That's all
    Taylor Rapp is a selfish POS